Bad day for Obama, unions in NC, WV, and especially WI

posted at 8:41 am on May 9, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Looks like Tuesday was a bad day for Barack Obama, Democrats in general, and particularly the unions.  Three states held primaries, and in each, voters rejected positions and/or candidates associated with all three, in embarrassing vote totals.  Let’s start with the least significant of these outcomes, the Democratic presidential primary in West Virginia, where an inmate in federal prison ran a novelty primary challenge to Barack Obama — and came within 20 points of winning (via Polipundit):

An obscure federal prison inmate gave President Obama an unexpected run for his money in the West Virginia Democratic Primary Tuesday, highlighting the deep dislike for the president in the Appalachian heartland.

With 96% of the precincts reporting Tuesday night, Keith Judd was holding steady at 41% of the vote and had won ten counties.

Judd is also known as federal prison inmate Number 11593-051 at the Beaumont Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, where Judd is serving a 210-month sentence for extortion and making threats at the University of New Mexico in 1999.

The best part of this story?  Thanks to the size of the popular vote for Judd, he’s entitled to at least one delegate at the Democratic National Convention.  I’d bet that the DNC will rule that Judd’s ineligibility as a convict will allow them to strip him of whatever delegates he does win, but it’s going to be a little embarrassing nonetheless.

Still, Obama has absolutely no chance of winning West Virginia in a national election anyway, so that’s more sideshow than significant.  However, Team Obama needs to carry North Carolina again this year after their narrow 0.3% win in 2008.  Obama ran unopposed in the primary in North Carolina, but that doesn’t mean he won all of the votes.  In fact, Obama couldn’t reach 80% in the Democratic primary, which featured competitive Congressional primary contests on the ballot.  Obama won only 79.2% of the vote, with slightly more than a fifth of all Democratic voters (20.8%) expressing “no preference.”  That totals over 140,000 Democrat votes that didn’t go to Obama in an unopposed primary — and Obama only won North Carolina by 14,000 votes in 2008.  The Tarheel State’s beginning to look like a lost cause.

Speaking of lost causes, the traditional marriage amendment that Obama publicly opposed in North Carolina passed by a wide margin:

North Carolina has become the 31st state to add an amendment on marriage to its constitution, with voters banning same-sex marriage and barring legal recognition of unmarried couples by state and local governments.

North Carolina is the last state in the south to add such an amendment, and supporters hoped for a resounding victory.

Incomplete returns show the amendment up 59.72 percent to 40.28 percent. Some large counties, including Durham and Mecklenburg have not reported results.

The final results were even more dramatic, 61.05% to 38.95%.  That represents a strong rejection of Obama’s position, and a demonstration of why the Tarheel State may already be lost to Obama.

By far the worst news for the Left came in Wisconsin, where primaries were held for the recall elections next month.  Tom Barrett won a contentious fight against Kathleen Falk, the candidate of Big Labor who got a ton of union help for her campaign but lost badly by 24 points, 58/34.  The real story, though, was Scott Walker, who got more votes than both combined despite facing only token opposition in the Republican primary:

As Barrett was campaigning Tuesday, Walker was barnstorming the state and showing the fight he will bring to what is expected to be a brutal month of canvassing for one of the most important elections to state office in Wisconsin history. A poll last week showed Walker and Barrett in a dead heat.

Walker, who won over 600,000 votes despite facing only token opposition Tuesday, has been preparing for months for the fast-approaching election, raising a record $25 million, while Barrett must now pivot toward this race with far fewer resources.

There was little reason for Republicans to turn out for this primary, as their incumbents are all trying to hold their offices.  Walker’s opponent got less than 20,000 votes, while Walker rang up over 626,000.  Contrast that the two Democrats, who combined for 619,049 votes, seven thousand less than Walker, in a primary election where unions tried to stoke turnout to boost Falk.  Republicans in Wisconsin appear fired up and ready to turn out in June, and presumably in November, to protect their state against Big Labor’s efforts to undo the 2010 elections and take control of the state.  That’s not good news for Obama, either, since Obama won Wisconsin in 2008 and needs the state in 2012.

