Breaking: Romney apologizes for high-school pranks; Update: Audio added
posted at 11:26 am on May 10, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
Thankfully, our long national nightmare is over:
Mitt Romney apologized on Thursday morning for pranks he helped orchestrate in high school that he said “might have gone too far,” including an incident in which he pinned down a fellow student and cut his hair.
The presumptive Republican presidential nominee was responding to an article published a few hours earlier by The Washington Post documenting the episode with first-hand accounts from Romney’s classmates.
“Back in high school, I did some dumb things and if anybody was hurt by that or offended, obviously I apologize for that,” Romney said in a live radio interview with Fox News Channel personality Brian Kilmeade. Romney added: “I participated in a lot of hijinks and pranks during high school and some might have gone too far and for that, I apologize.”
Romney’s campaign hastily scheduled the radio interview for the candidate to call in from Omaha, where he is holding a campaign event later Wednesday, to respond to The Post’s report.
Politically speaking, this was the smart thing to do. Other campaigns would have tried challenging the veracity of the stories and/or the motives of the witnesses, but that’s a losing proposition. The more a campaign debates those points, the longer the story goes, and the more legitimacy it has in the media. Instead, the Romney campaign made it an old story before it began to grow legs by just expressing remorse over any cruelty that may have taken place in high school.
I eagerly await the next set of stories about how in middle school Romney refused to give cuts in line to kids from low-income families, or how he shamelessly violated the “exies-no-erasies” rule in elementary school with his female classmates.
Update: Via BuzzFeed, here’s the audio from Romney’s interview in its entirety:
“I don’t remember that incident,” Romney told Kilmeade, chuckling. “I certainly don’t believe that I thought the fellow was homosexual. That was the furthest thing from our minds back in the 1960s, so that was not the case.”
One e-mailer suggested that the hairstyle might have been the focus of the prank, not perceived orientation. Cranbrook would likely have had a fairly strict set of rules on personal appearance. Either way, it’s still a mean-spirited thing to do, but teenage boys (or girls, for that matter) aren’t known for their sense of proportion or maturity in every moment of the day, either.
Related Posts:
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 Next »
Romney? Or 0bama..?
affenhauer on May 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM
Sorry, Glorious Hammer. I’m rusty having been away. I’ll get better. ; )
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM
What happened to the pinata, all the candy ran out?
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM
3) the Hot Air staff who seek revenue over credible, on topic discussions
and are willing to let one besmirch those they supposedly revere with unsupported slanders
PolAgnostic on May 10, 2012 at 5:09 PM
Me I would rather talk baseball with fellow Louisianan Chuck Finley (great Angels pitcher).
Dude, I think she broke his nose too?!?
I vaguely remember her getting arrested for battery on him….
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:09 PM
Yep, its tough though. He knows how to get folks upset. We, at least most everyone of us, keep a special place in our heart for our service members. I know I do. Most of us don’t have room in our hearts for hate. I know I don’t. With that said, I am having a bit of trouble getting back in the swing of things. I have fallen to sleep the the last two nights on the QOTD thread. My favorite thread as you know. ; )
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:10 PM
In general, I agree. Displays of unapologetic and full-blown libtardation are, in moderation, my version of mind-candy…
affenhauer on May 10, 2012 at 5:11 PM
Give Tawny Kitaen her due (for those of you too young, look her up, especially re: a famous Whitesnake video):
She put Rudy Sarzo and David Coverdale in the hospital and then goes on to get arrested for battery against her husband, Angels pitcher Chcuk Finley, who is SIX-FOOT-SIX!!!
Bet she was fun at a party.
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:12 PM
Dress rules are dress rules. Don’t like them? – go elsewhere!
OldEnglish on May 10, 2012 at 5:12 PM
Nope, not a good image at all. And I understand that Obama never apologized to the little girl he bullied at that private school he attended in Hawaii.
TarheelBen on May 10, 2012 at 5:12 PM
I tied a dudes long hair to a chain link fence…..in a thick double knot. It had to be cut at the roots to get him off the fence.
