Subpoenaed: GOP wants to know why Obama administration misled Americans on drilling ban
posted at 8:25 am on April 4, 2012 by Rob Bluey
President Obama’s offshore drilling moratorium following the 2010 oil spill caused widespread job losses and a significant drop in energy production in the Gulf of Mexico. Two years later, a U.S. House committee wants to know why the administration misled the public about the drilling ban.
The House Natural Resources Committee yesterday issued its first subpoena to the Department of the Interior after Secretary Ken Salazar refused to turn over documents related to the moratorium. At issue is why Salazar’s department suggested a panel of engineering experts supported the drilling ban when in fact they did not.
Despite the Obama administration’s transparency promises, Salazar has rebuffed the committee’s requests and stymied the department’s inspector general investigation. Salazar, who previously apologized, was defiant when asked about the subpoena:
The bottom line is I’m very comfortable with everything we did including the time out and reset button that we had to put in place in the Gulf of Mexico. What the House Natural Resources and energy committee is doing is simply a distraction in the name of politics.
Natural Resources Chairman Doc Hastings (D-WA) said it was important to understand what happened and why Salazar failed to conduct any technical, scientific or economic analysis prior to imposing the drilling ban. He gave the department one week to produce the documents. The subpoena was a last resort for the committee.
The administration’s controversial moratorium — and the subsequent permitorium that followed — caused economic hardships throughout the Gulf region and in communities across America. A recent survey of employers, conducted by Greater New Orleans Inc., revealed 41 percent of businesses are not making a profit and 76 percent have lost cash revenues.
One of the region’s business owners, Leslie Bertucci of R&D Enterprises, shared her story about the moratorium’s impact:
At the time Salazar imposed the drilling ban, he justified his action with a May 27, 2010, report that recommended a six-month drilling moratorium. That recommendation was allegedly supported by seven members of the National Academy of Engineering, who had peer-reviewed the report.
But only after Salazar imposed the job-killing moratorium did Americans learn the truth: Political appointees at the White House and Department of Interior inserted the moratorium recommendation without the knowledge of the seven experts. They subsequently rebutted the implication and went a step further to note the ban “will not measurably reduce risk further and it will have a lasting impact on the nation’s economy which may be greater than that of the oil spill.”
When the department’s inspector general sought information on the incident, administration official stonewalled investigators. That ultimately led to yesterday’s subpoena. The documents sought include:
All documents created, sent, or received by Steve Black, Neal Kemkar, Mary Katherine Ishee, David Hayes and Ted Strickland between April 26, 2010 and June 30, 2010 related to the development, editing, review, issuance, response, or reaction to the May 27, 2010 Department of the Interior report that included a recommendation for a six-month drilling moratorium in the Gulf of Mexico.
All 13 documents that the Interior Department has intervened to block the Acting Inspector General from providing to the Committee.
Rob Bluey directs the Center for Media and Public Policy, an investigative journalism operation at The Heritage Foundation. Follow him on Twitter: @RobertBluey
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here

Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Great comedy.
cozmo on May 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM
In the meantime, Moonbeam Brown and the rest of the Sacramento idiots will just sit on the oil off the west coast, and let it leak to the surface “naturally”.
GarandFan on May 12, 2013 at 12:35 PM
Drill, baby, drill!
petefrt on May 12, 2013 at 12:37 PM
So. what political party are these governors?
davidk on May 12, 2013 at 12:38 PM
“But oil is icky” /White House
Bitter Clinger on May 12, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Sorry for going off-topic for a minute, but I don’t really know where else to raise this:
This morning I got some political mailing from “Townhall Spotlight” signed by “Martin Biancuzzo Senior Correspondent, Capitol Hill Daily” It was about how Obamacare killed its one millionth victim. It’s not a big deal: I get spam all the time, but what struck me is that I received it to an email address that I know I’ve only ever used to register on this site. It also referred to me as “Time Lord,” a nick I only use here. So I checked the Terms of Use and it does say that I can expect mailings from this site, but I don’t see anything about selling/giving my email address to third parties, and I don’t think I’ve consented to anything like that. Could you clarify your policy regarding disclosure of my private information to third parties? Frankly, I find it unnerving that the owners of a political blog compile and share a list of the people who visit it.
Thanks!
