Gasp: Mitt Romney, once arrested for disorderly conduct?

posted at 8:47 pm on May 7, 2012 by Erika Johnsen

Well, darn it! For a moment there when I first read the headline, I thought we were finally in for a bodacious instance of youthful rebellion revealing that Romney has a hitherto unknown “cool factor” all his own… but alas, it really wasn’t anything untoward. I do, however, think it was a rather plucky bit of civil disobedience:

It’s a little reported anecdote, but in 1981 presumptive Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney was arrested for disorderly conduct. …

According to what Romney told the Boston Globe in 1994, he had taken his family off to Wayland, Mass.’s Lake Cochituate, about an hour outside Boston, for a summer excursion. As Romney prepared to put his family boat into the water, a park officer told Romney not to launch because his license appeared to have been painted over. The officer told Romney if he put his boat into the water he would face a $50 fine. …

“I figured I was at the state park with my kids. My five kids were in the car wondering why we weren’t going out in the boat, so I said I’d launch and pay the fine,” Romney said in 1994.

After Romney put the family boat into the water, the officer reappeared visibly angry and arrested Romney for disorderly conduct. Romney was handcuffed on the scene, taken to the local police station, and booked.

“There I was, dripping wet in a bathing suit,” Romney told the Globe. A magistrate let him go without bail.

The charges were dropped, and this is apparently old news — I really don’t think this could (or should) pose an issue to Romney’s campaign. His detractors of the class-warmongering ilk might point to Romney’s blasé attitude about paying a $50 fine, but really, most of us do this everyday. When you’re driving on the highway and pushing past the speed limit, you’re technically breaking the law, but you’re willingly taking the gamble of getting a speeding ticket. It’s about tradeoffs, and on a day he wanted to spend boating with his family, Romney thought, sure, I’ll just go ahead and pay the price society has decided to place on people who don’t perfectly display their licenses. And while I have nothing but respect for the uniformed men and women who protect our communities on a daily basis, they’re prone to mistakes and power-trips like the rest of us. It sounds like this officer was in the wrong, and should’ve been writing Mitt Romney a ticket instead of arresting him. No biggie.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:22 AM

Those rejections are simply par for the course. You collect them as hash marks for service in the field. EVERYONE gets them. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:26 AM

one was mad as he saved the other?

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:22 AM

Wait, was he angry or not lucid?

wolfsDad on May 3, 2013 at 1:26 AM

nonsense and palavar…

Scrumpy on May 3, 2013 at 1:24 AM

Add “Goblin Song” to the crap I’m supposed to show you when you know me as me. :)

Awesome group – who didn’t write (and didn’t like, even to this day) ‘The Flame’, by the way, hehe.

Played bass in a CT cover band for awhile – great material, lots of fun.

Midas on May 3, 2013 at 1:24 AM

Kiss. “Beth.”

Craziness.

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:27 AM

wheels in the sky

Fred

jrsrigmvr on May 3, 2013 at 1:28 AM

I haven’t seen grace on for a minute. I’ve also been working days so I haven’t been up too late.

tom daschle concerned on May 3, 2013 at 1:30 AM

You say that like it’s a bad thing (SP love). :p

kim roy on May 3, 2013 at 1:00 AM

Another one. I addressed renalin, though it blinds many of you.

You all misunderstand – I am not bluegill. I voted for SP. That ship sailed.

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 1:03 AM

I was joking with you hence the “:p”

A self-identified, unapologetic Palinista here who thinks we’re all the poorer for letting the liberals do what they did.

Ships have a way of finding home port. You never know.

Quit being so cranky all the time.

kim roy on May 3, 2013 at 1:30 AM

More Than Words – Extreme

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:31 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCiyb2xvAh8

This Axe? :-)

Scrumpy on May 3, 2013 at 1:31 AM

More Than Words – Extreme

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:31 AM

*dons Skidz*

tom daschle concerned on May 3, 2013 at 1:34 AM

Wait, was he angry or not lucid?

wolfsDad on May 3, 2013 at 1:26 AM

Ironically, a Shakespeare habit causes you to use ambiguous words that weren’t quite as ambiguous c. 1600. :) — lol

Um. Not lucid. And very near death, too, actually.

Thank you for pointing it out, and for asking. :)

PS: Anyone ever suggests you write hallucinatory madness in first person, pass. :) I still have a headache.

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:36 AM

tom daschle concerned on May 3, 2013 at 1:34 AM

lol! :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:36 AM

More Than Words – Extreme

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:31 AM

That song always reminds me of Rubber Soul.

