Will Jan Brewer make the veepstakes short list?

posted at 5:21 pm on April 25, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Which direction will Mitt Romney go in selecting his running mate?  The Hill suggests that Romney will look for a “mini-me,” someone much like himself, as his track record as an executive in the private sector indicates:

Mitt Romney is on the hunt for a vice presidential candidate, and if his years running Bain Capital are any indication, he might be looking for a version of himself.

In his roughly 25 years at Bain, Romney tended to hire mini-Mitts — smart, ambitious, clean-cut and a little awkward, according to those who dealt closely with the men.

Romney built the private equity firm, a spinoff of the consulting firm Bain & Co., from the ground up in the mid-1980s, bringing on several people who would help him turn it into an investment giant.

“First-rate brain power, first-rate analytical power. These were sometimes kind of geeky people,” said Howard Anderson, a senior lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s school of business who invested with Bain as an entrepreneur. “They were not often people who would be elected class president.”

That would tend to favor people with extensive executive experience, which leaves out the legislators on the short lists of the commentariat.  However, that would tend to strengthen the hand of some of the governors on the GOP bench, including Tim Pawlenty, whose name has gotten more mention as of late.  Allahpundit gave a good rundown of Pawlenty’s appeal to Romney last night, but the strongest argument for Pawlenty is that no one would doubt his readiness to assume the Presidency if disaster struck.  He’s been a pretty good campaigner who had one bad moment in a debate last year, and Pawlenty also signed onto Team Romney quickly after getting out and has been working hard (if quietly) since for Romney’s nomination.  Bobby Jindal also fits the profile suggested by The Hill, and has a little more connection to the conservative base, and Bob McDonnell in Virginia as well.

If Romney wanted to roll the dice a bit, perhaps he needs to look further west.  In my column today for The Week, I present a case for Jan Brewer that would entail more risk, but perhaps more reward as well:

Brewer has a record of fighting the federal government and the media. After Brewer signed a bill from the state legislature requiring law-enforcement officers to check residency status when arresting or detaining criminal suspects, Obama’s Department of Justice filed suit against the state. To the cheers of conservatives, Brewer fought back, later writing a book to bolster her case, and squared off against open-borders advocates in the media.

Nor is that the only fight Brewer has picked with the Obama administration and the media. She called a special session of the legislature to get authorization to hire outside counsel to join the lawsuit against ObamaCare, after Goddard refused to do so. Brewer also pushed for gun-rights legislation that eventually removed the permit requirement to carry guns, making Arizona one of only three states in the nation to do so. Brewer also oversaw deep cuts in social programs in order to resolve a $4 billion budget deficit, although that also included increases in some taxes.

Given Romney’s vulnerabilities with the base on immigration, health-insurance mandates, and gun rights, Brewer might be just the kind of candidate that could get the Tea Party back on board. A Brewer nomination might also force the Obama campaign to retire the “war on women” attack line. It would also firm up Romney’s standing in Arizona, as one poll this week suggested that the Republican nominee wasn’t garnering much enthusiasm in this transitioning interior-West state.

There is some downside to Brewer, too.  She has had to retract a couple of her arguments on border security in the past two years, but that’s probably not enough to make her a liability in and of itself.  Brewer is a hardliner on immigration, though, and that could complicate Romney’s efforts to woo the Latino vote away from Obama.  It might also provide him some cover to back Marco Rubio’s upcoming efforts on immigration reform by solidifying his credentials as a borders-first candidate.

The choice depends on whether Romney feels the need for a game-changer in late summer.  If the winds are already blowing favorably, Romney’s not likely to take a risk in selecting a running mate, and will go with a candidate who matches up well with himself.  If Romney needs more unity from the base, though, he may consider an outside-the-box choice of a candidate who has already been battle-tested against the administration — and that could put Brewer and Rick Perry in play.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

That didn’t take long, did it?

