Economy slowing down?
posted at 11:01 am on April 18, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
The Obama administration got caught flat-footed a couple of weeks ago by an anemic job-creation report for March from the Department of Labor, and it looks as if that was no fluke. Two more economic indicators over the last 24 hours show at least a slowdown in the US economy — and potentially bad news for Barack Obama’s prospects in the next election. Manufacturing output dropped for the first time in four months, as Reuters reported last night:
Manufacturing output slipped for the first time in four months, dropping 0.2 percent, the U.S. Federal Reserve said on Tuesday.
The decline dragged on overall industrial production which was unchanged and fell short of analysts’ expectations.
“It looks pretty bad on the face of it,” said Tom Porcelli, an economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
Surging exports and efforts by companies to restock their shelves have made economic growth look more solid in recent weeks.
The factory data did little to change that view, but economists said it suggested the recovery lost a little steam at the close of the first quarter, in part due to headwinds from Europe’s debt crisis, which is weighing on global growth.
On top of that, residential housing starts plummeted 5.8% in March, although permits jumped by over 7%. Most of the decline came in multi-unit housing. Permits, however, sharply declined for private single-unit housing:
Privately-owned housing starts in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 654,000. This is 5.8 percent (±15.6%)* below the revised February estimate of 694,000, but is 10.3 percent (±14.6%)* above the March 2011 rate of 593,000.
Single-family housing starts in March were at a rate of 462,000; this is 0.2 percent (±12.6%)* below the revised February figure of 463,000. The March rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 178,000. …
Privately-owned housing units authorized by building permits in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 747,000. This is 4.5 percent (±1.1%) above the revised February rate of 715,000 and is 30.1 percent (±1.6%) above the March 2011 estimate of 574,000.
Single-family authorizations in March were at a rate of 462,000; this is 3.5 percent (±1.1%) below the revised February figure of 479,000. Authorizations of units in buildings with five units or more were at a rate of 262,000 in March.
The best that analysts could offer as positive spin was that the housing market is still trying to find a bottom, after predicting a slight increase to 705,000:
Some analysts speculated that a mild winter in the U.S. led homebuilders to start new projects ahead of schedule, and that March’s decline amounted to a payback.
“Weather was so mild earlier in the year we might have pulled some of the starts forward,” said Mark Foster, who helps manage $500 million at Kirr Marbach & Co. in Columbus, Ind. “But the trend looks good, it feels like the housing market is trying to form a bottom.”
However, the demand for purchases appears to have tailed off again. The Mortgage Bankers Association reports that purchase applications for mortgages dropped by over 11% last week, even though long-term rates declined. That did spur a spike in applications, but for refinancing rather than new buyers:
The Mortgage Bankers Association said its seasonally adjusted index of mortgage application activity, which includes both refinancing and home purchase demand, rose 6.9 percent in the week ended April 13.
The MBA’s seasonally adjusted index of refinancing applications surged 13.5 percent, but the gauge of loan requests for home purchases dropped 11.2 percent. It was the second week in a row purchases have declined. …
The refinance share of total mortgage activity climbed to 75.2 percent of applications from 70.5 percent the week before.
There isn’t too much mystery about this. Manufacturing slowdowns mean fewer new hires; fewer new hires means lower demand for home purchases, which leads to fewer housing starts, and all of that gets reflected in the mortgage application statistics. On top of that, the recent settlement on foreclosures will put more competitive pressure on new housing, as some potential buyers will aim for bargains in foreclosures and short sales rather than pay a premium for new housing.
Obama really needed to show some significant growth this spring. So far, it looks like the stagnation of the past two springs may be returning a third time.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Chuck Todd: The Obama administration is trying to “criminalize journalism”


House Oversight e-mails: IRS IG report was originally supposed to be released … last September?






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Sweet. How sweet it is.
Finally, Obama’s chikkinzzz are coming home to roost.
petefrt on May 19, 2013 at 8:22 PM
This.
When you have to plead incompetence to defend against charges of malfeasance, you know you might be in trouble.
petefrt on May 19, 2013 at 8:36 PM
ear relevant…
driguana on May 19, 2013 at 8:59 PM
Flush this lying tudd down the drain with the rest of the Obamacrap.
kemojr on May 19, 2013 at 9:34 PM
This was Dan Pfeiffer’s week in the barrel, like Susan Rice he was given the White House talking points and sent on a mission. He really needs to get copies of these tapes and watch them and see how foolish and unbelievable he looked and sounded. The White House is losing the little credibility it still had by sending these shills out every week trying to do damage control. Community organizers make poor leaders.
savage24 on May 19, 2013 at 9:42 PM
Pfeiffer’s statement that the law is irrelevant because the IRS conduct was “outrageous” and “inexcusable”, tells us all we need to know about this administration.
However, the follow-up should have been, “On what standard do you judge their conduct to be outrageous and inexcusable since the law is apparently not an appropriate standard?” (At least in Pfeiffer’s mind.)
What this comes down to is this: “if the Administrative deems something “outrageous” and “inexcusable,” then it is declared such. As we have seen in so many other areas, if the Administrative deems something to not be “outrageous” and “inexcusable,” then it is declared such.
In their mind, the law is – in fact – irrelevant. That’s what makes this situation so dangerous.
It’s not socialism. It’s worse.
EdmundBurke247 on May 19, 2013 at 10:36 PM
Irrelevant = “What Difference Does It Make?”
jaydee_007 on May 19, 2013 at 10:41 PM
A fitting capstone to Ed’s story about loss-prevention (aka employee theft) and management’s “permission structure” in this post.
(Not to mention the jaw-dropping statements of Eleanor Clift in this one.)
AesopFan on May 19, 2013 at 11:40 PM
I enjoy popcorn and hope it is a long week.
Drill and Fill on May 20, 2013 at 12:41 AM
Hey give Barky a break. He had to get his sorry ass out to Vegas.
tbear44 on May 20, 2013 at 4:49 AM
Of course they sent Pfeiffer out to do the Sunday shows. He was the most senior expendable staff member they had . . .
BigAlSouth on May 20, 2013 at 5:39 AM
Pfeiffer… The guy with the red shirt in the landing party…
Boudica on May 20, 2013 at 5:53 AM
Perfect!
lea on May 20, 2013 at 7:11 AM
Does anybody else remember the campaign in 2008 when Obama defended his lack of administrative experience by saying he was just so smart and tuned in that his instincts were better than experience. Someone needs to dredge up these sound bites and play then with the current line about the government being too large to control and that the White House only knows what it reads in the newspaper.
bartbeast on May 20, 2013 at 8:43 AM
If where the president was during the Benghazi crisis is “irrelevant”, then he wasn’t where one would expect the Commander-in-Chief to be. So, where was he? Was he watching a movie in the residence? Was he bowling? Or was he having a bi-curious outing with his good buddy Reggie Love? If Obama was AWOL, as I suspect he was, it is he who is irrelevant. This entire stinkin’ criminal Obama Regime must go and now!
SpiderMike on May 20, 2013 at 9:31 AM
If this continues all week, it will be ‘O’ himself doing the rounds on the Sunday talk shows – except for Fox, of course. (‘O’ can do everything better than everyone else as he has been known to say.)
He then gets the extra benefit that no one will challenge him like they have begun to do with his minions.
Carnac on May 20, 2013 at 11:00 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2