All of that makes for a very bad night indeed for Democrats, and a pretty good indicator which way the wind is blowing before the general election.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

New meme: What would candidate obama do? WWCOD

If only (candidate) Obama knew!

aquaviva on May 22, 2013 at 2:43 PM

I feel so sorry for you Obama-azz-dwelleres.

Suffocate from what you’ve consumed, you traitors.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:43 PM

Dwellers…it ain’t Beluga caviar…you’ve been consuming Obama’s shit. Suffocate from it, slowly and painfully.

I hope that Messrs. Ailes and Murdoch will fight for the 1st, with all their might, and the help of the ACLU and any decent leftist, hah.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:45 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:46 PM

Chuck “Frog” Todd discovers the scorpion.

Mr. D on May 22, 2013 at 2:46 PM

It’s just like the gun laws they want. A national registry prevents anyone from ever discussing in public whether or not they might have guns. You might have liberal (re: Communist) neighbors that would report you to the moral authorities…

Freakin’ USSA

kirkill on May 22, 2013 at 2:47 PM

It looks an awful lot like the administration is willing to go to frighteningly extreme lengths for the sake of information control.

Soviets would be proud.

goflyers on May 22, 2013 at 2:48 PM

At this point, can’t we just make Cuba the 58th state already?

kirkill on May 22, 2013 at 2:48 PM

Obviously, Todd and all those singing his same tune have lost all credibility. Worse, those on the Left are also traitors.

Love,
Obama’s Choirboys
Chris Matthews
Our trolls

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 2:48 PM

Hmmm but it is really satisfying to see them sweat too.

petunia on May 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM

Wow. They’ve gone too far even for Chuck Todd.

Can I get a Maddow?

Robert_Paulson on May 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM

Is this surprising? After all, it’s the Chicago Way.

Fred 2 on May 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM

The media I mean.

petunia on May 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM

Boo Hoo. Chuck Todd was right there with the effort to criminalize private gun ownership, in fact if not in name, via harassment of gun owners. Now all of a sudden I’m supposed to be outraged because his ox is getting gored.

It’s a serious thing, but I’m not buying the sudden respect for rights from most of these clowns.

JohnTant on May 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM

“Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.” – David Burge

kirkill on May 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 2:46 PM

Gad. And HAL’s book is Sal Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals too. Such a freakin’ idiot.

But true. I’m getting to the point that our only hope is that after the complete collapse of the United States, the sane people with all the guns can reinstall the Constitution and start over.

RESET!

kirkill on May 22, 2013 at 2:54 PM

In one way I cannot disagree – the U.S. media is probably comprised of many of the world’s most dishonest people. Many “journalists” lie on a level similar to Barack Obama or Marco Rubio. But, Obama only wants to criminalize those who don’t agree with him.

bw222 on May 22, 2013 at 2:54 PM

Let’s not forget that Chuck Todd’s wife (Christin Deny Todd) is a Democratic operative.

bw222 on May 22, 2013 at 2:55 PM

Big whoop. What are all these hyperventilating pearl-clutchers in the journalism field going to do about it? Nothing. They’re Obama’s kept b_tches and they know it.

Aitch748 on May 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM

May you journalists, aka lemmings, be the first useful idiots he jails.

txhsmom on May 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM

As Jim Geraghty put it at NRO, there is a clear pattern running through all of these scandals: It looks an awful lot like the administration is willing to go to frighteningly extreme lengths for the sake of information control.

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

Be outraged. Use the law and a good portion of absolute moral authority to take this criminal enterprise down.

Dusty on May 22, 2013 at 2:59 PM

I don’t think Chuckie and his ilk will be turning in their Hope & Change autographed kneepads yet though…

Bruno Strozek on May 22, 2013 at 3:01 PM

Flashback:

Chavez Jokes He Is More Right-Wing Than ‘Comrade’ Obama

Forward!

visions on May 22, 2013 at 3:02 PM

Did IRS guidelines say teaching the Constitution is a political act?

Kerry Brentwood – Michigan

Shulman is squirming again.

Oh jeez, Shulman admits he doesn’t know the constitution and can’t recite it or explain 1, 2 or 19th amendments. Brentwood asks if he knows what TEA stands for – taxed enough already – Shulman says he didn’t know.

