Romney: Very conservative voters might not be with me now but they will be in November
posted at 7:47 pm on March 14, 2012 by Allahpundit
Via RCP, the key bit comes at around 3:40. This is his whole strategy in a nutshell and I still can’t decide whether to admire him or loathe him for it. He doesn’t care if you trust him. He doesn’t care if his rallies leave you flat. He doesn’t care if pulling the lever for him reduces you to dry heaves in the voting booth. He cares about two things: 1,144 and 270, and he’s likely to achieve at least the first thanks to hard work, careful planning, and the great good luck of having extraordinarily weak competition. Those qualities — high energy, fortitude, diligence, not needing to be liked — could be huge assets in a president if he applied them to enacting a worthy policy agenda, starting with entitlement reform. But I don’t think he’d use them to policy ends; he’d use them to position himself for re-election by pandering to centrists, which means no meaningful entitlement reform or anything else. He’s telling you right here why he’d be such a risk in office to the right. When push comes to shove, you’ll always hold your nose and vote against the Democrat, no matter how annoyed at him you might be. And he knows it — and he doesn’t care. He doesn’t need his base to like him. That’s a recipe for squishiness.
Mitt Romney leads the pack in the race for the Republican presidential nomination. He’s also the second pick for enough Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich supporters that if one of them dropped out, Romney would remain the frontrunner.
Romney has the backing of 38 percent of Republican primary voters in a Fox News poll released Wednesday. He’s followed by Santorum at 32 percent, Gingrich at 13 percent and Paul at 12 percent…
In a straight two-way matchup, GOP primary voters prefer Romney to Santorum by 49-44 percent…
Meanwhile, a 58-percent majority of primary voters would rather nominate a candidate who is more likely to beat President Obama, even if the candidate is not a true conservative. Less than a third — 31 percent — would pick the true conservative who might be less electable.
Romney actually leads Obama by nine points on the question of who’s best equipped to manage the economy, but head to head overall O leads by four. The key data point:

That’s a nice trend for Mitt, but again — he doesn’t care either way. The magic number is 270. If it all comes from column two instead of column one, hey.
Here’s his interview today with Megyn Kelly. Watch for the part where she asks him whether Newt should drop out; Romney, who I think is benefiting considerably from Gingrich’s perseverance notwithstanding the poll data above, conveniently has no opinion. There’s a fun exchange on the mandate at the very end too, but that’s because of the old clip Kelly chose to torment him with. In that same vein, via BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski, watch the second one below on the vagaries of “ultimate conservatism.”
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Have you read some of the people of who comment around here AP?
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM
“the babies”
That, right there, is all you need to know.
UnderstandingisPower on May 22, 2013 at 6:46 PM
Good point.
KCB on May 22, 2013 at 6:46 PM
Not even Gosnell’s attorney could sit in that courtroom, and see those images, and not come away unaffected. I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: No wonder the MSM ran from this trial like it was the plague.
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:47 PM
This really is a disgusting and self serving comment, all living things are viable until they die, the only thing taking a babies viability away is the abortionist.
clearbluesky on May 22, 2013 at 6:53 PM
[NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM]
It’s Mary Katharine.
Dusty on May 22, 2013 at 6:54 PM
DITTO, what “clearbluesky” wrote ^^.
Lourdes on May 22, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Understanding and lenient? To defend a guy who brutally murdered babies? How about without conscience and evil?
Understanding and lenient implies empathy and mercy are possible emotions to have toward those who are willing to either kill a child or have the child they are carrying be killed. The choice is between death and life for a baby.
Sorrow, grief, and anger for the unborn child are appropriate emotions to have. Empathy and mercy are for those who have repented and turned from this evil.
INC on May 22, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Oops. Sorry MKH.
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:56 PM
Gosnell didn’t have to keep his place so filthy, inspections or not. He didn’t have to re-use single-use instruments, or keep the parts of murdered babies in jars. He is simply a vile piece of human trash.
A sixteen week window is never going to be tolerated by the violent baby-killing Left who will do anything to stop it from becoming law. As MKH notes above, they’re not supportive of a twenty-week limit. I bet many in NARAL (which should be spelled ‘gnarl’ like the acronym sounds — twisted) think there should be no limit at all, even killing the infant just as he’s being born if the mother changes her mind about keeping him.
I don’t blame the lawyer for doing his job, and agree with the sixteen week limit as a first step. But if I were a defense attorney, I’d never have taken the case.
Liam on May 22, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Well, I can see why they’d go along with this, because you can still kill a LOT of babies in 16 weeks, but I’m not quite ready to call this progressjust yet.
Kensington on May 22, 2013 at 7:08 PM
“A person’s a person, no matter how small.”
INC on May 22, 2013 at 7:15 PM
That’s the excuse of a 5 year old child. It doesn’t take regulators for you to keep your place clean. But butcher Gosnell was simply interested in making more money for himself.
rbj on May 22, 2013 at 7:16 PM
Going to sixteen or seventeen weeks is definitely a step in the right direction. Know what would be a better step? Zero weeks. Just saying.
