Polish tabloid: Is Obama going to sell us out to Russia on missile defense?

posted at 6:42 pm on March 26, 2012 by Allahpundit

Go look at the screenshot and translation at BuzzFeed. I don’t get it. Why would Poland be nervous about its western allies leaving it under the thumb of a menacing authoritarian neighbor?

If/when O’s reelected (shudder) and gives up eastern European missile defense entirely, I sure hope it’s for something tangible in return — Russian concessions on Syria, maybe — and not another sub-moronic “reset” with Putin. The concession he’ll probably seek, as Heritage’s James Carafano points out, is some sort of reduction in Russia’s nuclear arsenal. The One’s goal is “nuclear zero,” not lots of nukes + lots of defensive measures, so if he has to trade missile defense to shrink the overall global stockpile, hey. I hope it’ll comfort the Poles to know that while there’s nothing stopping Russia from nuking them except the dubious promise of a NATO retaliation if they do, they might not be nuked quite as much.

In the meantime, Romney and Gingrich are making Obama pay:

“This is no time for our president to be pulling his punches with the American people,” Romney said while campaigning in San Diego. “And not telling us what he’s intending to do with regards to our missile defense system, with regards to our military might and with regards to our commitment to Israel … I will make it very clear that the relationship we have around the world is one where America will be strong, that America’s strength and commitment to our friends and allies will be unshakable and unwavering.”

Gingrich called the exchange with Medvedev an “extraordinary moment caught on tape where the president basically said to a Russian leader, ‘Please wait until after the election so I can sell out.’

“If you read what he said, it is the most blatant comment about selling out American defenses I think any American president’s ever made and I don’t see how any American could trust him ever again after that comment,” Gingrich said. “I mean, he thinks it’s in private and he’s saying to the Russians, please quote ‘give me some space’ so I can be re-elected and then I’ll be free to do anything I want to. Well, that just told you how radically left-wing Obama’s going to be in the second term.”

Is that actually true, though? Daniel Drezner points to Reagan, Dubya, and Bush 43 as examples of presidents who actually drifted more towards the center on foreign policy in their second terms than towards their respective bases. The reason is simple: As time wears on and unforeseen developments happen abroad, presidents become more reactive than proactive. They see what’s working and what isn’t in their favored approach and adapt, which means inching away from that approach. O, remember, came into office promising he’d talk to anyone without preconditions, but once he realized he couldn’t charm Iran into giving up nuclear weapons, it was sanctions and Stuxnet and, maybe soon, war. (Another example is him borrowing heavily from, and even expanding on, Bush’s counterterror playbook. You didn’t hear him talk much on the trail in ’08 about drone strikes on American citizens like Awlaki, huh?) The problem is, from his stalling on entitlement reform to cheap populist panders like “the Buffett Rule” to the transparent charade of pretending he’s opposed to gay marriage, every move Obama makes seems calculated to maximize his reelection odds. Whether that’s because his top priority is to protect policy initiatives like ObamaCare from early in his term or if he’s just so ambitious that winning again means more than anything, I honestly don’t know what he’d do if he had a free hand as a lame duck. Would he abandon missile defense? Well … yeah, maybe. Want to chance it?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

All this and unilateral nuclear disarmament too.

Somewhere, a retired KGB guy is laughing his a$$ off.

Mr Galt on March 26, 2012 at 10:54 PM

Obama is going to make sure that the next President’s won’t have the options to re-defense… He is taking the US enough notches that the rest of the world will be able to just pssssttt us off… He wants us to become Portugal in the European Union when it comes to holding power in the world…

That is the only way to community organize the US’s current 1% status in the world… Obama’s golds are not different then communist, socialist, anarchists or jihadists…

Y314K on March 26, 2012 at 11:39 PM

Well, that just told you how radically left-wing Obama’s going to be in the second term.”

Is that actually true, though? Daniel Drezner points to Reagan, Dubya, and Bush 43 as examples of presidents who actually drifted more towards the center on foreign policy in their second terms than towards their respective bases.

Umm, yeah, because if he was going to drift to the center, given that he has been to the left, the Russians would totally be willing to “give him space”.

AP, you really don’t believe that he was telling the Russians he was going to stand firm on missile defense?

AZfederalist on March 26, 2012 at 11:43 PM

“Is Obama going to sell us out to Russia on missile defense?”

Short answer: Yes.

Long answer: Beyond a shadow of a doubt if he is reelected.

Rick013 on March 27, 2012 at 4:29 AM

Unfortunately, national defense is a back-burner issue for most Americans. They are concerned with the imploding economy, lack of work security and other immediate pocket book issues. That so many still don’t ties this sh*t sandwich to the chef, Barry Hussein, is a testament to his fluffers in the media continuing to prop him up. I keep thinking “this can’t last” but somehow it does. And the GOP’s answer?…Willard (Slobama) Romney. God, help us, because You are the only one who can.

swinia sutki on March 27, 2012 at 5:31 AM

Um, he already threw Poland under the bus on missile defense when he canceled the European Ground Based Interceptors, and the Czech Republic over the radar. The only question now is whether, and how many times he backs up over them.

Dexter_Alarius on March 27, 2012 at 8:33 AM

You said it. Obama may deserve the benefit of the doubt, but can we really take the chance? I don’t think so.

RebeccaH on March 27, 2012 at 10:12 AM

Is Obama going to sell us out to Russia on missile defense?

Who knows?

I mean sure he said he was going to; but he says a lot of stuff and doesn’t bother to do most of it.

Basically if he weren’t a liar who can’t possibly be trusted to keep his word this would be a lot more worrying.

gekkobear on March 27, 2012 at 1:01 PM

In a single word YES!

scboy on March 27, 2012 at 3:24 PM

Comment pages: 1 2