Erin Burnett “annoyed” she appears in RNC ad

posted at 3:40 pm on March 20, 2012 by Tina Korbe

Remember that excellent Republican National Committee ad of, oh, two days ago? The one that succinctly exposed “Obama’s war on women”? About that …

CNN’s Erin Burnett isn’t happy the RNC clipped footage of her to include in the ad. At first, she says, she was “amused,” but the more she thought about it, the more she was “annoyed.”

“To be honest, at first, I was amused I was included,” Burnett acknowledged. “Then I was annoyed because I don’t agree the Democrats are in a war on women. Two influential and big money donors, no need to name them again, have recently used vile words to describe women. One of them made the bad decision to elaborate in a disgusting manner. The fact is neither party came out hard enough when the offender was one of its own. Now to say an entire party is at war with women? This is all politics!”

Burnett’s interview with Obama chief campaign strategist David Axelrod was showcased in the attack ad, and was edited showing the CNN anchor grilling him over Maher’s use of the c-word.

“Frankly, we’ve seen many references to a ‘war on women’ from Dems and GOP sympathizers. But both sides need to be honest that the words used like the s-word and the c-word aren’t acceptable. Not by someone who is a pundit, not by an entertainer, not by a coworker, not by anyone. There isn’t any defending it. this isn’t political. This should be personal for everyone. If you’re a woman, you get it because you deal with sexism in its mundane and offensive forms all the time. And if you’re a man, you have women in your life who needs respect and don’t want to hear those words used to describe them.”

While Burnett may certainly feel however she wants to feel, I can’t help but think she made a mistake expressing her emotions about this one. The RNC ad was edited to depict “Obama’s war on women,” yes, but the clips that included her speak for themselves. They show a conscientious reporter holding a public figure to account without regard for his political party. They show her putting into practice the very view she reflects above — the view that some words are just unacceptable no matter who says them. The clips reflect incredibly well on her. She could choose to actually look at this as free and positive publicity: The audience for the RNC ad probably isn’t identical to the audience for OutFront. Thanks to the ad, some hardcore conservatives might be more willing to give her show a chance — and she won’t risk many liberal viewers because most people watching the ad will know that Burnett didn’t volunteer herself to be in it. By venting her frustration now, though, she risks the appearance of living according to a double standard of her own. Would she have been equally as annoyed if the DNC had used her in an ad decrying the “Republican war on women”? According to her comments above, the answer is “yes,” but there’s no way to know for sure and her comments against the RNC ad raise the suspicion.

Sometimes, it’s OK — even for professional commentators — to not comment.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

It is absurd for a news anchor to be complaining of this. As long as it is not a long segment, it is fair game. You are a public person, you have to accept the repercussions.

I could care less if she is annoyed.

neoavatara on March 20, 2012 at 3:43 PM

She’s a cutey. Wonder how she’d look barefoot and pregnant.

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM

She used to be incredibly hot. Put on a few pounds, now still hot, just not HAWT.

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM

eye candy

gerrym51 on March 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM

“s-word” Really?

Have we become so pansified in this nation we can’t bear to see the word slut in print?

Really?

ButterflyDragon on March 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM

She may have “grilled” Axelgrease but she’ll still vote Dem in the Fall. Hence, this is why she is “annoyed”.

Bitter Clinger on March 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM

The clips reflect incredibly well on her.

Not if you’re part of the limousine liberal elite it doesn’t.

Lost in Jersey on March 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM

She should be happy with any publicity. It was probably a fluke that she got her job in the first place.

RBMN on March 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM

If the Dems didn’t play the stupid fake sensitivity game, we wouldn’t have to beat them over the head with their hypocrisy when they said non PC things. They created these stupid rules.

SirGawain on March 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM

She’s a cutey. Wonder how she’d look barefoot and pregnant.

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM

Shhhh!

They’re not supposed to know that’s what we really think!

VibrioCocci on March 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM

She should be happy with any publicity. It was probably a fluke that she got her job in the first place.

RBMN on March 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM

I see what you did there.

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

From what little I’ve seen of her … on CNN … she appears to have some professionalism about her.

I don’t have a problem with her not wanting to be associated with any politically themed usage of her personae.

Would that more tv network types would just stick to reporting, instead of being like the Diane Sawyers and Soledad O’Briens, et al., of the world.

OhEssYouCowboys on March 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM

Keep playing the game, HA. Keep playing the game.

Meanwhile, no mention of the Santorum-friendly GOP committee’s antics in St. Charles County, Missouri the other day.

