Romney had best fundraising month in March

posted at 3:41 pm on April 20, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Not that it matters now, but Mitt Romney had his best fundraising month of the primary campaign in March, raising more than $12 million.  His campaign report shows a fiscally-sound balance sheet and plenty of cash on hand:

 The Romney campaign today announced that it hauled in nearly $12.6 million in the month of March – the largest amount they have raised since the former Massachusetts Governor entered the presidential race. …

Romney has so far only raised money for the Republican primary. It was recently reported that the Romney campaign will begin working with the Republican National Committee with a goal of raising $800 million to use against the president in the general election.

Romney ended the month of March with no debt and nearly $10.1 million cash on hand. The campaign did not announce how much it had spent in the month, though it is expected that its expenditures have continued to decrease from the $18.7 million and $12.3 million spent in January and February respectively, when he was battling both Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum for the Republican party’s nomination.

And just to remind people what it means for a candidate to partner with the party, MSNBC offers this reminder:

Eye-popping donations totaling $50,000 or more have taken the place of the relatively meager $2,500 checks to Mitt Romney’s campaign now that the former Massachusetts governor has pivoted to the general election.

The $2,500 figure might be most familiar to political observers as the maximum possible contribution to a candidate allowed by law.

But things aren’t quite that simple.

The most generous political donors might write checks totaling $38,500 — or as much as $50,000 — to gain access to the most exclusive fundraisers for either Romney or President Obama. Romney’s begun to attend these fundraisers, including a notable one on Sunday evening.

Why the change? And how is it legal? The answer lies in the so-called “Victory” funds set up by the Obama and Romney campaigns, each in concert with their respective national party committees and select state party organizations. The structure is designed to make it easy for the richest donors to write the largest possible checks to their candidate of choice.

Er … “how is it legal”?  Did anyone at MSNBC ask that question a year ago, when the Obama campaign began doing the very same thing?  This has been going on since last spring with the DNC and Team Obama.  In fact, neither one has specified how much each got of their joint $53 million haul from March.

Even without that kind of help, Romney has raised $87 million over the last year for the primary fight — while only having 11% of their donors max out for the first stage.  Romney and the RNC will get a late start, but they may catch up very quickly, especially considering Team Obama’s burn rate.  Even after raising perhaps $200 million over the last few quarters, they only had $85 million cash-on-hand at the end of March.  Romney has $10 million and no debt, and a good chance to close the gap rapidly.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Seamus would be proud…

PatriotRider on April 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM

Yeah, but Romney’s got an unfair advantage. Obama’s gotta jet all over the country on official business while squeezing in the occasional fundraiser.

/

Doughboy on April 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM

yuck and ick . . .money is important but substance is what really counts.

Palin or Perry/West 2012

Pragmatic on April 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

Ed, I understand your “not that it matters now” comment. I do however think it does matter ‘now’.

reddevil on April 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM

Yeah, but….cookies!

a capella on April 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM

That will buy a lot of dog food.

JPeterman on April 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM

Angryed put Romney over the top. Don’t let him fool y’all.

cozmo on April 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM

Perry/West 2012

Pragmatic on April 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

You’d have better luck with unicorns/skittles 2012.

cozmo on April 20, 2012 at 3:54 PM

Pragmatic on April 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

Damn,..you’re tiresome.

a capella on April 20, 2012 at 3:54 PM

expenditures have continued to decrease from the $18.7 million and $12.3 million spent in

Money that would have been better spent kinking Bammys skinnt ass. F the primary process.

sheikh of thornton on April 20, 2012 at 3:55 PM

Damn,..you’re tiresome.

a capella on April 20, 2012 at 3:54 PM

Yep

sheikh of thornton on April 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM

Eye-popping (R) = unexpected (D)

VietVet_Dave on April 20, 2012 at 3:59 PM

Pragmatic on April 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

Fer crissakes…give it a rest.

NeoKong on April 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

Selling Access Early Equals Big Money. Crony Capitalism Lives In Both Parties Now, which is why need Sarah Palin to Drain The Swamp. Conservatives will never have the Republican Party as long as Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie can raise $100 Million Fast. The Republican Party is a Lost Cause. Mitt Romney, Kar lRove, and Ed WG illespie’s Bundlers/Donors Are The Crony Capitalists That Will Own America if Romney Wins. There are plenty of Solyndras in the waiting for Mitt Romney too.

CoolChange80 on April 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

Pragmatic on April 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

Damn,..you’re tiresome.

a capella on April 20, 2012 at 3:54 PM

Amen!

