Poll: What was the Obamateurism of the Week?
posted at 9:00 am on April 15, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
Time again to take the extraordinary and unprecedented step of choosing the Obamateurism of the Week — you know, the step we take every Sunday. Don’t blow your opportunity to make a selection. We may only have the luxury of tweaking this historically-weak President for another nine months.
Previous weekly “winners” in 2012:
- “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”
- Blames Fox News for his unpopularity because “they hear Obama is a Muslim 24/7, and it begins to seep in”
- Attacks Limbaugh while remaining silent on Maher contribution to his super-PAC
- Says “when the chips are down, I have Israel’s back,” WH claims it’s not a military doctrine
- Apology to Karzai “calmed things down“
- Uses Boeing plant in SC to cheer manufacturing after his NLRB tried to shut it down
- Emphasizes graduation rates in SOTU, cuts DC voucher program that nearly doubled grad rates
- “Well, it turns out our Founders designed a system that makes it more difficult to bring about change that I would like sometimes.”
- Finds claim of unemployment “interesting” because he is getting “the word” that woman’s husband should have no trouble finding work
- Hails Roe as essential to allow “our daughters … to fulfill their dreams“
- Shuts down DisneyWorld in order to promote tourism
- “He didn’t want to take pictures with any more soldiers; he was complaining about it[.]
- Famous opponent of signing statements issues one covering 17 provisions of bill he signed
Previous Obamateurisms of the Year:
- Giving 2 minutes of “shout-outs” before getting to the Fort Hood shooting (2009)
- Obama leaves Clinton at press conference podium on tax deal to attend Christmas party (2010)
- “I would put our legislative and foreign policy accomplishments in our first two years against any president— with the possible exceptions of Johnson, F.D.R., and Lincoln.” (2011)
Got an Obamateurism of the Day? If you see a foul-up by Barack Obama, e-mail it to me at obamaisms@edmorrissey.com with the quote and the link to the Obamateurism. I’ll post the best Obamateurisms on a daily basis, depending on how many I receive. Include a link to your blog, and I’ll give some link love as well. And unlike Slate, I promise to end the feature when Barack Obama leaves office.
Breaking on Hot Air
NYT convinces itself Hillary is exciting and surprising while she remains same ol’ Hillary
The progressive agenda for 2016 : Much more spending, much less trade
Pew poll: Support for death penalty collapsing among Democrats, women
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Gotta be the Supreme Court since nearly 60% of the country in a recent poll said he was “trying to intimidate the Court.” That cannot possibly be the narrative he was going for. Major screw-up.
Rational Thought on April 15, 2012 at 9:04 AM
For the moment, I’m the single vote for #1, since I think it’s the closest one to being simply amateurish in nature.
I just think the rest are too intentional and calculated to fall into that category.
To each his own.
pambi on April 15, 2012 at 9:05 AM
The Supreme Court fiasco.
Another early favorite for OOTY.
VelvetElvis on April 15, 2012 at 9:07 AM
The SC thingy should have been retired as an all time winner like they retire names of really bad storms.
Kissmygrits on April 15, 2012 at 9:07 AM
SCOTUS idiocy. Not even close this week.
flipflop on April 15, 2012 at 9:11 AM
With luck, his loss in November will be the OOTY.
flipflop on April 15, 2012 at 9:13 AM
It’s really too bad this group of Obummers fell in the unusual two week accumulation period. Any one of the four might make the year’s top 10 if they had happened in separate voting periods.
EconomicNeocon on April 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM
Well, for the 1st time in many months, I did not have to ponder ..SC, hands down.
hillsoftx on April 15, 2012 at 9:16 AM
I voted #4 because it led to Rosen’s attack on Ann Romney. If Obama loses the election, Rosen’s attack might be the tipping point when Obama’s ship started sinking (shades of the Titanic). We’ll just have to wait and see what happens.
It does seem to me that Obama is making bigger mistakes these days. I wonder how all this is being perceived inside the White House. It’d be fascinating to listen in on the strategery meetings they’re having now
Gladtobehere on April 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM
Geez, we have to put up with this pompous jack a** for 9 more months?!!! At the rate he’s going, we may not have a country in 9 months.
Susanboo on April 15, 2012 at 9:22 AM
82.44% for Supreme Court.