Dante on March 20, 2012 at 3:48 PM

Hot liberal chicks are such a rarity. Why can’t she be a slut instead of Sandra “F”?

Archivarix on March 20, 2012 at 3:48 PM

It’s always ‘not political’ by the time there’s blowback on the Dems.

She’s killing me.

faraway on March 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM

For being supposed super smart journalists they sure act stupid.

jukin3 on March 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM

I’d fluke that.

lorien1973 on March 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM

Hot liberal chicks are such a rarity. Why can’t she be a slut instead of Sandra “F”?

Archivarix on March 20, 2012 at 3:48 PM

How do you know she isn’t?

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM

You know, I’ve gotta say: she is teh sexy.

Kensington on March 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM

It’s almost as if she appeared to be, for one brief interview, non-partisan. She should wear it as a badge of honor. She should, but the fact that she doesn’t, speaks for itself.

Fallon on March 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM

She’s a cutey. Wonder how she’d look barefoot and pregnant. NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM

Larger, and you could see her feet. Hopefully in the kitchen, makin a sammich. Fer me.

Akzed on March 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM

Funny how she only raised her objection right after the Repubs used her to give the Dems a taste of their own medicine but didn’t object to Axelrod using her to push the War on Women garbage. Gee, I wonder why that is.

Verdict: Biased, partisan hack. Not hot.

Christien on March 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM

Meanwhile, no mention of the Santorum-friendly GOP committee’s antics in St. Charles County, Missouri the other day.

Rick rolled at daily beast

gerrym51 on March 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM

By venting her frustration now, though, she risks the appearance of living according to a double standard of her own.

that’s true. Maybe she’s frustrated that she’s supposed to be just giving the appearance of being objective, without actually being objective and, whilst appearing objective, she gets used against the party she knows and identifies with.

put some ice on it tootsie./

ted c on March 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM

I always find it odd when an attractive woman like Burnett is a liberal. I mean, it’s just that there are so many beta males on that side. You know, little whiny sissy men like Barack Obama. Why would a good looking woman want to have anything to do with those shemales?

WarEagle01 on March 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM

What ever happened to

sticks and stones may break my bones
but words will never hurt me

toughen up people, as my Father always told me
“you’ll never make it in the real world if your so sensitive that a few words make you cry.”

dmn1972 on March 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM

How about a compromise, EB? Instead of that Axelrod interview, the RNC can instead use that creepy ass clip of Fat Bastard Matthews on Hardball asking you to move your face closer to the camera because of how hot he thought you were? That still remains one of the most bizarre moments I’ve ever seen from a TV host. You know dude was plastered during that broadcast.

Doughboy on March 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM

…the s-word and the c-word…

Are they really equally deserving of the “f-word” treatment?

Tzetzes on March 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM

Erin Burnett

Who?

Oh, she’s on CNN. No wonder I’ve never heard of her.

UltimateBob on March 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM

The clips reflect incredibly well on her.

That was my reaction when I saw the ad. Back when she was on CNBC I had the impression she was tilted to the left, but she seemed competent and capable. When I saw she had gone to CNN, I figured I had been right about her tilt.

When I saw the ad I still thought she was on the left, but I had one of the moments of doubt about my strongly held belief all people of the left are fundamentally deranged and hypocritical. She really seemed to want consistency even from the likes of Axelrod.

This reaction of hers is disappointing, but, sadly, not surprising at all. It was not Axelrod’s hypocrisy that bothered her. She wanted a denunciation of something that offended her personally. No principle was actually involved. Typical Democrat.

fadetogray on March 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM

Don’t want it replayed? Don’t say it on the air.

Pork-Chop on March 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM

Oh please.
Anything “Republican” annoys her.
If Obama used the clip she would be in heaven.

NeoKong on March 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM

It’s funny though that while her aim is to smack down the GOP, she’s telling her viewers that this ad exists which means some people who have never see it will go online to look for it.

What am I saying? It’s CNN. That means 3 people will watch it.

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM

This is also a lead on Yahoo, ….she ought to be thrilled, she will have more people watching her than ever before.

Tater Salad on March 20, 2012 at 3:54 PM

Hot liberal chicks are such a rarity. Why can’t she be a slut instead of Sandra “F”?

Archivarix on March 20, 2012 at 3:48 PM

How do you know she isn’t?

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM

She is married, which means someone else is paying for her contraception. You cannot be a real slut if you don’t milk the public for condom money.

