Obama stuck on repeat: End subsidies for big oil

posted at 2:20 pm on March 17, 2012 by Tina Korbe

For the fourth straight week, energy issues dominated the Democratic and Republican weekly addresses. I wonder why they bother to make new videos: The president and whoever is the Republican-of-the-week say the same thing every time. Just replay the first energy-themed addresses and leave it at that!

As long as the president is going to repeat his call to end subsidies for big oil, though, I’m going to echo it with the call to end all energy subsidies. As I’ve written before, it’s a myth that the tax code favors oil over renewables; in fact, under the Obama administration, renewable energy has been and continues to be more heavily subsidized by tax carve-outs than any other energy sector. We all know how those alternative energy subsidies have worked out for us. It doesn’t matter who the cronies are; crony capitalism is the problem.

The president also implied in his address that high prices right now might be partially the fault of traders “who distort the price of oil, and make big profits for themselves at your expense.” But Daniel Yergin, chairman of IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, explains in The Wall Street Journal that “the oil market is [just] reading the front page.” The price reflects what’s going on in the world. Far from a distortion, it’s the one reflection we have of the state of American energy today. Yergin writes:

In 2012, the reason is mainly geopolitics. Last November, the United Nations declared that Iran was clearly developing nuclear-weapons capabilities. The West is responding with sanctions aimed at reducing Iran’s ability to export oil, on which it depends for more than half of its government revenues, to get it to halt its nuclear-weapons program. Tehran has answered by conducting large naval exercises and threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which passes some 35% of the world’s oil exports.

Global oil prices and U.S. gasoline prices have both risen about 20% since mid-December. And all this is occurring in a world oil market that is already tight, tighter than it was last year, with no more than 2.5 million barrels of spare capacity. At least half a million barrels a day are currently out of the market because of disruptions in South Sudan and Yemen and civil war in Syria.

A market this tight would already be susceptible to upward price pressures. But the market is operating on expectations that supplies will become even tighter as new U.S. and European sanctions against Iran take effect and the risk of military conflict increases.

These facts actually work in Obama’s favor; there’s no need for him to invoke traders “who distort the price of oil.” Still, while it might be true that the president isn’t responsible for every factor currently driving up the price of gas, he also can’t hide the evidence of the first three years of his administration. At every turn, he has pursued an energy policy that punishes oil and gas companies and rewards alternative energy companies. Had he taken a different approach from the beginning, we might not be facing the high prices we do today. Yet, in the face of these high prices, all the president proposes is to double down on his already questionable approach. Perhaps he lacks the humility to learn from his past mistakes.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Preach it brother. The Founders were no dummies. They understand that leaving things up to man would ultimately lead to disaster. But we have moved so far from the original meaning of the Constitution that we have allowed man to rule over us with the predictable results.

NotCoach on May 24, 2013 at 6:45 PM

Whether it’s from incompetence or a lack of accountability or too much complexity or — dare I even write it — something perhaps more sinister, the layers of a large bureaucracy conveniently provide too many available smokescreens for mistakes and abuses. I doubt very much that we’ve seen the last of these types of big-government engendered injustices coming out of the Obama administration, and none of it makes a very compelling case for growing the government still further.

Better watch who you call or text or email now, Erika. And, stay off those adult websites, by all means. Big Brother’s awatchin’. ;-)

TXUS on May 24, 2013 at 6:52 PM

Whether he was involved in these scandals from the beginning or not, one thing that is certain: his subsequent behavior in protecting, lying, stalling, etc makes Barack Obama the direct owner of them.

Rich H on May 24, 2013 at 6:54 PM

I doubt very much that we’ve seen the last of these types of big-government engendered injustices coming out of the Obama administration, and none of it makes a very compelling case for growing the government still further.

Your problem, Erika, is that you are a reasonable person looking at the issue in a reasonable way. Unfortunately, there is a critical mass of people who are not reasonable and believe that the problem is that the government is not big enough and is not spending enough money.

catsandbooks on May 24, 2013 at 6:55 PM

I always wondered how Germany fell for Nazism in the 30s. How could they be so stupid?

Ouch.

faraway on May 24, 2013 at 6:55 PM

Each of these events is the direct byproduct of two central philosophies of the Obama administration — the massive expansion of the size and power of the federal government and a lack of trust in the American people. …

Bobby, I love ya man! I voted for you when you first ran for Congress. But you’re wrong here. It isn’t a lack of trust in the American people it is contempt for the American people. An attitude that the American public isn’t intelligent enough to know what is good for them.