My dad beat the s**t out of me.
rickyricardo on May 10, 2012 at 5:12 PM
I don’t know- it is kind of interesting to let trolls talk. The more they do; the more you find out that they aren’t quite as intelligent as they think they are.
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt.
Abraham Lincoln
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/fool.html#Ir8BxXyQbtqvlauC.99
melle1228 on May 10, 2012 at 5:14 PM
Maybe, maybe not. I’ve never met angryed. I know he gets under the skin of a lot of people who want to keep swilling the Kool Aid but don’t have any effective counterargument. Anyway, that “cowardice” goes both ways. Would you call angryed a worthless coward to his face? Of course you wouldn’t.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:15 PM
what i really want to know about mittens?
did he get his cootie shots forever by thumping his thumbs on his shoulders at the age of 5 after someone nerd in class sneezed and wiped his nose on the sleeve of his shirt and everyone said ewwwww “cootie shots forever”.
that’s the most important thing to me.
never know when the president might run up against a kid who didn’t get his cootie shots.
we’d have to go to the VP who’s next in line because the pres would be with hamburgler/grimace and mayor mcCheese.
Yep, really important stuff here.
athenadelphi on May 10, 2012 at 5:16 PM
Yep. For me there is an additional problem. I am a Southern male who was brought up to be polite and respond to anyone who asks a question of me or says anything in my general direction. I am committed to respond. ; ) At a point in real life. I have also been taught to remain silent and to refrain from response. This silence is not usually a good sign with folks of my ilk. And usually begins something which doesn’t necessarily end well. ; )
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:16 PM
I would. Go back to page 3 (or maybe 7?) for his sub-rant on reasoned discourse v. violence…
affenhauer on May 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM
Those were the days. That’s where the inspiration for the movie, “War Games” came from.
That brought back a memory. I was considered the #2 or #3 genius in my middle school, but the #1 genius was this really out there Einstein-type uber-nerd. So the teachers and our parents would try to get us together to see if we could invent time travel or something.
He had a Tandy and modem setup as you described, and it was a thrill to watch him tap into the ‘net of a major defense contractor from his house and prowl around.
We disappointed the adults by focusing our energies on downloading Dungeons and Dragons programs from nerd engineers at the company and going through them line by line to make the monsters cooler.
We were 11. What did they expect?
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:18 PM
“Trolless thread” = one that is a nice comfy little echo chamber.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:18 PM
I would not hesitate. If I say something here you can bet I would say it to you out here. What I won’t do is say something here that I wouldn’t say out here. See the difference.
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:18 PM
Yeah, we’re all badasses online.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:19 PM
Quite the contrary. One that is a thoughtful and thought provoking discovery of issues. You got a chip on your shoulder? You have been complaining an awful lot lately.
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:20 PM
The point was, some of our friends already had the D & D games on disc.
Our schtick was to mess around with the monsters, line of code by line of code, so that when we challenged our friends to play the game with us, and they laughed and said they’d eat us for lunch, because they were used to the UNhacked version of the game, the monsters did what WE programmed them to do, instead of what they were used to. No one could beat us at “our” game.
Sort of like what the MSM is trying to do to Romney!
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:21 PM
Yeah, right. Lookit. Angryed is this season’s unseen: a guy who’s despised because he doesn’t go with the rah-rah Red Team flow.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:21 PM
A number of us are badasses offline as well…
affenhauer on May 10, 2012 at 5:22 PM
Bullying? How about beating a poor little puppy over the head with a club until it dies, then cooking and eating it? How does that compare with cutting a sissy’s hair?
jan3 on May 10, 2012 at 5:22 PM
LOL you are only showing yourself to be a coward by how quick you are to doubt them. :)
Bizarro No. 1 on May 10, 2012 at 5:23 PM
Yeah, I’ve got that “damn sick and tired of being told I’m an O-bot troll” chip on my shoulder.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:23 PM
Yep. Some of us saw this coming. They were emboldened and here we are.
kim roy on May 10, 2012 at 5:23 PM
As I pointed out on another thread, you clearly ARE angryEd’s sock puppet and a sad little puppet at that.