Archivarix on March 20, 2012 at 3:55 PM

Maybe the RNC is warming to the idea of #WAR

Kini on March 20, 2012 at 3:55 PM

. Two influential and big money donors, no need to name them again, have recently used vile words to describe women.

Actual Liberal attack on women: “No need to name them over and over again.”

Trumped up Conservative attack on women: “RUSH RUSH RUSH RUSH RUSH RUSH RUSH RUSH!!!!”

portlandon on March 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM

When are we as Americans going to put a stop to guys being called the d-word? It’s never OK!

Christien on March 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM

Are they really equally deserving of the “f-word” treatment?

Tzetzes on March 20, 2012 at 3:52 PM

H-word if I know.

Doughboy on March 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM

Erin, quick bit of info. No one is getting in the way of ‘reproductive rights’ (whatever that one is in the constitution). Women are free to choose whether they reproduce or not.

The Dems have seen fit to wage a war on religious groups who choose not to provide birth control medicines at no cost. Women everywhere are free to go to the doctor, get a prescription and pay for it out of pocket. Much like the many other types of drugs that are not covered by insurance that most people have to pay everyday out of pocket. If you are currently unhappy with your particular medical benefits you are free to choose one that includes these types of drugs. No company or organization is required to give you benefits. They do so because they want to be good neighbors and because they want to attract the best people to work for them.

And on a side note, the Catholic Church has given a waiver for women to get ‘the pill’ for other medical needs of the woman, not as birth control. Erin, quit failing everyday and perhaps your show might be the one out of many that make it on CNN.

reddevil on March 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM

Sometimes, it’s OK — even for professional commentators — to not comment.

No comment.

ITguy on March 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM

Sometimes, it’s OK — even for professional commentators — to not comment.

Oh my.

This was pure self promotion on her part. She’s trying to tie herself to more well known journos “Chris Matthews, myself, and George Snuffalufagus”

faraway on March 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM

I could care less if she is annoyed.

neoavatara on March 20, 2012 at 3:43 PM

“couldn’t care less…”
My pet peeve.

LASue on March 20, 2012 at 3:57 PM

The fact is neither party came out hard enough when the offender was one of its own. Now to say an entire party is at war with women? This is all politics!”

The RNC ad was edited to depict “Obama’s war on women,” yes, but the clips that included her speak for themselves. They show a conscientious reporter holding a public figure to account without regard for his political party.

Odd, that she doesn’t mention the President.

When does Bristol Palin get her phone call?

And if its all politics, if the Dems don’t start noth’n, there won’t be noth’n.

Its always about shutting up Conservatives.

Speakup on March 20, 2012 at 3:57 PM

She’s a cutey. Wonder how she’d look barefoot and pregnant.

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM

She’s going to end up like Maureen Dowd. Over 50 with a barren womb that never had a child.

wildcat72 on March 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM

Archivarix on March 20, 2012 at 3:55 PM

She also has a real job and is not a career, student agitator.

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 3:59 PM

“couldn’t care less…”
My pet peeve.

LASue on March 20, 2012 at 3:57 PM

Thank you! That’s been one of my biggest pet peeves for about thirty years. And people said I could never take care of a pet.

Kensington on March 20, 2012 at 3:59 PM

She’s annoyed that the GOP got it into an ad before the DNC did.

Her segment surely was targeted to produce the exact sound bite we get to see to provide the DNC, and by proxy Bill Maher, a vaccination against the vitriol and blame that was to be directed at Rush.

BobMbx on March 20, 2012 at 3:59 PM

Erin who?

CN what?

Is that a cable outlet or some news thingy on the Ophrah Winfrey Network?

PappyD61 on March 20, 2012 at 3:59 PM

She’s going to end up like Maureen Dowd. Over 50 with a barren womb that never had a child.

wildcat72 on March 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM

Isn’t that a badge of honor for liberal women? Having a baby is like getting cancer for these people.

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM

She was supposed to get praised by left-wing feminists and TV liberals. That didn’t happen and she found herself in a Republican ad instead. That turned her world upside down and now she’s upset.

It’s never about content with liberals; it’s always about logrolling propaganda and appearances. Her interview was not being “properly” used for the greater liberal cause. That’s why she’s whining.

Django on March 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM

She’s had no problem bashing the entire gop on the war on women

Grow up erin

cmsinaz on March 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

Isn’t that a badge of honor for liberal women? Having a baby is like getting cancer for these people.

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM

Actually, it’s worse. At least with cancer you can beat it and it’s gone. With a baby, you’re punished for life (to paraphrase Obama).

