“Mad Men” character knocks Mitt Romney’s father

posted at 1:50 pm on April 2, 2012 by Tina Korbe

Sunday’s episode of the popular drama “Mad Men” made headlines at The Hill:

Sunday’s episode of “Mad Men” — the popular drama about an ad agency in the 1960s — gave a nod to the current political scene, with one character taking a not-so-subtle jab at the father of 2012 Republican front-runner Mitt Romney.

Character Henry Francis, a Republican political aide who had worked for New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller in previous seasons, is shown fielding a request for his new boss — strongly hinted to be New York City Mayor John Lindsay — to travel to Michigan to appear with then-Gov. George Romney.

“Well, tell Jim his honor’s not going to Michigan. Because Romney’s a clown and I don’t want him standing next to him,” Francis responds.

Reporter Justin Sink also notes that “Mad Men” executive producer Matthew Weiner is outspoken about his liberal politics and recently appeared as a guest panelist on Bill Maher’s “Real Time.”

Does it matter that Weiner and the other makers of “Mad Men” — a show that is set in the 1960s — managed to work in a political jab that indirectly applies to our times? I think so. It’s yet another illustration that Andrew Breitbart was right to focus so much of his empire on Big Hollywood. The entertainment industry affects us in both subtle and overt ways. In spite of ourselves, we imbue views from beloved fictional characters. The less conscious we are of the value system a show employs, the more susceptible we are to assuming it for ourselves. Straightforward stories — narratives with beginning, middle and end — are, perhaps, the most primordial way in which we make sense of ourselves and our world — and they continue to be one of the most powerful.

It’s better than nothing, I suppose, for conservatives to be able to lay bare the liberal value system of a show, but it would be better still if conservatives told their own stories more frequently and more effectively — and with the same meticulous attention to artistry that ravishing shows like “Mad Men” display.

Click the image to watch.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Wow…so the Libtards will even reach back into the past in order to bash a Republican today???

Next thing you know, they’ll be writing most of our history textbooks and revising history in order to fit their ideologies.

Oh, wait….

LOL

Dr. ZhivBlago on April 3, 2012 at 4:50 PM

Ah, 1964! I was a freshman in high school and had a Goldwater sticker on my binder. My father was a Texan and a Southern Democrat. LBJ had been the Congressman from his district during WWII, and got an air force base and an airport named after my cousin. My political affiliation was not appreciated. I admired George Romney very much, and I don’t remember anything particularly clownish about him. Humphrey and Johnson were entirely another matter. LBJ in particular just oozed creepy clown.

It’s fascinating to see how they develop their view of the sixties, and I think pretty accurate overall. I’ll be watching to see how they portray Johnson. It’s amazing to remember how many people seemed to think they owed it to JFK’s memory to vote for the man, and how quickly that view changed as the death count went up and the draft started in ernest. The draft filled most people my age with dread, and I was no exception, even though I ended up actually joining after my number came in 276.

claudius on April 4, 2012 at 1:27 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3