Happy Nomad on May 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM

The Big Crime Syndicate of Obama should be the biggest loser.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:11 PM

Good stuff Bobby. Keep honing that message. Hoping for big things from him in 2016.

can_con on May 24, 2013 at 7:11 PM

The Obama presidency, and liberalism in general, are based on not trusting the American people — a belief that big government is better for people. The latest scandals show why liberalism and big government don’t work. …

Bobby must have been listening to Rush this week, because he said much the same thing: trying to pin it on Obama is not working; instead, it all shows the failure of liberalism and big government writ large.

It isn’t a lack of trust in the American people it is contempt for the American people.
Happy Nomad on May 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM

This is it exactly. Contempt. These government types are those who wouldn’t bat an eye to hustle us all off to “reeducation camps.”

PatriotGal2257 on May 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM

Even small government would be bad if run by criminals. Jindal seems to have tunnel vision.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM

Jindal seems to be implicitly saying that government is so big it got out of Obama’s control. Bull.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:17 PM

Even small government would be bad if run by criminals. Jindal seems to have tunnel vision.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM

I’ll take a small government run by criminals any day over the bloated and corrupt mess we have now.

NotCoach on May 24, 2013 at 7:18 PM

Bobby must have been listening to Rush this week, because he said much the same thing: trying to pin it on Obama is not working; instead, it all shows the failure of liberalism and big government writ large.

PatriotGal2257 on May 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM

Then they are both simply Obama apologists.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:20 PM

I’ll take a small government run by criminals any day over the bloated and corrupt mess we have now.

NotCoach on May 24, 2013 at 7:18 PM

And take being shot with a .22 over being shot with a 30.06. I prefer neither.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:22 PM

Obama is a much bigger target than big government. Only fools can not see this.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:24 PM

I thought Jindal was just saying we needed to stop arguing about big government because it was a loser? Pfft.

echosyst on May 24, 2013 at 7:27 PM

We will always have big government. Even under Reagan we had big government. He didn’t/couldn’t even get rid of the Dept of “Education”. Now is not the time to turn all batteries at big government. At least 5 of 6 guns should be aimed and firing at Obama. If Limbaugh and Jindal are not up to the task, they should get the hell out of the way.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:29 PM

I always wondered how Germany fell for Nazism in the 30s. How could they be so stupid?

Ouch.

faraway on May 24, 2013 at 6:55 PM

…you’re not faraway at all!…you’re right on!

KOOLAID2 on May 24, 2013 at 7:30 PM

VorDaj, saying that Rush n Jindal should “step aside” simply becuase they dont go far enough, INHO, isn’t reason enough. Besides who else out there do you think has the platform or the common sense governance to at least get ‘our’ side of the conversation out there, esepcially to those that we’d like to convince? If you got a candidate in mind, im sure we could find a few holes in *thier* Geopolitical theory also.

BlaxPac on May 24, 2013 at 7:46 PM

I won’t go into details about my 44 years Military and Civilian experience with Viet Nam and Vietnamese and Vietnamese-American Society. I do agree that the Democrats, who were responsible for getting into that war and after killing a few million S E Asians and including non combat deaths over 100,000 Americans, betrayed our Vietnamese and Cambodian allies and sabotaged the South Vietnamese War effort insuring the defeat of South Viet Nam in 1974 and 1975. Yes, I was there at that time.

That said, over the last 30 years the current Vietnamese has been struggling to dismantle what was a very authoritarian Communist Government. From my first post War visit in 1995 till now(I’ve retired here), Viet Nam has made astonishing progress in dismantling the old regime. Except for Reagan, we Americans have mostly gone the other way.

Think about it.

Linh_My on May 24, 2013 at 7:53 PM

And take being shot with a .22 over being shot with a 30.06. I prefer neither.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:22 PM

False equivalency. A better one is a million .22s vs. 1 30.06. I’ll take my chances with the single 30.06. Not only that we can better respond to and destroy the single 30.06.

NotCoach on May 24, 2013 at 7:54 PM

Even under Reagan we had big government. He didn’t/couldn’t even get rid of the Dept of “Education”.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:29 PM

and that was before it really got entrenched—5-6 years into it.

arnold ziffel on May 24, 2013 at 7:55 PM

test

RickB on May 24, 2013 at 8:43 PM

F. Hayak wrote in his book “The Road To Serfdom” that Hitler was voted into power by large numbers of “docile and gullible” people who believed the lies (propaganda)told by Hitler and his elites.