John the Libertarian on May 3, 2013 at 1:37 AM

This Axe? :-)

Scrumpy on May 3, 2013 at 1:31 AM

A poem I wrote that your poem reminded me of. :)

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:38 AM

Diamonds and Rust – Judas Priest

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:38 AM

Nothing

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 1:39 AM

John the Libertarian on May 3, 2013 at 1:37 AM

Good evening, John. Good to see you. :)

The tune is a pretty little ballad with decent harmony. I like it. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:40 AM

kr, schadenfreude is not crankiness.

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 1:40 AM

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:38 AM

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh I see…. hmmmmmmmmmmm… :-)

Scrumpy on May 3, 2013 at 1:40 AM

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 1:39 AM

Excellent. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:41 AM

I miss 4Grace too. She’s too good to put on a princess hat, though.

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:41 AM

You Send Me – Cooke

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:42 AM

The tune is a pretty little ballad with decent harmony. I like it. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:40 AM

I would put that song on a top 10 ballad list. Funny, those guys just evaporated after that.

John the Libertarian on May 3, 2013 at 1:44 AM

kr, schadenfreude is not crankiness.

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 1:40 AM

I should have put a winky after it.

Wish I could have put this in instead: fight

;)

kim roy on May 3, 2013 at 1:46 AM

John the Libertarian on May 3, 2013 at 1:44 AM

That industry is as tough, and mercurial, as the film/television industy. Of course, it could have been any number of things, but it is a shame. They were talented.

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:47 AM

sorry.. industry.

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:47 AM

layla

Fred

jrsrigmvr on May 3, 2013 at 1:48 AM

OMG I CAN’T STAND IT

I’m out. I can’t say it and I can’t show it and I’m going to go explode a safe distance from this ridiculous mountain lion that I rescued from under the shed.

^That makes sense, I swear.

Night Jackie. :)

Night everyone. Great tunes.

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:48 AM

Cold – Tears for Fears. The Elemental album was the best, when Roland Orzabal was abandoned to write and perform alone. You can hear the pain.

John the Libertarian on May 3, 2013 at 1:48 AM

Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me – Mel Carter

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:49 AM

sorry.. industry.

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:47 AM

You had it right the first time, and yes, agreed. It’s even more merciless because you have to catch fire before 35.

John the Libertarian on May 3, 2013 at 1:50 AM

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:48 AM

Is that what we discussed the other day? The thing that was the thing?

Was it?

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:50 AM

Nitey nite Axe!! God Bless and sleep well.

The lion sleeps at night ;-)

Scrumpy on May 3, 2013 at 1:51 AM

John the Libertarian on May 3, 2013 at 1:50 AM

In certain respects, not much difference really. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:51 AM

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:48 AM

You’ll never tame it, but it’ll fascinate you, forever.

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 1:51 AM

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 1:51 AM

:)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:52 AM

Nite Axe!

tom daschle concerned on May 3, 2013 at 1:53 AM

This Magic Moment – The Drifters

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:54 AM

Axe on May 3, 2013 at 1:48 AM

Yes.. I do believe I saw it. :) Goodnight, Axefellow. Sleep… if you can. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:55 AM

And so, I must away, to slumber yet to sleep so deep, I hope to dream, to quiet restless thoughts and rest my weary soul…

God Bless y’all…

Good Night!!

* swoosh *

Scrumpy on May 3, 2013 at 1:55 AM

Scrumpy on May 3, 2013 at 1:55 AM

Goodnight, Spritely One. Sleep well. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:56 AM

this always puts a tear in my eye. i miss dad. my daughter told me today that i taught her what love is. time to call mama.

adiosa: vaya con dios.

my father’s eyes clapton
fred

jrsrigmvr on May 3, 2013 at 1:57 AM

Under The Boardwalk – The Drifters

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:58 AM

jrsrigmvr on May 3, 2013 at 1:57 AM

You’ve got a wonderful family, and you’re a wonderful man, Fred. Goodnight. Sleep well. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 1:58 AM

Harlan Howard

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 2:00 AM

Nite Scrumpy and nite all!

tom daschle concerned on May 3, 2013 at 2:00 AM

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 2:00 AM

Wonderful. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 2:02 AM

tom daschle concerned on May 3, 2013 at 2:00 AM

Goodnight, TDC. Thanks for the tunes.:) Sleep well. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 2:02 AM

Only You – The Platters

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 2:04 AM

I bid you all a fond goodnight. It’s been a pleasure, as always. See you soon.

