Former RNC chair Ed Gillespie heading running-mate search for Romney?
posted at 1:56 pm on April 11, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
With the nomination for President all but clinched, the next order of business for Republicans is to find a running mate. That’s the first big test for any nominee, although Mitt Romney has publicly stated that he hasn’t yet begun to build a list of potential partners for the general election. According to BuzzFeed, that’s only because he’s delegated that task to former RNC chair and Bush adviser Ed Gillespie:
Just hours after Rick Santorum left the race, voters at a rally here Monday were already clamoring to find out who would join Mitt Romney on the presidential ticket.
“I’m here to announce today that I do not even have a list!” Romney replied to a supporter’s question.
But Romney does have a plan: One long-time GOP operative said Romney staffers are quietly circulating that former Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie, who joined the campaign as a “volunteer” advisor last week, will “take the lead” on the search for a Vice President.
The search, and the vetting that accompanies it, are likely to be conducted with particular intensity because senior party operatives are still reeling from their inability to defend vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin in 2008. Party leaders expect the Romney camp better take the process seriously this time around, and everything about Romney’s own methods suggest a careful, deliberate process. But Romney’s team itself is extremely light on general election experience, and they’re turning to a cohort of old-time GOP hands in developing a strategy to win in November.
Some had apparently expected Charlie Black to run this operation, according to the article, although I’m not sure why. Black did some work on John McCain’s campaign, and caused a stir when he asserted that a terrorist attack on the US would benefit McCain’s election chances, although to be fair, he only answered a direct question on that point from Fortune. BuzzFeed reports that Black didn’t expect to be involved, either, saying that task usually falls to lawyers.
Gillespie would be a better choice, but one that could generate some concern among grassroots activists leery of the GOP establishment. Gillespie certainly falls into that category, with a term as RNC chair and a few years as a key adviser to George W. Bush. However, Gillespie ran the RNC during Bush’s 2004 re-election effort, which successfully held the White House and picked up four seats in the Senate and three in the House, retaining control of Congress. He knows a few things about winning elections, and that’s the kind of expertise that should boost Romney’s chances in the fall.
That depends, of course, on the eventual choice for running mate. Those who have been reluctant to get behind Romney will watch this process carefully. They will want to see someone who excites them, while Romney will want to make sure that the eventual running mate doesn’t end up overwhelming the narrative. Given Romney’s private-sector background, I’d expect to see him choose someone with an executive background and experience, with enough Tea Party credibility to help pull the party together at the convention. That leaves a lot of possibilities, and it will probably take almost all summer to make the choice. We’ll see if Romney can pass this first crucial test as nominee.
Update, 4/15/12: Gillespie told Fox News Sunday that “it was news to me” that he was heading up the VP search effort:
Veteran Republican strategist Ed Gillespie, who recently joined Mitt Romney’s campaign as a senior advisor, shot down reports that he will run Romney’s search for a running mate.
“It was news to me,” he said on Fox News Sunday, adding that “as far as I know, it is not accurate.”
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Now there’s a dusty old name…I haven’t seen that sketch for at least ten years. Still remember it was funny!
MelonCollie on March 16, 2013 at 7:35 AM
Cheers:)
There is some amazing irony in your commentary – someone who sounds remarkably like a spoiled child calling me “juvenile” and “deliberately obtuse” for not being able to make sense of your delusional fantasies. I’ll have to leave it to others to make sense of your blatherings – which begin with the false premise- that the narcissistic Marxist grifter Obama and Romney are like ideological fraternal twins. It then wanders off into something I can’t comprehend. I gather it has something to do with being pissed off that Sarah Palin didn’t run as a third party Tea Party candidate, and thus being left with no choice but to stomp your foot, pick up your ball, and stay home? Or maybe you had Ron Paul in mind? Who the hell knows. I’m not going to waste any more time trying to make sense of your nonsensical ‘analysis’.
Buy Danish on March 16, 2013 at 8:37 AM
Romney did not rise to the occasion in the election, so why expect him to do so here?
Sherman1864 on March 16, 2013 at 11:40 AM
He lost by 3%, not a blow out, but a loss is a loss. He is a good and accomplished man who would have been a far better president than Obama who had no real accomplishments before his political life began. Romney isn’t a conservative and maybe that is why he lost but he is a respectable and humble man.
Dollayo on March 17, 2013 at 2:05 AM
He should be sorry he lost because he passed on the opportunity to unseat the Liar of Benghazi (oh, yes, where is that report now? What has the admnistration discovered?).
In a sense, this lack of political judgment disqualified him. We should have known not to nominate a person unable to beat McCain.
virgo on March 17, 2013 at 3:55 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2