Ramirez on Obama’s gay marriage flip-flop

posted at 2:41 pm on May 15, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Last week, Barack Obama finished “evolving” on same-sex marriage with his statement endorsing legalization.  Entirely coincidentally, that was just in time for a big Hollywood fundraiser at George Clooney’s mansion that raised $15 million for Team Obama’s coffers after reports of anger in the entertainment industry began to percolate in the media. Two-time Pulitzer Prize winning editorial cartoonist Michael Ramirez captures the essence of Obama’s flip-flop on gay marriage for Investors Business Daily:

Just how committed to his evolutionary conversion is Obama?  His appearance on The View paints him as a man of … inaction:

During an appearance on ABC’s “The View” taped Monday, Obama said his administration views DOMA as unconstitutional, but came up shy of saying it should be repealed.

“Congress is clearly on notice that I think it’s a bad idea,” said Obama, who last week endorsed gay marriage for the first time.

The Justice Department has served notice that it will no longer enforce DOMA, which would prevent states from marrying gay and lesbian couples. But as long as the law is on the books, it could conceivably be enforced by future administrations to outlaw gay marriage.

Obama has said he think the issue is a state issue.

Actually, DOMA has nothing to do with whether states can marry gay and lesbian couples.  It only allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states, providing an exception to the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.  This is the actual text of DOMA:

Section 2. Powers reserved to the states

No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.

Section 3. Definition of marriage

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.

If Obama truly believes this to be unconstitutional, shouldn’t he be pushing Congress to repeal it?  He had plenty of opportunity in 2009-10, when his party held substantial majorities in both chambers of Congress.  His own oath of office requires him to defend the Constitution.  So why doesn’t he take action and demand a repeal?  Because it would amplify the damage he’s already done to himself with last week’s statement, that’s why, and he knows it.

Also, be sure to check out Ramirez’ terrific collection of his works: Everyone Has the Right to My Opinion, which covers the entire breadth of Ramirez’ career, and it gives fascinating look at political history.  Read my review here, and watch my interviews with Ramirez here and here.  And don’t forget to check out the entire Investors.com site, which has now incorporated all of the former IBD Editorials, while individual investors still exist.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Great cartoon, only improvement would be a rainbow halo around his rear.

Too soon?

JeremiahJohnson on May 15, 2012 at 2:43 PM

Barry Obama is now Barry Badrinath.

“What’s a ZJ?”

“If you have to ask, you can’t afford it.”

teke184 on May 15, 2012 at 2:43 PM

O.M.G.

That is classic. Ramirez nails it.

LOL!

portlandon on May 15, 2012 at 2:44 PM

are those “mom shorts”?

ted c on May 15, 2012 at 2:44 PM

Ramirez draws what my mind thinks .
Dude’s a genius !

burrata on May 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM

Hands down, Mr. Ramirez is one of the best cartoonists I’ve had the privilege of reading.

SnarkySam on May 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM

Best. Cartoon. Ever.

thebrokenrattle on May 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM

Brings polls er….poles to a whole new level of meaning./

ted c on May 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM

Burn.

Meric1837 on May 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM

The Justice Department has served notice that it will no longer enforce DOMA

No good third world country would be complete without selective enforcement of laws.

Bill Clinton’s little bagboy has done well for himself.

MNHawk on May 15, 2012 at 2:47 PM

I notice that Ovagina is standing by a fire hydrant ,
and the puppy that hangs out at that place is missing ….wonder what happened ?:D

burrata on May 15, 2012 at 2:47 PM

Ramirez is a national treasure.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2012 at 2:47 PM

Last week, Barack Obama finished “evolving” on same-sex marriage

Er, no. The evolution continues.

rogaineguy on May 15, 2012 at 2:48 PM

This is exactly Rush’s take this morning. Obama’s evolution does nothing to further the cause of SSM. It does however, open the checkbooks of his base.

Hmmm. The Occupy movement demonizes those who put profits before principles. Looks like they have a new poster child.

Mallard T. Drake on May 15, 2012 at 2:48 PM

It wasn’t Evolution. It was ‘Intelligent Design’.

