Is Obama really in trouble with young voters?
posted at 7:21 pm on April 26, 2012 by Karl
There has been a wavelet of stories from outlets like The Atlantic, The Hill and Yahoo! suggesting Pres. Obama could be in trouble with the youth vote. The Atlantic’s Molly Ball notes:
Less than half of 18-to-24-year-old voters want Obama to win reelection, and he leads a generic Republican candidate by just 7 percentage points, according to a survey of youth voter attitudes released Thursday by the Public Religion Research Institute and Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs.
The poll did not test Obama against Romney directly, but found more enthusiasm for Obama than Romney. The Hill’s Amie Parnes found a somewhat different result in another poll:
Obama leads presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney 60 percent to 34 when it comes to the youth vote, according to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll. But Obama’s enthusiasm has taken a nosedive, the poll shows. In 2008, 63 percent of 18- to 34-year-olds took a big interest in the election. Four years later, 45 percent have the same level of interest, reflecting the most sizable drop in one of the major voting groups.
Yahoo’s Chris Moody reports on yet another survey:
The wide-ranging survey of 3,096 18-29 year-olds conducted by Harvard University’s Institute of Politics shows 43 percent said they plan to vote for Obama in November, while just 26 percent plan to vote for Romney. The last time Harvard matched Obama against a GOP challenger, in December 2011, they asked who young voters thought would win the election: 36 percent said Obama would lose, a sign that support for Obama is increasing closer to the election.
***
However, Obama’s approval rating has dipped by six percentage points from Obama’s first year in office, according to a Harvard poll taken in November 2009, from 52 percent to 58 percent. That could be a sign that the youth vote is far more up for grabs in 2012 than it was in 2008, when Obama overwhelming won the youth vote.
As John Sides notes, these types of stories should always be read in the context of a number of polls, as well as the broader population and other demographics. Sides notes that a recent Pew poll has Obama over Romney 61%-33% among 18-29 year-olds, in comparison to Obama’s 66%-33% victory with the demographic in the 2008 exit poll. Those numbers are better for Obama than some of the polls cited above, but what Sides notes is that Obama’s numbers now are down 3%-5% among all of the age demographics from the 2008 exit poll results. Moreover, as Andrew Gelman notes, nonuniform swings are difficult to detect in a survey, because they have a larger margin of error. In short, Obama’s problem with young voters is likely reflective of Obama’s problem with voters generally.
So why is Obama wooing college students and slow jamming the news with Jimmy Fallon at taxpayer expense this week? Because Team Obama, like most everyone, is anticipating a much closer election in 2012 than in 2008. If Obama were to drop from 66% to the level of youth support John F. Kerry got in 2004 (~54%), he would lose ~2% of the overall vote, which he likely cannot afford. We cannot know this for certain. Obama’s 2008 performance with young voters was tied in part to his boost in performance and turnout of minority voters. Conversely, we do not know whether the Republican-leaning youth vote was particularly depressed. While the latest raft of polls might look like Obama’s youth vote has softened, the GOP should not take it for granted any more than Obama does.
Update (Allahpundit): One more data point for you. New from Gallup:

That 64/29 split is right in line with O’s margin over McCain in 2008, which is a testament to the amazing durability of his appeal to young voters. Even after four years of economic dreck, with recent college grads facing a brutal job market, they’re still his strongest age demographic by far. I think Romney’s strategy with respect to young adults during this campaign will be simply to avoid giving Obama any powerful wedge issues to get them excited. That’s why he sided with O on extending the student-loan interest rate and against the congressional GOP. He knows he’s going to lose this demographic by 30 points; his best bet at neutralizing them is making sure they have no strong reason to turn out. Judging by Gallup’s numbers, it’s working so far.
This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The foxes are guarding the fox house. I don’t think there are any hens left.
The Rogue Tomato on May 17, 2013 at 12:38 PM
When did the IRS hire Jerry Lundergaard from Fargo?
Terp Mole on May 17, 2013 at 12:38 PM
shawked
phatfawzi on May 17, 2013 at 12:38 PM
It explains why the new acting commissioner was coincidentally promoted a few days before: he was their fall guy.
blammm on May 17, 2013 at 12:40 PM
This is NOT a good or decent person.
