Trade deficit climbs 4.3% in January; Update: Wholesale inventories rise, sales fall
posted at 10:25 am on March 9, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
After getting good if incremental news on the jobs front this morning from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Obama administration got more mixed news from the Bureau of Economic Analysis on the trade front. The US trade deficit jumped up 4.3% in January, thanks to a big rise in imports, but exports also nudged upward:
The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, through the Department of Commerce, announced today that total January exports of $180.8 billion and imports of $233.4 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $52.6 billion, up from $50.4 billion in December, revised. January exports were $2.6 billion more than December exports of $178.2 billion. January imports were $4.7 billion more than December imports of $228.7 billion.
In January, the goods deficit increased $2.4 billion from December to $67.5 billion, and the services surplus increased $0.3 billion from December to $14.9 billion. Exports of goods increased $1.9 billion to $128.6 billion, and imports of goods increased $4.3 billion to $196.1 billion. Exports of services increased $0.7 billion to $52.2 billion, and imports of services increased $0.4 billion to $37.3 billion.
The goods and services deficit increased $5.0 billion from January 2011 to January 2012. Exports were up $12.9 billion, or 7.7 percent, and imports were up $18.0 billion, or 8.4 percent.
The trade deficit in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing. The change in direction is more important, and that’s what makes this report such a mixed bag. An increase in exports is always good, but the increase in goods exports was slightly under 1.5%, while the increase in imports — which takes away from domestic production — increased 2.2%. In services, the news was somewhat better, with a small increase in exports outstripping an increase in imports by $300 million.
Coupled with disastrous durable-goods and factory orders and shipment reports from January, the change in direction looks like the start of a bad trend. Job numbers looked good today, but if this trend continues into February and March, the growth numbers for the US economy will begin to look poor — and that will kill whatever impulse there is now to create jobs, especially in the manufacturing sector.
The AP expects more of the same this year, thanks to the European fiscal crisis and declining demand for US products:
The U.S. trade deficit surged to the widest imbalance in more than three years in January as imports hit an all-time high, reflecting big demand for foreign-made cars, computers and food products.
U.S. exports to Europe fell, raising concerns that the debt crisis in that region could dampen U.S. economic growth. …
Economists are looking for the deficit this year to widen from last year’s $560 billion imbalance, reflecting in part the economic woes in Europe, which represents about 20 percent of America’s export market.
Economic growth weakens when exports decline because factories tend to produce fewer goods. And U.S. companies earn less.
We already saw that happen in January’s factory reports. Keep an eye on these trends as we move into spring, and as Europe absorbs the impact of the solution to the Greek crisis.
Update: Also today, wholesale inventories continue to rise while sales fell:
Sales. The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that January 2012 sales of merchant wholesalers, except manufacturers’ sales branches and offices, after adjustment for seasonal variations and trading-day differences but not for price changes, were $413.1 billion, down 0.1 percent (+/-0.7%)* from the revised December level, but were up 7.9 percent (+/-1.1%) from the January 2011 level. The December preliminary estimate was revised upward $0.5 billion or 0.1 percent. January sales of durable goods were down 0.2 percent (+/-1.2%)* from last month, but were up 10.2 percent (+/-1.4%) from a year ago. Sales of metals and minerals, except petroleum were down 3.0 percent from last month, while sales of computer and computer peripheral equipment and software were up 1.7 percent. Sales of nondurable goods were down 0.1 percent (+/-0.9%)* from December, but were up 6.1 percent (+/-1.4%) from last January. Sales of paper and paper products were down 3.1 percent from last month.
Inventories. Total inventories of merchant wholesalers, except manufacturers’ sales branches and offices, after adjustment for seasonal variations but not for price changes, were $475.5 billion at the end of January, up 0.4 percent (+/-0.4%)* from the revised December level and were up 9.4percent (+/-1.2%) from the January 2011 level. The December preliminary estimate was revised upward $0.5 billion or 0.1 percent. January inventories of durable goods were up 0.8 percent (+/-0.5%) from last month and were up 10.7 percent (+/-1.9%) from a year ago. Inventories of machinery, epuipment, and supplies were up 1.2 percent from last month and inventories of metals and minerals, except petroleum were up 0.9 percent. Inventories of nondurable goods were down 0.2 percent (+/-0.5%)* from December, but were up 7.6 percent (+/-1.1%) from last January. Inventories of chemicals and allied products were down 2.8 percent from last month, while petroleum and petroleum products were up 2.3 percent.
