Palin: Rosen “awakened many Mama Grizzlies”

posted at 4:16 pm on April 13, 2012 by Tina Korbe

Yesterday, the HA faithful debated Sarah Palin’s reaction to Hilary Rosen’s comments before she had even given that reaction — so I figured the least I could do would be to put this out there for y’all to rehash.

On “Hannity” last night, the original Mama Grizzly weighed in on Rosengate, echoing many of the sentiments that had already been expressed throughout the day and also adding her own unique perspective. Her most salient point: When she ran for vice president, some on the left actually criticized her for not staying home with her five children. Clearly, it’s not a “mommy” thing, Palin pointed out. It’s a conservative thing.

True. When was the last time you heard Nancy Pelosi criticized for anything at all related to her five children? Why is it conservative families are fair game, but liberal families are off-limits? Thank goodness President Barack Obama at least made that point: He has no patience, he said, for attacks on politicians’ spouses. Neither should we.

Palin also specifically says she thinks Rosen’s comments awakened “apolitical” moms. More and more formerly apathetic individuals are waking up (I’m ashamed to admit it, but I myself was pretty apolitical in 2008, watching idly as many of my peers campaigned for Obama and doing nothing more to stop his election than casting my vote for John McCain) — but plenty of people remain oblivious to the political landscape. While I don’t think it’s necessary for every individual in the country to obsessively follow the news cycle, may I just say that I hope it doesn’t take Obama or his surrogates specifically attacking every segment of the country before we wake up and realize what’s at stake in the 2012 elections? If ever there was a time to be political, it’s now.

 

 

 


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6

@SarahPalinUSA GREAT show tonight with you and @EricBolling ! #PayingAtThePump

/tweeted

ornery_independent on April 14, 2012 at 2:25 AM

The Romneybots are severely brain damaged. It must be because their Dear Leader Willard the Magnificent is so “Severely Conservative”.

CoolChange80 on April 13, 2012 at 11:17 PM

maybe, but what is your excuse for your brain derangement/damage?

jimver on April 14, 2012 at 2:44 AM

Well, lets hope it has awakened some Democrat mama grizzlies. Or some of the Independents that voted for Obama last time.

crosspatch on April 14, 2012 at 3:05 AM

Roused Grizzlies ready to fight…?

Shoot them before they hurt someone. Standard policy.

lexhamfox on April 14, 2012 at 3:14 AM

lexhamfox on April 14, 2012 at 3:14 AM

Grizzlies are like Wilford Brimley; shooting them just makes them angrier.

Buckshot Bill on April 14, 2012 at 3:32 AM

Where is the Mama Grizzly outrage against Stephen Colbert’s long and vicious War On Bears????

:p

Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on April 14, 2012 at 3:35 AM

He’s been trying his little heart out, to explain why Palin could never be President…LOL

idesign

Some things are so obvious they don’t need explaining. Even Palin knows she can’t win. It’s why she didn’t run.

xblade on April 14, 2012 at 4:50 AM

The establishment did not want another charismatic conservative to gain power in the GOP. They fought Reagan tooth and nail to keep him from being the Republican candidate. Unfortunately for Gov. Palin, she was the first to come along after Reagan. If there is another, he/she will be treated the same way. I believe it is because the EGOP are so entrenched in DC and so committed to retaining the power they have that they will do whatever it takes to make sure they continue feeding at the trough that the taxpayers provide. This is also why they tried to marginalize the Tea Party because they and, more importantly, their agenda of fiscal conservatism and smaller government had to be quashed.

JannyMc on April 14, 2012 at 5:07 AM

JannyMc on April 14, 2012 at 5:07 AM

You have a strange view of history. Reagan was an insurgent candidate in 1976, but he was running against a sitting President in his own Party. Of course “the Establishment” was behind the incumbent. But Reagan campaigned hard for Ford and other Republicans in the fall and in 1978, and was the overwhelming favorite for the nomination in 1980.

There were some doubts about his age, and Bush managed to win Iowa, but Reagan took charge with “I paid for this microphone” and never looked back. The Establishment, such as it is, fell right in line.

Romney isn’t part of the DC Establishment. “The Establishment” didn’t make millions of Republicans vote for him in primaries and caucuses.

Adjoran on April 14, 2012 at 5:45 AM

the EGOP are so entrenched in DC and so committed to retaining the power they have that they will do whatever it takes to make sure they continue feeding at the trough that the taxpayers provide. This is also why they tried to marginalize the Tea Party because they and, more importantly, their agenda of fiscal conservatism and smaller government had to be quashed.