Jabberwock on May 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM
Is Miller a tax cheat also?
docflash on May 17, 2013 at 12:42 PM
Wait… If they staged it they knew the internal report and decided to damage control it…
That had to come from above and the one person who had the lost at stake said he didn’t know about it because the report wasn’t released yet…
Skywise on May 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM
so if i get this right? the department that makes sure were all honest LIED? OK i get it. Just wanted to make sure.
phatfawzi on May 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM
“Targeting, Congressman Brady, is what right wing whackos like Sarah Palin does, with pictures of targets and all, and we didn’t use any pictures.”
TXUS on May 17, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Great reference. I’ll take it farther: Government has arranged to kidnap its own “wife”- and taxpayers are father-in-law Wade, who’s expected to come up with the ransom money.
Bat Chain Puller on May 17, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Horrible Customer Service
Bwahahahahahahaha
TAKE’n from a man’s labor … no different from slavery..
tooo bad them slave owners n da south didn’t practice “good customer service”
roflmmfao
donabernathy on May 17, 2013 at 12:45 PM
These people (liberals in charge) have no conscience. They believe government is the answer, and therefore only have to answer to themselves. It’s all a big party, complete with hats and hooters.
kirkill on May 17, 2013 at 12:46 PM
Man it is hard to not go on a profanity laced rant in these comments.
CycloneCDB on May 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM
Every American citizen should watch this hearing to see who will be in charge of their most personal medical information…!!!!!!!!!!!!
d1carter on May 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM
It’s a pipe dream, but Congress should reciprocate the contempt the IRS commissioner showed Congress today and completely defund the entire IRS organization! That would hopefully get their attention…
geojed on May 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM
Is the government throttling our comments here at HA…? Slow down…!
d1carter on May 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM
Taxpayers aren’t the ‘customers’ of the IRS. They are the EMPLOYERS of the IRS.
Resist We Much on May 17, 2013 at 12:48 PM
This guy is really restoring my faith in big government!
/sarc
I can’t wait to find out what “bad customer service” looks like under ObamaCare.
gwelf on May 17, 2013 at 12:49 PM
So your faking this from top to bottom, and we’re supposed to trust you to be completely honest and forthright from now on?
On a sidenote, except for a few brief appearances by libfree to yap about a black church being burned down in 1802, this week has been low-troll. Curious.
Bishop on May 17, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Can’t wait.
Who’s The Racist? The Most Racist Countries In The World And The Answers Will Surprise Only The Race-Mongers
Resist We Much on May 17, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Is everyone testifying about the IRS being put under oath?
slickwillie2001 on May 17, 2013 at 12:49 PM
WHAT ‘HONESTY’ AND ‘CREDIBILITY’?
GarandFan on May 17, 2013 at 12:50 PM
Rep Mike Kelly just finished up…..the gallery erupted in applause.
CoffeeLover on May 17, 2013 at 12:50 PM
No retirement – jail. No pension, no healthcare plan, just fines and imprisonment. For a *shitload* of IRS people, damnit.
Midas on May 17, 2013 at 12:53 PM
Democrats’ solution: We should outsource this to phone operators in Mexico. And any phone operator and every remote family member can have U.S. citizenship.
BuckeyeSam on May 17, 2013 at 12:53 PM
In a just world this guy would be led from the hearing in handcuffs…
d1carter on May 17, 2013 at 12:53 PM
The House GOP, if they had any balls at all (yeah, I know) need to do a few things immediately.
Voting to repeal ObamaCare is fun and all, but we know it goes nowhere in the Senate (at least for now).
DEFUND it. Starve the beast.
And we’d better start having some serious discussions about a total revamping of the tax code- eliminate the income tax, and start de-funding the IRS while you’re at it.
Enough already.
ICanSeeNovFromMyHouse on May 17, 2013 at 12:55 PM
This.
Let’s see how many of them howl and scream their way to the top of the problem when faced with real punishment.