Looking at the fools and idiots in positions of power the rest of the world must be ROTFLTFAO at us.

wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 3:05 PM

Obama not born in Kenya. Born in East Berlin.

kurtzz3 on May 22, 2013 at 3:05 PM

What’s funny is, I think, Candidate Obama, if George Bush and Dick Cheney were doing this, imagine what Candidate Obama would say. Candidate Obama would be unloading.

No, what’s funny is how you tongue bathers have allowed him to shift all over the place while you turn a blind eye to it. For your failure to do your “job”, you’ve allowed this to happen. If he’d have been held accountable early in his career by the press, as a politician, do you think he would’ve made it this far? With this type of behavior? C’mon Chuck, by saying “Candidate Obama” you’re basically saying that you guys have been witness to this guy changing his positions and had the utter luxury of unrestrained freedom of movement to adapt his position to the situation at hand.

What good are you, Chuck???? See Obama and see your failure, it’s that simple, homeboy.

ted c on May 22, 2013 at 3:08 PM

Candidate Obama would be unloading.

I hate to break this to you, but Candidate Obama and President Obama are one and the same person.

This means that he played you, Chuckie. He told you a bunch of pretty, pretty lies and you swallowed them all. Let that sink in.

Saltyron on May 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM

Wow. They’ve gone too far even for Chuck Todd.

Can I get a Maddow?

Robert_Paulson on May 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM

Not going to happen. It’s going to get worse before it can get better.

Fenris on May 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM

It appears to me like the administration doesn’t even care what anyone thinks about what they’ve been doing. If the president were really “outraged” don’t you think someone’s head would roll? Who is he afraid of? Holder? Because what they’re doing is downright cowardly.

scalleywag on May 22, 2013 at 3:10 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book.
HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM

Should probably wait and see what the fallout from all this is before making a statement like that.

A lot of people are getting a taste of what ‘progressivism’ really means. I don’t think that’s going to work well for you guys.

rightmind on May 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM

A talking sock puppet that sleeps with the lowest form of prostitute. Willing to sell his soul and his kids for a few
peices of silver and a chance to fellate the kenyan.

acyl72 on May 22, 2013 at 3:13 PM

…our philosopher King?

This is why you have a parasitic criminal class near most college campuses and other concentrations of liberals.

Marks like tingles are the best, though. They never admit that they were mugged.

IlikedAUH2O on May 22, 2013 at 3:14 PM

So, F. Chuck Todd is a racist, along with Chris Matthews, for criticizing a Black President?

pjarhead on May 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM

Welcome to Chicago politics, F. Chuck Todd. These MSM reporters are truly fools.

Henry Bowman on May 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Lol!!! Chucky Todd. Starve!!! Bunch of damn fluffers.

Bmore on May 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Far as I’m concerned, these smug no-balz reporters can cry in their $10 lattes all week, while I laugh at them. Their liberalism and their precious Obama brought all this about, even though they were warned five years ago their candidate is a sleaze.

This is nothing. I think more have been spied on, including azz-kissers like Matthews. In any dictatorship, the biggest supporters are the ones most closely watched. There’s always a suspicion of heresy, and that has to be stamped out faster than any active opposition. Wait till Obamacare kicks in, too.

You reap what you sow. I hope their precious Obama gives them a bountiful harvest.

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM

scalleywag on May 22, 2013 at 3:10 PM

And why is it that they don’t care? Is it because they know nothing will happen to them? I have always thought the POS knows he’s untouchable and that’s probably because of the powers behind the throne.

wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM

Criminalize journalism?

Yes, chuck, journalism. It’s that profession that you haven’t been involved with over the last few years. Don’t worry, there’ll be plenty of jobs for leg humpers, tongue bathers and water carriers. Pays the same as you make right now, buddy.

ted c on May 22, 2013 at 3:20 PM

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Well, I guess TECHNICALLY it doesn’t say the President can’t do any of these things. So there’s that.

UnderstandingisPower on May 22, 2013 at 3:21 PM

Lol!!! Chucky Todd. Starve!!! Bunch of damn fluffers.