Sound familiar? History repeats.

nofreelunch on May 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM

F. Hayak wrote in his book “The Road To Serfdom” that Hitler was voted into power by large numbers of “docile and gullible” people who believed the lies (propaganda)told by Hitler and his elites.

Sound familiar? History repeats.

nofreelunch on May 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM

Lord have mercy, here I am defending or explaining Germans.

Adolph Hitler never got a clear majority in an election. He sorta grabbed power by exploiting deals, tricks, vacuums and technicalities. That aspect may now in replay before us.

Howover, I never heard of any elite behind him.

He was a thug, soldier and street fighter.

Unless OFA takes to the streets and Obama starts looking to build a vengeful, word dominating America, the two have little in common except a love of government power.

IlikedAUH2O on May 25, 2013 at 12:03 AM

the two have little in common except a love of government power.

IlikedAUH2O on May 25, 2013 at 12:03 AM

Well that in itself, and there are other things, is an awful lot.

VorDaj on May 25, 2013 at 1:33 AM

You know. My maid understands this may be one of the most dangerous, egregious, undermining of The Constitution since the Japanese internment. But neither Congress, The Senate, nor Obama seem to get it. This can destroy the nation.

pat on May 25, 2013 at 2:16 AM

An attitude that the American public isn’t intelligent enough to know what is good for them.

Happy Nomad on May 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM

Well, they did vote for Øbama – twice. Maybe there’s something to that. :)

At least 5 of 6 guns should be aimed and firing at Obama. If Limbaugh and Jindal are not up to the task, they should get the hell out of the way.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:29 PM

The last I checked, Øbama is not up for reelection. We certainly need to pound him but also those who think like him (you know, big govt types).

Odysseus on May 25, 2013 at 7:46 AM

Lots of blah, blah, blah…because in the back of the Republican’s mind is that some day they will be back in the White House and they will do everything Obama is doing. Any criticism will be met with “Obama did the same thing and no one cared, so we can do it, too.”

albill on May 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM

The last I checked, Øbama is not up for reelection. We certainly need to pound him but also those who think like him (you know, big govt types).

Odysseus on May 25, 2013 at 7:46 AM

Beyond that, Obama has benefited from a lot of unethical behavior by liberals in general (and in government specifically). He is more post turtle than mastermind. His culpability is probably mostly in implicitly endorsing this kind of behavior in his speeches. He has a history of turning a blind eye to what others do to win his elections for him.

Count to 10 on May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM

Bobby “BJ” Jindal: blah, blah, blah, big government is bad, blah, blah, blah, American flag, blah, blah, blah, Obama sucks, blah, blah, blah, the people, blah, blah, blah. This guy NEVER says anything new. Suck it, BJ.

HiJack on May 25, 2013 at 9:43 AM

Lots of blah, blah, blah…because in the back of the Republican’s mind is that some day they will be back in the White House and they will do everything Obama is doing. Any criticism will be met with “Obama did the same thing and no one cared, so we can do it, too.”

albill on May 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM

Absolutely, positively. We can bank on it.

HiJack on May 25, 2013 at 9:45 AM

“…none of it makes a very compelling case for growing the government still further.”

You’re missing the point Erika Johnsen: Takers gotta take. They don’t need no ‘compelling reason’as long as they’re on the receiving end. It’s why they vote democrat.

locomotivebreath1901 on May 25, 2013 at 9:51 AM

People are so afraid of calling Obama Cheat, liar, crook or whatever name that’s appropriate. If people had been this kind to Richard Nixon his face would be on Mt. Rushmore by now.

Herb on May 25, 2013 at 9:53 AM

Calling this government paternalistic is cowardly. This government is authoritarian and moving toward tyrannical.

The media are not in bed with the left; they are the left. They are the same people.

InterestedObserver on May 25, 2013 at 10:15 AM

I always wondered how Germany fell for Nazism in the 30s. How could they be so stupid?

Ouch.

faraway on May 24, 2013 at 6:55 PM

We’ve killed 55,000,000 of our children.

We’re not much better than the Nazis.

itsnotaboutme on May 25, 2013 at 3:59 PM