Breaking: Current TV “terminates relationship” with Olbermann, replaces him with … Eliot Spitzer; Update: Olby regrets joining Current, vows “legal actions” against it
posted at 5:25 pm on March 30, 2012 by Allahpundit
Fox, MSNBC, ESPN, and now Current. Apparently it’s impossible for a media outfit to co-exist happily with Keith Olbermann.
Note to CNN: How lucky do you feel?
In a letter to viewers, the channel said Friday: “We created Current to give voice to those Americans who refuse to rely on corporate-controlled media and are seeking an authentic progressive outlet. We are more committed to those goals today than ever before. Current was also founded on the values of respect, openness, collegiality, and loyalty to our viewers. Unfortunately these values are no longer reflected in our relationship with Keith Olbermann and we have ended it.”
Mr. Olbermann will not be given an opportunity to sign off…
The decision to dismiss Mr. Olbermann was unanimous among the senior managers of Current, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Alternate headline: “Cable-access host loses last three viewers.” If any of this comes as a surprise, you must have missed (a) this post and its follow-up back in January when the first rumblings about Olby not getting along with Current’s management began and (b) the entire arc of his career.
Updates are coming as reaction to this wholly predictable clusterfark develops, so stand by. A question to ponder while you wait: No one embodies “respect,” “openness,” and “loyalty” quite like Client Number Nine, huh?
Update: TPM has a source.
According to a source familiar with the situation, Current decided to let Olbermann go because the progressive pundit “did not respect the viewers of Current.” The basis of his firing included, according to the source: “sabotaging the network” and attacking Current and its executives.”
The source added that Olbermann failed to show up for work without authorization, missing almost half of his working days in the months of January and February. Olbermann asked for a vacation day on March 5, the night before Super Tuesday, according to the source. He was told it would be a breach if he took the vacation, which Olbermann did.
The NYT story linked up top has that same detail about March 5.
Update: As promised, here comes the clusterfark: Olby just tweeted that he’ll be putting his statement out on Twitter imminently. Here’s his feed. Things I’m hoping to see: “That Nobel prize was totally undeserved.” Stay tuned.
Update: Yep. Clusterfark:
I’d like to apologize to my viewers and my staff for the failure of Current TV. Editorially, Countdown had never been better. But for more than a year I have been imploring @AlGore and @JoelHyatt to resolve our issues internally, while I’ve been not publicizing my complaints, and keeping the show alive for the sake of its loyal viewers and even more loyal staff. Nevertheless, Mr. Gore and Mr. Hyatt, instead of abiding by their promises and obligations and investing in a quality news program, finally thought it was more economical to try to get out of my contract. It goes almost without saying that the claims against me in Current’s statement are untrue and will be proved so in the legal actions I will be filing against them presently. To understand Mr. Hyatt’s “values of respect, openness, collegiality and loyalty,” I encourage you to read of a previous occasion Mr. Hyatt found himself in court for having unjustly fired an employee. That employee’s name was Clarence B. Cain: http://nyti.ms/HueZsa In due course, the truth of the ethics of Mr. Gore and Mr. Hyatt will come out. For now, it is important only to again acknowledge that joining them was a sincere and well-intentioned gesture on my part, but in retrospect a foolish one. That lack of judgment is mine and mine alone, and I apologize again for it.
Whom to believe? The guy who seems to end up clashing with every network he joins? Or … Al Gore?
Update: Andy Levy of “Red Eye” imagines the statement Olby should have issued.
Update: The only place left he can go is the Internet, which is good because if ever there was a guy who really needs to be his own boss, he’s it. I wonder if he’ll start his own Beck-type operation where he does a show every night for paid subscribers or if he’ll latch onto, say, Media Matters and put out exorbitantly expensive podcasts for them. Let’s hope that a serene, independent-minded shop like MMFA can cope with his hysterical partisanship and unique workplace charm.
Update: The Political Math guy tweets, “If you play Olbermann’s career in reverse, it’s the story of a jobless man who rises from a lowly Internet channel to a prime-time talk show”.
Update: Politico identifies Olby’s chief nemesis at Current as network prez David Bohrman:
There was noticeable tension between Bohrman and Olbermann from the get-go, said a source familiar with the situation.
“It seemed like Bohrman had it in for Keith since Bohrman got hired at Current TV,” said the source. The source asserted Bohrman used Olbermann’s show as “a guinea pig for trying out new talent” on Current’s airwaves, such as Spitzer and Bill Press, both of whom guest hosted “Countdown.”
Bohrman “brought in all his own people,” said the source, asserting Bohrman favored folks with CNN ties, including Shelley Lewis, who was the lead producer for CNN’s “American Morning” and is now Current’s executive vice president for programming. Spitzer, of course, also came from CNN.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Networks like Current (and CNN, and Fox News, and ESPN, and the Weather Channel, and most of the other ones) make their money by charging per-subscriber fees to the cable system operators. (If your cable system wants to carry ESPN, they might have to pay ESPN $5 per month per cable subscriber. And every cable system wants to carry ESPN.)
But whatever a cable system was paying Current, it was probably too much, since hardly anyone was watching. And if Al Jazeera is giving its programming away for free online, there’s no incentive for Time Warner to pay per-subscriber fees for that.
If AJ were willing to give Time Warner its programming for free, or even pay Time Warner to carry their channel (like a home shopping channel might do), I’m sure they could get back on the cable system in no time.