When inventories rise and sales fall, it puts downward pressure on future wholesale purchases and eventually forces discounting, which cuts into profits. Small wonder that wealthier Americans still feel that we are in a recession.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
it won’t happen here.
too many idiots and, again, a D majority.
since the 2 yrs of R majority (2010 was historic for maine) could not fix decades of D issues the idiots here went back to D.
most people here deserve to starve to death.
dmacleo on May 11, 2013 at 7:07 PM
Needed the Atomic bomb picture..
Electrongod on May 11, 2013 at 7:07 PM
…its Maine!…where the girls think they are Republicans…that Maine?
KOOLAID2 on May 11, 2013 at 7:12 PM
I shudder when I think about what will happen in Maine when our common sense Governor is no longer in office. Maine is the best state I’ve ever lived in, but sadly it’s only one breath away from becoming another liberal Hellhole due to an overabundance of misguided or willfully ignorant voters.
Birchbark on May 11, 2013 at 7:19 PM
The Borg. Always we will fight the Borg.
M240H on May 11, 2013 at 7:31 PM
Well, that’ll have our Progs clutching their pearls and saying cutting, cutting things about our governor! AKA ‘business as usual’.
PersonFromPorlock on May 11, 2013 at 7:32 PM
Plus, the turbines make a huge sound when they whip down and cast weird shadows with their huge blades. Drives people crazy. Oh, they kill endangered birds, too.
PattyJ on May 11, 2013 at 7:40 PM
Yes….what he really is saying is that he’d like to be able say the wind initiative was a resounding success even if not 1 watt was ever produced. You see, success comes from feeling good about wasting someone else’s money.
BobMbx on May 11, 2013 at 7:40 PM
Out here in the sunny People’s Republik of Kalifornia, we’re still inhaling.
Gonna grow wind, cut all that evil carbon-heavy reliance on fossil fuels. AND solar!
Right now they’re paying a professor in San Diego to come up with a computer-run program to forecast when cloud cover will cause solar input to the grid to drop.
Gotta get power to replace what will be lost. Of course they haven’t gotten around to forecasting when the wind will drop, and cut output.
The grid will “magically” correct itself, and rainbow colored unicorns will make up the short fall so that the grid doesn’t crash.
Just ask Moonbeam. IF you can tear him away from his choo-choo.
GarandFan on May 11, 2013 at 7:43 PM
Wind power is all about democrats enriching donors and cronies based on exploiting the ignorant and imbecilic.
tom daschle concerned on May 11, 2013 at 7:45 PM
born here,live in Etna
its a hole now since early 90′s.
dmacleo on May 11, 2013 at 7:48 PM
Start spreading the rumor that windmills could hurt Moochelle’s taxpayer lobster supply and that could impede the implementation of this latest green fiasco.
That, and make PETA aware that if you really want to smack birds out of the sky a ginormous windmill is a fantastic ornithoblenderizer.
viking01 on May 11, 2013 at 7:49 PM
What will we do with all of those unicorns?
BDavis on May 11, 2013 at 7:58 PM
What will we do with all of those unicorns?BDavis on May 11, 2013 at 7:58 PM
As nonpartisan said..
Fluck them..
Electrongod on May 11, 2013 at 8:02 PM
Wind power: the energy of the future …. since the 16th century.
PackerBronco on May 11, 2013 at 8:09 PM
The problem here in MidCoast maine, (I live in Bath) is that the local newspapers are really democrat propaganda organs. Maine’s largest daily, the Portland Press herald, is owned by the husband of Democrat
CongressmanCongresswoman Chellie Pingree. Any guess as to how the news is shaded up here?But to add even more interest to this fire, that Wind Energy law passed while Baldacci was governor was written to help out former governor, and current Maine US Senator Angus King and his pet energy projects. Where, or where, do you think King got all his money to run for office from? His wife Mary is a social bar fly too, and fits right in with the self-appointed aristocracy in Washington.
There is a huge stench of corruption all over that Wind Energy bill, and a lot of it is coming from Baldacci and King, and it’s way past time that those two were the subject of state and federal investigations.
TKindred on May 11, 2013 at 8:09 PM
The state can simply relocate those at-risk birds to avian work collectives where they can contribute productively to History. Of course, their wings must be clipped, for their own good, to keep them from flying back into the people’s wind turbine power production zone, and also for equality, because it’s not fair that they should fly, when so many other revolutionary working plants and animals cannot.
