Energy Sec Chu takes to Facebook to review The Avengers and simultaneously tout clean-energy ‘investment’

posted at 5:26 pm on May 18, 2012 by Erika Johnsen

I hadn’t realized that Obama’s cabinet members were joining in on the Facebook fun, but they are really going full frontal assault on the messaging campaign. The youths, you know (emphasis mine):

I can rarely find the time to make it to the movies, but my staff is buzzing about The Avengers, which focuses on a new, limitless clean energy source called “The Tesseract.” In the film, there is evidently an intergalactic struggle to claim this new resource – one we can only win by relying on heroes like Captain America, Thor, Iron Man, Black Widow, and the Incredible Hulk. Naturally, the group includes a couple scientists!

While the “Tesseract” may be fictional, the real-life global competition over clean energy is growing increasingly intense, as countries around the world sense a huge economic opportunity AND the opportunity for cleaner air, water, and a healthier planet. This is now a $260 billion global market, a sum that would impress even Tony Stark. According to the International Energy Agency, last year — for the first time — more money was invested worldwide in clean, renewable power plants than in fossil fuel power plants.

Given how big the opportunity is, and how fast it is growing, it is no surprise that 80 countries have adopted policies or incentives to capture a share of the clean energy market. The good news is that we have an advantage every bit as powerful as the Incredible Hulk: Americans’ talent for entrepreneurship and innovation is unrivalled [sic] by any other country in the world. We have world-leading scientific facilities that would make Bruce Banner green with envy, and the investments we’re making today in groundbreaking new technologies can help American businesses stay ahead of the curve.

Ultimately, however, the clean energy prize is still up for grabs and countries like China are competing aggressively. It’s not enough for us to simply invent the technologies of the future, we need to actually build and deploy them here as well. As President Obama noted recently, one step Congress should take immediately is to renew the expiring tax credits for clean energy – a step that will create jobs and help American companies compete. When it comes to clean energy, our motto should be: “Invented in America, Made in America, Sold Around the World.”

Er, sorry, but drawing on themes from a popular fantastical superhero movie does not a coherent taxpayer-subsidized green-energy argument make.  I can think of at least four different ways to skin the cat here, but I’m just going to stick with one this time and take umbrage with Secretary Chu’s last sentence.

The manufacture of many green energy technologies, solar panels and wind turbines included, requires rare earth elements. Although rare earth mineral deposits are actually relatively plentiful in the earth’s crust, mining them can be both economically and environmentally costly. Regardless, there are plenty of American companies jockeying to fill the green-energy industry’s (taxpayer-subsidized) demand for REEs — except that the federal government has strict holds on the industry with permits and regulations.

So from where, exactly, do we obtain the crucial elements we need to construct clean energy technologies? Just guess.

The U.S. could add jobs and strengthen national security by developing rare earth mining domestically and in other countries to break China’s 97% monopoly on the global supply of these critical minerals, according to a new report from the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA).

Rare earth deposits exist all over the globe but China is the only country that is actively mining and exporting any significant amounts. Even so, China has both raised prices and cut back on export amounts, exacerbating both rare earth shortages and expenses for the U.S.

“The immediate challenge is getting access to alternate sources of rare earths,” said NCPA Senior Fellow H. Sterling Burnett.  “It takes the United States five times as long as other countries to get a permit and get a mine brought online. What takes two years in Canada takes more like ten years here due to restrictive regulation policies and differing jurisdictions for multiple agencies.”

That’s right. The United States government touts American-made clean energy technology as a means to furthering energy independence and competing with countries like China… while withholding the necessary means to independently produce these clean technologies. Which we then purchase, from China, who enjoys a practical monopoly on the REE market. It all just smacks of “winning the future,” doesn’t it?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

it won’t happen here.
too many idiots and, again, a D majority.
since the 2 yrs of R majority (2010 was historic for maine) could not fix decades of D issues the idiots here went back to D.
most people here deserve to starve to death.

dmacleo on May 11, 2013 at 7:07 PM

Needed the Atomic bomb picture..

Electrongod on May 11, 2013 at 7:07 PM

…its Maine!…where the girls think they are Republicans…that Maine?

KOOLAID2 on May 11, 2013 at 7:12 PM

I shudder when I think about what will happen in Maine when our common sense Governor is no longer in office. Maine is the best state I’ve ever lived in, but sadly it’s only one breath away from becoming another liberal Hellhole due to an overabundance of misguided or willfully ignorant voters.

Birchbark on May 11, 2013 at 7:19 PM

The Borg. Always we will fight the Borg.

M240H on May 11, 2013 at 7:31 PM

Well, that’ll have our Progs clutching their pearls and saying cutting, cutting things about our governor! AKA ‘business as usual’.