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

The fact is neither party came out hard enough when the offender was one of its own. Now to say an entire party is at war with women? This is all politics!”

That’s the point… the Democrats started it, so they’re getting what they gave.

But since you are so incredibly good-looking we’ll let it go this time.

mankai on March 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

She needs to understand that there is a difference between the c-word and the s-word that has nothing to do with who says them.

Try it yourself. Tell a woman you know that you saw a drunken woman at a bar acting like a total slut. Then say the same thing but call her a filthy c-word.

I’ll bet you a Mitt-bill you get two rather different reactions.

CorporatePiggy on March 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

I’d just chalk it up to a ratings gimmick. She barely cracked 100k in the “key demo” on Thursday. Her days at CNN are probably numbered. Anyone remember Campbell Brown’s No Bias, No Bull show?

rw on March 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM

OT: 7.6 Earthquake hits Mexico. Right where Malia Obama is vacationing.

portlandon on March 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Why does Burnett have any opinion? Is she an entertainer, a media bunny or a CNN anchor?

Honestly, she shouldn’t care one way or the other if she is a professional, and the network she works for CNN is objective, and not biased. Of course Maher works for HBO – CNN’s sister network that’s owned by Time Warner. So there’s that, Burnett is nothing more than a corporate shill. Maybe she should stick to human interest stories about animals, and covering grocery store openings, dancing with the stars segments, if she’s not up to serious reporting.

I have no interest in what Erin Burnett “Feels” about anything.

Dr Evil on March 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Maybe she can come to Fox News and team up with Cavuto.

22044 on March 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Don’t care if she’s an anti-gun communist. Time would shatter at the rate I’d hit it.

MadisonConservative on March 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Call Ron Paul , it’s sand in vagina syndrome.

the_nile on March 20, 2012 at 4:04 PM

Isn’t that a badge of honor for liberal women? Having a baby is like getting cancer for these people.

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM

Pretty much.

However, it’s been proven that they go INSANE at that age by passing their reproductive years by without having a man or a kid.

See: Maureen Dowd.

Coming soon: See Chelsea Clinton

wildcat72 on March 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM

Anyone remember Campbell Brown’s No Bias, No Bull show?

rw on March 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM

me neither…..

ted c on March 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM

But both sides need to be honest that the words used like the s-word and the c-word aren’t acceptable.

Yes, and one side has apologized… still waiting on the other side.

mankai on March 20, 2012 at 4:06 PM

OT: 7.6 Earthquake hits Mexico. Right where Malia Obama is vacationing.

portlandon on March 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Why is God so racist?

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 4:06 PM

If I hadn’t seen her in an RNC ad, I’d have no idea this woman existed.

Ronnie on March 20, 2012 at 4:06 PM

The clips reflect incredibly well on her.

That is why she is anoyed, it was an RNC ad, nothing more. Can’t be made looking good to the RNC folks when you work for the communist news network.

D-fusit on March 20, 2012 at 4:06 PM

“CNN’s Erin Burnett isn’t happy the RNC clipped footage of her to include in the ad.”

Who?

Resist We Much on March 20, 2012 at 4:08 PM

Don’t care if she’s an anti-gun communist. Time would shatter at the rate I’d hit it.

MadisonConservative on March 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM

You have a way with words….

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 4:08 PM

Erin just wanted to assure her peers that she’s still a hardcore Dem. That’s all this is.

Kevin M on March 20, 2012 at 4:08 PM

Y’all don’t understand. It’s like Tom Cruise had to be in Born on the Fourth of July to make up for being in Top Gun.

Knott Buyinit on March 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM

OT: 7.6 Earthquake hits Mexico. Right where Malia Obama is vacationing.

portlandon on March 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Hope everyone is safe.

22044 on March 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM

Erin Burnett is hot!

netster007x on March 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM

Moochelle’s weight gain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dpUYuE8eaY

wildcat72 on March 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM

Has anyone noticed that Tina has become prolific with threads? I think she is in her element. Lots of stuff to discuss.

SparkPlug on March 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

She’s a cutey. Wonder how she’d look barefoot and pregnant.

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM

She’s not a Palin.

KeninCT on March 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

She’s not a Palin.

KeninCT on March 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

Truer words have never been spoken.

fadetogray on March 20, 2012 at 4:15 PM

She’s not a Palin.

KeninCT on March 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

Do you hate your mother because she was barefoot and pregnant at least once in her life?

