Jay Carney: It’s absurd for the GOP to politicize these scandals that my side would surely politicize under a Republican president

posted at 7:21 pm on April 20, 2012 by Allahpundit

Skip to 4:39 below for a little Friday evening fake outrage, White House style. The gist:

Asked by CBS News’ Bill Plante whether, considering also the General Services Administration investigation, there’s been a “breakdown” in the White House’s oversight of federal agencies — as Palin, Sen. Jeff Sessions, and others have suggested — Carney replied, “Any assertion by those politicians that you mentioned should be valued by the cost that you paid for it. It is preposterous to politicize the Secret Service, to politicize the behavior of the terrible conduct of some soldiers in Afghanistan, in a war that has been going on for ten years.”…

“I think on the face of it is a ridiculous assertion that trivializes both the very serious nature of the endeavor that our military is engaged in in Afghanistan and the very serious nature both of the work the Secret Service does, the apolitical nature of the institution, and the seriousness of the investigation underway with regard to the Secret Service and the military and the incident in Colombia,” Carney said.

What do you think? Do you think the left and its media allies might weave a narrative or two if, under President Romney, in the span of a few weeks (a) a Secret Service advance team embarrassed the country by hiring hookers (three more agents resigned today), (b) the head of GSA had to resign due to obscenely lavish spending on a conference, and (c) photos of U.S. troops posing with jihadis corpses in Afghanistan surfaced? The “administration in chaos” headlines would fly, er, fast and furious instead of sporadic items like this that acknowledge Obama’s political problems from the scandals while spinning on his behalf. You don’t even need to bother with GSA and the Secret Service for this thought experiment, in fact. Imagine if Romney had doubled down on Afghanistan by sending tens of thousands of extra troops and then, after a few years of drift and Karzai corruption, suddenly we were hit by trophy photos, Koran-burnings, riots, fraggings, and finally an honest to goodness rampage by an American soldier. There’d be a lot of angry rhetoric out there about chickenhawks and empire and the length of deployments and the culture of wingnut warmongering that makes horrors like this possible. You don’t hear much of that now — and we all know why — but we will again just as soon as being anti-war becomes politically advantageous again for Democrats. So, with that in mind, enjoy Carney’s outrageous outrage, which wasn’t even the dumbest thing he said at today’s presser.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

barky isn’t a shooter, he’s more of a ball handler.

VegasRick on May 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM

Ouch. :)

Bob's Kid on May 21, 2013 at 1:11 AM

There would have been a major scandal if any member of the White House senior staff had learned of the IRS malfeasance, without any pursuant investigation or comparable action.

bayam on May 20, 2013 at 5:42 PM

Oh, if only dear leader Stalin knew of these atrocities he’d certainly stop them…

Pull the other one.

I agree with you, whether Barky knew or not is “Irrelevant”.

Except in my mind even if it’s the crew who scuttled her, the captain goes down with the ship. In your mind, he gets a promotion.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on May 21, 2013 at 1:41 AM

Obama, head of the Neo-Know Nothing Party.

Sgt. Schultz, chief of staff.

HOPE and CHANGE

I KNOW NOTHING, NOTHING!

profitsbeard on May 21, 2013 at 3:36 AM

Why bother the sock puppet? He’s busy shooting hoops.

mojo on May 20, 2013 at 5:28 PM

And all that practice shows. Two out of twenty-two. Not even Jason Collins is that bad.

Happy Nomad on May 20, 2013 at 5:31 PM

Oh, I so needed this. Thank you.

athenadelphi on May 21, 2013 at 4:15 AM

This is simply not believable. It seems Obama and his minions are all too young to have learned the lessons of Watergate.

claudius on May 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM

jimgeraghty ‏@jimgeraghty 4h

These abuses of the First Amendment wouldn’t be happening if we had a constitutional law professor as president.

That is precisely why they are able to use law as legal passes, such as “I don’t recall,” I did not know,” I drank too much tea” “No one informed me. I first saw this travesty on Fox none-news.”
Under oath, that would shift rapidly to: “Under advisement of my attorney, I plead the fifth amendment.”

Don L on May 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM

From the Sopranos:

It’s not good to go into the unknown, not knowin’.

claudius on May 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM

L*I*A*R

easyt65 on May 21, 2013 at 9:34 AM

Obama runs the white House like a terrorist cell! He probably uses couriers to communicate with his cohorts in other cells of the government! Find the couriers, water board them, and you’ve caught him in his crimes! Ha!

Marco on May 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM

There would have been a major scandal if any member of the White House senior staff had learned of the IRS malfeasance, without any pursuant investigation or comparable action.

bayam on May 20, 2013 at 5:42 PM

But what if the President not only knew about it, but started it…?

President met with anti-Tea Party IRS union chief the day before agency targeted Tea Party.

dominigan on May 21, 2013 at 10:24 AM

There would have been a major scandal if any member of the White House senior staff had learned of the IRS malfeasance, without any pursuant investigation or comparable action.

bayam on May 20, 2013 at 5:42 PM

But what if the President not only knew about it, but started it…?

President met with anti-Tea Party IRS union chief the day before agency targeted Tea Party.

dominigan on May 21, 2013 at 10:24 AM

Good question. Had this been any republican, bayam would call it proof, as undeniable as the sun rising in the east.

But bayam will simply pretend that it proves nothing, there is no smoke and therefore no fire. Hypocrite practices hypocrisy, who’s surprised?

On the other hand, bayam’s statement could be interpreted as stating that obama is responsible and should be held accountable. Is that what you’re saying bayam?

runawayyyy on May 21, 2013 at 10:40 AM

Two words: Valerie Jarrett

Pomai on May 21, 2013 at 1:37 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3