PersonFromPorlock on May 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM

Plus, the turbines make a huge sound when they whip down and cast weird shadows with their huge blades. Drives people crazy. Oh, they kill endangered birds, too.

PattyJ on May 11, 2013 at 7:40 PM

“I think that it’s an unrealistic goal, and there should be consideration beyond that of whether megawatt capacity installed is really the best metric of our wind energy policies.”

Yes….what he really is saying is that he’d like to be able say the wind initiative was a resounding success even if not 1 watt was ever produced. You see, success comes from feeling good about wasting someone else’s money.

BobMbx on May 11, 2013 at 7:40 PM

Out here in the sunny People’s Republik of Kalifornia, we’re still inhaling.

Gonna grow wind, cut all that evil carbon-heavy reliance on fossil fuels. AND solar!

Right now they’re paying a professor in San Diego to come up with a computer-run program to forecast when cloud cover will cause solar input to the grid to drop.

Gotta get power to replace what will be lost. Of course they haven’t gotten around to forecasting when the wind will drop, and cut output.

The grid will “magically” correct itself, and rainbow colored unicorns will make up the short fall so that the grid doesn’t crash.

Just ask Moonbeam. IF you can tear him away from his choo-choo.

GarandFan on May 11, 2013 at 7:43 PM

Wind power is all about democrats enriching donors and cronies based on exploiting the ignorant and imbecilic.

tom daschle concerned on May 11, 2013 at 7:45 PM

I shudder when I think about what will happen in Maine when our common sense Governor is no longer in office. Maine is the best state I’ve ever lived in, but sadly it’s only one breath away from becoming another liberal Hellhole due to an overabundance of misguided or willfully ignorant voters.

Birchbark on May 11, 2013 at 7:19 PM

born here,live in Etna
its a hole now since early 90′s.

dmacleo on May 11, 2013 at 7:48 PM

Start spreading the rumor that windmills could hurt Moochelle’s taxpayer lobster supply and that could impede the implementation of this latest green fiasco.

That, and make PETA aware that if you really want to smack birds out of the sky a ginormous windmill is a fantastic ornithoblenderizer.

viking01 on May 11, 2013 at 7:49 PM

What will we do with all of those unicorns?

BDavis on May 11, 2013 at 7:58 PM

What will we do with all of those unicorns?

BDavis on May 11, 2013 at 7:58 PM

As nonpartisan said..

Fluck them..

Electrongod on May 11, 2013 at 8:02 PM

Wind power: the energy of the future …. since the 16th century.

PackerBronco on May 11, 2013 at 8:09 PM

The problem here in MidCoast maine, (I live in Bath) is that the local newspapers are really democrat propaganda organs. Maine’s largest daily, the Portland Press herald, is owned by the husband of Democrat Congressman Congresswoman Chellie Pingree. Any guess as to how the news is shaded up here?

But to add even more interest to this fire, that Wind Energy law passed while Baldacci was governor was written to help out former governor, and current Maine US Senator Angus King and his pet energy projects. Where, or where, do you think King got all his money to run for office from? His wife Mary is a social bar fly too, and fits right in with the self-appointed aristocracy in Washington.

There is a huge stench of corruption all over that Wind Energy bill, and a lot of it is coming from Baldacci and King, and it’s way past time that those two were the subject of state and federal investigations.

TKindred on May 11, 2013 at 8:09 PM

The state can simply relocate those at-risk birds to avian work collectives where they can contribute productively to History. Of course, their wings must be clipped, for their own good, to keep them from flying back into the people’s wind turbine power production zone, and also for equality, because it’s not fair that they should fly, when so many other revolutionary working plants and animals cannot.

Kenosha Kid on May 11, 2013 at 8:10 PM

Wind power: the environmentally-correct way of committing avicide.

PackerBronco on May 11, 2013 at 8:12 PM

Even better, in the meantime, LePage is trying to use their Wind Energy Act as a model for expanding the state’s natural-gas infrastructure. Natural gas, I might add, has a much more effective track record than wind at reducing carbon emissions, creating jobs, and lowering costs — all without wind’s dependence on federal and state assistance!

Maine would be a great place to expand the “natural gas infrastructure”. There’s a huge LNG (liquefied natural gas) import terminal about 90 miles over the border in New Brunswick (Canada), and Maine would be the first in line to receive the gas not used by the Canadians. It’s closer than shipping fracked gas from Pennsylvania.

Steve Z on May 11, 2013 at 8:13 PM

Green energy: producing energy through the process of burning money.

PackerBronco on May 11, 2013 at 8:13 PM

We expect to freeze to death in Montana if the epa gets its way and closes down all the coal fired power plants. I think someone warned them and they are starting to rethink the new lower mandated emission levels. One cold day a few years from now, we won’t be able to drive the cars we currently own, use our lawn mowers or heat our homes(if we still own one)after the greenies and govt gets through with us.