J.S.K. on January 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM
I should probably note that most cable networks also make some money from national advertising — so it could theoretically be worth a cable network’s while to offer its programming to cable system operators free, in hopes of increasing its audience so it can sell more advertising.
J.S.K. on January 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM
Isn’t this pretty much what Jonah Goldberg wrote about in Liberal Fascism…that the views of Al Qaida and AJ were WAY closer to the left than the right?
Darin on January 4, 2013 at 3:46 PM
Sincerely doubt that AJ could front up two presenters more execrable than Ed Schultz or Sean Hannitty (who worked in construction btw).
CorporatePiggy on January 4, 2013 at 4:03 PM
Oh noes! What will happen to The Young Jerks?
Galtian on January 4, 2013 at 4:20 PM
Apparently there are people still stuck in the 80′s, who actually pay for TV, 99% of which they’d never watch.
Oh well. Until they figure out there’s a whole world of TV available on the internet (which Al Gore took the initiative in creating btw) I guess we’ll have to continue reading stories dealing with the drama of which channels of crap are available and which are not, all for the steal of $80+ per month.
MNHawk on January 4, 2013 at 4:32 PM
My chat minutes ago with Comcast:
analyst Ivy Rose has entered room
Ivy Rose: Hello Akzed, Thank you for contacting Comcast Live Chat Support. My name is Ivy Rose. Please give me one moment to review your information.
Akzed: My Issue: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/01/leftist-jihadist-media-nexus-terror-tv-a-jazeera-acquires-gores-current-tv-a-jazeera-america.html Comcast must not carry Al Jazeera in basic cable since it bought Current TV.
Ivy Rose: I hope your day is doing great! I am looking forward to help you.
Akzed: To whom do I complain about this?
Akzed: I’m not complaining about you, but about carrying Al Jazzera!
Ivy Rose: Oh!
Ivy Rose: I understand that. We will definitely look into this.
Ivy Rose: Since you reached Phone and Internet Technical support, I would be glad to connect you to our Cable analyst for further assistance, Akzed.
Akzed: thanks. The options were limited. I chose “other.”
analyst Ivy Rose has left room
Ivy Rose: You will see a message that says I have “left the room”; however, you will still be connected to the next available agent. Please stay online and connected to the chat for the next agent who will assist you as soon as possible. Thank you for contacting Comcast – we appreciate your continued business.
Ivy Rose: Good bye for now. Take care!
Akzed: Thanks
Ivy Rose: Please wait, while the problem is escalated to another analyst
analyst Ryan has entered room
Akzed: My Issue: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/01/leftist-jihadist-media-nexus-terror-tv-a-jazeera-acquires-gores-current-tv-a-jazeera-america.html Comcast must not carry Al Jazeera in basic cable since it bought Current TV.
Ryan: Thank you for taking the time to chat with us today.
Ryan: So you will not have to repeat yourself, can you allow me 2-3 minutes to review what has already been discussed please?
Akzed: No problemo.
Akzed: Al Jazeera is the mouthpiece of radical Islam. It is a propaganda tool, not news.
Ryan: Thank you for that information.
Ryan: Akzed, I have checked my resources.
Ryan: At this time Comcast does not carry the English version of Al Jazeera TV.
Akzed: If it’s part of basic cable, I’m paying for enemy propaganda.
Akzed: They bought Current TV which you do carry.
Akzed: They will be broadcasting in English on what is now Current TV.
Ryan: Let me check on that.
Akzed: Take it to the bank.
Ryan: Akzed, I have checked our channel lineup.
Akzed: Visit the link I sent above.
Ryan: Al Jazeera is not part of our channel lineup.
Ryan: You can go to this link to confirm that.
Ryan: https://www.comcast.com/Localization/Localize.ashx?Referer=%2fCustomers%2fClu%2fChannelLineup.ashx%3farea%3d0
Akzed: You carry Current TV, which they bought and will be using to put enemy propaganda in our homes at our expense. It’s a fact. Current is now owned by Al Jazeera.
Akzed: Go here: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/01/robert-spencer-unholy-alliance-comes-out-of-the-shadows-and-into-your-living-room.html
Ryan: Yes, Current TV is part of our Digital Preferred channel lineup.
Ryan: Akzed, with the diversity of our customers’ interests, we strive to provide a wide variety of quality channels that will interest all of our customers.
~
Then he quit the chat.
Akzed on January 4, 2013 at 6:52 PM
Stealth Jihad right here..it’s very telling to say that Al-Jazeera is more inline with Current Tvs views than Glenn Becks views..
sadsushi on January 4, 2013 at 8:07 PM
Why is this considered a sell-out? More like bringing sunshine to the dark global warming underworld. The cap and tax scam has always been about keeping Middle East oil flowing and stopping America from developing it’s own resources. The oil sheiks and their bag man Al Gore are getting us to concentrate their efforts on inefficient, non-sensical “green” energy sources to keep us dependent.
Don’t believe me? Take a look at Gore’s father, Al Sr.. He did the exact same thing during the Cold War, pretending to be an agent of detente while lining his pockets with Armand Hammer’s Russian oil money. The Gore family has consistently sided with evil and practiced duplicity. Why is anyone surprised?
miles on January 5, 2013 at 9:59 AM
Two points:
1. Al Gore has finally lowered himself to the point that the left can no longer deny he is nothing more than a shil of the worst kind (I would have said pimp, but that implies the presence of at least some morality, and we know that Gore is completely amoral)
2. A Trojan Horse comes in many shapes.
georgeofthedesert on January 6, 2013 at 3:40 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2