That might be a record.
This might be the (hopefully) OOTY>
22044 on April 15, 2012 at 9:23 AM
*final OOTY* (hit submit too fast)
22044 on April 15, 2012 at 9:23 AM
If Obama loses??? I thought you all were so confident that even a ham sandwich would beat him. Thought Sketch was already measuring the drapes..
What happened? Starting to realize how out of touch you all are with regular Americans?
Uppereastside on April 15, 2012 at 9:23 AM
Gotta go with SCOTUS. Also, gotta cut old Bambi a break, though. After all, he grew up in the Far East and all he knows about the U.S. he learned from Frank Marshall Davis . . .
BigAlSouth on April 15, 2012 at 9:24 AM
Might even call it a strong majority.
Barnestormer on April 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM
.
KA-BOOM !!!!!!!!!!!!
.
And with that, El Presidente Degradar launches an assault on the Supreme Court of the United States.
ExpressoBold on April 15, 2012 at 9:31 AM
Rational Thought on April 15, 2012 at 9:04 AM:
Obummer is a major screwup. Everything he says and does is blatantly false or stupid. What a creep!
chai on April 15, 2012 at 9:32 AM
Supreme Court wins this one for me, but as usual the others are almost as bad. The Three Amigos is a really good one to show how ineffectual he is as a person and especially as a President. He has to go and soon.
BetseyRoss on April 15, 2012 at 9:32 AM
No all he knows about the US is absolutely nothing.
chai on April 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM
What I want to know is this: Who speaks for this guy, the backbone of America? http://themorningspew.com/2012/04/14/you-wouldnt-believe-the-shit-ive-seen-kid/
bloggless on April 15, 2012 at 9:36 AM
I think this will be the easiest Weekly pick. Usually I have a hard time choosing between 2 or 3 of them a week… but this one was a no brainier.
Supreme Court flub. His and fellow liberals mask slipped with that comment.
In fact, it scared me so much to the point where I am more willing to hold my nose and vote for Mittens. Not because he in my mind is a good option, but he more so is to what is currently in the WH.
watertown on April 15, 2012 at 9:37 AM
The man is courting disaster this week.
Actually, he’s always courting disaster, but he’s usually not so hamhandedly obvious about it.
backwoods conservative on April 15, 2012 at 9:39 AM
The Ethics of Barack Obama
Political power is to be used for the accomplishment of good. I must hold political power because I am good and want to do good. My political power must increase so good may increase. Graft and cronyism are exertions of political power for the accomplishment of good.
Graft is good. Cronyism is good. It’s the Chicago way.
exdeadhead on April 15, 2012 at 9:43 AM
A very bad week for Obama and his administration this week. I hope they get “progressively” worse each and every week up til November 6 elections.
CoffeeLover on April 15, 2012 at 9:43 AM
Most weeks are close, but this is a no-brainer. Obama, the Constitutional Instructor doesn’t know the Constitution or the precedents set over 100 years ago and uses this feigned ignorance to usurp power. The man must be stopped.
Christian Conservative on April 15, 2012 at 9:44 AM
I thought the same thing, only about the “summit” item.
KS Rex on April 15, 2012 at 9:48 AM
Off topic, and I don’t care. I want to spread a little good news.
Христос воскрес! Воистину воскрес!
Χριστός ἀνέστη! Ἀληθῶς ἀνέστη!
基督復活了! 他確實復活了!
From our “Eastern” family to all our “Eastern” brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, moms and dads.
Kostya Kotz on April 15, 2012 at 9:55 AM
Toughy….
…..the Supreme Court and the luxury comment are just more illustration that 45% of our country is either not paying attention, the gop candidate always sucks, or they are so attached to the teat of the Federal Sow that they are just content as little piglets with full bellies and don’t care.
It’s a tossup.
***though can you imagine if Bush had this kind of Secret Service problem how it would be IMMEDIATELY LINKED to someone in the West Wing? And the whole thing is being spun like it’s the Agency and the guys involved and that…..ONCE AGAIN the American Jesus can do no wrong.