Schadenfreude on May 15, 2012 at 2:48 PM

So he’s not only the first gay POTUS but also the first gay hooker!

Ramirez shoulda put the gaylo over his head too!

Akzed on May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM

Ramirez nails it…

… Obowma is a gay whore!

Seven Percent Solution on May 15, 2012 at 2:50 PM

The libs take on the unconstitutionality issue is in Section 3 of DOMA.
It forbids the feds from recognizing gay unions as anything other than abnormal of an actual marriage. So no Fed recognition for the 3% of the general population that is pushing Obama.

gonnjos on May 15, 2012 at 2:51 PM

Absolutely brutal.

John the Libertarian on May 15, 2012 at 2:51 PM

Wow. Dead-on accurate…but I wouldn’t want to know what Ramierez will be getting in his mailbox.

MelonCollie on May 15, 2012 at 2:51 PM

are those “mom-jean shorts”?

ted c on May 15, 2012 at 2:44 PM

Either that or a mom-jeans mini-skirt.

BuckeyeSam on May 15, 2012 at 2:51 PM

Holy crap that is funny.

KateNE on May 15, 2012 at 2:51 PM

Close the comments, because that cartoon wins the universe.

NotCoach on May 15, 2012 at 2:52 PM

What happened to that lil puppy that hangs out by that fire hydrant ?
Answer me Obama !!!

burrata on May 15, 2012 at 2:52 PM

I hope MO reminded him to take protection to that Clooney affair.

BuckeyeSam on May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM

Michael Ramirez is the best. LMAO!

ConservativeLA on May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM

Another homo home run by Ramirez! By far, my favorite cartoonist.

BRunner on May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM

I’m going to read you a short list of issues in the news. For each, please let me know which presidential candidate you trust more to handle that issue—Barack Obama or Mitt Romney.

Economy

Mitt Romney 51% {49%} (45%) [48%]
Barack Obama 39% {39%} (44%) [39%]

Health care

Mitt Romney 45% {46%} (41%)
Barack Obama 40% {42%} (44%)

National security

Mitt Romney 44% {42%} (41%)
Barack Obama 42% {45%} (45%)

Taxes

Mitt Romney 48% {47%} (45%)
Barack Obama 38% {42%} (45%)

Energy Policy

Mitt Romney 43% {45%}
Barack Obama 40% {43%}

No worries ABRtards, Obama has this thing in the bag (as in teabag).

Gunlock Bill on May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM

The only thing missing in the cartoon is a car driving away with a license plate “NC VOTERS”.

Steve Z on May 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM

…great!
…he is good!
…wait!…he’s racist and a homophob.

KOOLAID2 on May 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM

Obama should also be wearing fishnet stockings, a wig, and makeup.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 2:56 PM

just wow on the cartoon.

Gunlock Bill on May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM

looking good.

IR-MN on May 15, 2012 at 2:56 PM

No worries ABRtards, Obama has this thing in the bag (as in teabag).

Gunlock Bill on May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM

It’s still too early to call this election.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 2:58 PM

No worries ABRtards, Obama has this thing in the bag (as in teabag).

Gunlock Bill on May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM

Poll dancing already?

portlandon on May 15, 2012 at 2:59 PM

eh, funny cartoon… politicians are all who*** anyway, its well known… well, maybe not paul.

nathor on May 15, 2012 at 3:03 PM

Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo,thats why Obama went down to
Columbia,

for training!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:04 PM

A Progressive Pro!
(sarc)

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:05 PM

Ramirez is a true jewel! He has bho’s ears down pat and almost every cartoon is funny.
L

letget on May 15, 2012 at 3:05 PM

Just heard on the radio tomorrow Obama has “called a bipartisan committee on proposals for the economy he wants to discuss.”

Boehner is attending now that Obama is finished with Ricky Martin, Ellen, and Clooney.

Marcus on May 15, 2012 at 3:05 PM

If Obama truly believes this to be unconstitutional, shouldn’t he be pushing Congress to repeal it? He had plenty of opportunity in 2009-10, when his party held substantial majorities in both chambers of Congress.

