Romney to hit PA with ad blitz this week

posted at 10:26 am on April 9, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

With Mitt Romney’s sweep six days ago of primaries in Maryland, Washington DC, and the battleground state of Wisconsin, the Republican frontrunner continues to build momentum in the Republican presidential nomination sweepstakes.  In the official RNC count of delegates, Romney just crossed the halfway mark to 1144 with 573 delegates, far ahead of Rick Santorum’s 202; counting all of the non-binding contests, Romney leads by a slightly larger amount, 656 to 272.  The next binding contests come two weeks from tomorrow, and Santorum will only be competitive in one — and Romney is loading up for a knockout blow there:

Republican Mitt Romney will air presidential campaign ads in most of Pennsylvania starting on Monday, when candidates return from their Easter break, a source close to the campaign said on Friday.

The $2.9 million advertising campaign will run in the Wilkes-Barre, Scranton, Erie, Altoona and Philadelphia media markets until the April 24 primary election.

Within a week, the ads will run in the Pittsburgh market. The Romney super PAC Restore Our Future is airing commercials on cable channels statewide.

The campaign’s ad buy reinforces the former Massachusetts governor’s determination to win the home state of ex-Sen. Rick Santorum, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and U.S. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas. Santorum grew up in Butler County and owns a Penn Hills home, Gingrich spent childhood years in the Harrisburg area and Paul is a Green Tree native.

It’s not just advertising, either.  Since Romney should have little trouble winning in the other four states that go to the polls on the 24th — New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Delaware, the latter of which is a winner-take-all primary — he can spend almost all of his time stumping in Pennsylvania.  That makes the fight uncomfortably similar to Michigan and Wisconsin, both of which Santorum was perceived as having a lead or an edge, and both of which fell to Romney in the end.

As the LA Times points out, Pennsylvania is Santorum’s firewall, at least on credibility:

The former senator from Pennsylvania has resurrected his career after a shattering 2006 reelection defeat. Dismissed as a hopeless long shot when his presidential run began, he’ll finish no worse than second for the Republican nomination. At 53, he’s one of the nation’s leading social conservatives, and his long-range future has never looked brighter.

But as he resumes a do-or-die Pennsylvania primary effort this week, he’ll need all his local connections and considerable campaign talents to survive what could be the final showdown of the 2012 GOP contest. Polls show him with a small lead over Mitt Romney, who’d like nothing more than to finish off his main rival in the April 24 election.

After a day spent traversing the state’s steeply eroded ridges, studded with redbud blossoms and trees just greening up, Santorum expressed satisfaction at returning to “familiar territory, where I can say, ‘No, no, there’s a shorter way to get there’ to the drivers.”

He’s all but said that a primary loss would end his candidacy. “We have to win here,” he told reporters during a stop at Bob’s Diner in Carnegie, a Pittsburgh suburb he represented as a young congressman in the early 1990s.

Unfortunately for Santorum, failure in Pennsylvania might spell the end of not just the current political campaign, but any future in electoral politics.  It took an extraordinary effort to bring Santorum back from that large 2006 defeat in his home state, and if it happens again in a Republican primary, it might take even longer to get past it.  That puts more pressure on Santorum to defend the state if he chooses to continue, and polls are showing mixed signals at how well he’s managing to do it at the moment.

The delegate math is becoming more and more untenable, too.  Santorum’s camp released an argument last week that the media (and the RNC, apparently) has the delegate allocations all wrong, and that he’s actually much closer to Romney.  In part, that argument was based on a claim made by Newt Gingrich in February that the RNC would force Florida and Arizona to proportionally allocate their delegates.  Even the RNC admits that they can’t dictate state allocations, and in any case they don’t appear inclined to try, as their own scorecard shows.

On Tuesday, 159 delegates will be allocated in the four other states, the vast majority of which will go to Romney, while Pennsylvania’s 72 delegates will probably be closely split between Romney and Santorum regardless of the order of the finish.  There is a good possibility that Romney can pad his delegate lead by 100 or so on the 24th in both counts.  May’s nine contests look more promising for Santorum in a vacuum, but with Romney having perhaps over 800 delegates overall or 700 in the bound-only count, this race will hit a tipping point soon regardless of whether Santorum can win a squeaker in Pennsylvania — and states like Indiana and Oregon will probably fall Romney’s way, while Texas’ big prize will be proportionally allocated anyway.