PappyD61 on April 15, 2012 at 9:56 AM
Idiot, I can’t predict the future. If the election was based solely on Obama’s record, he’d lose in a landslide. Unfortunately, the African-American community, the head-up-their-butt White Liberals, some Hispanics, and some well-meaning independents will vote for him because he’s black. That’s maybe 40% of the electorate right there. Add in those who don’t trust or aren’t comfortable with Romney, and you’re probably near 50%. Defeating the first African-American (Kenyan?) POTUS won’t be easy.
Gladtobehere on April 15, 2012 at 9:57 AM
POTUS ego was so out of control this week. His view that the SCOTUS are lucky to have a job, because the Majority of the Founding Fathers were suffering from a hangover when they were constructing the Constitution.
MSGTAS on April 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM
Blowing the Three Amigos Summit didn’t happen. That news didn’t serve the narrative, so it didn’t get reported.
Seriously, there can be only one choice with the Supreme Court intimidation gambit in the mix.
novaculus on April 15, 2012 at 10:08 AM
Although the SCOTUS comment is the obvious winner for moronic comment of the week the real flub was in team Obama’s mishandling of the divide & conquer strategy: working women verses the GOP.
The Dems were counting on this to secure around 60% of women voters & they have screwed it up by maligning motherhood in general.
We must be a tribal society, fighting among ourselves for the scraps from our government overlords, in order for Obama to get reelected.
batterup on April 15, 2012 at 10:09 AM
Barack Obama actually said it. Hilary Rosen is just a person who is on television.
Yeah, that’s why she visited the Whitehouse more that thirty times.
Speakup on April 15, 2012 at 10:11 AM
There was a time in this nation’s history when such rhetoric was viewed as seditious.
FDR tried that too and failed. Leftists of a feather …
The Black Narcissus with his “Chamberlain Charm” has been exposed.
Emperor Urkel has no clothes.
~(Ä)~
Karl Magnus on April 15, 2012 at 10:14 AM
The thing that scares me is it seems the polls can still go either way. Even with all the shit he does, he looks unbeatable at times. I know polls change but this shouldn’t even be close. I didn’t care for the way Romney supporters pitched him with the attacks on the other candidates but we really need to put that behind us for the election. I still get word from my friends in Afghanistan and they’re not very happy with the way things are going. Changes to the rules of engagement would make pretty big news if they helped the bad guys even more. So what I’m hearing is that the General Orders are being changed and individual unit SOPs are being made more restrictive. I’ve got friends at one remote FOB that sound like they can’t even get on the road out of the place without making contact with an IED or idiots with guns. They also said they’re instructed to break contact alot when they call for indirect fire or CAS. They need some people in there that care what happens to the military. Obama has to go.
smoothsailing on April 15, 2012 at 10:15 AM
Sez the person from the Upper East Side
azkag on April 15, 2012 at 10:22 AM
I went with SC, but #4 is true to the lack of his achievement. They lived way beyond their means and only being elected U.S. Senator, then book (Ayres) success and that curious tripling of her salary set them up.
tim c on April 15, 2012 at 10:22 AM
Number 1 is a genuine amateurism by doofus.
Still voting for the SCOTUS strong arm though. That’s a pure Baorque blend of idiocy, thuggery, ignorance, and desperation.
It would be so much easier if he could have dictatorial power. Please transmit that to Vladamir.
CorporatePiggy on April 15, 2012 at 10:23 AM
I’m predicting an epic mid-October flameout, when he realizes it’s all over and he’s going down in a blowout election loss, as OOTY.
PatMac on April 15, 2012 at 10:25 AM
This OOTW was a layup.
Curtiss on April 15, 2012 at 10:25 AM
His comments about the supreme court not only show his ignorance, but a stunning amount of arrogance we’ve never seen in a president. Not that I can recall, anyway. Stunning and scary.
scalleywag on April 15, 2012 at 10:27 AM
No contest this time. In fact there’s a great chance of this being the Owe of the year.
scalleywag on April 15, 2012 at 10:27 AM
We’ve seen this kind of arrogance for the last 3.5 years. It started with Greek columns.
smoothsailing on April 15, 2012 at 10:15 AM
I totally agree. It’s why a lot of us still caution that it’s quite possible that Owe could win again. I’ve heard that any election needs to be won by at least 3-5% to overcome the liberal cheating factor. And after the ignored and not prosecuted intimidation at the polls, along with the refusal to accept voter ID – it simply encourages more cheating. BTW, also look at what OWE gets away with while collecting money online!