Time Lord on May 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM
Townhall and Hotair are now sister sites, since Malkin sold Hotair a couple of years ago. So it’s not really third parties as such.
http://hotair.com/about/
Jeff Weimer on May 12, 2013 at 12:59 PM
DRILL!
workingclass artist on May 12, 2013 at 12:59 PM
…and pigs…will fly!
KOOLAID2 on May 12, 2013 at 1:01 PM
With the ME blowing up, the World will be cut from that source in a few years.
Drill Holes, Drill Holes, Drill Holes
Oil Can on May 12, 2013 at 1:07 PM
Any idiotic state that crushed coal or any other form of energy such as fracking…ought to be shut off and let them sit in the cold, the dark and then the heat.
Let their cars sit idle…let their airports become ghost towns and let them bicycle forever…without benefit of a bike seat too.
Twana on May 12, 2013 at 1:10 PM
I can see the news in a few years: Red states are drilling and fortifying the new sites with National Guard and volunteers. Liberal protestors and saboteurs are beaten back (literally)…or just vanish…or worse. Because it is either local oil and screw them or complete economic collapse.
Seriously, forget cheap gas for a second and take a look around you the next time you’re in a hospital. Imagine everything made of plastic in critically short supply because the oil to make it has been cut off. Try to sleep well that night.
MelonCollie on May 12, 2013 at 1:13 PM
I would shut off the powerlines and pipelines myself.
The difference between civilization and barbarism in the modern world is electricity and oil. That is going to be made abundantly clear in our lifetimes.
MelonCollie on May 12, 2013 at 1:16 PM
I am in favor of letting state PUCs set higher wholesale rates for electricity to be send out-of-state, but I assume that would look like an attempt to regulate interstate trade and be illegal at the state level.
Still, I wonder if there’s a way. Liberal states should have to somehow foot the bill for their NIMBY approach to energy.
slickwillie2001 on May 12, 2013 at 1:16 PM
Obama won’t even approve the Keystone pipeline out of fear he’ll lose the support of the environmental activists (and their OFA donations). He’s not going to have the nerve to allow offshore drilling in the Atlantic.
jon1979 on May 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM
Time to end the drilling moratorium. Ya think?
totherightofthem on May 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM
.
It is specifically because it would aid and abet America’s economy and independence, that it will never be lifted by this White House.
listens2glenn on May 12, 2013 at 1:18 PM
.
Obama doesn’t fear losing the support of, or ‘pissing-off’ the environmental activists.
He fears pissing-off Maurice Strong and George Soros.
listens2glenn on May 12, 2013 at 1:23 PM
The greedy slob Warren Buffett is also paying him off with political donations to keep the oil flowing on his railroad.
slickwillie2001 on May 12, 2013 at 1:24 PM
I saw the words “coastal states” and thought that maybe California would be on the list. It had my hopes up for a short while.
BubbaCluck on May 12, 2013 at 1:41 PM
He might approve it, if he thinks it will shift the press off of Benghazi.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on May 12, 2013 at 1:52 PM
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. This state is sitting on untold wealth. If we could ever get past the ‘Santa Barbara, 1969′ mentality, this state could could end its budgetary and unemployment problems overnight.
Thanks for the sentiment, Bubba, but unfortunately California has been experiencing starvation-levels of sanity for quite some time now.
BillH on May 12, 2013 at 1:52 PM
It’s long past time to revolt against the tyrannical policies of D.C.
I would love to see these governors just go ahead and drill. They may have to protect the sites, but that is why they have a National guard.
Some folks once pledged their lives, fortunes and sacred honor. What will we pledge?
FOWG1 on May 12, 2013 at 2:01 PM
Besides all having coastlines, I wonder what else these states have in common.
/
Odysseus on May 12, 2013 at 2:19 PM
Isn’t Preezy still in contempt of court over no-drilling in the gulf ?
Seems a pretty good time to bring that up.
Add it to the list of cr@p finally seeing the light of day.
pambi on May 12, 2013 at 2:22 PM
Steve Z on May 12, 2013 at 2:37 PM
The actual plan that Lefties have for the Golden State, delay drilling to reserve those resources for the ‘new owners’ when they cede the territory back to Mexico.
socalcon on May 12, 2013 at 2:56 PM
Well, yes. But when are all the governors going to express outrage that no one has been allowed to build a refinery in the entire country for more than thirty years, and gas prices are higher than they should be because of it?
