Quotes of the day

posted at 8:51 pm on May 4, 2012 by Allahpundit

“Back in his Wisconsin district today to hold a series of listening sessions, House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan commented on President Obama’s latest campaign mascot, a hypothetical woman whom the campaign calls ‘Julia.’ Ryan called the imaginary character ‘creepy,’ and called the idea of creating a fictional woman dependent on the government ‘demeaning.’

“‘It suggests that this woman can’t go anywhere in life without Barack Obama’s government-centered society. It’s kind of demeaning to her,’ Ryan said. ‘She must have him and his big government to depend on to go anywhere in life. It doesn’t say much about his faith in Julia.’…

“‘It really shows the philosophical premise they operate from, which is — I think Romney coined it well — it’s a ‘government-centered society.’ You have to have government at every stage of your life to be there for you, otherwise, you’re going to fail. It’s promoting a cradle-to-grave welfare society,’ said Ryan.”


“Julia’s central relationship is to the state. It is her educator, banker, health-care provider, venture capitalist, and retirement fund. And she is, fundamentally, a taker. Every benefit she gets is cut-rate or free. She apparently doesn’t worry about paying taxes. It doesn’t enter her mind that the programs supporting her might add to the debt or might have unintended consequences. She has no moral qualms about forcing others to pay for her contraception, and her sense of patriotic duty is limited to getting as much government help as she can…

“The point of view of ‘The Life of Julia’ is profoundly condescending. It assumes that giving people things will distract them from larger considerations of the public weal — the economy, debt, the health of the culture. This view’s infantilizing tendency is captured by Obamacare’s insistence that, for purposes of health insurance, young adults are children who belong on their parents’ policies until the age of 26. It devalues self-reliance and looks at us less as independent citizens than as drab Julias, bereft without the succor of our life partner and minder, the state.”


“My story? I’ve founded three web ventures over the past eight years without a penny of taxpayer money or government venture socialism. We free-market-centered small-business women can ‘grow the local economy’ and raise our children and improve our schools just fine without the meddling, patriarchal hand of President Obama taking credit for our every last success.

“After hyperventilating for months about the Republican ‘war on women,’ Democratic new-media gurus inadvertently have exposed the real Barack Obama: a chauvinistic control freak who would tether every last woman and child to his ever-expanding, budget-busting Nanny State.

“Mamas, for the sake of your family’s freedom and our republic’s survival, don’t let your babies grow up to be ‘Julia.'”


“The most shocking bit of the Obama story is that Julia apparently never marries. She simply “decides” to have a baby, and Obama uses other people’s money to help her take care of it. Julia doesn’t appear to be poor; at various points the story refers to her glamorous career as a Web designer, and it makes no mention of her benefiting from poverty programs like Medicaid or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.

“In 1999 Lionel Tiger coined the word ‘bureaugamy’ to refer to the relationship between officially impoverished mothers of illegitimate children and the government. ‘The Life of Julia’ is an insidious attack on the institution of the family, an endorsement of bureaugamy even for middle-class women.”


“How might Julia’s son, whom she names Zachary, fare in a post-Obama world? Herewith ‘The Life of Zachary.’

“Age 5: Zachary starts kindergarten. Julia drops Zachary off at his first day of public kindergarten. She is surprised and perplexed to find that despite the hefty local property taxes she pays, the class is large. While Zachary is at school, Julia does some Googling and finds that more and more of her taxes pay for pension and health benefits for retired teachers, not for salaries for current teachers. She wonders vaguely whether all that money from the federal government will really help Zachary…

“Age 25: Zachary meets a nice girl. Zachary meets a woman at work (his employer has taken a legal chance on this hardworking young lady). But in getting to know her, Zachary learns that she has $70,000 in student loans, plus $10,000 in credit-card debt. She makes about the same salary that Zachary does. Zachary likes her, but he can’t help but worry that if he got serious with her, he would be taking on a tremendous debt burden. Zachary often thinks long-term; he realizes that if he married her in a few years, both of them would have to work full-time, even if they had children, in order to stay current on the debt. They remain friends.”

“Age 42: Zachary’s mom calls him, crying. Julia is 73 now. She likes working, so she wasn’t too upset when the government abruptly pushed the Social Security retirement age for full benefits back five years, to 72. But now that she’s been collecting benefits for a year, she realizes that what she collects isn’t enough to live on. She’s more upset, though, at the reforms to Medicare that have just been enacted. Though generations of politicians promised never to touch benefits for people close to retirement age, in the end, they had no choice: younger voters demanded it. The basic Medicare package now will cover only big-ticket items. All but the poorest are on their own when it comes to doctor’s visits, prescription drugs, and tests.”


“‘I would love to see the DNC or somebody follow up with a ‘Here’s what life under the Romney-[Paul] Ryan plan would be like for Julia,” said Finney. ‘She’d be in the grave by her mid-30s I can almost assure you.'”


Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Via the Examiner.


Via Mediaite.


Click the image to watch.

Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air



Trackback URL


Julia, a dependent, subservient citizen of a social system that echoes the names and objectives of Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Mao, Chavez and now — Barack. He really is an obamanation…

Gohawgs on May 5, 2012 at 3:26 AM

Soda and pie, for all…

Gohawgs on May 5, 2012 at 3:30 AM


DHChron on May 5, 2012 at 6:05 AM

It’s the ant and the grasshopper tale fitted to the human form and it does upset some people just as much as the truth.

mixplix on May 5, 2012 at 6:22 AM

Wasn’t it Julio who was blubbering his gratitude towards Obama back in the 2008 campaign? I guess that he was neutered for this go round. The testicle-lock-box castration surgery has been accomplished in Obama’s brave new world.

onlineanalyst on May 5, 2012 at 6:34 AM

Can someone please tell me the difference between this:

“Waaaaah, Rush Limbaugh made a sexist comment about Sandra Fluke, Clear Channel MUST drop him immediately!”

and this?

“Waaaaah, Jehmu Greene made a racist comment about Tucker Carlson, FOX News MUST drop her immediately!”

Because I’m not seeing one, and that disturbs me.

In just one week, Jehmu Greene, Julia, Karen Finney, Debbie Whatshername Schultz, Juan Williams, Elizabeth Warren, Lawrence O’Donnell, OWS Tools, MoveOn.Org Morons, and Obama himself, have done more to expose the idiocy, hypocrisy, and danger of the progressive agenda than anything the RNC could have come up with themselves.

Yet, some of you want them silenced? Just when not only are the scales falling from the eyes of the voting public, but also some members of the media?


I say hell no! Let them spew and continue to expose not only the nakedness of the emperor – but his entire ideology.

Flora Duh on May 5, 2012 at 7:22 AM

My take.

kingsjester on May 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM

“‘I would love to see the DNC or somebody follow up with a ‘Here’s what life under the Romney-[Paul] Ryan plan would be like for Julia,” said Finney. ‘She’d be in the grave by her mid-30s I can almost assure you.’”

Yes, because before dreamy Baraka Obama and his magic, big-government programs came along, barely any Americans ever lived past the age of 35.

Hey Finney, here’s a clue: most Americans don’t want a life of big-government dependency inspired by the dreams of Obama’s Kenyan Commie 100%-income-tax father. We prefer the life of self-reliance, personal responsibility, and success limited only by our own imaginations and efforts that was envisioned by our own fathers, a/k/a the Founding Fathers.

AZCoyote on May 5, 2012 at 8:04 AM

I say hell no! Let them spew and continue to expose not only the nakedness of the emperor – but his entire ideology.

Flora Duh on May 5, 2012 at 7:22 AM

Good point. I concur. As long as the hits keep coming against their philosophy and agenda, I’m all for it.

ExpressoBold on May 5, 2012 at 8:32 AM

I would prefer to see Ryan — and Romney — use the phrase “government-controlled society” rather than “government-centered society.” It is more accurate. The left doesn’t seek to put government at the center of society, which can be inferred my many as a positive; it seeks to use government to CONTROL every aspect of Americans’ lives, cradle to grave. Their vision is all about a wide scale loss of freedoms. Ryan and Romney need to say so.

Rational Thought on May 5, 2012 at 8:52 AM

generations of politicians promised

Here’s our biggest problem.

All but the poorest are on their own when it comes to doctor’s visits, prescription drugs, and tests.”

This is the way it used to be when I was growing up. We weren’t poor, my dad had a job, but when you went to the doc, he treated you and you paid him out of your own pocket. This changed when I went to work and the unions got us benefits. Now they call health care a right. In one generation we have become dependent on this right.

Kissmygrits on May 5, 2012 at 9:24 AM

‘The Life of Julia’

Obama is our first Druggy President. Whether or not he is actually *still* using drugs — my best guess is that he is — he continues to exhibit the mind, intellect and physical actions of someone who most certainly is still a druggie who is still using and/or who has never reached a recovery stage (so, thus, isn’t actually “sober” in any recovery sense — even if he’s “stopped” with substances, and I don’t think he has, but even if he has, he hasn’t realized any improvement in his state of mind or emotions, his overall psychology, so, thus, he’s not recovered, he’s stuck in his “druggie state of mind”).

He’s benefiting greatly from a lot of multi-billion dollar advisers and benefits of all sorts, including fawning admirers and such along with all the materials bestowed on him and at his use, and what shows instead by this guy, Barack Obama/Barry Soetoro, whatever his actual name is, is that he’s just a very high-using user. Still lost in his druggie “dreams of composites”.

Lourdes on May 5, 2012 at 10:07 AM

Still lost in his druggie “dreams of composites”.

Lourdes on May 5, 2012 at 10:07 AM

Yes, the next edition of his autohagiography is to be released with a revision: Composite Dreams of My Father. Or was that Dreams of My Composite Father?

de rigueur on May 5, 2012 at 10:31 AM


aic4ever on May 5, 2012 at 11:02 AM

She was born to be ruled.

Isn’t it simpler this way? Isn’t this what she wanted?

StubbleSpark on May 5, 2012 at 4:07 PM

An excellent parody:


unclesmrgol on May 5, 2012 at 6:00 PM

Dim. This is the only to describe the whole Julia is creepy thing. If we are going to take back America this first thing we need is brains. Please try and grow some. Quick reacting the the Dems. Come up with something other than ‘I made and anyone who can’t is creepy’

Observation on May 6, 2012 at 12:19 AM

Why is Barak Obama “President” throughout her whole freaking life? As if I didn’t need another example for my crazy tin-hat notion there won’t be an election this fall. Very subtle, I see what you did there Marxist dictator wanna-be. Creepy indeed.

quiz1 on May 6, 2012 at 4:18 AM