Plus, the Des Moines Register reports that the few superdelegates in the GOP have begun to move towards Romney:

The Associated Press has polled 114 of the 120 superdelegates, party members who can support any candidate for president they choose at the national convention in August, regardless of what happens in primaries or caucuses.

In the latest survey, conducted Tuesday to Friday, Romney has 35 endorsements, far more than anyone else but a modest figure for the apparent nominee. Gingrich has four endorsements, Santorum has two and Texas Rep. Ron Paul got one.

RNC members have been slowly embracing Romney. He picked up 11 new endorsements since the last AP survey a month ago, after the Super Tuesday contests. Over the course of the campaign, however, Romney methodically has added endorsements from every region of the country. In the U.S. territories, where voters help decide the nominee but can’t vote in the general election, Romney has dominated.

Santorum will have two weeks to decide whether he wants to roll the dice on his future in a Pennsylvania primary for a nomination in which the math looks almost impossible to overcome, or take his gains and play for the future while the opening for a gracious and party-building exit remains in play.  He’s overcome a lot of long odds to put himself in that position, and perhaps Santorum will feel that the risks are still worth taking.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6

INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM

Yes..long time ago.
Was a big story here..locally.

Yeah.. understatement. :(

bazil9 on May 13, 2013 at 5:33 PM

Trolls shown up yet?

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:34 PM

Sachiko on May 13, 2013 at 5:29 PM

You’re welcome.

I have another quote for you. I think I got this one from the Priests For Life site.

Nothing has been as damaging to our cause as the advances in technology which have allowed pictures of the developing fetus, because people now talk about that fetus in much different terms than they did fifteen years ago. They talk about it as a human being, which is not something that I have an easy answer how to cure.
–Harrison Hickman
–1989 conference of the National Abortion Rights Action League.

Now with Gosnell, they have no answer. Jill Stanek has been writing this year about the increasing demoralization of abortionists. That’s how much they care about making abortion “rare”—they get down about it.

INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:34 PM

Just you…

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM

Just you…

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM

I opened THAT door up, didn’t I.

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:40 PM

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:40 PM

And walked ran right into it.

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:41 PM

You’re welcome.

I have another quote for you. I think I got this one from the Priests For Life site.

Nothing has been as damaging to our cause as the advances in technology which have allowed pictures of the developing fetus, because people now talk about that fetus in much different terms than they did fifteen years ago. They talk about it as a human being, which is not something that I have an easy answer how to cure.
–Harrison Hickman
–1989 conference of the National Abortion Rights Action League.

Now with Gosnell, they have no answer. Jill Stanek has been writing this year about the increasing demoralization of abortionists. That’s how much they care about making abortion “rare”—they get down about it.

INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM

I bet they hate the ability to change your profile picture to your ultrasound picture on Facebook.

cptacek on May 13, 2013 at 5:52 PM

cptacek on May 13, 2013 at 5:52 PM

William Saletan of Slate wrote an article in 2007 on the impact of technology on abortion: “The fetus is squirming, and so are we.”

Yeah, they hate it.

INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM

9 of 12 Jurors in #Gosnell Trial Are ‘Pro-Choice’ http://ow.ly/kZwUn

Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Somebody ask for Humpbot?

http://tinyurl.com/humpgos

jmad on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

I didn’t know that. Was that when they were being asked questions prior to being seated for the trial?

“And to give you some background on the jurors, of the seven women and five men who are on the jury, at least nine told the court that they are pro-choice. Two say that they are neither pro-choice nor pro-life.”

So only one is pro-life? That’s remarkable.

I wonder what they all think now.

INC on May 13, 2013 at 6:07 PM

bazil9 on May 13, 2013 at 4:50 PM

I agree with you … and a year or 2 ago I would agree with you.
and I feel the Bible supports this because as was pointed out…
an image bearer of GOD was murdered.

but then the cold eyed accountant shows up …
paying X amount for appeals x number of years …
*sigh* …. but I agree it meets the criteria IMHO
to be a DP award ….

conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM

9 of 12 Jurors in #Gosnell Trial Are ‘Pro-Choice’ http://ow.ly/kZwUn

Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Seriously?!?!?!

ladyingray on May 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM

Even if given the death penalty, he won’t die from it. Take life without parole in general population.