JannyMc on April 14, 2012 at 5:07 AM

BINGO!

Don L on April 14, 2012 at 6:48 AM

lexhamfox on April 14, 2012 at 3:14 AM
Grizzlies are like Wilford Brimley; shooting them just makes them angrier.

Buckshot Bill on April 14, 2012 at 3:32 AM

The way to make a grizzly dissapear off the face of a planet is to let the left think they’re just brown polar bears…

Oh yeah, that big brown animal charging right at you? That’s just the brown (cinnimon ) phase of the common black bear.

Save the brown polar bears folks -buy a smart car or a Volt.

Don L on April 14, 2012 at 6:52 AM

Some of the most informed and concise remarks on US energy policy I have seen in quite sometime:

“We need an administration that comprehensively looks at our energy infrastructure and resources and develops and implements a real energy plan for the future.”

“One of them is a tax credit available to all U.S. manufacturers – so it’s unfair to target just this one industry if you’re not going to remove that tax credit for everyone else. Another tax break they get is to accelerate their deductions of what they call “intangible drilling costs” related to drilling oil or gas wells. This is particularly beneficial to smaller independent oil producers who can deduct 100% of these costs in the well’s first year, while the larger companies can deduct 70% in the first year and the rest over the next five years. If people have a problem with this particular break, then why not follow the suggestion the Heritage Foundation made and allow all companies to expense their full capital costs immediately.”

“A truly effective alternative energy source needs to be efficient and profitable.”

“If you increase the supply, you will see downward pressure on the prices at the pump, just as we’ve seen with natural gas. We know from past evidence that even the news of more areas being opened for future drilling has an immediate effect on the price of oil as the markets respond to the news of a future surplus.”

“(Obama) continues to under-represent our oil resources – claiming that we have only “2% of the world’s oil reserves.” He doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He’s spewing numbers in a game of semantics that claims a subset of “proved oil reserves” to make it sound like America doesn’t have much oil. Bull. His number is nowhere near a true picture of our recoverable oil resources – most of which are locked up to development because of government policies.”

“A more energy independent America will be a more prosperous and peaceful America.”

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/12/palin-interview-exclusive

Viator on April 14, 2012 at 7:10 AM

It’s simple: Buy Danish, Basilsbest, and other are going to drive enough voters away from Romney to cause Obama to win.

These posters will never convince many of us that Romney is conservative or the best choice to run this country. We know
otherwise.

That said, he will have the nomination. We will vote for him
because he is not Obama. It will most likely never be more than
that.

The republican estab pushed him because he will do their bidding.
Now, if we could just find out who the repub estab is, the order
of hierarchy and their agenda for the country. Any ideas? My fear

For many of us, Palin’s commentary on the election will be one
of the few bright spots, if you will. Instead of denigrating Palin, Romney and his supporters should be thankful they have
a “free” attack dog against Obama on a major cable news network.

However, the dumba$$es on this site and others will probably
continue to “Palin Bash” because, well, because they ARE dumb.
There is no getting around the facts.

Amjean on April 14, 2012 at 7:35 AM

Ooops! the end of my sentence didn’t post -

“I fear that the agendas of both partys (those that run things)
are similar.”

Amjean on April 14, 2012 at 7:38 AM

Romney isn’t part of the DC Establishment. “The Establishment” didn’t make millions of Republicans vote for him in primaries and caucuses.

Adjoran on April 14, 2012 at 5:45 AM

So what did win those millions of votes? Romney’s views? His record? His hair? Was Romney closer to the average voter than, say, Perry? Santorum?

No, Romney himself isn’t “establishment”. He’s not been successful enough at politics. He’s just the establishment’s vessel.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM

Some things are so obvious they don’t need explaining. Even Palin knows she can’t win. It’s why she didn’t run.

xblade on April 14, 2012 at 4:50 AM

Well then that makes her smarter than Romney and the ‘bots, doesn’t it? He can’t win either, but he’s running anyway. That’s “smarts”.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:48 AM

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM

Back to work? And so soon. Poor little nista is just so worried Romney could win.

lexhamfox on April 14, 2012 at 3:14 AM

The only thing better than a sad little whacked nista is a raging idiot like lexhamfox.

