A Crucial Question: Are We Shooting Enough Endangered Species?
posted at 10:45 am on April 1, 2012 by John Hawkins
Let’s say you’re a farmer and you discover an endangered red bellied tree sloth on your property tomorrow. What do you do? Well, you probably look left, look right, and if you don’t see anyone, you immediately run over it with your tractor and bury it in a hole before some government bureaucrat finds out it’s there and makes your life a living hell.
Of course, there’s a better alternative the government could pursue. It could encourage people to own and profit off of endangered species. That’s been happening in Texas, but a facet of the program may be about to come to an end.
This is the African savanna, Texas-style, where the hot climate and hilly terrain mimic parts of the world’s second-largest continent. The land — splayed with cedars, live oaks, low-lying blackbrush and the occasional prickly pear cactus — also is home to something far more exotic: three species of endangered African antelope.
Their very existence here depends on a tension between survival and death. To protect these species, ranchers here argue, we must kill them.
The antelope are magnificent: limber, with large, almost undulating horns, different on each species. There’s the scimitar-horned oryx, the addax and the dama gazelle, whose horns have a gentle, rising S-curve.
They’re nearly extinct in their native habitats of the African savanna. But because of an unusual exemption under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, these animals have thrived into the thousands by being hunted legally on sprawling ranches in the United States. In all, there are more than 5,000 such ranches in Texas, mostly in the south-central region known as Hill Country.
Alongside the antelope exist exotic animals of every stripe, including zebra, African bongos, kangaroo and regal rare Pere David’s deer, which are extinct in the wild.
…The Texas game ranches have the cachet of the wild, providing hunters with the experience, game and trophies of endangered and extinct-in-the-wild animals they want without leaving the United States. A successful trophy hunt can cost up to $15,000, depending on the beast.
…The exotic-ranch owners are in a furious fight with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service — and animal rights groups — over having to get permits as of next Wednesday for the three endangered species of African antelope.
The ranchers argue, forcefully, that they’ve saved the antelope because they haven’t had to abide by the Endangered Species Act, which imposes paperwork and accounting requirements, since 2005, giving them the incentive to raise the animals for sport hunting.
Animal activists counter that conservation doesn’t mean raising an animal to kill it and put its head on the wall.
….The fact that the three antelope species went from a few dozen when they first arrived in Texas in the late 1970s to more than 17,000 in the organization’s 2010 census makes the conservation argument a “no-brainer,” said Seale, standing in front of a wall of mounted animal heads.
“They’re challenging animals to hunt,” said Nyle Maxwell, a West Texas rancher who has four car dealerships in the Austin area. “It provides us pleasure to hunt, meat we enjoy and a trophy on our wall.”
Maxwell was getting rid of his scimitar-horned oryx before next week’s permit deadline. Interviewed in late March, he was down to seven of the 12 he had on his ranch.
“If we don’t have an economic purpose, these animals are going to go away,” he said, adding that, “we very much enjoy the meat.”
The conservation argument doesn’t impress the ranchers’ nemesis: Friends of Animals.
“A Texas game ranch is not an ecosystem wherein animals are protected,” said Priscilla Feral, the president of Friends of Animals, which successfully sued the government to force the rule change on the African antelope. “They’re a commercial product.”
You know what other animal is a “commercial product?” Cows. What do you think the chances are that they’re going to go extinct any time soon? If Bald Eagles tasted like chicken, but had less calories, we’d have “Bald Eagle Freedom Burgers” on the menu at McDonald’s and you’d be buying their eggs at Piggly Wiggly.
You want to save any endangered species? Well, just remember that free enterprise works. Incentives also work. Let people find a way to profit off of a critter, get out of their way, and watch that endangered species make a comeback like Tim Tebow in the 4th quarter.
John Hawkins is a professional writer who runs Right Wing News and Linkiest. He’s also the co-owner of the The Looking Spoon. You can hear more from John Hawkins on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, G+, You Tube, & at PJ Media.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

MSNBC consensus: Obama’s speech was historic, amazing, “one of the best of his presidency”

Video: Baltimore schools spend stimulus dollars on … makeovers?







Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
To keep the money flowing to his base, and Dem operatives employed until the next campaign.
PattyJ on May 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM
There is at least one nobrain on each thread. The rats are out in the last two days. Desperado.
Schadenfreude on May 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM
It’s called Quantitative Easing. The same reason gas, milk, eggs, and everything else is more expensive. But I don’t expect you to know anything about money or math because you’re a libturd. Which means you’re an idiot.
Dominion on May 9, 2013 at 4:36 PM
The NewsBusters blog over the years has compiled hundreds of actual examples of the Democrat Media “reporting” a story and how they “report” it depending on the party affiliation of the person the story is about. And their evidence, with actual linked results, prove conclusively that the Democrat Media will in fact ID the subject of a story as Republican. but will usually not do so if said story subject is a Democrat. Even if the story is about the same subject.