Goodnight, Paladin. :)

thatsafactjack on May 3, 2013 at 2:05 AM

Nite Jackie – don’t work so hard on vacation.

Schadenfreude on May 3, 2013 at 2:07 AM

Carnival Cruz has zero chance of being president. I’d say he also has zero chance at the nomination. Seeing that this is Palin, Cain and Santorum country, I’d just thought I tell you to spare yourselves of supporting this jack@ss.

rubberneck on May 3, 2013 at 6:33 AM

rubberneck on May 3, 2013 at 6:33 AM

cheer up. sun’s out.

renalin on May 3, 2013 at 6:47 AM

You can tell Cruz is a Conservative by the reaction of the “Romney Supporters”…HA’s equivalent of Rush’s “Seminar Callers”.

O/T: “Florida Sheriff Wants Citizens to Find Someone Who Hates Obama…and Rat on Him” My take.

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 6:50 AM

You can tell Cruz is a Conservative by the reaction of the “Romney Supporters”…HA’s equivalent of Rush’s “Seminar Callers”.

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 6:50 AM

Yeah, all those Democrats who spent November and December lecturing Republicans just what kind of candidate they needed to support (think blimp-sized NJ jackasses) have morphed somewhere along the line into “Romney supporters.”

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 6:58 AM

cheer up. sun’s out.

renalin on May 3, 2013 at 6:47 AM

Not good news if rubberneck is a vampire or something.

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 6:59 AM

You can tell Cruz is a Conservative by the reaction of the “Romney Supporters”…HA’s equivalent of Rush’s “Seminar Callers”.
kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 6:50 AM

Oh, really? I know a lot of Romney supporters who support Cruz.

Kingjester, I don’t like how you think you are in a position to say who is and who isn’t a conservative. That’s all you ever do. “Well, if you don’t agree with me, then you are not a conservative.” Apart from parroting Mark Levin, that’s all you do or say on here.

NEWSFLASH: it is possible to be conservative and disagree with Cruz’s style. I happen to love Cruz. But I don’t go around proclaiming people “not real conservatives” if they don’t feel the same way.

I will say, though, that Palin groupies, like you, have embarrassed yourselves terribly whenever Cruz’s name pops up. You guys try to piggyback on his newfound fame by saying things like, “Palin is who we should thank for Cruz,” when that is hardly the case.

bluegill on May 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM

Yeah, all those Democrats who spent November and December lecturing Republicans just what kind of candidate they needed to support (think blimp-sized NJ jackasses) have morphed somewhere along the line into “Romney supporters.”

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 6:58 AM

When liberals ‘heart’ a Pub candidate, find someone else to vote for.

Liam on May 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM

NEWSFLASH: it is possible to be conservative and disagree with Cruz’s style. I happen to love Cruz. But I don’t go around proclaiming people “not real conservatives” if they don’t feel the same way.

bluegill on May 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM

NEWSFLASH: People who post this kind of crap only define conservatism along fiscal grounds and hate social conservative matters. They’d trip overthemselves rushing to vote for amnesty for illegals or same-sex marriage because they don’t differ with liberal Democrats on those issues. They then go about demonizing the Republicans who dare stand up for traditional values. They are no better than the filthiest of the supporters of the rat-eared coward.

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 7:21 AM

When liberals ‘heart’ a Pub candidate, find someone else to vote for.

Liam on May 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM

Heh! I knew the 2008 elections were over when the WaPo endorsed McCain in the primaries. Of course they endorsed the rat-eared coward in the general but by that time their work was done.

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 7:23 AM

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 7:21 AM

+1000

I define my personal Conservatism as adherence to Original Intent of the Constitution.

Liam on May 3, 2013 at 7:25 AM

Heh! I knew the 2008 elections were over when the WaPo endorsed McCain in the primaries. Of course they endorsed the rat-eared coward in the general but by that time their work was done.

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 7:23 AM

The liberal media keep trying to set the narrative. Some of us know better than to listen to that!

Liam on May 3, 2013 at 7:26 AM

bluegill on May 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM

Wait. The very poster who always tries to speak for “all Conservatives” is accusing me of what she does all the cotton-pickin’ time?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha…I can’t breathe…hahahahahahahaha!

Oh, that’s rich! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

It’s the big one, Elizabeth! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Log – eye – cinder- mine. Un-bu-lievable PDS.

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 7:26 AM

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 7:21 AM

Right on! Right on!

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 7:28 AM

I can’t think of a single state that Cruz would win that Romney didn’t. In fact, Cruz would lose North Carolina, too.