CW on April 14, 2012 at 7:50 AM

ddrintintin get a life . Gawd you’re your a sad little person. Laters.

CW on April 14, 2012 at 7:50 AM

No. Not at all.

I couldn’t care less about Donna Trump sticking her nose into it for the sake of getting some attention.

Moesart on April 13, 2012 at 10:55 PM

Is that why you just HAD to comment, squishy?

Moesart here is one of them there true-blue conservative Mittbots. You know they’re conservative because they’ll tell you they are. They’re conservative just like Andrew Sullivan.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM

ddrintintin get a life . Gawd you’re your a sad little person. Laters.

CW on April 14, 2012 at 7:50 AM

Don’t you have a bunny to boil?

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:55 AM

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM

Back to work? And so soon.

Huh? Incoherent, but at least you got it out without the usual methadone-addict syntax.

Poor little nista is just so worried Romney could win.

CW on April 14, 2012 at 7:50 AM

Worried Romney could win? ROFL…

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:58 AM

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:58 AM

Interesting isn’t it how some who post here want to shut you up or anyone else who agrees with you. Also, the tactic of trying to demean what you have to say is particularly lame considering they are attempting to make the case for their guy. Guess when all you have is sarcasm and snark, you use it.

JannyMc on April 14, 2012 at 8:17 AM

Where is the Mama Grizzly outrage against Stephen Colbert’s long and vicious War On Bears????

:p

Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on April 14, 2012 at 3:35 AM

You are right. I am outrageously outraged at that idiot Colbert (but mostly I ignore him.)

I, for one, fully support our Second Amendment right to arm bears.

Fallon on April 14, 2012 at 8:18 AM

If there ever was a time to be political it is now

What was that Samuel Adams quote about letting “your chains rest lightly on your limbs; we have no need of your service”?

Cleombrotus on April 14, 2012 at 8:39 AM

Amjean on April 14, 2012 at 7:38 AM

You’ve noticed that too, huh?

Cleombrotus on April 14, 2012 at 8:42 AM

“I fear that the agendas of both partys (those that run things)
are similar.” Amjean on April 14, 2012 at 7:38 AM

thats why the romney supporters on this site e.g. basilsbest, danish et al sound eerily similar to obamas minions.

when a rmoney supporters hears “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need …” do their eyes tear up?

Palin 2012, She can’t be bought!!!!

renalin on April 14, 2012 at 8:58 AM

You are right. I am outrageously outraged at that idiot Colbert (but mostly I ignore him.)

I, for one, fully support our Second Amendment right to arm bears.

Fallon on April 14, 2012 at 8:18 AM

HaHaaaaa!
:D

Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on April 14, 2012 at 9:00 AM

Interesting isn’t it how some who post here want to shut you up or anyone else who agrees with you. Also, the tactic of trying to demean what you have to say is particularly lame considering they are attempting to make the case for their guy. Guess when all you have is sarcasm and snark, you use it.

JannyMc on April 14, 2012 at 8:17 AM

Yeah, the thing is, I want Obama out of office too. I just don’t think Romney or any other moderate is the one to do it. And it didn’t HAVE to be Palin. Pence or Jindal or even a better-prepared Perry would’ve been better than Romney or Gingrich or Santorum. But they probably knew the game as well and decided there was no use.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 9:02 AM

Aw… the strong stench of Palin hysteria in the morning!!!
Actually, I am starting to feel Mama Grizzlyish myself. We may have a candidate that wasn’t necessarily our first choice but we also have an engaged Tea Party and Sarah Palin to keep these pols honest. They are not going to be able to ignore us any longer. This has not been the case in the past. We have strengthened our forces and I feel good about our chances. Sarah Palin doesn’t make sense to so many because she speaks truth- A concept many many have fallen dark to. Truth is simple but that doesn’t make it easy.

1nolibgal on April 14, 2012 at 9:04 AM

i get this weird vision where i see the elites all sitting in a quiet romm years ago. ” well you see fellas no one is going to swallow big government from a white guy. So lets let this black guy get the ball rolling. after 4 years people will be up in arms and willing to take anyone, then WHAMMO, we give ‘em our boy romney.”

its going to really, really, really, really, really tough for me to pull the lever on romney.

renalin on April 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM

So what did win those millions of votes? Romney’s views? His record? His hair? Was Romney closer to the average voter than, say, Perry? Santorum?