JPeterman on April 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

yuck and ick . . .money is important but substance is what really counts.

Palin or Perry/West 2012

Pragmatic on April 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

Your handle is a complete misnomer. If you were truly pragmatic, you’d be jumping on the Romney train at this point to defeat Obama.

Bitter Clinger on April 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

MSDNC:

Republican Victory Fund = “Eye-popping” donations

Democrat Victory Fund = …… crickets

Bitter Clinger on April 20, 2012 at 4:04 PM

“Did anyone at MSNBC ask that question a year ago, when the Obama campaign began doing the very same thing?”

They were too busy quoting scripture…

Seven Percent Solution on April 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM

CoolChange80 on April 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

And… that would be orders of magnitude worse that what we have been living thru?

Given the choice, I’d rather have Romney “own” America rather than the current pResident.

VietVet_Dave on April 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM

This cycle was the first time since George W. Bush ran the first time against Gore that I have donated to the RNC. For the last two election cycles (2004 and 2008) I have been giving directly to the candidates.

I gave on gop.com last week. I also donated more to the Romney campaign than I have donated to any presidential campaign in my life. This isn’t as much a flaming endorsement of Romney as it is to show how critical I believe it is to purge Democrats from government at all levels this cycle.

It is absolutely imperative that we not only get Obama out of the White House, but also clean Democrats out of the Senate and in various state races. The Gov. Walker and state Senate recalls are also going to be critical. It is again, absolutely imperative that the Democrats go down in flames in that effort.

This is more important than just a presidential campaign to me, this is a struggle for our country. I would request that people be as generous to our party and candidates as their economic situation will permit. Even $10 will make a huge difference. Obama and the Democrats are destroying my country. We have to get rid of them.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM

Selling Access Early Equals Big Money. Crony Capitalism Lives In Both Parties Now, which is why need Sarah Palin to Drain The Swamp. Conservatives will never have the Republican Party as long as Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie can raise $100 Million Fast. The Republican Party is a Lost Cause. Mitt Romney, Kar lRove, and Ed WG illespie’s Bundlers/Donors Are The Crony Capitalists That Will Own America if Romney Wins. There are plenty of Solyndras in the waiting for Mitt Romney too.

CoolChange80 on April 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

I sure hope Palin has a restraining order against you.

GOPRanknFile on April 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

To counter Romney, Barry will be hosting a fundraiser where hot dog will be served. He was also considering serving snake during that event, but he still need Axelrod until November.

galtani on April 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

Selling Access Early Equals Big Money. Crony Capitalism Lives In Both Parties Now, which is why need Sarah Palin to Drain The Swamp. Conservatives will never have the Republican Party as long as Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie can raise $100 Million Fast. The Republican Party is a Lost Cause. Mitt Romney, Kar lRove, and Ed WG illespie’s Bundlers/Donors Are The Crony Capitalists That Will Own America if Romney Wins. There are plenty of Solyndras in the waiting for Mitt Romney too.

CoolChange80 on April 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

Looks like you’re just a couple more Romney posts away from rocking in the corner and sucking your thumb.

changer1701 on April 20, 2012 at 4:16 PM

Palin or Perry/West 2012

Pragmatic on April 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

looks like angryazz and Pragmaticpenis are tag teaming us!

KOOLAID2 on April 20, 2012 at 4:22 PM

Hey, who are Romney’s biggest donars? Does anybody know? Last I heard he is keeping that information hidden. Why? What is Romney hiding?

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:23 PM

Hey, who are Romney’s biggest donars? Does anybody know? Last I heard he is keeping that information hidden. Why? What is Romney hiding?

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:23 PM

He is trying to protect AngryEd’s anonymity. Don’t rock the boat!

Bradky on April 20, 2012 at 4:26 PM

Sent my first donation a few weeks ago when the nitwits on the left went after Ann Romney.

Mitt won’t have the luxury of virtually all of the MSM protecting him, hiding his gaffes, reciting his talking points like the lapdogs will for Obama.

bailey24 on April 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM

Richard A. Grenell has been named “national security and foreign policy spokesman” for presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. He is very close to John Bolton. Grenell is highly-respected and would be in the running to become Ambassador to the United Nations or NSA adviser.

What will cause the ears to pick up on the Left? Grenell is OPENLY gay.

“But, but, but, Mitt Romney is a homophobe!!!”