I enjoy 200 EV beatings. So please, ladies and gentlemen, proceed.

inklake on May 3, 2013 at 7:34 AM

inklake on May 3, 2013 at 7:34 AM

You’re a masochist, then?

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM

I can’t think of a single state that Cruz would win that Romney didn’t. In fact, Cruz would lose North Carolina, too.

I enjoy 200 EV beatings. So please, ladies and gentlemen, proceed.

inklake on May 3, 2013 at 7:34 AM

I can’t think of anything more futile and ridiculous than to make claims about how an election three and a half years off is going to shake out.

Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 7:39 AM

You can tell Cruz is a Conservative by the reaction of the “Romney Supporters”…HA’s equivalent of Rush’s “Seminar Callers”.

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 6:50 AM

As Romney’s pre-eminent supporter on this site, I fully support Cruz and believe he has the education, intelligence and courage to take on Obama and his slack jawed media. Cruz will be a very effective conservative leader. Your time would be better spent asking why Hot Air puts up an unflattering photo of Cruz where he has a silly smirk on his face and looks like he’s wearing lipstick.

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 7:40 AM

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 7:40 AM

Thank you for your advice, Basil. I reject it in the same snotty spirit in which it was given. How’s President Romney doing?

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 7:42 AM

Ted Cruz’s “problem” is that when he walks into any room, he’s the smartest guy in that room. He IS the sharpest knife in the drawer.

The democrats and RINO republicans know this. Since they can’t say he is dumb, he has to be evil. That’s the playbook.

p.s. Cruz should challenge Jen Rubin to run for office. She has an awful lot to say for someone not in the game.

monalisa on May 3, 2013 at 7:42 AM

I can’t think of a single state that Cruz would win that Romney didn’t. In fact, Cruz would lose North Carolina, too.

I enjoy 200 EV beatings. So please, ladies and gentlemen, proceed.

inklake on May 3, 2013 at 7:34 AM

Minnesota.

We just kicked the snot out of the demorat-controlled state legislature on their stupid gun bill, and the taxes they are looking to hit us with are about as popular as having your legs removed with a chainsaw. We’re tired of the crap here and wide open for fiscal sense.

Bishop on May 3, 2013 at 7:53 AM

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 7:40 AM

Thank you for your advice, Basil. I reject it in the same snotty spirit in which it was given. How’s President Romney doing?

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 7:42 AM

I’m not surprised. You are a slow learner.

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 7:56 AM

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 7:40 AM

you say that your still proud to be a supporter of romney, when it’s clear now that he was just a stalking horse for obama.

*facepalm*

renalin on May 3, 2013 at 8:01 AM

How can one intuit which states Cruz would win or lose? I guess campaigns make no difference. All we need to do is ask some idiot leftist commenting on HotAir.

MPan on May 3, 2013 at 8:03 AM

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 7:40 AM

you say that your still proud to be a supporter of romney, when it’s clear now that he was just a stalking horse for obama.

*facepalm*

renalin on May 3, 2013 at 8:01 AM

You are another slow learner who spends more time attacking Republicans than Obama. I don’t particularly like Cruz but I will support him wholeheartedly because of his education and professional background, his platform and because he has the best chance of uniting conservatives and defeating the cancer in Washington.

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 8:08 AM

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 8:08 AM

ohhhhhh, i get it now. everyone else is “slow learner” except you.

an ivy league law degree and for the squishes, thats all it takes, and its amore.

ROFL

renalin on May 3, 2013 at 8:25 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66-G00_8NEI

Like a big pizza pie. That’s amore.

renalin on May 3, 2013 at 8:27 AM

I can’t think of anything more futile and ridiculous than to make claims about how an election three and a half years off is going to shake out.
Happy Nomad on May 3, 2013 at 7:39 AM

Amen. Must be why your called “happy”.
Some though live for it, will spend hours upon hours, doing such.

bazil9 on May 3, 2013 at 8:29 AM

Basil did a nice hack job on fellow cons here
last year…quite rich.
Even stalking bmore, page to page.

bazil9 on May 3, 2013 at 8:31 AM

How can one intuit which states Cruz would win or lose? I guess campaigns make no difference. All we need to do is ask some idiot leftist poster commenting on HotAir.

MPan on May 3, 2013 at 8:03 AM

Ain’t just the trolls Bud.

bazil9 on May 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM

williamg on May 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM
Sarah Palin?
Not any more.
*Y’all still better leave my senator alone!*

annoyinglittletwerp on May 3, 2013 at 8:52 AM

Basil, you want to run a Left-leaning squish like Romney again, and you call Conservatives “slow learners”?

