Romney: Obama’s the real Etch-a-Sketch candidate, you know

posted at 5:07 pm on April 4, 2012 by Allahpundit

In which a man possessed of legendary flip-flop kung fu, whom some in the green lobby are backing precisely because they don’t believe a word he says about skepticism towards man-made climate change, beats up on an opponent for not being true to his word. Stuart Rothenberg wrote a column just yesterday arguing that Mitt’s vacillations are actually one of his great strengths in the primary because, no matter how far right his rhetoric may stray, centrists discount it on the surefire assumption that he’s lying for electoral advantage. It’s the Republican version of liberals shrugging at Obama’s ultra-cynical, decades-long “evolution” on gay marriage. And yet, here’s Mitt’s take today on The One: “He doesn’t want to share his real plans before the election.” Er, yeah. Don’t you hate candidates like that?

All right, deep breath. I had to get that off my chest before we shift to blind circle-the-wagons mode for the new nominee. In fact, as Guy Benson argues, Romney’s attack on O today was pretty sharp. And while he didn’t use the words “Etch-a-Sketch,” there may be a method to the madness of trying to paint Obama as the flip-flopper in the race. It’s not Romney being oblivious to his own record, it’s simple strategy:

Mitt Romney has decided the best defense is a good offense. Derided as a “flip-flopper” by President Obama? Throw the charge back in the president’s face. Attacked for his plan to revamp Medicare? Fire back that Obama has already crippled the popular entitlement program.

That was the central theme of the all-but-inevitable Republican presidential nominee’s speech Wednesday to the Newspaper Association of America: Try to take evident vulnerabilities of his own candidacy and turn them against the current White House occupant. As Romney pivots toward the general election – and after Tuesday’s victories, this week seems to mark a line of demarcation between the primary and general elections – it hints at a major part of his strategy to unseat Obama.

Romney has been knocked repeatedly – by Republican and Democratic critics alike – for changing position on issues like abortion-rights and gay marriage. But during his speech, he listed a series of Obama’s own flip-flops he deemed “election-year conversions.” The list included corporate tax rates, regulation, and energy policy.

That’s an interesting twist on the Rovean game plan of reframing your opponent’s greatest strength as a weakness, but maybe Mitt had no choice. What’s Obama’s “great strength” at this point? His landmark domestic “achievement” is on life support at the Supreme Court and the long-hoped-for economic recovery hasn’t yet picked up serious momentum. He’s the rare president who’s going to try to win a second term by making the election a referendum on his challenger, so here’s Romney trying to head him off at the pass by neutralizing one of the Democrats’ strongest attack lines.

And of course he’s right in what he says about Obama’s habit of torching Republican straw men. O might have gotten a standing ovation from the reporters in the room after yesterday’s speech (whereas Romney did not after today’s), but that didn’t stop the AP from dropping this fact check on him for treating opposition to the mandate and cap and trade, among other things, as uniquely GOP phenomena. Take two minutes to read, especially if you’ve forgotten which Democratic presidential candidate was pro-mandate in 2008 and which was anti.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Been to many TEA party rallies, have you? Or are you merely engaging in rectal speak?

As usual…

JohnGalt23 on May 24, 2013 at 1:46 PM

As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.

hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM

Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?

mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM

MSNBC consensus: Obama’s speech was historic, amazing, “one of the best of his presidency”

Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?

parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM

They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.

They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.

A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.

Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM

MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.

rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM

Nobel Peace Prize that he totally earned a mere nine months into his presidency? Yeah, that one.

I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.

fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM

Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!

And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!

Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM

They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.

They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.

Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM

…bromides about what we’re told are President Foreign Policy’s miraculous yet still oddly unmaterialized abilities to move us drastically closer to world peace.

Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!

KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM

I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.

Do they even know or care that they are morons.

marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM

His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.

DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM

Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:

During his foreign policy speech Thursday afternoon, President Obama warned that domestic terrorism would increase in the modern age of the Internet.

“[T]his threat is not new,” Obama said. “But technology and the Internet increase its frequency and lethality.”

Obama warned Americans that materials on the Internet could influence people to commit terrorist acts.

“Today, a person can consume hateful propaganda, commit themselves to a violent agenda and learn how to kill without leaving their home,” he said.

To combat domestic terrorism, Obama reminded Americans that it was important to reach out to Muslim communities.

“The best way to prevent violent extremism is to work with the Muslim American community — which has consistently rejected terrorism — to identify signs of radicalization and partner with law enforcement when an individual is drifting towards violence,” he said. “And these partnerships can only work when we recognize that Muslims are a fundamental part of the American family.”

You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.

onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM

That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?

onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM

Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.

myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM

Didn’t take you that long to inject the man’s race into this didn’t it? And you wonder why blacks will never accept you tea billies hate the man simply because he’s a black man occupying the “people’s” house.

HotAirLib on May 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM

Nah. I’d detest the little pissant s.o.b. if he was white…or Asian…or any one of the myriad of made-up racial divisions.

Solaratov on May 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM

Comment pages: 1 2