Shump on May 22, 2013 at 7:17 PM
I thought McMahon was a sleaze when he used the race card during the trial. Now I know hes slime because of his vociforous defending of this monster after he was convicted of murder. Meagan is wrong and we can tar him with the same brush as his client. He is as vile as Gosnell
neyney on May 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM
Oh we can’t have that. Dear Reaper, I mean Dear Leader wants it to be 39 weeks.
VorDaj on May 22, 2013 at 7:20 PM
In that, he is incorrect. It was the willful abandonment of existing regulation enforcement by the state, due to a political climate created by groups such as NARAL and PP that led directly to the situation at Gosnell’s clinic. It’s blood on their hands as much as his.
A new law, enforced as well as the old, will do exactly as well; meaning not at all. In the Navy we have a saying – you can expect what you inspect.
Jeff Weimer on May 22, 2013 at 7:30 PM
I don’t really care what this legal streetwalker has to say, aside from from a bemused curiosity regarding self-debasement. There was never any real question as to what the demon butcher Gosnell had been doing; this mercenary apologist as much acknowledges that he was comfortable with the practice in theory if not -belatedly- in actual gruesome reality.
So lawyer McMahon took the money, and defended the indefensible. And now he tries reassert his humanity by musing depressively about the macabre procession that has just come to a meat-grinding halt. But he willingly marched a leg in that procession; at least he didn’t portray his steps, in tired fashion, as necessary measures in assuring that “the system works for all.”
I hope that for the rest of his life, his last thought before tortured sleep is of scissors.
M240H on May 22, 2013 at 7:36 PM
And that right there is one of the big horrors of the abortion industry. That 83.5% of abortions are performed for no greater reason than the mother doesn’t want the baby or the hassel of giving birth and putting the baby up for adoption.
It is if you are a liberal who can’t think for yourself and insist on regulating every aspect of life.
hopeful on May 22, 2013 at 7:46 PM
Exactly. “Unwanted puppies and unwanted babies are the same thing.”~thujackass
davidk on May 22, 2013 at 7:49 PM
Never forget that the Allies once having liberated the concentration camps / death camps had to force march the local citizens through those camps to shock them into realization of the holocaust their pretending what was happening wasn’t happening had enabled.
— counting the seconds until psycho thuja spams us with his collaborationist prattle.
viking01 on May 22, 2013 at 7:50 PM
Maybe you should call your congressman/woman and demand they sponsor legislation to lock up every woman who does an abortion.
HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 8:02 PM
Interesting comment by the lawyer.
Quickest would be choosing to avoid actions that tend toward becoming pregnant.
AesopFan on May 22, 2013 at 8:21 PM
Well said, and worth repeating:
ITguy on May 22, 2013 at 8:29 PM
Stanek to testify for nationwide 20-week abortion ban
Jill Stanek is the IL former nurse who also testified in IL when Obama was in the IL State Senate. Does he ever know who she is.
http://www.jillstanek.com/2008/02/links-to-barack-obamas-votes-on-illinois-born-alive-infant-protection-act/
She’s got courage. She’s never let up. I haven’t heard if she’s been audited, but the FBI did show up at the door of her daughter and son-in-law last summer.
http://www.jillstanek.com/2012/07/obama-administrations-harassment-of-pro-lifers-gets-personal/
INC on May 22, 2013 at 10:02 PM
Or we could just lock up the Gosnell-esque ghouls and go from there. If doing that resulted in a de facto end to legal abortion, I wouldn’t feel bad at all.
gryphon202 on May 22, 2013 at 10:03 PM
I’m sorry I had to go sit shiva tonight and was unable to perform my usual duty. Maybe someone else could take up the slack?
thuja on May 22, 2013 at 11:18 PM
Gosnell gave the left exactly what they wanted;
A woman’s right to an abortion anytime, for any reason.
If they tell you different, they are lying. And the lawyer is basically negotiating price… With the level horror being the currency.
These baby killers are just that vile and there is a special place for them…
RalphyBoy on May 22, 2013 at 11:24 PM
I usually like Megyn Kelly, but not in this interview. They guy’s trying to be calm and reasonable, and Kelly’s just killing him. What did she want the guy to say? “You’re right Megyn. My client’s a sleazeball, and he’s horrible, and he’s despicable.” Clearly, that wasn’t going to happen. So what was the point?
asc85 on May 22, 2013 at 11:26 PM
They won’t go lower than 20 weeks unless they can test for Down’s Syndrome earlier than that.
/sad but true
cptacek on May 23, 2013 at 12:27 AM
At the absolute minimum the standard should be heartbeat and brainwave activity. You wanna define the lack of those as death, then the beginning of same must equal life. Oh wait…liberals and logic don’t mix.
MelonCollie on May 23, 2013 at 9:00 AM