He’s WANTING the death penalty at this point….

ladyingray on May 13, 2013 at 6:15 PM

I’m wondering how many other denizens of abortion clinics are closely watching this unfold. I also wonder what their pucker factor is right about now.

Oldnuke on May 13, 2013 at 6:24 PM

The one image that comes to mind is the scene in the movie “Ghost”. The bad guy dies at the end, and the black shadows come to get him, and drag him away.

I hope when they come for Gosnell, he goes kicking and screaming, and has to run the gauntlet of the faces of every baby he ever butchered…all the way to Hell!

grumpy_old_soldier on May 13, 2013 at 6:26 PM

His lawyer is a piece of work.

Speaking outside the courthouse moments after the jury handed down its decision, Gosnell’s attorney Jack McMahon said he had confidence in the legal system but acknowledged that the case presented particular difficulties, including what he called “The baby factor.” McMahon also claimed the media made his job toughter: ”The media has been overwhelmingly against [Gosnell],” he told reporters.

What media was that?

Cindy Munford on May 13, 2013 at 6:39 PM

grumpy_old_soldier on May 13, 2013 at 6:26 PM

yup .. and then at the great white throne … he is brought before the King of Kings and is tried … every baby he butchered is there and testifies against him …
he is judged by his works as everything is written down … then the lambs book is opened and his name is not written down … and at this point the King of Kings pronounces sentence “depart from me into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels!”
at this point he is picked up and cast into the lake of fire.

conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM

9 of 12 Jurors in #Gosnell Trial Are ‘Pro-Choice’ http://ow.ly/kZwUn

Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Seriously?!?!?!

ladyingray on May 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM

Which tells you how truly ugly this was that even believers couldn’t turn away.

kim roy on May 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM

What media was that?

Cindy Munford on May 13, 2013 at 6:39 PM

oh come now … the throngs of reporters and tv and radio types down there
standing room only in the press area .. /s

conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:41 PM

A just verdict. The jury has rightly convicted #Gosnell for his appalling crimes, ensuring no woman is victimized by him ever again.

PP is just as guilty as Gosnell. More guilty in fact, they have far more innocent baby blood on their hands.

Kjeil on May 13, 2013 at 6:43 PM

Silly ‘social conservatives’ ruining the party with their defense of the unborn. How many more babies do you want to save at the expense of the party!?eleventyone1one1!

LaughterJones on May 13, 2013 at 6:52 PM

PP is just as guilty as Gosnell. More guilty in fact, they have far more innocent baby blood on their hands.

Kjeil on May 13, 2013 at 6:43 PM

It’s a hollow statement by the leading, government authorized death camp in the USA.

You get to have freedoms in the USA! Just have to make it out of the womb first!

LaughterJones on May 13, 2013 at 6:55 PM

Trolls shown up yet?

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:34 PM

.
Just you…

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM
.

I opened THAT door up, didn’t I.

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:40 PM

.
And walked ran right into it.

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:41 PM

.
Why do I always miss the good stuff, in real time ?

listens2glenn on May 13, 2013 at 6:57 PM

Ok, now that the trial is over, will the Exalted One comment on it?

And will anyone in the media have the temerity to actually ask him to go on record?

Forgive me. I’ve been watching political movies, where these things actually happen…

Chris of Rights on May 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM

May they now Rest in Peace

txmomof6 on May 13, 2013 at 8:00 PM

May they now Rest in Peace

txmomof6 on May 13, 2013 at 8:00 PM

Another 3,288 today, and every day in the USA.

slickwillie2001 on May 13, 2013 at 8:14 PM

A just verdict. The jury has rightly convicted #Gosnell for his appalling crimes, ensuring no woman is victimized by him ever again.

Wow, can’t even bring themselves to mention the babies.

Dongemaharu on May 13, 2013 at 9:15 PM

If the bill Obama sponsored in the Illinois legislature had passed in Pennsylvania, would Gosnell have been convicted?

As I recall, Obama wanted to decriminalize killing a baby after a botched abortion.

jya lai on May 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6