Slainte on May 10, 2012 at 5:23 PM
I would. He is a worthless coward and deserves to be called out on it. What’s he going to do? Beat me up? Pfffttt!
Trafalgar on May 10, 2012 at 5:24 PM
No, c’mon. He said some pretty hair-raising things about the military on this thread.
It’s a bit more than not “going with the flow.”
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:25 PM
ddrintn does indeed have a chip on his/her shoulder and it’s never far from angryEd.
Slainte on May 10, 2012 at 5:26 PM
Nothing I can do for you on that note. I’ll just stand down and remain silent at this point. Good fortunes to you.
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:27 PM
Ed serves a purpose or two, albeit unintentionally. Before the moby mask really slipped off he was one of the loudest ABR guys around. So knowing what we now know about him, I see a liberal troll who was trying to persuade people to keep Mitt from winning the nomination.
I’ve been told that the left will tell us who they fear. Once the primaries were over it made my transition to being a Romney supporter that much easier.
alchemist19 on May 10, 2012 at 5:27 PM
Haha, are you kidding me?
Chuck Schick on May 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM
Would you like to take a vote here about who has a lower Q rating between the 2 of them? Then, when you’d see angryed’s being much lower, you’d have to engage your brain for the first once if you wanted to reasonably explain why your comparison was sooooooo misguided.
Bizarro No. 1 on May 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM
There’s a HUGE HUGE HUGE difference between unseen and crazyEd.
I’ve been around for at least four years and I don’t recall the level of derision towards unseen that was heaped on crazyEd today.
Please don’t romanticize crazyEd. You only diminish unseen with the comparison. Unseen’s a good guy. Maybe a little enthusiastic, but a good guy. CrazyEd needs institutionalization for some of the comments he’s been making for the past month or so.
kim roy on May 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM
People who sit on the sidelines and poke sticks at the military do so because they have a immutable fear of being in harms way. They’re almost compelled to do it because they’re trying to proof to themselves the sacrifices other people make for them are stupid. They belong to an exclusive group of people who know no shame in that they are too afraid to fight and too stupid to understand how they’re protected from harm by better men and women than themselves. While you’re sitting in your cozy computer chair showing what an idiot you are, there’s a kid someplace on the line soaking wet thinking about his family.
That’s the person you’re making fun of.
hawkdriver on May 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM
first
oncetimeBizarro No. 1 on May 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM
angryed is despised because he’s an obnoxious arsehole.
I give you about 6-8 weeks before you reach that threshold. Your anti-Romney rants are getting as old and asinine as angryeds’ schtick.
HumpBot Salvation on May 10, 2012 at 5:29 PM
I’m not going with the consensus. If I’m a coward, what does that make you?
Maybe, I haven’t read it yet. But I also remember that unseen was absolutely raked over the coals for some really REALLY dastardly things he was supposed to have said about Bachmann and Mitch Daniels…while really he was being raked over the coals for being a Palin fan. The same thing happened to me: I was supposed to have said something proFOUNDLY disrespectful of the military. I was also supposed to have made fun of Christie’s weight and Jindal’s religion and was supposed to have said something that was blatantly bigoted anti-Mormon stuff. None of it was true. All of it was thrown out there because I am a ‘nista.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:29 PM
I like unseen, ed crossed the line with his name calling. You don’t call people rubes and make fun of their geographic location, type of residence and vehicle ownership, it’s counter productive. If I was interested in being schooled by my “betters” I’d listen to Frum, Noonan, Parker and Brookes who at least get paid to be condescending pseudo elites.
Cindy Munford on May 10, 2012 at 5:29 PM
Yes. Given that he’s a dedicated internet troll, odds are he’s not very tough or physically imposing, and I certainly don’t care about offending his delicate sensibilities.
