Time for another debate?

posted at 8:40 am on March 21, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Mitt Romney sailed to an easy win over Rick Santorum last night in Illinois, winning by twelve points in a primary that unfolded just about how pollsters predicted — unlike in Mississippi a week earlier.  The 47% plurality won by Romney may have been the lowest winning percentage in Illinois in 100 years as Smart Politics points out, but it’s also the first time in decades that an Illinois primary meant anything to Republicans, too.  Romney took the lion’s share of the delegates — at least 41 of the 54 at stake last night, with three delegate races still outstanding.  It was an impressive win:

With a decisive win in the Illinois presidential primary, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney sets his sights on the bayou where Louisiana holds the next Republican primary.

“We thank the people of Illinois for this extraordinary victory,” Romney told supporters in the Chicago suburb of Schaumburg. “Elections are about choices. Today, hundreds of thousands of people in Illinois joined millions of people in this country in this cause.”

With 99% of precincts reporting, Romney led former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum by a 47%-to-35% margin. Texas Rep. Ron Paul was running third at 9%, while former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had 8%.

With the victory, Romney was poised to win at least 41 of the 54 delegates up for grabs in the state, giving him a total of 562, according to CNN’s estimate. Santorum is second with 249, Gingrich third with 137 and Paul last with 69.

Next comes Louisiana, where Santorum expects to do well in a proportional primary on Saturday.  He’ll need a win to keep the race from hitting a tipping point and Republicans from coalescing around Romney.  If Romney wins in Louisiana, he’ll add a Southern state to his regional claims and head into the 10-day break with momentum and a favorable primary schedule in April.  Santorum has to last out April to get to a more favorable primary schedule in May, with five southern states and two in the Midwest.  Romney wants a knockout, and fast; Santorum needs a gamechanger.

You know what might work for both of them?  Another debate.  In my column for The Week, I lay out why both men might be inclined to see a debate between Louisiana’s primary and the four contests on April 3rd as an opportunity for their own strategic purposes, as long as it was a real, one-on-one debate:

Santorum might feel that the potential reward of another debate would be worth risking another mediocre showing. Santorum has won two primaries and a caucus since the last debate, and he has a fair shot at winning Louisiana’s primaries on Saturday, while Tuesday’s primary in Illinois looks likely to break for Romney. Starting in April, though, the primary schedule looks a lot less friendly for the Pennsylvanian. Eight states will hold primaries — four on April 3, and five more on the 21st — and Santorum probably only has a significant chance of winning in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. If he can gain traction and catch up in the delegate hunt, May looks more promising, with seven of the eight states in the South or Midwest. But by the time Santorum gets there, his strength may have faded if he can’t keep up with Romney in April. Santorum has managed to outmaneuver Gingrich to become Romney’s most significant competitor, but without real wins to close the delegate gap, his credibility will evaporate. He needs a game-changer.

Would Romney agree to a debate? Conventional wisdom would dictate that a frontrunner avoid getting tangled in another debate. However, Romney may also need a game-changer — not to win the nomination, but to win it more quickly. Thanks to rule changes made by the RNC after John McCain won the nomination before most of the country got a chance to vote, Romney has to outlast everyone else and hope that he gets enough delegates to clinch a convention majority. While his opponents continue to campaign, the delegate splits at least give the impression that Romney won’t be able to close the deal, leaving the possibility open for a brokered convention. A big debate win for Romney, or even just another defensive and distracted performance from Santorum, might be enough to derail Santorum and produce the tipping point that Romney needs to get voters to climb onto his bandwagon.

More importantly, though, voters in the upcoming states could use a fresh debate, as long as it doesn’t use the game-show format we’ve seen thus far — and with only two candidates on stage, the need for that format disappears:

The most important question is whether the voters need another debate — and perhaps the answer is yes, given the right conditions. None of the previous debates used a format that produced real insight into policy or governing temperament, owing mainly to the number of candidates on stage and the media’s insistence on using game-show techniques. With only the two frontrunning candidates on stage, the time pressure on answers created by the need to get to seven, eight, or nine candidates evaporates. Romney and Santorum would have more time for substantive answers to substantive questions — presuming the moderator focused on issues that matter most to voters, and not silly questions about underwear and personal squabbles. In a revamped format that perhaps could take its cues from the Gingrich-Herman Cain debate, one last face-off might produce significant value for voters still choosing which candidate to support.

I’d guess that the likelihood of another debate would be low.  Both candidates probably want to focus on raising money in the ten-day break, and neither would leap at the chance to put themselves at risk.  However, voters never got a real debate with the leading candidates, and one at this stage — with almost half of the states remaining to cast ballots — might be a very good idea for them.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I think there should be another debate, but this debate should be between 2008 Obama and 2012 Obama. If the Republicans were smart they would cobble together a debate between 2008 Obama and 2012 Obama and play commercials of it between any Republican debate.

OxyCon on March 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM

Anything to keep the Santorum dream alive, right Ed?

OT: this site should look to hire an economic conservative as a writer. HA definitely has the social-cons represented.

rndmusrnm on March 21, 2012 at 1:38 PM

Anything to keep the Santorum dream alive, right Ed?

OT: this site should look to hire an economic conservative as a writer. HA definitely has the social-cons represented.

rndmusrnm on March 21, 2012 at 1:38 PM

I believe Hot Air already has economic conservatives. If you’re looking to tilt the field more towards Romney, you need a socially liberal economic conservative.

Oh wait. You already have Allahpundit.

tom on March 21, 2012 at 2:10 PM

In a word…NO!!!!!!

Natebo on March 21, 2012 at 2:11 PM

worst idea…

jimver on March 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM

Romney got more votes in this year’s Illinois Primary than McCain got in 2008:

2012 Illinois Primary:
Romney 428,434
Santorum 321,079

2008 Illinois Primary:
John McCain 424,071

bluegill on March 21, 2012 at 9:04 AM

YAWN !!!!

Can someone please explain to me why people are trying to undercut Romney’s big Illinois win by talking about voter turnout levels, when in reality Romney got more votes this year than McCain got 4 years ago?

2012 Illinois Primary:
Romney 428,434
Santorum 321,079

2008 Illinois Primary:
John McCain 424,071

bluegill on March 21, 2012 at 9:29 AM WHAT?

KOOLAID2 on March 21, 2012 at 3:05 PM

OT: this site should look to hire an economic conservative as a writer. HA definitely has the social-cons represented.

rndmusrnm on March 21, 2012 at 1:38 PM

I’m much more of an economic conservative than a social conservative. But to most Romney acolytes here, anybody who isn’t in full lockstep with the Romney campaign is a Neanderthal Christian zealot wingnut, and you’re not sophisticated enough to discern the distinction.

Right Mover on March 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM

With the RepublicRAT establishment in his back pocket, RINO Romney (aka Obama-Lite) doesn’t have to debate anything. Willard (from the RAT movie of the same name) can just skate now. All of which really, really angers me about the RepublicRAT establishment being COMPLICIT in the LIES, LIES, LIES Willard (from the RAT movie of the same name) spread ALL OVER Florida and Iowa before that about Gingrich (see “What Really Happened to the Gingrich Ethics Case?” by Byron York, Townhall.com 2/6/2012). Nice goin’, STUPID Party!! IF you can get Willard (from the RAT movie of the same name) elected (which is now doubtful since you’ve pissed off 62% of your base), you weasels will have succeded in replacing the J@ck@ss LIAR-In-Chief with the (R) version!?! Good Freakin’ Luck, STUPID Party!?!

Colatteral Damage on March 21, 2012 at 5:02 PM

Comment pages: 1 2