Yes, but bach then our benevolent god-king was a mere Homo Phobus Neandertalus. Now he’s evolved into a Homo Sexualus Marriageus Is-kinda-coolus.

Yes, I went there.

crazy_legs on May 15, 2012 at 3:05 PM

His own oath of office requires him to defend the Constitution.

Typical liberal. And “oaths” don’t mean anything. Ask Jerry Brown and Kamil Harris. He was, she is Attorney General of the State of Kalifornia. Jerry would not defend Prop 8 (Definition of marriage act) in court as Jerry deemed it “unconstitutional”. Odd, I thought that the purview of the courts. Likewise Harris opposes the death penalty – despite the fact that it is the current law in this state – and she’s stated that she will not seek it’s use.

At one time, I thought public office holders could be recalled for failure to perform their duties. Guess everything is “flexible” now.

GarandFan on May 15, 2012 at 3:07 PM

Very nice.

AllahsNippleHair on May 15, 2012 at 3:08 PM

Barack ‘Down Low‘ Obama

BobMbx on May 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM

Just heard on the radio tomorrow Obama has “called a bipartisan committee on proposals for the economy he wants to discuss.”

Boehner is attending now that Obama is finished with Ricky Martin, Ellen, and Clooney.

Marcus on May 15, 2012 at 3:05 PM

Marcus:I fired it off to tips,a little while ago!:)
===================================================

@CNBC tweeted:
***************

Obama to meet with Congressional leadership at the White House tomorrow. Meeting will include: Boehner, Reid, Pelosi & McConnell

Submitted 2 hours ago from twitter.com/CNBC

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM

The neck and legs should be a little skinnier.

Wigglesworth on May 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM

Obama…
The Won Trick President.

Electrongod on May 15, 2012 at 3:10 PM

Obama should also be wearing fishnet stockings, a wig, and makeup.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 2:56 PM

But then he’d be confused with Moochie!

GrannyDee on May 15, 2012 at 3:10 PM

It only allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states, providing an exception to the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.

You do realize that it doesn’t work that way, right? A statute can not provide an exception to the Constitution. That would be something only DEMs think, right?

tommylotto on May 15, 2012 at 3:10 PM

AllahsNippleHair

Dear Lord. Was Rebel4972 taken?

BobMbx on May 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM

Oh gads! Look out boehner and mcconnell, bho is up to no good with this?

I can’t believe bho is actually in dc doing something other than on AF1 campaigning!
L

letget on May 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM

Ouch , that was below the belt…

the_nile on May 15, 2012 at 3:12 PM

You do realize that it doesn’t work that way, right? A statute can not provide an exception to the Constitution. That would be something only DEMs think, right?

tommylotto on May 15, 2012 at 3:10 PM

What about variances in drinking, marriage, or age of majority statutes between the states? Speed limits? How about bag limits for hunters? Radar detectors? The list is endless.

Are these unconstitutional? Check that….first, define which state has it right. Then answer the constitutional question.

BobMbx on May 15, 2012 at 3:16 PM

Dangit! Why didn’t I think of the “gay for pay” thing! Grrrrrr!

SouthernGent on May 15, 2012 at 3:19 PM

Now that’s pandering pandering.

antipc on May 15, 2012 at 3:19 PM

are those “mom shorts”?

ted c on May 15, 2012 at 2:44 PM

ted c:Haha…..who wears short shorts!:)
========================================

Nair Commercial from the 1980s
*******************************

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou9AabR6_1w

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:20 PM

Obama should also be wearing fishnet stockings, a wig, and makeup.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 2:56 PM

But then he’d be confused with Moochie!

GrannyDee on May 15, 2012 at 3:10 PM

Moochie is the one who looks masculine!

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:20 PM

Obama’s gay marriage flip-flop

That’s not a gay Obama flip-flop… THIS is a gay Obama flip-flop!

JetBoy on May 15, 2012 at 3:20 PM

Dangit! Why didn’t I think of the “gay for pay” thing! Grrrrrr!