Liam on April 8, 2013 at 7:25 PM

Any alternative plan proposed by a Democrat is simply going to be “raise and create more taxes”, not reform or reduce them.

catmman on April 8, 2013 at 7:27 PM

speaking as the resident Jindalista….Coward

annoyinglittletwerp on April 8, 2013 at 7:28 PM

OT: Drudge Headline: THE 1,500-PAGE IMMIGRATION BILL?
—–

On Jindal, keep it up Bobby, I’m still with ya. You’re moving the Overton window and that’s all to the good.

Dusty on April 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM

GONE: TAX REFORM AND PERFORM

HERE: TAX COMPROMISE AND DEMISE

Varchild on April 8, 2013 at 7:32 PM

State Rep. Katrina Jackson, D-Monroe, said she and other members of the Black Caucus would propose an alternative plan.

LMAO – taxing whitey to add to Obama’s stash doesn’t qualify as a serious plan.

Daemonocracy on April 8, 2013 at 7:35 PM

People just do not like the idea of swapping income tax for sales tax.

It feels like a con, and you’re going to pay more via sales than income.

budfox on April 8, 2013 at 7:35 PM

And I am disappointed Jindal has backed off so soon, but who knows, maybe he’s asking for what he knew he couldn’t get to force some kind of reform.

Daemonocracy on April 8, 2013 at 7:36 PM

5.88% is less sales tax than Michigan’s 6%

Varchild on April 8, 2013 at 7:37 PM

“Working together” with demorats means one thing to them: Bend over.

Bishop on April 8, 2013 at 7:37 PM

I know plenty of people who would love to swap a sales tax for an income tax.

At least you can control the amount of money you give to the state with a sales tax. Most day to day stuff is exempted (food primarily). With a sales tax you at least have control of where and how much.

With an income tax, it’s involuntarily confiscated and most of it is wasted.

Don’t see what the big deal would be.

catmman on April 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM

Steel Bendy Straw Spine.

portlandon on April 8, 2013 at 7:40 PM

“State Rep. Katrina Jackson, D-Monroe, said she and other members of the Black Caucus would propose an alternative plan.”

I suppose there isn’t a White Caucus in the Louisiana Legislature or I would have seen an expose of the endemic racism of the South.

Drained Brain on April 8, 2013 at 7:43 PM

Jindal backs off of his tax reform plan: “Let’s work together”

lolololololololololol.

Even the crazy fringe conservatives who live in LA are seeing the light. For a while i could have sworn they were for paying their bosses taxes as long as said bosses promised to keep them on the job.

HotAirLib on April 8, 2013 at 8:06 PM

Bobby, Bobby, you must at least start on the “Right” side, then you can move closer to the center. If, as most of you tend to do, start in the middle, you always move left…always!

rgranger on April 8, 2013 at 8:08 PM

Getting rid of the Income Tax would be a boon for Louisiana. His critics were just that critical of any idea as they have none of their own.

Grunt on April 8, 2013 at 8:29 PM

job.

HotAirLib on April 8, 2013 at 8:06 PM

…BLOW

KOOLAID2 on April 8, 2013 at 10:14 PM

…so how is he different?

KOOLAID2 on April 8, 2013 at 10:21 PM

Just for shits’n'giggles, I did an experiment with the taxes where I live.

I used an online tax tool to fill out annual income taxes as if I were a single mom with two kids making $40,000 per year, living in Toronto (Ontario, Canada), and paying $950 per month in rent. I took advantage of every deduction that she could get for her kids. I then assumed that all money left after income tax and rent is spent on taxable goods at our current sales tax rate of 13%. I did not try to take into account items that don’t have sales taxes, like basic groceries.

I then calculated what would happen if there was no income tax and, instead, just a 20% sales tax. Assuming that the mom spends everything after rent on taxable goods (again, not trying to account for non-taxable items like staple foods), she pays a total of… $2000 a year less in total taxes with the sales tax-only approach.

Whenever I argue for eliminating income taxes and moving to a higher sales tax, my left-leaning cow-orkers always freak out and call me a racist, a Nazi, and so on.

Then I show them the math.

Then I ask them why they hate single moms.

Then they stop talking to me.

Lickmuffin on April 8, 2013 at 11:49 PM