Good Solid B-Plus on May 10, 2012 at 5:30 PM
How you been hawkdriver? I had worried you were gone for a while before I myself took leave. Nice to see you. ; )
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM
The moles are poking their heads up one by one.
Here’s a primer on how to deal with them:
LINK
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM
Thus beautifully illustrating my comments above.
F*ing totalitarian.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM
If you are female, and wish to help, you may prefer THIS LINK.
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:33 PM
I saw it. There is nothing wrong with being uneducated, especially if funds it the roadblock and the military is the path to a better life.
Cindy Munford on May 10, 2012 at 5:33 PM
1) He wasn’t there
2) He had never heard of it before he somehow became the source for WaPo’s story.
Unbelievable. Next!
Chuck Schick on May 10, 2012 at 5:33 PM
,
Yeah I would. He called me white trash, basically said I wasn’t civilized because I defended myself from being raped, my father was horrible for teaching me to defend myself from said rape, and went after military people who included my husband, so point me to his address.. Please.
melle1228 on May 10, 2012 at 5:34 PM
This is a wonderful example of why I love you Cindy. In a sister sort of way of course. A nicely measured and reasoned reply. Perfect. ; )
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:35 PM
Well, unless you’re doing it in the service of Romney. I’ve seen that tactic used many a time here by the ‘bot squad with nary an eyebrow being raised.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:35 PM
He was pulling our chain. We beat the candy out of him. The story is getting walked back. He left for papier mache repair. Ed and Allah got a 1,000+-comment thread.
All in all, a god day of hunting :-)
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM
God is GOOD!
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM
If you need a chuckle, check the links I just gave!
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:37 PM
LOL– Yeah I know. Trolls don’t bother me. He certainly wouldn’t say the things he did to my face that he said on the internet- so meh.
melle1228 on May 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM
Mole? I’ve been commenting here ever since late 2008.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM
Boo hoo..Poor little thing…need a tissue?
Face it dude..you’re a ahole and whine like a little girl when you get called out for it.
Another funny thing….never, ever see you commenting on a thread critical of Obama…unless it’s to take a swipe at Romney. And you’re BFF’s with the likes of angryed..so spare me if you get your panties in a twist…because you are likened to a lib tard troll.
I couldn’t give a crap if you don’t go with the rah-rah team or not. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Like I said..you’ve repeated the same asinine comments about 10,000 times. Get a new gig..this one has worn old.
HumpBot Salvation on May 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM
The only person you and angryEd are in service to is Obama.
angryEd has definitively stated he wants Obama to win. It’s just a matter of time before you let slip the same desire.
Slainte on May 10, 2012 at 5:40 PM
I’ve been telling the Mittwitts the same thing at every possible opportunity for the last four months. Do you know how annoyed Buy Danish is with me? In the end I’m not going to let some bully talk me into or out of doing what little I can do for our country. It’s not like we have limitless options, so I will do what I think is best for the country at the moment and continue to work for conservatism.
Cindy Munford on May 10, 2012 at 5:41 PM
Wanting someone who repeatedly violates the TOS banned = totalitarian?
Wow. No words.
Good Solid B-Plus on May 10, 2012 at 5:42 PM
Are you kidding? Unseen was ridiculed and raked over the coals for the better part of 3 years. He/she was a paid Palin shill, and on and on and on and on.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM
You are too nice. I can’t even respond to Buy Danish anymore. And I had to step away for a few days, because I found my self getting to vitriolic..
melle1228 on May 10, 2012 at 5:44 PM
No Mitt. Don’t apologize. You almost had AFA and evangelicals on your side.
lester on May 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM
Yes, I know. I’m referring to the changing nature of your comments in recent months. You seem to be going ever leftward, unless I’m mistaken.