Kenosha Kid on May 11, 2013 at 8:10 PM
Wind power: the environmentally-correct way of committing avicide.
PackerBronco on May 11, 2013 at 8:12 PM
Maine would be a great place to expand the “natural gas infrastructure”. There’s a huge LNG (liquefied natural gas) import terminal about 90 miles over the border in New Brunswick (Canada), and Maine would be the first in line to receive the gas not used by the Canadians. It’s closer than shipping fracked gas from Pennsylvania.
Steve Z on May 11, 2013 at 8:13 PM
Green energy: producing energy through the process of burning money.
PackerBronco on May 11, 2013 at 8:13 PM
We expect to freeze to death in Montana if the epa gets its way and closes down all the coal fired power plants. I think someone warned them and they are starting to rethink the new lower mandated emission levels. One cold day a few years from now, we won’t be able to drive the cars we currently own, use our lawn mowers or heat our homes(if we still own one)after the greenies and govt gets through with us.
Kissmygrits on May 11, 2013 at 9:35 PM
The UK study showing wind turbines only last 12-15 years instead of 25-30 showed that the promises were near scandalous.
theperfecteconomist on May 11, 2013 at 10:20 PM
All of that was predicted in a SciFi novel by Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, and others entitled “Fallen Angels”.
It’s frighteningly prescient.
TKindred on May 11, 2013 at 11:36 PM
Wow, it is almost as if just wishing will NOT make it so!
Adjoran on May 12, 2013 at 1:53 AM
If T Boone Pickens couldn’t make it work in Texas, it ain’t gonna work.
txhsmom on May 12, 2013 at 3:39 AM
Government subsidized Wind Companies won’t face charges in condor deaths.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-killing-condors-20130511,0,1790222.story
Obama has tossed California Condors under the bus in favor of windmill power – and kick backs from chronies.
papertiger on May 12, 2013 at 4:57 AM
Ayuh! Left Maine some time ago for the bright sunny climes of Connecticut. It’s even worse down here but there was work at the time! What we need is a concerted effort to change the main stream media into telling the truth instead of propagandizing 24/7.
Boats48 on May 12, 2013 at 5:52 AM
Like Ethanol that reduces gas mileage, increase engine wear, drives up the price of food and every other product dependent on corn, and doesn’t do anything for the environment; wind, solar, electric car, and other green disasters are here to stay.
Why?
Because they are politically drive agendas that allow politicians to control huge sums of money for votes and significantly increases government control over every aspect of our lives. Oh yeah, and they get to do all of this with other people’s money without being held accountable for their miserable failures. The latter due mostly to low and no-information voters.
But the most amazing aspect to all of this is that it was 100% predictable as clearly and publicly highlighted by those who have opposed government mandated Ethanol, wind, solar, electric cars, and the other green nonsense.
Facts have never been of much concern when a politician can seize the opportunity to flush other peoples’ hard earned money down the political toilets.
No, politics have and will continue trump reason, logic, efficiency, and good government.
BMF on May 12, 2013 at 6:19 AM
Wind energy could have become a reliable peak demand electrical producer but the utilities were forced to buy the lousy electricity they produce whenever they produce it.
Slowburn on May 12, 2013 at 6:44 AM
When has a Progressive initiative EVER been rolled back, curtailed, repealed, reduced, or otherwise rethought?
Cleombrotus on May 12, 2013 at 6:58 AM
Without a war or other major civil upheaval, that is.
Cleombrotus on May 12, 2013 at 6:59 AM
Ya but it’s not cool
david kumbera on May 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM
So like PV solar it never will payback unless energy costs soar.
1+1=POTATO
jukin3 on May 12, 2013 at 10:56 AM
Capacity. That is the amount of electricity produced under ideal conditions. What is the actual output? Typically it is less than 10% of advertised capacity. And at times, actual output is zero.
iurockhead on May 12, 2013 at 11:33 AM
I’m from a little town on the Maine coast, Eastport. They talked about putting an LNG terminal in the area. Would have created a crapload of jobs, and helped energy costs. But no, out of state libtards, looking to turn the area into Cape Cod North…… So glad I left. Nearly 20 years now.
DStreete on May 12, 2013 at 7:04 PM