VibrioCocci on May 17, 2013 at 12:56 PM
The Conservative customer is always WRONG …
- IRS motto
ShainS on May 17, 2013 at 12:56 PM
The Tea Party weren’t “Targeted”.
They were just zeroed in on for IRS harassment.
portlandon on May 17, 2013 at 12:58 PM
I don’t know if it’s the fact that I grew up hearing stories from my grandparents about the communist Russia that they escaped as German Russians, but today’s hearings brought tears to my eyes. I can’t believe this is my country and the country my grandparents were so proud to become citizens of and my father fought for in WWII. Please, someone tell me we can be saved.
lea on May 17, 2013 at 12:58 PM
Even though it’s risible in the context, I’d give the IRS Commish a break on “horrible customer service.” Given the nature of all large organizations — with their mission statements and accompanying objectives to service “customers” and other stakeholders — that’s much how IRS leadership undoubtedly sees it.
But sadly, it just shows how out of touch managers in large organizations can be.
bobs1196 on May 17, 2013 at 12:58 PM
yeah, but what a fire it was!
I think sesquapredictable mentioned something about being out of pickled baby’s feet.
kirkill on May 17, 2013 at 1:00 PM
These poor IRS people are just doing the jobs that “normal” Americans won’t do.
kirkill on May 17, 2013 at 1:00 PM
Not mentioned here is this is the fellow Hillary brought in to arrange for the IRS audits of the Clinton women and enemies. Remember? And here he was, back at the IRS and that did not raise suspicion?
pat on May 17, 2013 at 1:05 PM
This charlatan was promised his great pension, and all the bennies, in exchange for all the lies.
How does any sane person believe a single word from these thugs?
Schadenfreude on May 17, 2013 at 1:06 PM
I missed that one. I remember something about shrubbery and reading up on Korean pickled cabbages, though.
rogerb on May 17, 2013 at 1:07 PM
>>Customer service
Please don’t
tazeaudit me brobbordwell on May 17, 2013 at 1:07 PM
“I want to give unelected bureaucrats like Steve Miller more power and more authority over my life, and especially my children’s lives! Big Government FTW!” -Average Dem voter
visions on May 17, 2013 at 1:07 PM
I’d have to check my notes – Miller
You have notes on that?
Ummm…No – Miller
You just said you have notes on that meeting…Now you’re saying you don’t have notes?
workingclass artist on May 17, 2013 at 1:08 PM
1. In re-ed
2. Intoxicated from all the crap
3. Working harder…’cause sugah daddy’s in trouble
Schadenfreude on May 17, 2013 at 1:09 PM
Please detail the contents of your prayers – IRS
workingclass artist on May 17, 2013 at 1:10 PM
Carnac the magnificent holds the envelope to his head.
“How did the man working on his rain gutter fall down?”
The Rogue Tomato on May 17, 2013 at 1:11 PM
It’s Rush Limbaugh’s Fault
Democratic Caucus & Il Duce’s motto
workingclass artist on May 17, 2013 at 1:12 PM
It’s mealy-mouthed bureaucrats like this that make me wish I was serving on this committee. It would give me perverse pleasure to reduce this guy to tears with the worst dressing-down he’s ever gotten.
CurtZHP on May 17, 2013 at 1:12 PM
IRS…Your Shadow Government at Work
workingclass artist on May 17, 2013 at 1:13 PM
Carnac the Magnificent holds the envelope to his head.
“When should Obama resign?”
The Rogue Tomato on May 17, 2013 at 1:14 PM
PLEASE make Kelly’s statements and applause available, HA !
Didn’t record it, and hubby needs to see/hear it !!!
pambi on May 17, 2013 at 1:14 PM
Having dealt with the IRS about back taxes, I can affirm that it does indeed have horrible customer services. You will never get the same answer from different phone reps about the same question. You often get contradictory answers, in fact. But each time they’ll insist the current answer is Gospel truth.
I remember I had a payment agreement setup that I was running late on. “Submit payment by X date or the agreement will be canceled,” they said. Now, it costs over $100 to set one of those things up (don’t ask me why) so I really didn’t want to have to do it again. So I went online and submitted my payment before X date. However, it didn’t post to their system until after X date. They said the agreement was canceled.