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 4:16 PM

KeninCT on March 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

Odd how the 39 year old virgin comments on topics related to sex all the time.

http://www.besocial.com/profile/view/keninct

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 4:16 PM

Sounds like she’s just another Dem hack pretending to be an “objective” journalist. If she were the latter, she wouldn’t have complained. Ah well.

changer1701 on March 20, 2012 at 4:17 PM

Don’t care if she’s an anti-gun communist. Time would shatter at the rate I’d hit it.

MadisonConservative on March 20, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Edgy conservative talk from America’s Dairyland!

KeninCT on March 20, 2012 at 4:17 PM

she pretty much has to say this to maintain her social status. Gets lonely if the ‘community’ ostracizes you

besides, if she said anything else no Dem/Axe would ever do her show…remember, the left plays for keeps (unlike the Rs)

r keller on March 20, 2012 at 4:18 PM

She’s not a Palin.

KeninCT on March 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM

Do you hate your mother because she was barefoot and pregnant at least once in her life?

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 4:16 PM

He hates her because she didn’t abort him. The nerve of that woman!!

angryed on March 20, 2012 at 4:18 PM

Nice article.

GaltBlvnAtty on March 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM

She just hates exposing the world to the truth about the “Cause”

Grunt on March 20, 2012 at 4:20 PM

Sounds like she’s just another Dem hack pretending to be an “objective” journalist. If she were the latter, she wouldn’t have complained. Ah well.

changer1701 on March 20, 2012 at 4:17 PM

Yeah, I wonder how “annoyed” she’d be if that had been a DNC ad of her interviewing Rush.

Bitter Clinger on March 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM

KeninCT on March 20, 2012 at 4:17 PM

Meaningless mumbles from a miserable mutated mass.

MadisonConservative on March 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM

I’d fluke that.

lorien1973 on March 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM

Why? Your kids (if she didn’t abort them, a longshot) would be pretty, but STUPID. She’s a teleprompter reader with no mind of her own like the rest.

wildcat72 on March 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM

Btw, what is this “CNN” that Tina wrote of in her post?

Bitter Clinger on March 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM

Maybe we should simply label this controversy as an element of Critical Sexist Theory instead of a War on Women. This theory seems to be supported by all left-thinking women. They all know that men are inherently sexist b*stards and that our laws and our constitution need to be changed to reflect this reality.

NuclearPhysicist on March 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM

Meaningless mumbles from a miserable mutated mass.

MadisonConservative on March 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM

Not so edgy this time. Try harder!

KeninCT on March 20, 2012 at 4:30 PM

She takes a long time to cry “uncle”…

You know when a naked partisan like Erin Burnett wants to change the subject, the issue is hurting the Democrats.

Haiku Guy on March 20, 2012 at 4:30 PM

NuclearPhysicist on March 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM

Perhaps they could champion segregation of men and women like Derrick Bell did for whites and blacks.

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 4:34 PM

Someone call Erin the WAAAAAMBULANCE!

Roy Rogers on March 20, 2012 at 4:34 PM

Erin Burnett “annoyed” she appears in RNC ad

Obviously Ms Burnett has been told ever since she was a little spoiled brat princess…that “Erin sweetie….your poo doesn’t ever stink…and your farts are just like expensive perfume”…

Gawd.. and does it ever show…what an arrogant jerk this woman is… :(

BigSven on March 20, 2012 at 4:37 PM

Perhaps they could champion segregation of men and women like Derrick Bell did for whites and blacks.

NotCoach on March 20, 2012 at 4:34 PM

YES! Male/Female segregation. Think of the problems that it would solve. Overpopulation, rape, incest, sexism…the list goes on and on!

NuclearPhysicist on March 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM

I’m tired of all you troglodytes being so gender insensitive. Don’t you know it’s not “wo-man” or “wo-men”, it’s “woperson” or “wopeople”. Now that we got that straight, never heard of that individual formerly referred to as “her”.

SpiderMike on March 20, 2012 at 4:39 PM

This is about as trite as Bruce Springsteen complaining when a conservative dares use one of his incredibly poorly sung songs. And just as revealing.

pat on March 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM

Hello, Erin. This is Barack. Just called to tell you to keep up the good work and to tell you that your parents must be proud. I am really sorry you are being used by the mean spirited RNC. A little note. Next time you have Axelwad on throw softballs. Thanks again and sorry for your pain.

RickinNH on March 20, 2012 at 4:42 PM

Living in MA, we get three choices. Green Party, Rainbow Party and Democrat Party. I’m guessing that’s where her head lives all of the time.

Hening on March 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM

Comment pages: 1 2