Wow.

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 9:02 AM

Ok, KJ, I think I might have misunderstood your comment a bit. You put “Romney supporters” in quotes for a reason, right? Meaning people who aren’t truly Romney supporters? I thought you were taking a swipe at those people who supported Romney.

Anyway, regarding Cruz, will shall see now things play out and how the primary campaigns go. People like intake who are already counting EV’s don’t have much to go on and seem a bit silly. Unless a candidate has already been on a national ticket and floundered terribly and later resigned from office before completing a single term (anyone know of someone like that?), it’s hard to know three years out what kind of national candidate they will be.

bluegill on May 3, 2013 at 9:17 AM

bluegill on May 3, 2013 at 7:11 AM

It seems that bluegills can never get over her Palin phobia.

Even while begging Palin supporters to follow her.

cozmo on May 3, 2013 at 10:06 AM

*Y’all still better leave my senator alone!*

annoyinglittletwerp on May 3, 2013 at 8:52 AM

Cruz? Who is this Cruz guy folks are ranting about?

Is he an affirmative action thing?

cozmo on May 3, 2013 at 10:07 AM

You can tell Cruz is a Conservative by the reaction of the “Romney Supporters”…HA’s equivalent of Rush’s “Seminar Callers”.

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 6:50 AM

As Romney’s pre-eminent supporter on this site, I fully support Cruz and believe he has the education, intelligence and courage to take on Obama and his slack jawed media. Cruz will be a very effective conservative leader. Your time would be better spent asking why Hot Air puts up an unflattering photo of Cruz where he has a silly smirk on his face and looks like he’s wearing lipstick.

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 7:40 AM

Basil, you want to run a Left-leaning squish like Romney again, and you call Conservatives “slow learners”?

Wow.

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 9:02 AM

As I said kingsjester, you are a slow learner. Thanks for proving my point.

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 11:39 AM

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 11:39 AM

Denial is not just a river in Egypt.

kingsjester on May 3, 2013 at 11:50 AM

Hokey or not, I like Ted Cruz. Many of his “talking points” are actually taken right from the Constitution of the USA, highly recommended reading.
I beg your pardon, if I missed it, but I didn’t see anyone mention that Ted Cruz cannot run for President in 2016 because he was born in Canada. Or is that yet another law that the current administration refuses to uphold?

Libertylea on May 3, 2013 at 1:26 PM

I didn’t see anyone mention that Ted Cruz cannot run for President in 2016 because he was born in Canada. Or is that yet another law that the current administration refuses to uphold?

Even though he was born in Canada, although his father is (or was)a Cuban exile, his mother is an American citizen, so it carries to Ted. It’s whether “natural born” also means exclusively born on U.S. soil.

hawkeye54 on May 3, 2013 at 1:43 PM

Palin and Cruz, in that order, are the new leaders of the conservative movement.

fight like a girl on May 3, 2013 at 2:10 PM

You are another slow learner who spends more time attacking Republicans than Obama. I don’t particularly like Cruz but I will support him wholeheartedly because of his education and professional background, his platform and because he has the best chance of uniting conservatives and defeating the cancer in Washington.

Basilsbest on May 3, 2013 at 8:08 AM

I don’t particularly like Cruz but I will support him wholeheartedly because of his education and professional background, his platform and because he has the best chance of uniting conservatives and defeating the cancer in Washington.

I support that. Can’t recall your comments regarding Romney, but it’s water under the bridge now anyway. I’m certain everyone, including myself expressed our opinions and reasons, for or against him.
It’s a new day & R’s & D’s are both against Americans & our Country.

That’s my 2 cents.

bluefox on May 3, 2013 at 2:18 PM

Let’s not get too rambunctious here. Cruz is hardly a Washington outsider. In fact he is the poster boy for an inside the beltway pol. Harvard/Princeton/Clerked at the Supreme Court. In fact, in Texas his conservative Bona Fides are even in queston. Nothing like a well oil machine and a compliant press.

georgeofthedesert on May 4, 2013 at 6:48 PM

terrific, can’t wait for the traffic jam. i hope i see the campaigner in chief’s motorcade so i can give him the middle finger

burserker on May 6, 2013 at 5:29 PM

Every single last bit is predictable if you follow the logic of Hosanna Tabor.

StubbleSpark on May 11, 2013 at 2:04 AM

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6