SouthernGent on May 15, 2012 at 3:19 PM

SouthernGent:Baaaaaaaaad SG,Lol!:)

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:21 PM

So I’m listening to Lykke Li’s song Get Some when I see the Ramirez cartoon. ROFLOL! I won’t ever hear that song again w/o seeing that cartoon.

txhsmom on May 15, 2012 at 3:21 PM

Moochie is the one who looks masculine!

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:20 PM

Gladtobehere:Its the Biceps,and Shoulders I tells ya!
(sarc).

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM

DOMA is central to the miliary position on homosexual marriage. Because under DOMA the Federal Government does not recognize homosexual marriages the military established rules denying base housing, medical coverage, preferential hiring or any other benefits that accrue to military spouses to homosexual couples regardless of whether they are “married” in the eyes of some State. If DOMA goes away the rationale for the policy does as well.

SoonerMarine on May 15, 2012 at 3:24 PM

Remind me again why we’re paying this guy!!! He’s not in his office doing his damn job!

Bob in VA on May 15, 2012 at 3:24 PM

@CNBC tweeted:
***************

Obama to meet with Congressional leadership at the White House tomorrow. Meeting will include: Boehner, Reid, Pelosi & McConnell

Submitted 2 hours ago from twitter.com/CNBC

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM

Yup. This gay marriage gamble is killing him. Barack needs to change the topic, and he needs to change it fast.

Rational Thought on May 15, 2012 at 3:25 PM

That’s not a gay Obama flip-flop… THIS is a gay Obama flip-flop!

JetBoy on May 15, 2012 at 3:20 PM

JetBoy:Nice colour coordination!:)
(sarc).

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:25 PM

It wasn’t Evolution. It was ‘Intelligent Design’.

No. Ignorant Design.

osborn4 on May 15, 2012 at 3:26 PM

In Ramirez’s cartoon, there appears a fire hydrant. There used to be a dog named Zippy standing next to that fire hydrant, but Obama ate the poor Zippy..

maubman on May 15, 2012 at 3:27 PM

Actually, DOMA has nothing to do with whether states can marry gay and lesbian couples. It only allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states, providing an exception to the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.

I am opposed to gay marriage. But I agree with the Obama administration that DOMA is unconstitutional. A piece of legislation cannot provide an “exception” to the constitution, unless the constitution itself allows for such legislative exceptions. The full faith and credit clause clearly requires one state to give recognition to marriages performed in another state. If Congress wants to change that, it has to be through constitutional amendment.

If we’re going to be constitutional conservatives, we have to be consistent, even when it results in an outcome we don’t like.

Shump on May 15, 2012 at 3:27 PM

Moochie is the one who looks masculine!

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:20 PM

Gladtobehere:Its the Biceps,and Shoulders I tells ya!
(sarc).

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM

I agree; Moochie could wrestle Bigfoot and win.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:28 PM

Rational Thought on May 15, 2012 at 3:25 PM

If I had to bet, it would be bho wants all kinds of krap the R’s will never go for and he can blame them for ‘not doing his bidding to help the ecomony’?
The R’s will get the blame whatever comes up!
L

letget on May 15, 2012 at 3:28 PM

AllahsNippleHair

Dear Lord. Was Rebel4972 taken?

BobMbx on May 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM

merde! how bored does a mind have to be to come up with a handle like that? (I borrowed the merde from Schadenfraude)

DanMan on May 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM

I agree; Moochie could wrestle Bigfoot and win.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:28 PM

how does one wrestle oneself?

GhoulAid on May 15, 2012 at 3:31 PM

Yup. This gay marriage gamble is killing him. Barack needs to change the topic, and he needs to change it fast.

Rational Thought on May 15, 2012 at 3:25 PM

You mean that he might have to actually talk about the economy. Amazing. I wonder if he’ll gay up the economy by talking about how gays are being especially hurt by the “Bush” economy. Maybe he’ll even propose a new “stimulus” package just for gays.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:33 PM

I

agree; Moochie could wrestle Bigfoot and win.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:28 PM

how does one wrestle oneself?

