ARG poll has Gingrich edging Romney in Alabama by three

posted at 11:00 am on March 12, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

We will have a long evening tomorrow as the returns come in from Alabama, a second pollster has reported today.  After PPP predicted a dead heat in Alabama with Mitt Romney edging Newt Gingrich by a single point, American Research Group shows Gingrich with a three-point lead — still within the margin of error:

Newt Gingrich leads the Alabama Republican presidential primary with 34%. Gingrich is followed by Mitt Romney with 31%, Rick Santorum with 24%, and Ron Paul with 6%.

Gingrich leads Romney 39% to 30% among self-identified Republicans, followed by Santorum with 23% and Paul with 3%. Among self-identified independents and Democrats, Romney leads with 33%, followed by Santorum with 28%, Gingrich with 17%, and Paul with 15%.

Gingrich leads Romney 34% to 31% among likely Republican primary voters saying they will definitely vote in the March 6 primary, followed by Santorum with 25% and Paul with 5%. Gingrich leads Romney 37% to 29% among those saying they will probably vote, followed by Santorum with 19% and Paul with 8%.

Gingrich leads with 54% among likely Republican primary voters saying they are supporters of the Tea Party, followed by Santorum with 23%, Romney with 20%, and Paul with 1%. Among likely primary voters saying they are not supporters of the Tea Party or are undecided about the Tea Party, Romney leads with 41%, followed by Santorum with 25%, Gingrich with 16%, and Paul with 10%.

There aren’t too many surprises from ARG, but the loss of traction for Santorum might be one.  He’s still in the hunt, but it looks like Gingrich is winning the battle for conservative voters in Alabama as represented by the Tea Party affiliation, at least in ARG’s sample.  That’s a big difference from the PPP poll, which showed an almost-even split among Tea Party voters in the state, with Gingrich edging Santorum 38/34.  That appears to be the most significant difference between the two polls, and it’s one worth watching if other pollsters come in with data today from Alabama.

Meanwhile, CBS takes the national temperature of Republican primary voters and finds that Santorum has a four-point lead, with Gingrich far back in third.  However, almost three-quarters of those voters expect Romney to win the nomination now, a big increase from their previous poll:

A new CBS News/New York Times poll shows Rick Santorum holding a very slight lead over Mitt Romney among Republican primary voters across the nation, but GOP voters increasingly expect Romney to eventually win the nomination.

In the survey conducted between March 7 and March 11, 34 percent of Republican primary voters said they support Santorum, compared to 30 percent for Romney. Santorum’s lead falls within the poll’s margin of error.

Newt Gingrich was backed by 13 percent of those surveyed – a slight increase in support from the last CBS News poll conducted a month earlier, while Ron Paul received 8 percent, a slight decrease in support. The changes in support for Gingrich and Paul also fell within the margin of error. …

In January, 55 percent of the Republican primary voters polled by CBS News said they expected Romney to clinch the nomination. That number climbed significantly in this new poll to 73 percent.

Don’t take this poll too seriously.  It’s based on a sample of only 301 registered voters who claimed they would participate in a Republican primary contest.  The MoE in this case is a rather laughable six points thanks to that small sample, and on top of that, CBS has not yet released the sample data.  It lines up generally with their February poll which had Santorum leading 30/27, so the series is interesting, even if it’s not very reliable.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

If we did, for tens of millions of Americans to have health care was well worth any of our political careers in my view.”

And then..
There will be tens of millions of Americans that had health care..
That will have it dropped or drop it themselves due to expense.

Thanks Nancy.

Electrongod on April 25, 2013 at 8:05 PM

Surely, the poll was taken of Rush fans of 98% when most other polls are ‘more fair’ by running D45, I35, and R20.

Liam on April 25, 2013 at 8:11 PM

Pelosi and shumer can you think of a combination
That would be more evil?
Well now that I think about it reid and waxman oblamer
Wow just too much evil to list .. Sorry
I should have thought this through.

MrMoe on April 25, 2013 at 8:17 PM

while 21% do not, either because they have no opinion about the California congresswoman and former House speaker, or because they have never heard of her.

So 21% of the population lives in a vacuum and has no idea who she is? These aren’t “low information voters”, these are DEAD voters.

Nancy-poo is the reason the Democrats won’t retake the House.

GarandFan on April 25, 2013 at 8:18 PM

Pelosi and shumer can you think of a combination
That would be more evil?
Well now that I think about it reid and waxman oblamer
Wow just too much evil to list .. Sorry
I should have thought this through.

MrMoe on April 25, 2013 at 8:17 PM

Evil is hard to contemplate if you’re not in its fold.