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM

Romney’s campaign is a strong example that negative ads work. I bet he’s spent more on ads attacking, and often lying about, his opponents than he has on positive messages about the important issues.

NoNails on April 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM

gryphon202 on April 13, 2012 at 10:18 PM

Cannot help but agree with you.

Cleombrotus on April 14, 2012 at 9:14 AM

What was that Samuel Adams quote about letting “your chains rest lightly on your limbs; we have no need of your service”?

Cleombrotus on April 14, 2012 at 8:39 AM

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom — go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

gryphon202 on April 14, 2012 at 9:20 AM

i get this weird vision where i see the elites all sitting in a quiet romm years ago. ” well you see fellas no one is going to swallow big government from a white guy. So lets let this black guy get the ball rolling. after 4 years people will be up in arms and willing to take anyone, then WHAMMO, we give ‘em our boy romney.”

its going to really, really, really, really, really tough for me to pull the lever on romney.

renalin on April 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM

I’ll reiterate what I said upthread: Either it’s more important for you to get rid of Obama, or to keep Romney out of the Oval Office. One or the other will happen at this point, but either way, the general election is going to be a hell of a lot closer than it should be.

gryphon202 on April 14, 2012 at 9:23 AM

its going to really, really, really, really, really tough for me to pull the lever on romney.

renalin on April 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM

At least you didn’t say it will be impossible. I won’t like it one bit, but pulling the lever for Romney will be much easier than pulling the lever for the alternative. Pulling the lever for Obama will be a sin of commission. Not voting or pulling the lever for a third-party candidate will be a sin of omission. Either way, you’ll help screw us all.

NoNails on April 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM

Watching Sarah Palin today is like watching the last days of Brett Favre. I never like her or her team but she had and undeniable talent that was sometimes breathtaking to watch. Now? Her touch gone, she wanders from issue to issue desperately searching fro attention and relevance, pleasing a few die-hard fans but, deep dopwn, knowing that her time has passed.

urban elitist on April 14, 2012 at 9:39 AM

At least you didn’t say it will be impossible. I won’t like it one bit, but pulling the lever for Romney will be much easier than pulling the lever for the alternative. Pulling the lever for Obama will be a sin of commission. Not voting or pulling the lever for a third-party candidate will be a sin of omission. Either way, you’ll help screw us all.

NoNails on April 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM

A whole lot of truth in this statement!!!

1nolibgal on April 14, 2012 at 9:40 AM

Watching Sarah Palin today is like watching the last days of Brett Favre. I never like her or her team but she had and undeniable talent that was sometimes breathtaking to watch. Now? Her touch gone, she wanders from issue to issue desperately searching fro attention and relevance, pleasing a few die-hard fans but, deep dopwn, knowing that her time has passed.

urban elitist on April 14, 2012 at 9:39 AM

Boy, you sure gave yourself the right tag name.

1nolibgal on April 14, 2012 at 9:41 AM

Now? Her touch gone, she wanders from issue to issue desperately searching fro attention and relevance, pleasing a few die-hard fans but, deep dopwn, knowing that her time has passed.

urban elitist on April 14, 2012 at 9:39 AM

Uh, I think she was asked for her opinion, not the other way around. She’s been heading for irrelevance for such a long long time now…but somehow always manages to stay quite relevant. Amazing.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 9:45 AM

What’s truly hilarious though and never fails to crack me up is the spectacle of various frothing-at-the-mouth anti-Palin types flocking to this or that multi-hundred comment Palin thread to tell us how irrelevant Palin is.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 9:47 AM

That’s like the late Jean Jacques Revel ‘the long dark night of fascism is falling on America, but it always lands in Europe’

narciso on April 14, 2012 at 9:52 AM

At least you didn’t say it will be impossible.

NoNails on April 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM

you are right. have to admit it. obama must lose. i will vote for the nominee.

renalin on April 14, 2012 at 9:52 AM

Thank goodness President Barack Obama at least made that point: He has no patience, he said, for attacks on politicians’ spouses. Neither should we.

The joke is that anyone believed this. Of course this was orchestrated from the white house. Did he ever stop the hate and vitriol from those who attacked Sarah? Never! He had to say something because it was getting out of hand and they saw the women backing Ann Romney. They thought they had a coup. They could say this and take Ann out of the picture so that no one would listen to her again.
Kind of backfired didn’t it?