GhoulAid on May 15, 2012 at 3:31 PM

Is Moochie an only child? Has she no living relatives?

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:35 PM

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM
————————————
Yup. This gay marriage gamble is killing him. Barack needs to change the topic, and he needs to change it fast.

Rational Thought on May 15, 2012 at 3:25 PM

Rational Thought:Oh gawd,another back-fire,haha,I hope Boehner
re-shedules(read that stall)for two weeks,btw,
thanks for the link!

Oh,and it also has had some Political Collateral
Damage as well,this went down in flames,overnight!
===================================================================

Lawmakers block gay advocate from Va. judge seat
Posted on: 1:46 am, May 15, 2012,
*********************************

RICHMOND, Va. (WTVR) — The vote over Tracy Thorne-Begland’s nomination as judge to the Richmond General District Courts ran late into Tuesday morning. At 1:13 a.m. , Del. Jennifer McClellan (D – Richmond) announced lawmakers voted down Begland’s nomination 33-31 with 10 abstentions. He needed 51 votes.

Del. Bob Marshall (R -Manassas) wanted Thorne-Begland, who is openly gay, removed from consideration because of the prosecutor’s past involvement with the gay rights movement, most notably his network interview about “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” [COMPLETE COVERAGE: Openly gay prosecutor denied judgeship]
(More….)

http://wtvr.com/2012/05/15/judge-nomination-of-tracy-thorne-begland-voted-down/

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:35 PM

I suspect that V1.0 included pumps, but got rejected by the paper so the bottom inch got clipped off.

slickwillie2001 on May 15, 2012 at 3:36 PM

Dangit! Why didn’t I think of the “gay for pay” thing! Grrrrrr!

SouthernGent on May 15, 2012 at 3:19 PM

Maybe because you’re not like Obama. It’s really a good thing.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:38 PM

If Obama truly believes this to be unconstitutional, shouldn’t he be pushing Congress to repeal it? He had plenty of opportunity in 2009-10, when his party held substantial majorities in both chambers of Congress. His own oath of office requires him to defend the Constitution.–Ed M.

Ed-
Firstly, when has Obama defend the Constitution? He believes in its “replacement” with a set of social justice/positive rights as opposed to it being a document of limited government.
Secondly, clearly Obama didn’t think he needed the money in 2009-2010 thus no point to pander to the monied Hollyweird/San Fran/NYC triumverate of the gay lobby. Him holding fundraisers at Clooney’s and yesterday/today in NYC is no coincidence. Anyway, he was focused on passing massively unpopular laws that he insanely thought would become popular once passed. Plus all that laser-like focus on jobs……..

smfic on May 15, 2012 at 3:40 PM

No worries ABRtards, Obama has this thing in the bag (as in teabag).

Gunlock Bill on May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM

It would be nice to see the irritation geared toward who it needs to be: Progressives..instead of other Conservatives.

melle1228 on May 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM

Is Moochie an only child? Has she no living relatives?

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:35 PM

she probably ate them.

GhoulAid on May 15, 2012 at 3:48 PM

Is Moochie an only child? Has she no living relatives?

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:35 PM

Oh, the possibilities. But it would get me banned :)

NapaConservative on May 15, 2012 at 3:51 PM

I agree; Moochie could wrestle Bigfoot and win.

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:28 PM

I dont know why, but that comment reminded me of the Eddie Murphy skit from the movie “Delirious”…

Eddie Murphy: [as his drunk father] Your wife’s a Bigfoot, isnt she, Gus? Your wife is a Bigfoot, isnt she? Thats why the —– moustache is so ———– thick… cause you shaved the —– down and taught her to speak.

Goonie-Goo-Goo!!

AverageJoe on May 15, 2012 at 3:53 PM

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM
————————————

Oh gads! Look out boehner and mcconnell, bho is up to no good with this?