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM
Yeah, wow. No, what’s f*cking totalitarian is a little claque of self-appointed brownshirt internet vigilantes deciding who’s a troll and should be banned forthwith and who’s part of the little groupthinking echo chamber and therefore cool. That’s what’s f*cking totalitarian. Wow. No words.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:46 PM
I’ve been honest to a fault before (I’ve worked on that so that while I’m a still as honest as ever, I’ve learned to be a lot more diplomatic!), and considering I have enough integrity that I do not say things, either off- or online I am not willing to back up 100%, why, I’d say makes me a non-coward, you crazy (notice my emphasis on “crazy”!) coward! :)
Bizarro No. 1 on May 10, 2012 at 5:47 PM
LOL. Objecting consistently to Romney = “going leftward”. Bizarro.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:47 PM
Hey, I have to go do some intensive work right now. If I’m wrong about you, let’s table it for now. Just wanted to let you know I’m not doing a drive-by on you….
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:48 PM
geez my proofreading needs work! “I’m
a stillas honest as ever…”Bizarro No. 1 on May 10, 2012 at 5:48 PM
Another Internet badass.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:49 PM
Wait a sec, now. Go back on this thread and read the things angryed said.
He was way over the line, and that’s why he’s gotten flamed so hard.
No need for you to go jihadi, unless you have read angryed’s words today and agree.
You better read the thread again.
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:49 PM
Angreyed, Dbear sock puppet? Anyone?
I am not sure about that. I think I have heard dd’s frustration with the direction of the Republican party and IMHO he/she may have taken it to the extreme, but I can certainly understand that frustration.
melle1228 on May 10, 2012 at 5:50 PM
I will come out immediately and state that I don’t want angryed to be banned. I am perfectly capable of ignoring him or any others using the same tactics.
Cindy Munford on May 10, 2012 at 5:51 PM
This story has really hit a nerve with people. It is story most people can relate to. At least Romney apologized for his actions. He received no punishment for his actions at the school. I guess it helps when your rich father is the Governor.
ZippyZ on May 10, 2012 at 5:52 PM
I’ve got to get to work, but his frustration shouldn’t include supporting angryed’s over-the-line statements on this thread.
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:52 PM
I read them. They’re out of line. But cut the bullshit. The groupthink squad wanted angryed hung from the nearest electron tree a long time ago for not subscribing to the Mittbot Creed. That’s what the dynamic is. If MJBrutus or some other nasty pro-Romney jerk here had said that same thing it wouldn’t have gotten 2 looks from anyone.
ddrintn on May 10, 2012 at 5:52 PM
I don’t either, unless he keeps talking over the line as he did today.
If he does, then he deserves a quick ban. He said some very bigoted things today, specifically to provoke and hurt military families. Debate is one thing. Incitement is another.
Today is angryed’s mulligan, in my book. He gets this one.
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:54 PM
First off, I don’t want Angryed banned, but Angryed got more crap about his personal attacks on this thread and his anti-military crap then he did about his Mitt craps.
Secondly I am anybody but a Mittbot. In fact at the beginning of the thread- I thought Romney was idiotic for apologizing for something he did 50 years ago.
melle1228 on May 10, 2012 at 5:55 PM
Party pooper. ; )
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 5:55 PM
I’m just going on what I saw today. I try not to keep long-term books in my head on commenters; it makes for too much drama, and so your “b.s.” noun doesn’t apply to me.
But he can’t expect to continue talking as he did today, and not expect a tsunami of e-mails to management recommending he be banned. He needs to walk it back from today’s bigotry, or leave.
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:56 PM
I’m not going to comment on the source of your frustrations, because, honestly, I donn’t give a crap, but if anyone at all disparaged the military the way this a-hole did, I’d have plenty to say about it. And, I think many others here would, too. Romney/Obama has nothing to do with it.
nico on May 10, 2012 at 5:57 PM
I gotta go.
Let’s see whether the WaPo is forced to issue a correction.
Interesting.
cane_loader on May 10, 2012 at 5:57 PM
Lol @ the idea ddrintn is a mole/troll/etc. He is a staunch conservative who has been here for years. Not every commenter who is having a hard time getting excited about Romney is a Soros funded shill with nefarious intentions.
Kataklysmic on May 10, 2012 at 5:59 PM
Here is what started me off . For the record. I do not like him one bit. I am unapologetic for wanting him gone.