Bambi on April 14, 2012 at 10:04 AM

The joke is that anyone believed this. Of course this was orchestrated from the white house. Did he ever stop the hate and vitriol from those who attacked Sarah? Never! He had to say something because it was getting out of hand and they saw the women backing Ann Romney. They thought they had a coup. They could say this and take Ann out of the picture so that no one would listen to her again.
Kind of backfired didn’t it?

Bambi on April 14, 2012 at 10:04 AM

You are so right. I kept thinking that on a thread in Brietbart were a lib was whining about how we caused it by picking on Michelle last election. Michele didn’t have a CLUE what being picked on was, and all it would ave taken was one word from the Obama camp telling them that kids, especially disabled children are off limits no matter what. But they didn’t.
It is a double standard, pure and simple, and we would just need to get together to cause a metaphorical rumble, but we don’t. We sit and snipe at each other on these threads because our guy or gal didn’t make the cut.
We are we going to get the collective brain of a nat.. any idea renalin?

Noelie on April 14, 2012 at 11:28 AM

What’s truly hilarious though and never fails to crack me up is the spectacle of various frothing-at-the-mouth anti-Palin types flocking to this or that multi-hundred comment Palin thread to tell us how irrelevant Palin is.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 9:47 AM

Coming from the poster who has posted 24 times so far in this thread that is really funny…

Bradky on April 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM

What’s truly hilarious though and never fails to crack me up is the spectacle of various frothing-at-the-mouth anti-Palin types flocking to this or that multi-hundred comment Palin thread to tell us how irrelevant Palin is.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 9:47 AM

It is funny. The anti-Palin types never cease to impale themselves on her sword. Their hate makes them irrational.

SparkPlug on April 14, 2012 at 12:41 PM

Bradky on April 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM

I think you proved his point.

SparkPlug on April 14, 2012 at 12:42 PM

Clinton in 1992. And he still only won with 43% of the popular vote in a three-way race. Good luck, Mitt. You’ll need it.

gryphon202 on April 13, 2012 at 8:50 PM

You know what? If Clinton (not Hillary, but Bill) were running against Romney today, (yes, yes, anyone stupid enough to think I don’t know he can’t due to being termed out can shut up in advance) it would be a tough choice for me. I hate to say that, since I didn’t vote for Clinton either time, but I’m almost 20 years older now and perspectives change. Sad commentary on our candidates, huh?

totherightofthem on April 14, 2012 at 1:38 PM

You have learned nothing in 20 years, if you believe that, Clinton gave us the CRA revisions, cuts in the CIA and military, HUD pressure
on banks, consent degrees against local police departments, Ginsberg
and Breyer,

narciso on April 14, 2012 at 2:55 PM

Bradky on April 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM

I think you proved his point.

SparkPlug on April 14, 2012 at 12:42 PM

Exactly. Our very own Bill Maher clone just couldn’t pass up a Palin thread. Weird, isn’t it?

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 3:05 PM

^ In fact, I think ol’ Maher there ONLY posts in Palin threads. That’s almost as weird as sitting there counting my comments. I guess this is #27 for me.

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 3:08 PM

You have learned nothing in 20 years, if you believe that, Clinton gave us the CRA revisions, cuts in the CIA and military, HUD pressure
on banks, consent degrees against local police departments, Ginsberg
and Breyer,

narciso on April 14, 2012 at 2:55 PM

Feel free to miss my point entirely. Romney isn’t all that different from Clinton in terms of where he falls on the political spectrum of right to left. His record doesn’t give me the warm fuzzies that he’s the second coming of Ronald Reagan, despite what others here may wish. He’s not too far from Clinton, redux, without the seamy side. At least Clinton walks the lefty walk and doesn’t hide his progressive nature. Romney? I’m not so certain. Romney’s not a depraved reprobate, I’ll grant you that.

Still and all, I’m voting for him, if he takes the nomination. I am certain that Obama is far to the left of both Romney and Clinton, who at least love the country as far as I can tell.

totherightofthem on April 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM

Romney – Damon Corporation

damian1967 on April 14, 2012 at 8:46 PM

Romney’s campaign is a strong example that negative ads work. I bet he’s spent more on ads attacking, and often lying about, his opponents than he has on positive messages about the important issues.

NoNails on April 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM

You must be insane! Romney did have a few positive messages to offer, as did his eldest son. Both stated that “Obama is a nice guy and doing a good job”. That’s counts as a positive message from where I stand. All others were LIES, LIES and more LIES. As was, is and will be his entire political life.

riddick on April 14, 2012 at 8:52 PM

At least Clinton walks the lefty walk and doesn’t hide his progressive nature. Romney? I’m not so certain. Romney’s not a depraved reprobate, I’ll grant you that.