Del Dolemonte on May 9, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Forget the Billion dollars Jack. How bout releasing some government data for free:
Let’s start with the Fast and Furious documents you are hiding under executive priviledge, then move on to the Benghazi videos and correspondence.
can_con on May 9, 2013 at 4:41 PM
The only thing Obama might ever have learned in Texas is how to tell “tall stories”. But then, he already has long since way past Texas in that.
VorDaj on May 9, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Low information, perhaps. I completely missed this story:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/
Did the US capture the wrong suspects?
bayam on May 9, 2013 at 4:44 PM
Austin TX Largest Employers:
1. Austin Independent School District.
2. City of Austin.
3. Dell.
4. US Government.
5. IBM
6. Seton Family of Hospitals.
7. St. David’s Health Care Partnership.
8. State of Texas.
9. University of Texas.
10. AMD
Only 2 “high tech” outfits in that list, Toots.
Del Dolemonte on May 9, 2013 at 4:45 PM
FIFM
Del Dolemonte on May 9, 2013 at 4:46 PM
Yes, because you know, the energy sector is not a prime consumer of technology and high tech. Just burnin coal and drillin’ fer oil!
can_con on May 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM
He says, tongue in cheek. Barry sees all, Barry knows all. There is nothing to learn. He’s there to do show the folks “how to” in whatever it is he needs them to know.
hawkeye54 on May 9, 2013 at 4:54 PM
bayams idea of free market tech startups is Solyndra.
tom daschle concerned on May 9, 2013 at 4:54 PM
So Mr. Obama jets into a state, at taxpayer expense, to tout an alleged jobs program, backed by egregious regulatory oversight, financed with taxpayer money- in a state that has unparalleled economic and jobs growth because of its low taxes, unobtrusive regulation and strict adherence to free-market principles?
Oh and the have a budget surplus (read no deficit).
Does he realize that sound is the entire country laughing at him?
Marcus Traianus on May 9, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Ain’t that the sad cold hard truth.
can_con on May 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM
It’s a good thing we have Republicans to block Senior President’s agenda, wouldn’t you say bayam.
DDay on May 9, 2013 at 5:07 PM
The irony is lost on him…too busy checking himself in the mirror wearing that Texan hat :) …’ich bin ein Texan’ :)…he thinks :)…
jimver on May 9, 2013 at 5:12 PM
Good thing Obama is for the tech industry… oh, wait…
NY Times: Obama May Back FBI Plan To Wiretap Web Users
tetriskid on May 9, 2013 at 5:13 PM
Obama would have thought he was the caterer.
Aviator on May 9, 2013 at 5:26 PM
The only reason Barry is in Texas is to turn it RED. Socialists don’t care about job creation. They want a bigger welfare system aka “income redistribution”.
GarandFan on May 9, 2013 at 6:02 PM
They really need to ban presidents flying on planes…
Make them take public transportation…like the Bus.
:)
William Eaton on May 9, 2013 at 6:12 PM
I think you could consider Dell more of a retailer.
BigWyo on May 9, 2013 at 6:30 PM
RESPECT???? Obama?????
He’s destroying the freaking country and denying my kids and grandkids their ability to advance in their lives.
The office deserves respect, the current occupant is not worthy of it.
Cruz takes it to him like Reagan took it to Carter in 1980.
In our pansified male squishy culture we’re not used to seeing someone on the Conservative side have any cajones.
Go get um Cruz!!!
PappyD61 on May 9, 2013 at 6:35 PM
He could talk to the other very fast growing business owners here, CHL trainers and testers.
I see a story about CHLs in one form or another nearly every night on the news in Dallas. They say there’s a minimum of 3 month wait (twice as long as it used to be) from the date if application.
So that truly is a growing cottage industry in the state! Hehehe.
tru2tx on May 9, 2013 at 6:45 PM
date of application. Oy.
tru2tx on May 9, 2013 at 6:45 PM
tru2tx on May 9, 2013 at 6:49 PM
Pay attention to the population shifts – means a lot in delegate and representative math.
California is not only losing jobs, but going deeper into the red; as in financial red.
Odie1941 on May 9, 2013 at 8:12 PM
Why Texas?
So he can sucker the rest of proggy America in having the moronic belief he has something to do with the Texas economy..
He doesn’t never did..
Just as in Ohio, we elect Kasich, and start a slow recovery from the democrat dark age, and he shows up claiming credit for the results of GOP polices he hates.
and the media aids in that smoke screen..
they should begin every report on him there, he opposed every policy which enabled this recovery, still does, and wants you to think he’s the REAL mover and shaker there.. when it’s only the special needs democrat voter who isn’t rolling their eyes at the crown prince of stolen credit.
mark81150 on May 9, 2013 at 8:25 PM
Cruz as called everyone’s bluff on immigration. He has cut to the core, cut to the bottom line, and staked his ground on the bottom line.
