Guns: They’re what’s bringing the GOP’s would-be First Ladies together
posted at 5:15 pm on April 5, 2012 by Tina Korbe
It’s a rare event that brings Ann Romney, Karen Santorum and Callista Gingrich together on the same stage — and presumably not to shill for their spouses, but just to express their common conservatism. The National Rifle Association will host just such an event April 13, though. “A Conversation Off The Campaign Trail” will feature the better halves of the GOP candidates. (Whether Carol Paul was invited or will be in attendance is a murky matter.) What the subject of discussion will be is up for speculation:
As Mitt Romney marches closer to the nomination even as Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum refuse to quit, will the wives act as policy surrogates? Will they tackle such hot-button issues as women’s reproductive rights, the budget, health care and, of course, gun legislation?
Will they touch on the good works they would promote should their respective husbands makes it to the White House? Music education for singer, pianist and French horn player Gingrich? Multiple sclerosis research and therapeutic horseback riding for Romney, who combats the effects of the former by engaging in the latter? The divinely-inspired decision for her mate’s White House run, or possibly home schooling for Santorum, a nurse and a lawyer who oversaw the education of the couple’s seven children?
Will the wives keep it light and chatty, how gosh-darn fun and in touch with voters their guys are?
Will they joke about the rigors of campaigning, while offering helpful hints on no-wrinkle travel clothing, hurricane-proof hair products and staying slim while enduring endless rubber chicken banquets and ethno-regional food-fests? (Thank heavens for elegant culinary interludes such as the NRA luncheon at the Four Seasons Hotel.)
It’s just a wild guess, but I’d imagine the importance of knowing how to handle a firearm just might come up. None of the would-be First Ladies are Sarah-Palin-style gun spokeswomen, but they surely know the trend: Women are buying guns in record numbers and target-shooting is one of the fastest-growing female sports. While liberals have their own arguments against guns, they surely can’t argue that empowering women to know how to wield ‘em — should they need to for self-defense or just wish to for sport — is somehow part of a “war on women,” a tired phrase if ever there was one. That right there might be the best reason for Ann, Karen and Callista to champion gun rights.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

America in decline – Bars selling rubbing alcohol as “scotch”


Oh, good: Iranian hackers trying to break into the American energy grid






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Nothing like witnessing the end of statist control, and the statists not being fully aware of it.
The schemers and controllers want to monopolize their force, assault weapons and death. Only THEY can steal. Only THEY can kill.
No, no more. Done enough damage.
fatlibertarianinokc on May 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM
time to go after paper politicians.
john1schn on May 7, 2013 at 6:22 PM
PITCHFORK CONTROL next?
Tar and feathers to be banned?
All you can eat buffets are killing Americans, over eaters should pay extra.
32 ounce $1.00 drinks at McDonalds causes Parkinson’s or something, special tax needed.
Seniors using too much healthcare in final years. Make Hospice Care free and provide a $10,000 tax credit to those that sign up at age 60.
And yet we dummies keep electing this!!!!!
PappyD61 on May 7, 2013 at 6:40 PM
Gun Crisis? What Gun Crisis?
Resist We Much on May 7, 2013 at 9:25 PM
Suck it, Lizardface.
fossten on May 7, 2013 at 9:44 PM
All those who were surprised by this move?
*crickets*
Valid security concerns aside, the idea of anyone literally being able to print unregistered weapons (possibly their ammo blanks too in the future) is absolutely terrifying to liberals.
MelonCollie on May 7, 2013 at 10:11 PM
Two things to think about before worrying about printed guns:
1. There’s no need to print guns unless Chuck and friends make it illegal to otherwise acquire them.
2. If having guns does become illegal the cartels which can smuggle weed across the border by the ton will bring in the guns as soon as there is a market.
Nomas on May 7, 2013 at 11:05 PM
The issue is not whether something should be done but whether something can be done.
The genius of this technology is that it is unregulatable.
You can pass laws but they won’t accomplish anything.
Furthermore, I can put the aforementioned six ounce slug of iron in the handle to make it legal.
Worse though you see how the gun comes apart into bits and pieces.
Lets say I take it apart. Will you spot the pieces?
What if every piece has a duel use. Every piece screws into something else. What if every little bit screws into my luggage.
The ultimate movie that had a plastic gun was “in the line of fire”… it was a neat little thing. They hid the bullet in a lucky rabbit’s foot. Everything else just broke down into little plastic bits that were here or there.
Can’t stop it. You protect yourself in that environment by knowing who is coming through the door… not by search them.
Karmashock on May 8, 2013 at 7:28 AM
Schumer can go bugger himself.
claudius on May 8, 2013 at 3:37 PM
Gotta love Schumer’s descriptive language, “Our Republicans”.
That’ll leave a mark.
MTF on May 21, 2013 at 2:46 PM
Dang it
Dear leader to take credit
cmsinaz on May 21, 2013 at 2:50 PM
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If amnesty passes both houses, I will never vote republican again.
I know that sounds like the typical empty threat. But in this case, I honestly do not see what the point would be of any longer pretending the GOP cares about limited gov’t.
My one vote and my limited finanical contributions won’t hurt the GOP. but hopefully, others will join in.
I would rather the GOP completely die as a party and allow us a chance to build something new while the DNC runs rampant that continue pretending that the GOP actually opposes DNC policies. The alternative, to continue the pretense, simply means allowing the DNC to pass its entire agenda a little more slowly than otherwise without any real chance of stopping it. At least if the GOP is killed off, a new party may actually come about that supports the idea of limited gov’t.
I don’t understand how Lindsay Graham is not beaten in a primary. Is there really nobody that could beat him by running to his right? I would also love to see McCain gone. Rubio has blown whatever conservative cred he had with this nonsense.
Monkeytoe on May 21, 2013 at 2:52 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2