Still and all, I’m voting for him, if he takes the nomination. I am certain that Obama is far to the left of both Romney and Clinton, who at least love the country as far as I can tell.

totherightofthem on April 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM

Romney openly stated, into a camera, that he is PROGRESSIVE. So, he is as open about it as Clinton is.

Its the entire moronic, senile, low IQ Romney supporters that refuse to face THE FACT their boy is not only NOT conservative, but is a SELF ADMITTED PROGRESSIVE.

riddick on April 14, 2012 at 8:56 PM

A Liberal, a Moderate and a Conservative walk into a bar. The Bartender yells “Mitt!!!” -M_Minnesota

CoolChange80 on April 14, 2012 at 9:40 PM

NO MORE GATES.

Thanks.

Reaps on April 14, 2012 at 10:15 PM

riddick on April 14, 2012 at 8:56 PM,
Right On. Romneybots are the biggest joke in the GOP. Romney is an admitted progressive, which makes Romneybots and Glenn Beck a Hypocrite.

CoolChange80 on April 15, 2012 at 1:28 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMcjJEXt9To

CoolChange80 on April 15, 2012 at 1:38 AM

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 3:08 PM

The fun part about your posts is how you set up false strawmen and pummel them. I post in a variety of threads – I like the palin threads only because the pbots like you really cannot see that my criticism is of your slavish, unquestioning devotion to all things uttered or in some cases telepathically conveyed to the faithful, of her.
Your Strawman you keep building is “you hate palin or deranged, blah blah blah”. Yet specific criticisms of Palin herself are simply not in those posts.

And your latest strawman – “weird how you count the posts”. I proved a point with facts and you say it proves your point in some kind of pretzel logic.
So go back to drooling over the cache of pictures you keep of teh won and keep checking those palin threads every 30 minutes or so to defend her honor or something.
I really feel sorry for you in that your life seems so narrowly occupied by the internet….

Bradky on April 15, 2012 at 8:51 AM

Romney’s campaign is a strong example that negative ads work. I bet he’s spent more on ads attacking, and often lying about, his opponents than he has on positive messages about the important issues.

NoNails on April 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM

That’s what I like best about Romney. He wants it bad enough to do what’s necessary. He raises money. He organizes. He gets down and dirty. I like his ruthlessness. He’s a fairly nice guy in every respect except politically. That’s fine with me.

writeblock on April 15, 2012 at 10:47 AM

And by the way, since when was being first lady of a state not considered real work?

writeblock on April 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM

Due to the Obama administration, there are right now so few jobs that we should be grateful to wealthy women who work for their families and communities for free instead of taking up a paid job that could go to someone else.

ansonia on April 15, 2012 at 9:36 PM

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/good-morning-america-poised-to-break-today-shows-16-year-win-streak_b122545

Looks like Katie bested Palin yet again. What’s a poor mama grizzly to do?

Bradky on April 16, 2012 at 1:20 PM

ddrintn on April 14, 2012 at 3:08 PM

The fun part about your posts is how you set up false strawmen and pummel them. I post in a variety of threads – I like the palin threads only because the pbots like you really cannot see that my criticism is of your slavish, unquestioning devotion to all things uttered or in some cases telepathically conveyed to the faithful, of her.
Your Strawman you keep building is “you hate palin or deranged, blah blah blah”. Yet specific criticisms of Palin herself are simply not in those posts.

“Slavish devotion” in itself a strawman. What is “slavish devotion”, anyway? Not having your Bill Maher attitude toward Palin? Tell us in a little more detail just how you differ from Bill Maher.

I really feel sorry for you in that your life seems so narrowly occupied by the internet….

Bradky on April 15, 2012 at 8:51 AM

Really, that “I have a life, sucks to be you looooooozer always on the Internet blahblahblah…” Maybe some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time.

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/good-morning-america-poised-to-break-today-shows-16-year-win-streak_b122545

Looks like Katie bested Palin yet again. What’s a poor mama grizzly to do?

Bradky on April 16, 2012 at 1:20 PM

Palin was on all last week? This is the sort of idiocy blind hatred can bring.

ddrintn on April 16, 2012 at 5:20 PM

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6