Kissmygrits on May 11, 2013 at 9:35 PM

it isn’t delivering on its promises

The UK study showing wind turbines only last 12-15 years instead of 25-30 showed that the promises were near scandalous.

theperfecteconomist on May 11, 2013 at 10:20 PM

We expect to freeze to death in Montana if the epa gets its way and closes down all the coal fired power plants. I think someone warned them and they are starting to rethink the new lower mandated emission levels. One cold day a few years from now, we won’t be able to drive the cars we currently own, use our lawn mowers or heat our homes(if we still own one)after the greenies and govt gets through with us.

Kissmygrits on May 11, 2013 at 9:35 PM

All of that was predicted in a SciFi novel by Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, and others entitled “Fallen Angels”.

It’s frighteningly prescient.

TKindred on May 11, 2013 at 11:36 PM

Wow, it is almost as if just wishing will NOT make it so!

Adjoran on May 12, 2013 at 1:53 AM

If T Boone Pickens couldn’t make it work in Texas, it ain’t gonna work.

Pickens continued, “Obama needs to go in, study it, look at it, and decide what an energy plan is, and then go forward with it. He needs to explain to his people,‘Hey, we can get on everything green. We can get on everything renewable. Then the cost of power will go up ten times.’ So be careful when you start fooling with it. Know what you’re working with.”

txhsmom on May 12, 2013 at 3:39 AM

Government subsidized Wind Companies won’t face charges in condor deaths.

Federal wildlife officials took the unprecedented step Friday of telling private companies that they will not be prosecuted for inadvertently harassing or even killing endangered California condors.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-killing-condors-20130511,0,1790222.story

Obama has tossed California Condors under the bus in favor of windmill power – and kick backs from chronies.

papertiger on May 12, 2013 at 4:57 AM

I shudder when I think about what will happen in Maine when our common sense Governor is no longer in office. Maine is the best state I’ve ever lived in, but sadly it’s only one breath away from becoming another liberal Hellhole due to an overabundance of misguided or willfully ignorant voters.

Birchbark on May 11, 2013 at 7:19 PM

Ayuh! Left Maine some time ago for the bright sunny climes of Connecticut. It’s even worse down here but there was work at the time! What we need is a concerted effort to change the main stream media into telling the truth instead of propagandizing 24/7.

Boats48 on May 12, 2013 at 5:52 AM

Like Ethanol that reduces gas mileage, increase engine wear, drives up the price of food and every other product dependent on corn, and doesn’t do anything for the environment; wind, solar, electric car, and other green disasters are here to stay.

Why?

Because they are politically drive agendas that allow politicians to control huge sums of money for votes and significantly increases government control over every aspect of our lives. Oh yeah, and they get to do all of this with other people’s money without being held accountable for their miserable failures. The latter due mostly to low and no-information voters.

But the most amazing aspect to all of this is that it was 100% predictable as clearly and publicly highlighted by those who have opposed government mandated Ethanol, wind, solar, electric cars, and the other green nonsense.

Facts have never been of much concern when a politician can seize the opportunity to flush other peoples’ hard earned money down the political toilets.

No, politics have and will continue trump reason, logic, efficiency, and good government.

BMF on May 12, 2013 at 6:19 AM

Wind energy could have become a reliable peak demand electrical producer but the utilities were forced to buy the lousy electricity they produce whenever they produce it.

Slowburn on May 12, 2013 at 6:44 AM

When has a Progressive initiative EVER been rolled back, curtailed, repealed, reduced, or otherwise rethought?

Cleombrotus on May 12, 2013 at 6:58 AM

Without a war or other major civil upheaval, that is.

Cleombrotus on May 12, 2013 at 6:59 AM

Natural gas, I might add, has a much more effective track record than wind at reducing carbon emissions, creating jobs, and lowering costs — all without wind’s dependence on federal and state assistance!

Ya but it’s not cool

david kumbera on May 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM

The UK study showing wind turbines only last 12-15 years instead of 25-30 showed that the promises were near scandalous.

So like PV solar it never will payback unless energy costs soar.

1+1=POTATO

jukin3 on May 12, 2013 at 10:56 AM

Maine’s wind energy capacity today is about 435 megawatts, according to the Maine Renewable Energy Association.

Capacity. That is the amount of electricity produced under ideal conditions. What is the actual output? Typically it is less than 10% of advertised capacity. And at times, actual output is zero.

iurockhead on May 12, 2013 at 11:33 AM

I’m from a little town on the Maine coast, Eastport. They talked about putting an LNG terminal in the area. Would have created a crapload of jobs, and helped energy costs. But no, out of state libtards, looking to turn the area into Cape Cod North…… So glad I left. Nearly 20 years now.

DStreete on May 12, 2013 at 7:04 PM