Resist We Much on April 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM

Looks like you’re just a couple more Romney posts away from rocking in the corner and sucking your thumb.

changer1701 on April 20, 2012 at 4:16 PM

The Romney supporters always have to make it personal, dissent is blasphemy for Koolaid drinkers.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:33 PM

changer1701 on April 20, 2012 at 4:16 PM

He is just one or two gallup polls favoring Romney away from posting 10,000 word manifestos.

Bradky on April 20, 2012 at 4:34 PM

He is just one or two gallup polls favoring Romney away from posting 10,000 word manifestos.

Bradky on April 20, 2012 at 4:34 PM

Another typical Romney supporter, smearing their opponents instead of making substantive arguments in favor of their crappy candidate.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM

Just wait until Rmoney™’s next month. It will be huge! The enthusiasm is building, slowly but surely, Rmoney™!

Bmore on April 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM

Just wait until Rmoney™’s next month. It will be huge! The enthusiasm is building, slowly but surely, Rmoney™!

Bmore on April 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM

Definitely. If Romney starts looking like a winner, all of Obama’s cronies will switch to Romney and take the path of least resistance. Business is business.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:42 PM

Another typical Romney supporter, smearing their opponents instead of making substantive arguments in favor of their crappy candidate.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM

When someone dribbles out tripe as coolchange did as easily as a baby has the runs, making fun of it is almost necessary.

Bradky on April 20, 2012 at 4:43 PM

all = many

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:43 PM

I sure hope Palin has a restraining order against you.

GOPRanknFile on April 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

HA!

alchemist19 on April 20, 2012 at 4:43 PM

The Romney campaign today announced that it hauled in nearly $12.6 million in the month of March – the largest amount they have raised since the former Massachusetts Governor entered the presidential race. …

At $12.6 million a month, Romney could raise $88 million by November…a little south of $800 million, unless the RNC can help him Romney speed things up dramatically.

On the bright side, Romney can now spend his money attacking Obama, instead of Santorum and Gingrich. Hope he’s got a good ad writer!

Steve Z on April 20, 2012 at 4:43 PM

This is more important than just a presidential campaign to me, this is a struggle for our country. I would request that people be as generous to our party and candidates as their economic situation will permit. Even $10 will make a huge difference. Obama and the Democrats are destroying my country. We have to get rid of them.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM

Just a little O/T but today Scott Rasmussen spoke at a PAC meeting for a large corporation today and I was there. What a nice man. He said (without being partisan) that we will begin to see a dynamic shift in this country that is going to change the way America looks right now. He did not get into specifics but he did say that this election cycle was going to be brutal and nasty and basically said it is a fight between how American was founded and the direction Obama wants to take us. He said he is an optimist by nature and also said that in his polls 80% of Americans polled still hold to traditional American values. That was very comforting to know. After hearing him and knowing that he sees the “inside” of politics, I’m feeling less and less apprehensive about this election and more and more hopeful. The media would have us believe that we are in the minority but after hearing Scott this morning, we are definitely NOT in the minority.

After my rambling what I meant to say is I wholeheartedly agree with you. Romney was not my first choice but I will work for his campaign, I’ll put signs in my yard, I’ll give my hard-earned money to help any way I can because the soul of America is at stake.

AmayasNana on April 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM

I think that Obama and Romney probably have a lot of the same donors in common already.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM

On the bright side, Romney can now spend his money attacking Obama, instead of Santorum and Gingrich. Hope he’s got a good ad writer!

Steve Z on April 20, 2012 at 4:43 PM

He really doesn’t need one. Just stay the course on “record” while Axelgrease prefers to talk about non-existent silver spoons, dogs, and cookies.

VietVet_Dave on April 20, 2012 at 4:47 PM

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM
Doh kay. Yew is so funny. Ha, ha, ya done got em.

Rusty Allen on April 20, 2012 at 4:48 PM

The Romney supporters always have to make it personal, dissent is blasphemy for Koolaid drinkers.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:33 PM

I’m sorry…say something, child?

changer1701 on April 20, 2012 at 4:49 PM

I think that Obama and Romney probably have a lot of the same donors in common already.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM

Seriously? It’s called Google. opensecrets.org

VietVet_Dave on April 20, 2012 at 4:49 PM

crosspatch
________________________

Well said.

Little donations will certainly add up.

Obama must go. Time to support our nominee.

bailey24 on April 20, 2012 at 4:51 PM

basically said it is a fight between how American was founded and the direction Obama wants to take us. He said he is an optimist by nature and also said that in his polls 80% of Americans polled still hold to traditional American values.