Bmore on May 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM

Friend, pls. photoshop the 3 monkeys of oblivion: Holder Obama and Hillary.

Also, consider photoshopping the 3 stooges, same characters.

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 3:22 PM

Our trolls

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 2:48 PM

Someone appropriately misspelled them “trools” this morning. I kind of like that.

oldroy on May 22, 2013 at 3:22 PM

Yeah Chuckie-boy, sark on it. Too bad you weren’t one of the realjournalists when F&F, Bengazi, HHS, OSHA, IRS, EPA, WiretAP scandals were breaking.

It was the folks like the ones here at HA doing the real grunt work.

Turtle317 on May 22, 2013 at 3:23 PM

Were all of the groups that got slammed by the IRS in total red states ?Did any of them have Democrat senators or Democrat congressmen?Were the Democrats in the group that doesn’t know anything or did they just go along with it?The MSM is dead in this country.The only media left is sites like this.

docflash on May 22, 2013 at 3:23 PM

Someone appropriately misspelled them “trools” this morning. I kind of like that.

oldroy on May 22, 2013 at 3:22 PM

I saw that, and like it, too. Kind of a cross between ‘trolls’ and ‘tools’.

Maybe that commenter coined a new term exclusive to HotAir. Might even catch on with other Conservative sites.

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 3:28 PM

Chuck – Hope you like the change you have been promoting the last several years.

albill on May 22, 2013 at 3:30 PM

But, Benghazi is a political witch hunt…

d1carter on May 22, 2013 at 3:31 PM

The State Run Media thought they would be exempt from the repression…LOL.

d1carter on May 22, 2013 at 3:31 PM

It’s great to see Chuck Todd cheering on journalism and journalists! Someday he might consider abandoning the Ministry of Truth propaganda machine, and join in.

MTF on May 22, 2013 at 3:34 PM

Yup. And he WON which is all that counts in my book..

HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 1:38

Mighty short book ya got there.

Dope.

herm2416 on May 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM

Someone appropriately misspelled them “trools” this morning. I kind of like that.

oldroy on May 22, 2013 at 3:22 PM

I saw that, and like it, too. Kind of a cross between ‘trolls’ and ‘tools’.

Maybe that commenter coined a new term exclusive to HotAir. Might even catch on with other Conservative sites.

Liam on May 22, 2013 at 3:28 PM

Or trolls and fools. But I repeat myself.

IrishEyes on May 22, 2013 at 3:39 PM

Schadenfreude on May 22, 2013 at 3:22 PM

Lol! Okay, you got it. I’ll drop it off when its done. ; )

Bmore on May 22, 2013 at 3:41 PM

meh…there’s something pathetic how conservatives keep hoping these liberal journalists are going to start being even-handed…just wait, Chuck Todd and the rest of them will forgive and forget when it’s convenient.

blue13326 on May 22, 2013 at 3:41 PM

And somehow Obama’s Gallup approval is still in the 50s.

I swear…Even if Obama rounded up 1/2 the country to the gas chambers, 50+% of the country including some of the 1/2 going into the gas chambers would still approve of Obama’s job performance.

Varchild on May 22, 2013 at 3:46 PM

The first step in totalitarian rule is to silence the opposition by intimidation. Now we can clearly see what kind of government we are going to get.

kemojr on May 22, 2013 at 3:50 PM

they want to criminalize journalism

But the Tea Party, they should be criminalized.

Alabama Infidel on May 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM

Manure Spreading Media = Useful Idiots (V.I. Lenin)

Missilengr on May 22, 2013 at 3:56 PM

When you’ve lost you’re losing Chuck Toad…

bofh on May 22, 2013 at 4:05 PM

BreakingNews: Chuck Todd(D) has placed his inflatable Obama love doll on CraigsList… it is SO over…

DANEgerus on May 22, 2013 at 4:06 PM

Once leftist scumbag todd gets his assurances from the OBOZO regime that he isn’t a target – he’ll be back licking OBOZO’s boots before you can say “d-cRAT stooge.”