Liam on April 25, 2013 at 8:19 PM

So 21% of the population lives in a vacuum and has no idea who she is? These aren’t “low information voters”, these are DEAD voters.

Nancy-poo is the reason the Democrats won’t retake the House.

GarandFan on April 25, 2013 at 8:18 PM

About 21% of Americans identify as liberal.

Maybe that’s why the numbers match — not even THEY want to be identified with her?

Just a snarky idea…

Liam on April 25, 2013 at 8:21 PM

Right on its just natural for them
I am disgusted at these communists

MrMoe on April 25, 2013 at 8:22 PM

Sadly America knows only a FRACTION of her political dealings.
It the TRUTH came out in toto … she would be tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail. She is old enough to remember those days.

Missilengr on April 25, 2013 at 8:40 PM

I don’t like, despise pelosi ried et al. They are scum

But boehner, rubio, et al; they are supposed to be on our side.

davidk on April 25, 2013 at 8:44 PM

If you don’t want Nancy Pelosi to become Speaker of the House again, make sure you have a strong Republican candidate running for Congress in your district in 2014.

Pelosi’s district in San Francisco is almost certain to re-elect her to Congress in 2014.

In 2012, Pelosi got 253,709 votes to win re-election with 85.08% of the vote.http://sfelections.org/results/20121106/index.php

Nancy Pelosi may not be liked in 99.9% of the country, but San Francisco voters evidently love her. San Francisco is unique in so many ways.

wren on April 25, 2013 at 8:49 PM

Pelosi is human trash and if not for our completely dysfunctional political system she would be playing the part of an aging scorned wife, downing handfuls of Valium while her husband was out with his mistress.

Bishop on April 25, 2013 at 8:58 PM

Pelosi is human trash and if not for our completely dysfunctional political system she would be playing the part of an aging scorned wife, downing handfuls of Va1ium while her husband was out with his mistress.

Bishop on April 25, 2013 at 8:59 PM

Val.ium? Really? The filter hits on Val.ium?

Time to catch up with the rest of the world, HotGas, and maybe update your system, what a joke.

Bishop on April 25, 2013 at 9:00 PM

Well known, least liked–I can think of someone else who fits the bill.

hillsoftx on April 25, 2013 at 9:04 PM

Did they mention Nanzi could scare Nosferatu?

viking01 on April 25, 2013 at 9:04 PM

Scumhag on a broom!!!

Schadenfreude on April 25, 2013 at 9:38 PM

Only a district full of sodomites could elect such a despicable reprobate.

tom daschle concerned on April 25, 2013 at 9:41 PM

So 21% of the population lives in a vacuum and has no idea who she is? These aren’t “low information voters”, these are DEAD voters.

GarandFan on April 25, 2013 at 8:18 PM

Welcome to Chicago, buddy.

Lanceman on April 25, 2013 at 10:27 PM

ditto
Plastic surgery addict moron. Replaced her brains with a silicon boob on her 1998 surgery. Gave brain to McCain.

pat on April 26, 2013 at 2:13 AM

Let me deliver the ultimate insult to Pelosi that I know will get under her skin.

If FDR himself was still alive, if he shook hands with Pelosi,he would immediately be washing them afterwards with scalding hot water and then applying half a bottle of hand sanitizer to them, because even HE would consider her that loathsome!

Have a nice day, SanFranNan!

pilamaye on April 26, 2013 at 5:46 AM

My idea of eternal damnation would be to spend all eternity listening to this creature blather on about her views on politics, communism and evil republicans.

acyl72 on April 26, 2013 at 7:09 AM

Do these people ever look any further than the tip of their noses? Libs are jumping up and down that an expansion of Medicaid will give another 70,000 access to health care in our state, but do not consider that we don’t have enough doctors to go around. Remember, ‘if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor’, well, you can if you can get an appointment when you need one.

Kissmygrits on April 26, 2013 at 9:47 AM

Pelosi really needs to be put out to pasture. She has an insane frame of mind in keeping this country strong. ObamaCare is a law that will criple American in a horrible way. Why isn’t Congress in this plan?

karlinsync on April 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM

Anything is possible in this great country.
The truly amazing phenomenon is how is it that someone who is so vacuous of fundamental knowledge and intelligence get to be FOURTH in line to be POTUS.
The baton is passed from VP then Secretary of State then Speaker of the House as I recall.
I’ll blame the Manure Stream Media for this and other recent atrocious situations. They’ve completely abandoned their fundamental purpose as journalists.
A friend in the circle of academe (local University) says they teach ‘advocacy journalism’ these days.
Curious, I always thought that was the arena of Used Car Salespersons?

Missilengr on April 26, 2013 at 7:07 PM