AmayasNana on April 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM

That may be true, but Romney supports the unconstitutional NDAA bill, he doesn’t represent traditional America values, he is a jackboot. That what that bill is about, giving the President jackboot authority.

Romney is one of only two politicians in the history of America to implement an individual mandate, which is a violation of our individual liberty and rights. It forces every citizen to purchase products and services from the companies that donated to Romney’s campaign, and Obama’s. Romney supported bailing out the corrupt Wall Street banks and GSE’s that were in bed with the government in a corrupt, crony-capitalism relationship that crashed our economy and bankrupted our future.

If the American people want to preserve traditional American values, we’re going to need somebody other than Obama/Romney.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:56 PM

Doh kay. Yew is so funny. Ha, ha, ya done got em.

Rusty Allen on April 20, 2012 at 4:48 PM

I’m sorry…say something, child?

changer1701 on April 20, 2012 at 4:49 PM

I must be over the target.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM

So lets see the list of all of Romney’s big-money bundlers. Let’s see why he won’t release his taxes until just before the election, the worst possible time.

Let’s not make the same mistake the Democrats made with Obama and nominate a hope and change candidate that hasn’t even been properly vetted.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:02 PM

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:02 PM

Someone gave you the link to find out exactly who and how much. Go check it out or are you afraid of what you will discover.

always get a chuckle from posters demand others do their research for them as if they were ordering a big mac at the drive through…

Bradky on April 20, 2012 at 5:05 PM

Seriously? It’s called Google. opensecrets.org

VietVet_Dave on April 20, 2012 at 4:49 PM

Does it include the information requested here just a few days ago?

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:10 PM

If the American people want to preserve traditional American values, we’re going to need somebody other than Obama/Romney.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 4:56 PM

If what you say is true (and I have no reason to not believe you….I’m just not going to google what you are talking about now), then what Mr. Rasmussen said is also true…..there is a change coming and its starting at the bottom and if Romney is as horrible as you say he may be, We The People are not going to tolerate it. He did not say Romney will bring the change….he did not say Obama was going to bring the change….he said We The People are going to bring the change. Our job as Americans is to continually take the fight to Washington to effect change in a positive way. I will not give up hope in my belief that the majority of Americans are sensing some bad, bad stuff and they are not going to take it lying down anymore. That’s the message I believe Scott was trying to say. He also said that attitude of “We The People” started with the bailouts in 2008 and it has been gaining steam ever since. He also said things are going to get much worse before they get better. I don’t know if he meant between now and the election or until this “change” he senses coming happens. Could be November could be five years from now.

AmayasNana on April 20, 2012 at 5:12 PM

Summary: Mitt Romney on National Defense

Complete the non-nuclear ballistic missile defense system.
Increase defense budget to 4% of GDP (gross domestic product).
Add 100,000 more troops to our armed forces.
Repair or replace military equipment lost in Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.
Work to better protect ourselves from cyber-attack.
Increase number of naval vessels and aircraft to levels needed to do their missions.
Terrorists should not have access to our civil courts or be imprisoned on U.S. soil.

The NDAA portion that he agrees with is to detain terrorists without a lawyer. This would be used against declared terrorist organizations. But I do share the concern that anyone could get declared a terrorist organization.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=D1yY3NCiMVQ

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM

Americans are sensing some bad, bad stuff and they are not going to take it lying down anymore.

AmayasNana on April 20, 2012 at 5:12 PM

I hope you’re right, but I don’t believe it’s so or else they wouldn’t let crony-capitalists force them to chose between Obamacare or Romneycare.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:17 PM

Anyone attempting to put Obama and Romney in the same political boat is a complete and utter moron.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:19 PM

Anyone attempting to put Obama and Romney in the same political boat is a complete and utter moron.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:19 PM

I agree!!!

AmayasNana on April 20, 2012 at 5:21 PM

Anyone attempting to put Obama and Romney in the same political boat is a complete and utter moron.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:19 PM

Oh, sure, it’s not like they’re the only two politicians in the history of the country to pass an individual mandate.

But in fact they are the only two.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:26 PM

moron.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:19 PM

Another Romney supporters reducing the debate to petty insults, just like Obama’s supporters. Insults and strawmen is all they have to fight with because their candidate is so bad.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM

But I do share the concern that anyone could get declared a terrorist organization.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM

If you share my concern then help me defeat all the jackboot politicians that support the NDAA.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:32 PM

angryed wants to see the poll on this.