When I read this I realized though I had always just ignored him, he is a boor really, this comment went to far. Defend it if you must. I won’t.
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 6:00 PM
+ 100..I agree..:)
Dire Straits on May 10, 2012 at 6:01 PM
LOL the fact you think it’s a such big deal to call someone you honestly believe is a coward, “coward”, directly in front of them is how I know you are a coward. And, not only are you a coward, you are one who comically takes being told you are a coward as an act of aggression, which shows that you are angry to the point of being delusional.
People whose brains function normally don’t think like you – I see you haven’t noticed this yet! :).
Bizarro No. 1 on May 10, 2012 at 6:06 PM
+ 100..:)
Dire Straits on May 10, 2012 at 6:09 PM
Has anyone gone to the other thread and read about the “sources” of this story about Romney? More outstanding journalism.
Cindy Munford on May 10, 2012 at 6:11 PM
Cindy Munford on May 10, 2012 at 6:13 PM
Between these and the “white trash” comment I concluded that no amount of reasoned responses would matter to this person. He or she is simply getting their jollies inciting people, deliberately goading them in an effort to cause as much upset as possible.
They are sick and to be pitied.
dogsoldier on May 10, 2012 at 6:16 PM
: ) Very true.
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM
Yeah, thats kinda “fake but accurate.” The WaPo has made an error with this.
dogsoldier on May 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM
True, but I’ll stick by my wish. ; )
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 6:18 PM
I’ll play,though I’m sure someone has gotten it: Spiro Agnew.
totherightofthem on May 10, 2012 at 6:37 PM
Hi everybody! I’ve been gone all day. Great job outing angryed for once and for all as being nothing but a lying p.o.s. Obama thug. We’ve had many clues before but the mask didn’t just slip, it was ripped off and tossed in the trash. I am usually the last person to suggest someone be banned but he deserves to get his punk self kicked out of here.
I thought for a brief moment it might be worth keeping him on only because he serves a useful purpose by alerting us to the talking points du jour (great work Del Dolemonte!!!). But after reading his disgusting screed about our military I personally see no place for this cockroach except scurrying away, going down, down, down the drain, into the bowels of the sewer, never to be seen again.
Buy Danish on May 10, 2012 at 6:40 PM
Me?:)
Buy Danish on May 10, 2012 at 6:46 PM
This reminds me – I had typed out my following post, which touches upon what you said here, a few hours ago, but didn’t end up sending it after a necessary browser restart.
Not only is there no proof, none will be forthcoming. How do I know this? Notice how the article only tried to insinutate that Mitt cut the guy’s hair because of his presumed homosexuality, how none of the eyewitnesses stated they believed it was his motivavtion? That’s because they didn’t have any good reason to believe it was a factor – if they believe it had been, does anyone intelligent believe they wouldn’t have made that opinion clear? LOL the answer to that is obvious!
To emphasize that point, I’ll mention that none of the eyewitnesses even said they suspected Mitt’s “homophobia” as his motivation i.e. I say the care the author took to not cross the line from manipulative insinuation into implication proves this – the failure to mention any suspiciousness they might have had indicates that the eyewitnesses knew it wasn’t his motivation, or securely believed it wasn’t, and they made the author aware of this.
That extremely childish, poorly written
articlehit piece will only fool people who are already too lost to able to accept that this was purely political attack premeditated by an adminstration which can’t seem to be capable of anything other than that kind of behavior. Thankfully, for the decent among us, 0bamessiah and his cynical team of Keystone Cops are too dumb to figure out how/why a sitting felon could have gotten 41% of the primary vote against Him in WV! :)Bizarro No. 1 on May 10, 2012 at 6:47 PM
She and I have agreed (I use that term loosely) to not respond to each other after she turned on me like a rabid dog and tried to bite my hand off. lol.
totherightofthem on May 10, 2012 at 6:48 PM
You and I in total agreement? Whats up with that?
Bmore on May 10, 2012 at 6:49 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 Next »