katablog.com on April 15, 2012 at 10:33 AM
His remarks about the SC show how sloppy this man is getting.As the campaign drags on we will se the real Chicago thug come out.The dirtier he gets the more his poll numbers go down.Popcorn machine locked and loaded.
jeffinsjvca on April 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Thanks for
lobbing us a softballplacing it gently on the tee!cane_loader on April 15, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Hands-down winner: the SC comment. Go right ahead and strengthen their resolve, Barky; at least their poll numbers are rising…
indyvet on April 15, 2012 at 10:38 AM
I have a lot of hope that 0bama will lose. He reminds me of the Nazgul chief struck down by Eowyn and Merry in “The Return of the King” : when he goes down, his forces will quail and rend their clothes and flee madly in all directions.
The mood in the country really does subconciously remind me of the welling sense of pent-up frustration under the surface in the spring of ’80. People are tired of being frustrated.
I’m going to make a prediction that many may not agree with, but I think that Romney is going to shine in the debate(s) and throughly clean his clock, and surprise us all… that that the clock-cleaning will be so thorough that the whole country watching will know it.
Then he will go down.
cane_loader on April 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM
Who’s “Sketch”?
Solaratov on April 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM
he’s not stupid but #2, amateurish calculation of faux stupidity trying to encite his stupid base for more angst and outrage as he hopes for civil unrest to save his second term. Utterly mis-calculated
screwauger on April 15, 2012 at 10:51 AM
“knowing it” doesn’t change his supporters like Peggy Moocher and Hollywood.
katablog.com on April 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Naturally I had to go with the bullying use of the bully pulpit to try to intimidate SCOTUS but I really gave some thought to the Three Amigo Summit. In the end I’m hopeful that our next president can fix that kind of stupid.
Cindy Munford on April 15, 2012 at 11:00 AM
If Obama loses??? I thought you all were so confident that even a ham sandwich would beat him. Thought Sketch was already measuring the drapes..
What happened? Starting to realize how out of touch you all are with regular Americans?
Uppereastside on April 15, 2012 at 9:23 AM
I ACTUALLY LOL’d. Are you kidding me? The upper east side? Talk about a group of people who are out of touch with regular Americans.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
threeinone on April 15, 2012 at 11:01 AM
“strong majority” liar wins this weeks vote.
profitsbeard on April 15, 2012 at 11:04 AM
SCOTUS by a mile. So-called Constitution instructor at major university demonstrates his ignorance of, or utter contempt for Constitution.
petefrt on April 15, 2012 at 11:09 AM
…Ed missed one!
KOOLAID2 on April 15, 2012 at 11:23 AM
…do people still do LSD?
How old are you?
KOOLAID2 on April 15, 2012 at 11:26 AM
Obumbles to SCOTUS:
“I’d sure hate to see something bad happen to you guys”.
Tim_CA on April 15, 2012 at 11:32 AM
This was the easiest gimme ever posted for OOT. This one Uppereastside still got it wrong. Of course he’s making big dough off of Puts though. Funny!
Bmore on April 15, 2012 at 11:33 AM
…and I even screwed this vote up!
He always has lived beyond his means and was on the verge of a BK…I thought managing the country like his family finances was bigger. (…the SC statement was insanity not stupidity).
KOOLAID2 on April 15, 2012 at 11:37 AM
I am having a difficult time choosing this morning.
The Democrats, trying to shape an absurd narrative – the War on Women… the progressive left thinks that staying home to raise your children is a luxury? Then why hasn’t the President of the United States, and the progressive led Senate, done something to change the tax code so more women like the President’s wife can have the luxury of raising their own children….if they have been so unfortunate to have been burdened with you know a human life they have to parent in the first place/
What is an American woman’s priorities according to the DNC? Abortions, Contraception and if you did reproduce- were burdened with a child- accessible Day Care. So outside of women’s reproductive role, women don’t care about anything else? The DNC calls republican’s tone deaf. They claim women are more than just baby makers, then they reduce women’s lives down to their role in reproduction. Obsessing over other people reproducing,(which is none of their business) this is how these people spend their days, in a eugenics haze.
Out of touch much? Who is kidding who, the DNC feminazis jumped the shark.