Incandescent on May 12, 2013 at 3:02 PM
Um, you don’t use an address specially for that type of junk?
TH, HA, TWITCHY, FB all go there ( for me).
Erase everything once a month, without reading it.
socalcon on May 12, 2013 at 3:04 PM
I have NO issues with offshore drilling.
That said, the drillers will have Bonds, Insurance, Coastal monitoring, and the understanding that the U.S. will hire the Mossad (cost, plus 12.5 percent) to haul them up by their genitals and burn their screaming carcasses in a public place if they kill one, delicious, soon-to-be-steamed-in-garlic-butter, piece of seafood.
Oil Weenies! Profit all you want! Go for it!
But an Exxon Valdez or New Orleans debacle…
Bitches, It’s gonna be Pay-Per-View as your Board of Directors have their genitals spiral-sliced, crisped in hot oil as they scream for death and…
Toast and beverages will be provided.
heldmyw on May 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM
WryTrvllr on May 12, 2013 at 7:06 PM
Toast and beverages will be provided.
heldmyw on May 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM
Provided by whom?
The federal court where o’bozo filed his lawsuit?
“Daddy, did you plug the hole yet?”
WryTrvllr on May 12, 2013 at 7:11 PM
WryTrvllr on May 12, 2013 at 7:14 PM
I have always thought it strange…. one day Obama comes out and surprises us all by saying he suddenly wanted to expand drilling off the east coast. Then… one month later Deep Horizon blows up and.. gosh, so sorry… now he “has to” issue a drilling moratorium.
Talk about weird coincidences. One day he does something good that nobody would ever expect… goes against his very nature and states he’s going to expand oil drilling…. then one month later.. nearly to the day.. an oil rig blows up and he can’t do it. In fact.. this gives him a reason to go in the exact opposite direction.
And nobody thinks that is suspicious? The President who gave us Fast and Furious?
JellyToast on May 12, 2013 at 7:54 PM
Take a look at:
Here are some facts about the U.S. city average price of unleaded regular gasoline in 2008:
The electorate was up in arms about the 30% increase in gas prices between January 2008 and July 2008. There was a “Tea Party” like reaction at the time (you could even call it the “‘Texas Tea’ Party” because it was over the price of “Texas Tea”, i.e. oil).
So, what are some of the factors that led to the price of gasoline DROPPING an amazing 59% in just 5 months, from $4.090 per gallon in July 2008 to $1.689 per gallon in December 2008?
Here are some significant data points:
Open up supply, remove any “perception of the possibility of a supply issue”, and the price of gas dropped nearly 60%!!!
So who do we have to thank for gas prices approaching new record highs?
Barack Obama for his illegal moritorium.
Barack Obama for his illegal war in Libya.
Barack Obama for his Middle-East policies.
Barack Obama and Democrats in general who seem do be doing everything they can to stand in the way of U.S. oil production and refining.
Do you want to see gas prices drop by more than 50%?
Allow us to DRILL & REFINE HERE! DRILL & REFINE NOW!!!
ITguy on May 12, 2013 at 9:39 PM
Why is it ok in Brazil, but not here?
gp403220 on May 12, 2013 at 10:26 PM
Since many blue states buy electricity from other, sometimes red, states (I’m thinking of this imbroglio from 2010), some of them do “foot the bill”; unfortunately, so do the rest of us.
The trick (politically and Constitutionally) is figuring out how to make them be the exclusive “beneficiaries” of anti-energy high prices.
AesopFan on May 13, 2013 at 12:30 AM
NO MYSTERY HERE:
If you want to figure out what Obama will do, just imagine what Al Qaeda would do to inflict maximum damage on the USA.
The US government has been infiltrated, and it no longer serves the interests of its citizens. This explains almost all US government actions since 2008.
For further information, review “The Manchurian Candidate” (originally intended as a fictional work).
landlines on May 13, 2013 at 1:24 AM
Mmmmmmm…… toast……..
BillH on May 13, 2013 at 10:17 AM
Because it’s a whole bunch of miles away in another country that speaks something similar to Austrian. The protests aren’t happening here in front of the cameras, and the LIVs couldn’t care less, just so long as they can continue to get fuel for their soccermobiles.
BillH on May 13, 2013 at 10:24 AM
He’s already ignoring 2 court orders to open up drilling again. Why would he listen to a bunch of governors?
osborn4 on May 13, 2013 at 4:46 PM