“No,” I said, “As you can see I submitted the payment on time. There shouldn’t be a new agreement.”
“The system canceled your agreement, so you need a new one,” they replied.
“But I paid on time. I paid before the deadline. I shouldn’t have to do this.”
And on and on it went for weeks. Finally, they re-instituted the original agreement. But, my God… I almost feel bad for the people working there. It’s like critical thought has been beaten out of them. That or the IRS simply hires people who don’t think.
Could be the latter…
selderane on May 17, 2013 at 1:15 PM
This is much worse than Watergate as potentially millions of voters were denied by the IRS the truth about this administration.
bucknut on May 17, 2013 at 1:16 PM
pat
at 1:05
Do you have where you got the info that Miller did a audits of Clinton women for Hillbeast.
If so there is a possible this is the Clintons depth charge they let go on Obama, after they figured Obama was going to blame her for Benzazie…..
APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 17, 2013 at 1:17 PM
So…ummm…
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/report-irs-deliberately-chose-not-fess-scandal-election_724711.html
I’m going to say it again. Shut. It. Down.
NOW.
Chris of Rights on May 17, 2013 at 1:17 PM
When Obama prances around the country shouting to businesses…You didn’t build that…
It’s not so strange.
Miller and likely most of the IRS crew are leftists.
The Dept. of Treasury has their own Union…and they contribute mostly to the DNC and democrats…
In 2012 Union membership gave $1,000 to republicans and over $100,000 to democrats.
workingclass artist on May 17, 2013 at 1:18 PM
“Fundamentally change America”…we’re going to have to take apart this government one Fascist/Socialist/Commie at at time.
It will take years to overcome the effect Dear Leader has had on our country and its media.
d1carter on May 17, 2013 at 1:18 PM
Yes, but it requires speaking out when you least want to and be willing to endure the consequences of speaking out.
darwin on May 17, 2013 at 1:18 PM
I sense Jarrett’s fingerprints in this mess. Lerner has to go, and Sarch Hall Ingram needs to be re-assigned or fired. Will not stand letting her oversee the Obamacare agenda. Cannot be trusted.
Amazingoly on May 17, 2013 at 1:19 PM
Well the IRS just ought to update their phone system to do the following:
If you are a member of a conservative group, Press 1.
If you are a associated with a Jewish group, Press 2.
If you plan to protest Planned Parenthood, Press 3.
If you plan to oppose Green Energy, Press 4.
If you plan to protest Obamacare, Press 5.
And the recording upon pressing those options simply ought to state, you are now being transferred to Homeland Security. I mean the IRS leaders talk about poor customer service and the reason they targeted conservative groups was to be more efficient. I mean, lets provide some solutions here and cut out the middle man. /
rsherwd65 on May 17, 2013 at 1:19 PM
The concept that citizens are the “customers” of the IRS is strange. The IRS is not a business with customers.
Is there any business in the private sector that could jail you and seize your private property for not using their services and giving them money?
visions on May 17, 2013 at 1:19 PM
Is Congress permitted to Waterboard witnesses to get a truthful answer to the question asked?
meci on May 17, 2013 at 1:20 PM
A customer is someone who voluntarily comes to you for a mutual exchange of good or valuable consideration. The IRS seizes property at the point of a gun. I’m not your damn customer, pal, and I want you to be a federal prisoner.
RadClown on May 17, 2013 at 1:24 PM
Really, the “customer service” term says all you need to know.
We really and truly have lost the concept of government of and by the people. I totally agree with shutting it down. This is insane.
ORconservative on May 17, 2013 at 1:26 PM
Time for decimination of the IRS (yes, in the military sense)
One out of ten employees from the division are fired at random. Only those that come clean will be spared.
blammm on May 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM
You want to know how deeply the IRS lies? They send people to prison who figure out that filing tax returns are completely voluntary according to Treasury Department regulations and the IRS Manual. In fact, the IRS does more than lie. They ruin honest peoples’ lives. THAT’s what they do. The good news: if you know how to fight ‘em, they back off. Trust me.
HiJack on May 17, 2013 at 1:30 PM
Like when Sarah Palin talked about some House Democrats “targeted” for defeat.