I narrowed it down to the above, and Obama instructing the Supreme Court how they are going to rule on Obamacare.
Dr Evil on April 15, 2012 at 11:42 AM
Obama’s strong majority is actually just 219 to 212, a ratio of 50.8%. If SCOTUS overturns this bill even with just a 5-4 split, that will be 55.6%.
galtani on April 15, 2012 at 11:43 AM
Uppereastside Day Trader?
Dr Evil on April 15, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Isn’t Barack Obama the head of the Democrat Party? Deb’s the DNC chairman.
How is a person the DNC hired specifically to do what Rosen was doing just some person who appears on teevee?
Dr Evil on April 15, 2012 at 11:48 AM
All good choices. I went with the “Three Amigos” summit because it best illustrates the complete ineptitude of this administration.
Unfortunately, there was a news blackout on what a complete disaster this event was for Bambi. To learn the magnitude of the disaster, you had to go to British and Canadian blogs & news sites. To be expected, I guess.
Tomolena1 on April 15, 2012 at 11:50 AM
And just what is your definition of a “regular American”? Make it a good one, d-bag.
Moose Drool on April 15, 2012 at 11:52 AM
If Obama wants to be taken seriously, he shouldn’t have said a word on the issue or just stated a generic statement. This is why we have three branches of government, checks and balances, that’s the way our REPUBLIC works – We are self governing people, based on our Laws enumerated in The United States Constitution.
Dr Evil on April 15, 2012 at 11:52 AM
I had to go for the “Luxury for her not to work”. The arrogance implied there is stunning. He was making $180K and described a stay-at-home mom as a luxury. I guess that makes sense when you believe fundamentally that the State makes a better parent than an individual. I make significantly less than that and wouldn’t consider my stay at home wife a luxury as she counters truly awful Los Angeles Unified School District indoctrination. No “war on women” here folks, keep walking – hahahaha.
LarryinLA on April 15, 2012 at 11:53 AM
His screw ups with Mexico and Canada are far more important than his SC bullying. Mexico and Canada will retaliate and it won’t be favorable for our economy.
What really aggravates me is that the press kept President Calderone’s comments about Fast and Furious out of the news.
Vince on April 15, 2012 at 11:53 AM
I got in the discussion in the QOTD thread late and seems like my question to Uppereastside about his boast was lost among all the links to youtube. Can Uppereastside reaffirms his claim that SBUX120421C00057000 that he bought was at 8 cents?
galtani on April 15, 2012 at 11:53 AM
You are a fool.
Vince on April 15, 2012 at 11:55 AM
Idle threats
Philly on April 15, 2012 at 11:58 AM
Not sure. Take a look through this area. Starting at 11:11 when the claim is made. Some of us thinks he has just learned to read the financials. My final question to him was if he worked for a firm or not. No reply.
Bmore on April 15, 2012 at 12:05 PM
He is quite evasive, that uppereastside, is he not?
Bmore on April 15, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Wow – all that happened THIS week?
Now, THAT’S “unprecedented”….. :P
TeresainFortWorth on April 15, 2012 at 12:07 PM
thinks=think
More coffee please.
Bmore on April 15, 2012 at 12:10 PM
Uppereastside said he made one month’s salary in last week’s trade. If he got 100 contracts of SBUX120421C00057000 call at 8 cents , which I doubt, and sold at $3, he would have made around $29000 for that trade. That would make him a top 1% dirtbag, wouldn’t it? Ever if he made a typo and the call was selling at 80 cents, he still would have made $21000, and that put him over the Barry definition of a millionaire(someone making $250000 a year). But Uppereastside said he is just a middle class American. You can fudge the number of contracts you traded, can’t you? Like stuffing a pair of socks in your pant’s pocket.
galtani on April 15, 2012 at 12:23 PM
I would have voted for this except the Supreme Court was in there again.
Seems like the Supreme Court was in there last week.
I think “the luxury for her not to work” has gotten short shrift because of this.
The Supreme Court thing will always trump practically everything around, so I wish to speak up for the “luxury” thing to get another chance next week.
Or something.