I can’t believe bho is actually in dc doing something other than on AF1 campaigning!
L

letget on May 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM

letget:Ya,no kidding,or scaring the h*ll out of New Yorkers in a
AF/1-low-level flight photo-op!!

canopfor on May 15, 2012 at 3:56 PM

It would be nice to see the irritation geared toward who it needs to be: Progressives..instead of other Conservatives.

melle1228 on May 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM

ABRtards for Obama are “other Conservatives”?

Who knew?

Gunlock Bill on May 15, 2012 at 3:58 PM

Ev-O-lution.

BKeyser on May 15, 2012 at 3:58 PM

Did Obama screw the pooch, or eat the pooch in this cartoon?

WhatNot on May 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM

Should we start a pool now on how much money Obama will have left over at the end of the campaign that can be “channeled” else where ?

J_Crater on May 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM

Is Moochie an only child? Has she no living relatives?

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:35 PM

she probably ate them.

GhoulAid on May 15, 2012 at 3:48 PM

I thought they only ate arugula. So the Obama’s are meat eaters? /s

Gladtobehere on May 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession.
I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.

- Ronald Reagan

ITguy on May 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM

Where’s the cigarette or crack pipe? Since Obama is familiar with both he should have one or the other.

banzaibob on May 15, 2012 at 4:01 PM

It would be nice to see the irritation geared toward who it needs to be: Progressives..instead of other Conservatives.

melle1228 on May 15, 2012 at 3:44 PM
ABRtards for Obama are “other Conservatives”?
Who knew?

Gunlock Bill on May 15, 2012 at 3:58

You didn’t say people voting for Obama, you said ABR(many who will just stay home). That being said, you are just as bad as the ABR who in a snit are voting for Obama. Many of us can understand someone who didn’t want Romney to be the nominee, because many of us Romney was our last choice. He won.. Bad winners are just as idiotic as bad losers.

melle1228 on May 15, 2012 at 4:05 PM

I don’t think I’m on board here. I don’t think Obama’s ambivalence has been a matter of money.

It’s the black vote. He’s worried about the black enthusiasm. (It’s not a “who else are they going to vote for?” thing.) Note the black preachers. Blacks are fairly religious, and while liberal, not too big a fans of gays.

He’s been straddling this position for years. (Make your own jokes here.) I’m pretty sure he’s furious that Biden outed him.

Pablo Snooze on May 15, 2012 at 4:17 PM

HAD to pass it along (with commentary):

http://is.gd/VBcVTM

TeresainFortWorth on May 15, 2012 at 4:18 PM

are those “mom shorts”?

ted c on May 15, 2012 at 2:44 PM

It’s actually an Earl Scheib paint job…rhinestones and all. That biatch Obama sure knows how to strut his her stuff.

timberline on May 15, 2012 at 4:26 PM

What happened to that lil puppy that hangs out by that fire hydrant ?
Answer me Obama !!!

burrata on May 15, 2012 at 2:52 PM

Ready for this?

HE ATE IT!

But you knew that all along.

timberline on May 15, 2012 at 4:28 PM

You didn’t say people voting for Obama, you said ABR(many who will just stay home).

And thus help Obama.

That being said, you are just as bad as the ABR who in a snit are voting for Obama.

That is a stupid statement. At least I am not willing to burn down the whole country just because my preferred candidate didn’t get the nomination.

Many of us can understand someone who didn’t want Romney to be the nominee, because many of us Romney was our last choice. He won..

If Romney is your last choice, is Obama your second to last choice?

THANK GOD Romney won!!!!!

Bad winners are just as idiotic as bad losers.

melle1228 on May 15, 2012 at 4:05 PM

So, making fun of the “bad losers” makes one a “bad winner”?

Really?

Gunlock Bill on May 15, 2012 at 4:34 PM

PERFECT!

Ramirez has done some of his best work during the obama years.

Pork-Chop on May 15, 2012 at 4:39 PM

This is somewhat on topic, well maybe? What to make of this?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-you-know-soros-other-high-ranking-democrats-met-for-an-ultra-secret-conference-last-weekend/
L

letget on May 15, 2012 at 4:41 PM

There is a reason Ramirez is the best. ; )

Bmore on May 15, 2012 at 4:41 PM

Comment pages: 1 2