But unlike Sarah Palin, whose political opinions are well-known, the IRS is supposed to be a politically neutral agency which collects taxes according to the laws voted by Congress.
Since the Tea Party, Patriot, and other conservative groups supported Republicans over Democrats, weren’t they “targeted” in the Sarah Palin sense?
Customer service? A customer is a person who buys something of value from a seller. What has the IRS ever sold to us for our taxes? If the IRS wasn’t a government agency with the power to collect taxes, no one would buy anything from the IRS!!!
This is not “horrible customer service”. This is coercive use of government power for political purposes.
Exit question for Steven Miller: Who told you and the IRS to do this?
Steve Z on May 17, 2013 at 1:32 PM
OK,
So, this Miller was the goong the Clintons sent to audit Judical Watch back in the 1980′s.
So, I smell revenge on Obama on this by the Clintons.
If true, this would be huge imnsho.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 17, 2013 at 1:32 PM
Gotta wonder: was Jim Crow just a matter of horrible customer service?
matt curtis on May 17, 2013 at 1:33 PM
dictatorship
secret police
state controlled media
and more
who the hell will stand up for The United States?
losarkos on May 17, 2013 at 1:34 PM
What a day for HA to be broken…
d1carter on May 17, 2013 at 1:34 PM
Is it still America?
Schadenfreude on May 17, 2013 at 1:36 PM
Washington Examiner May 14, 2013 by Paul Bedard
Deja vu: IRS boss of Tea Party probes targeted anti-Clinton groups in 1990′s..
connections
APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM
This is the Orwellian Newspeak of the Obama Administration. Like taxpayer subsidies to the Solyndras and Fisker Karmas of the world are “investments” in clean, green energy. With a rate of return of negative 100%.
If we the “customers” of the IRS are the coerced “investors” in Solyndra et al. and Obama’s wonderful windmills and choo-choo trains, WE DEMAND OUR DIVIDENDS!!! NOW!!!
Steve Z on May 17, 2013 at 1:43 PM
I guess it depends on our definition of “America”, but as far as I’m concerned it hasn’t been America for a long…long…time.
HiJack on May 17, 2013 at 1:43 PM
So who was the plant at the ABA conference, that asked Lerner about targeting certain groups?
Was this a member of the media – willing to play along? Or some political hack, that just slipped in to ask the question?
Hill60 on May 17, 2013 at 1:50 PM
This – make it go around, a million times over.
Schadenfreude on May 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM
This might sound familiar to you: Back in the USSR
What we have now discovered about Barack Obama and Eric Holder’s America, if we didn’t already know it, is that any belief in a benign and decent government in this country is absolute horseshit. Liberalism has been revealed as a fascist joke.
slickwillie2001 on May 17, 2013 at 2:19 PM
APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 17, 2013 at 1:17 PM
http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-boss-of-tea-party-probes-targeted-anti-clinton-group-in-1990s/article/2529533
I asked FNC to check it out since the hearning didn’t address it.
amr on May 17, 2013 at 2:24 PM
Lighter moment???!!! Yous gotta be kidding me. False analogy.
CUSTOMERS, in this case, do not have a choice of not patronizing their provided service.
Sir Napsalot on May 17, 2013 at 2:25 PM
I’ve been a government employee before. This is a failure of management. Rank-and-file IRS agents know exactly what they’re supposed to do and not supposed to do. They would not have done this without directives, I don’t care what the numbers say about party affiliation. This rot goes deep.
alwaysfiredup on May 17, 2013 at 2:51 PM
NYT: Official Says Treasury Dept. Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012
Resist We Much on May 17, 2013 at 3:19 PM
Every time I see a photo of Steve Miller I always think about this episode form the Three Stooges (hint: tarantula)
OxyCon on May 17, 2013 at 3:39 PM
You know who else had bad customer service?
Kermit Gosnell.
myiq2xu on May 17, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Tea Party
Just thought I would use fowl words on the internet….
APACHEWHOKNOWS on May 17, 2013 at 5:26 PM
More “horrible customer service” from Democrats.
Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on May 18, 2013 at 1:10 AM