Alana on April 15, 2012 at 12:26 PM
To point out another inconsistency of Uppereastside. Last night he went on and on that he would not shell out $300 a month to pay for health insurance because he and his wife are as healthy as some part of the horse. Did he miss the part about individual mandate in ObamaCare?
galtani on April 15, 2012 at 12:39 PM
; )
Bmore on April 15, 2012 at 12:44 PM
Hey, here’s a new story about your favorite “War Criminal”.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/04/with-new-heart-dick-cheney-returns.php
Funny how your Bozo Biden gets a Pass for Dodging the Draft 5 times, but you idiots said Darth was Evil for doing the same thing.
Del Dolemonte on April 15, 2012 at 12:51 PM
Every time he talks I hear toilet water running.
Gatekeeper on April 15, 2012 at 12:52 PM
Ed/HA/Allah/who ever is willing to listen ?
Why can we not start an “atrocious Obama campaign amateurism of the week” jokes section ? Here let me try my hand.
Obama 2012 campaign slogans to be rolled out soon- – What they say and what they actually mean (As overheard by MAD Magazine writers)
1.We are the ones that you have been waiting for (so that you can get free gas, free contraceptives, a free home and a free Volt and .. well nothing has any value any more any ways)
2.Yes we can (be absolutely terrible at governing… but look- there is a squirrel !!!) **
3. Fired and now where to go ? Join us ! (or at least quit looking for work already)
4. So you think you are smarter than Joe Biden ? (please note that this question is open only for those in grades 1 to 4. If you are still smarter than Biden then its a big f****ing deal)
** to be used when you get truly embarrassed explaining why you are still supporting us after every thing that we have done between Jan 21st 2009 and now. As always, thanks for being a total schmuck.
nagee76 on April 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM
If Sexism and Misogyny had a son – it would look just like Barack Obama.
Green eyed Lady on April 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM
Absolutely NO one is more out of touch with “regular Americans” than are the Obamas.
Schadenfreude on April 15, 2012 at 1:32 PM
If Alfred E Neuman and Angela Davis had a son, he would look like Barry.
galtani on April 15, 2012 at 1:34 PM
The Constitutional Law Scholar showing his Homer Simpson smrt’s.
Cleombrotus on April 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM
This one comment about: Playing The Stock Market Very Well, brought Day Trader to mind? At least he didn’t say he played it Good ;)
Dr Evil on April 15, 2012 at 2:26 PM
RalphyBoy on April 15, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Oh yeah, just like all those other regular Americans that live in the Upper Eastside.
Cleombrotus on April 15, 2012 at 2:29 PM
I have never met more people who live in a bubble of unrealistic proportions as those I’ve met on the Upper East side of Manhattan.
Having doormen opening your door every morning and building attendants taking out your trash tends to guild the harsher edges of reality somewhat.
Cleombrotus on April 15, 2012 at 2:34 PM
Sincerely doubt Uppereastside is in that league.
And since I did really follow his comments previously, did he say he lives in uppereastside of Manhattan? He might have meant the upper bunk of the bed in an apartment in eastside of Jersey City.
galtani on April 15, 2012 at 3:29 PM
Should read the comment before posting.
galtani on April 15, 2012 at 3:32 PM
gotta say–the SCOTUS comment is the most arrogant. The “luxury” comment is the the most outrageous example of how out of touch the O’s are… staying home, with only his salary, would have been a luxury????
Oh, wait. I guess it would be. I stayed home while hubby was making far less than Barry….
redgypsy on April 15, 2012 at 6:39 PM
And he was a law lecturer? Must have been an affirmative action one.
WannabeAnglican on April 15, 2012 at 8:19 PM
Red State State of Mind on April 15, 2012 at 9:05 PM
Yes, I need to practice my posting skills.^^^^
Red State State of Mind on April 15, 2012 at 9:06 PM
Well I chose the Supreme Court comment but then decided that’s not really an amateurish act – it was a deliberate threat.
Turn MD Red on April 16, 2012 at 6:10 AM
I voted for the Supreme Court one as well, but it’s so unfair that this administration is a target rich environment for amateurish antics.
Would someone please make sure the Romney campaign gets all of these?
exliberal on April 16, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Well, we “regular” Americans aren’t in a total state of constipation.
Upper East Side of what … PalookaVille?
I know, I know … you coulda been a contenduh.
~(Ä)~
Karl Magnus on April 16, 2012 at 11:50 AM