TeaPartyNation on May 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM

Let’s not forget that Chuck Todd’s wife (Christin Deny Todd) is a Democratic operative.

bw222 on May 22, 2013 at 2:55 PM

about three days before the election in 2008 there was a story out of Tennessee about two guys talking in a bar about shooting Senator Obama. Made big headlines with all the racial intoning that could be mustered. The gal that initiated the report was the wife of Kerry’s 2004 campaign manager. It caused me to research a whole lot of names associated with by-lines. The ties to journ-o-listers to the dem party are very strong.

And the story was bogus of course.

DanMan on May 22, 2013 at 4:08 PM

So, they want to criminalize journalism

Let me make sure I get my hands around all of this:

Criminalizing journalism, or in other words, restricting rights guaranteed under the First Amendment, is doubleungood.

Criminalizing gun ownership, or in other words, restricting rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment, is doubleplusgood.

NOW, it all makes sense

Tar Heel Sooner on May 22, 2013 at 4:15 PM

“Fundamentally change America!” The idiots that voted for this Commie had no idea what he was talking about because they never took the time to learn anything about this traitor to America!!

Deano1952 on May 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM

Candidate Obama would be unloading.

I hate to break this to you, but Candidate Obama and President Obama are one and the same person.

This means that he played you, Chuckie. He told you a bunch of pretty, pretty lies and you swallowed them all. Let that sink in.

Saltyron on May 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM

BINGO! I don’t think this will occur to the LSM as a whole, though. Nor will they ever call him on it.

fred5678 on May 22, 2013 at 4:31 PM

Hey Chuck,
You DID build that !!
Sleep with it !

Jabberwock on May 22, 2013 at 4:34 PM

Well Chuck, by being a gutless weasel, the alligator is going to eat you last. Don’t worry, he’s hungry.

rhombus on May 22, 2013 at 4:57 PM

So, they want to criminalize journalism, and that’s what it’s coming down to. If you end up essentially criminalizing journalism when it comes to reporting on the federal government…

.
Actually, Chuck, the way journalism has been practiced in the age of Øbama is criminal. You have a lot to atone for, Bub.

ExpressoBold on May 22, 2013 at 5:08 PM

When Obama has lost Chuck Todd he is done.

mitchellvii on May 22, 2013 at 5:10 PM

Drop that notepad and reach for the sky!, dirtbag.

BobMbx on May 22, 2013 at 5:43 PM

I swear…Even if Obama rounded up 1/2 the country to the gas chambers, 50+% of the country including some of the 1/2 going into the gas chambers would still approve of Obama’s job performance.

Varchild on May 22, 2013 at 3:46 PM

Right up to the time the ol’ EBT card achieved a zero balance, with no means of the government to fill it up.

“Waddya mean we cooked the dudes who we gots da money from?”

BobMbx on May 22, 2013 at 5:46 PM

For over 30 years…. I thought that I escaped my Communist country.

MNH on May 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM

Not buying it.

Judge apologizes for lack of transparency in James Rosen leak probe

The chief judge of the District’s federal court issued an unusual order Wednesday, apologizing to the public and the media for not making certain court documents widely available online.

The gesture of transparency by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth comes at a time when the Obama administration is under scrutiny for an unprecedented number of leak investigations, including one showing that the Justice Department had secretly probed the news-gathering activities of Fox News reporter James Rosen.

The investigation of Rosen was first reported Monday, after The Washington Post obtained court documents containing details of the case.

A federal judge had ordered the documents unsealed in November 2011, but they were kept sealed for 18 months and not posted on the court’s online docket until last week, after The Post inquired about them.

Lamberth blamed a series of administrative errors and said a review of the “performance of the personnel involved is underway.” He also said he was creating a new category on the court’s Web site where all search and arrest warrants will be made public unless they fall under a separate sealing order.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/judge-apologizes-for-lack-of-transparency-in-leak-case/2013/05/22/ad769370-c308-11e2-8c3b-0b5e9247e8ca_story.html

wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 6:37 PM

wyntre9 on May 22, 2013 at 6:37 PM

More information the public should have had before the vote.

That election was a fraud.

Obama is not President.

petunia on May 22, 2013 at 6:44 PM

BobMbx on May 22, 2013 at 5:46 PM

Heh

cornbred on May 22, 2013 at 8:55 PM