Bravo, Ted Cruz!
petefrt on May 9, 2013 at 10:06 PM
You are really “non partisan” for even having the thoughts to pen down that first sentence.
HotAirLib on May 9, 2013 at 10:29 PM
So far, there’s not a thing about Ted Cruz I’m finding to criticize.
I hope he doesn’t disappoint. So far, so good.
Lourdes on May 10, 2013 at 12:38 AM
As an insightful person once said, liberals try to discredit conservatives by attempting to paint them as one (or a combination) of three things: old/out of touch, stupid, or evil/crazy.
Ted isn’t old. And he sure as hell isn’t stupid.
They will try to paint him as evil/crazy. Be ready! Obviously Ted is neither evil nor crazy, but that will be their tact. They will call him “extreme” or “ultra right wing” etc. Thankfully Ted won’t take the attacks sitting down, and he doesn’t come off as extreme at all when you listen to him. In fact, there is a calmness and a confidence about him. He chooses his words carefully, but doesn’t do so out of fear. Ted will win the argument by sticking to substance. I love Mitt, but Mitt let himself be defined by others for too long before countering the attacks in an ongoing, very visible way. I was never a Ron Paul supporter, but at least he usually stood on principle when advocating for his positions, gradually winning himself more and more support, and I think that is what Cruz will do.
Speaking of the next presidential primary season… Ted is an engaging speaker, and doesn’t need to resort to the childish, Christie-style theatrics. Ted is a courageous man of principle, while Christie is a big mouth traitor who loves the adoration of Democrats and the media.
Oh, and don’t even mention Rand to me. His willingness to support amnesty means he’s off my list. Though redemption is possible. Oh, and Marco who? And Palin? Please, let’s be serious.
bluegill on May 10, 2013 at 3:04 AM
And I loved how Cruz refused to bow down before the Senate dinosaur Dianne Feinstein. Haughty Dianne was shaking and outraged that she was being challenged so directly when Cruz questioned her on her efforts to ban guns. It was a beautiful thing to witness. The woman was stuttering and stammering and shaken, causing her old buddies to jump in to try to help her out and cut off Cruz before he could continue and finish making his points. They could tell Dianne was floundering, so they went straight to insulting Cruz and the state of TX in response! And then haughty Dianne, who thinks she should be treated like a queen and never challenged, went whining on various tv shows later in the day about it. Dianne declared that it wasn’t her job to consider constitutionality, and that it was the responsibility of others to do so, and Cruz pointed out that they all swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. This exposed the haughty dinosaur Dianne as a fool who disregards her oath, and she knew it.
Dems are nervous about publicly debating Cruz one-on-one when they aren’t able to shut him up or shout him down. I’d like to see a one-on-one debate between Cruz and either Biden or Feinstein. We all know Biden and Feinstein couldn’t do it. Feinstein wouldn’t have her wingmen defenders to jump in when she’s floundering, and Biden would only be able to respond with his sneering expressions and childish chortling. That won’t work with Cruz, who is the very picture of class and who will hit back on substance.
bluegill on May 10, 2013 at 3:26 AM
What Cruz is that Romney, whom I love, wasn’t, is aggressive and confident while being aggressive.
Cruz thrives on the debate and on promoting and defending the right ideas.
bluegill on May 10, 2013 at 3:32 AM
Low Regulation Texas = West Texas Fertilizer Plant Explosion
Texas Tort Reform = One Million Dollars in Liability Insurance held by the owners of the Fertilizer plaint to be divided by the families of 14 dead and the 200 injured and millions of dollars in property damage as a result of the explosion.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/west-explosion/headlines/20130503-west-fertilizer-was-insured-for-only-1-million-a-fraction-of-estimated-losses.ece
I did service time in San Antonio and Wichita Falls Texas 42 years ago, it was a dusty, dirty backwards state then, and things apparently have not changed.
smokin hot politics on May 10, 2013 at 7:52 AM
That’s not how biden wins. He simply says something he can’t back up. No moderator ever challenges him. No one who debates him can contradict him because the “facts” he uses are meant to be obscure, so his debate opponents don’t challenge him because they never heard anything about what biden is talking about, and are afraid to be provably wrong on the subject. By the time it comes out that biden was talking out his ass, or even making it up out of thin air, the damage has already been done.
If Cruz knows how to defeat that, against leftist moderators (and every single one of them is), more power to him.
runawayyyy on May 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM
Obama doesn’t want more jobs, at least of the kind that one can make an honest living at.
Self sufficient individuals don’t generally vote for Democrats.
18-1 on May 10, 2013 at 12:09 PM
I was gonna say that Obama went to Texas to see how other countries create jobs, but I actually agree with…
RalphyBoy on May 11, 2013 at 1:13 AM
When Obama comes to town, keep your children home!
The O only speaks to kids. He can’t fool most adults.
Delsa on May 11, 2013 at 11:05 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2