FlaMurph on April 20, 2012 at 5:36 PM

If you share my concern then help me defeat all the jackboot politicians that support the NDAA.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:32 PM

And re-elect Obama? Not a freaking chance. Moronic blather. We just have to keep Democrats out of positions where they can label political opponents as “terrorists”. Only Democrats would do something like that.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM

And re-elect Obama?

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM

No, he supports the NDAA just like Romney does. They’ve both disqualified themselves, obviously. Let’s vote for a candidate that represents American values instead of European.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:53 PM

Only Democrats would do something like that.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM

Oh, sure. /rolls eyes

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM

Let’s vote for a candidate that represents American values instead of European.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:53 PM

Your choices are Obama or Romney. Pretending otherwise is the work of Democrat trolls and the “intellectually disabled”.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:58 PM

No, he supports the NDAA just like Romney does. They’ve both disqualified themselves, obviously. Let’s vote for a candidate that represents American values instead of European.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:53 PM

I thought you had this explained to you clearly enough already. Ron. Paul. Will. NOT. Be. The. Nominee. Beyond that the fact of the matter is the winner of the upcoming presidential election will be either Barack Obama or Mitt Romney. It’s naive and childish to pretend otherwise.

I don’t like the NDAA any more than you do and Mitt was at least my fourth candidate but he’s what we have, he’s better than Obama by a mile and so that’s what we have to go with. You can pout and pound your fists and cry if you want to but it does nothing to change the situation.

alchemist19 on April 20, 2012 at 6:04 PM

Romney will now start raising the big bucks from here on out now that the Primary is over. That’s a big reason why we need it to end instead of dragging on for months simply to promote the vanity of Santorum or Newt.

Also, the fact that Romney is consistently beating Obama in Gallup polls means the big money is going to start flowing in his coffers. If Romney didn’t look viable and was getting shellacked in the polls, many contributors would see it as a lost cause and not worth the investment.

BradTank on April 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 5:26 PM
The medicare payroll tax is a mandate.

Rusty Allen on April 20, 2012 at 6:14 PM

Your choices are Obama or Romney. Pretending otherwise is the work of Democrat trolls and the “intellectually disabled”.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:58 PM

Your facts are simply wrong, there will in fact be more than Obama and Romney to chose from.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 6:21 PM

The medicare payroll tax is a mandate.

Rusty Allen on April 20, 2012 at 6:14 PM

Ah, so now the Romney Koolaid drinkers are coming out of the closet and are willing to defend the mandate, now that they incorrectly think Romney has the nomination wrapped up. Who didn’t see that coming? I sure did.

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 6:23 PM

I thought you had this explained to you clearly enough already. Ron. Paul. Will. NOT. Be. The. Nominee.
alchemist19 on April 20, 2012 at 6:04 PM

.
I didn’t think there were any Ron Paul nutters left in here. WTF?
Aren’t they all basically conscientious objectors in hiding refusing to go to Canada ?

FlaMurph on April 20, 2012 at 6:42 PM

To counter Romney, Barry bamstahhh !!!! you da man nnn bammy baby !!! love ya bary ol buddy ol pal !! yahh!!!.

galtani at 4:13 PM

cableguy615 on April 20, 2012 at 6:47 PM

I didn’t think there were any Ron Paul nutters left in here. WTF?
Aren’t they all basically conscientious objectors in hiding refusing to go to Canada ?

FlaMurph on April 20, 2012 at 6:42 PM

He was complaining yesterday about the Washington state GOP trying to stop the election of slates of Paul candidates at the county level and from there on to Tampa, and that’s the proof Romney doesn’t have it wrapped up.

I thought emotional attachment clouding out logic was reserved for the left. I stand before you a corrected man.

alchemist19 on April 20, 2012 at 6:48 PM

Anyone attempting to put Obama and Romney in the same political boat is a complete and utter moron.

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 5:19 PM

Exactly right.

cicerone on April 20, 2012 at 6:51 PM

FloatingRock on April 20, 2012 at 6:23 PM
I never defended a mandate, just pointed out your lie that there are no other mandates. I honestly think you paul nuts are the most annoying creatures since jar jar binks. He makes more sense as well.

Rusty Allen on April 20, 2012 at 7:24 PM

Rocks only float when they are full of empty space.

Just sayin’

crosspatch on April 20, 2012 at 8:35 PM

How much money does it cost to erase ones records? Both Mitt and 0bama need to do exactly that if they want to win. You see, America does NOT SUPPORT LIBERALISM!

DannoJyd on April 21, 2012 at 2:13 AM