Obama to Dems: Get your own campaign cash

posted at 1:20 pm on March 5, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

If one reads the media reports on Barack Obama’s fundraising, every month is a feast for Obama’s re-election campaign and the DNC.  Never mind that the totals for Obama’s campaign actually lags the pace set by George W. Bush in 2004 and is far off the pace of the supposedly billion-dollar campaign promised for 2012, or even the $600 million campaign from 2008.  The media meme is that of a coolly confident incumbent President raking in the dough.

Politico’s John Bresnahan hears something entirely different:

President Barack Obama has a bleak message for House and Senate Democrats this year when it comes to campaign cash: You’re on your own.

Democratic congressional leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, have privately sought as much as $30 million combined from Obama for America and the Democratic National Committee — a replay of the financial help they received from Obama in 2008 and 2010.

But that’s not going to happen, top Obama aides Jim Messina and David Plouffe told Reid and Pelosi in back-to-back meetings on Capitol Hill on Thursday, according to sources familiar with the high-level talks. It was a stark admission from a presidential campaign once expected to rake in as much as $1 billion of just how closely it is watching its own bottom line.

Messina and Plouffe told the two Hill leaders that there would be no cash transfers to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee from OFA or the DNC, at least not before Election Day, the sources said.

There are only two conclusions to reach if this report is true.  Either Barack Obama is so self-absorbed that he can’t share the wealth himself, or his fundraising is going so poorly that his campaign has little wealth to share.  Neither looks particularly impressive, but either way, this undermines the notion that Obama is a fundraising juggernaut that will overwhelm the eventual Republican nominee.

But speaking of sharing the wealth … isn’t it a little hypocritical for the man who once famously intoned that “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money” to tell his fellow Democrats that they can’t ask him for a little income redistribution from his election effort?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

That Hope better come with some Change…

The Nerve on March 5, 2012 at 1:21 PM

Do as I say, not as I do.

Blacksoda on March 5, 2012 at 1:22 PM

The joker in chief strikes again!

scalleywag on March 5, 2012 at 1:23 PM

But he’s good for all the free pills and condoms they need.

de rigueur on March 5, 2012 at 1:24 PM

Either Barack Obama is so self-absorbed that he can’t share the wealth himself, or his fundraising is going so poorly that his campaign has little wealth to share.

I vote both.

rbj on March 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM

When it comes to your own money, you’re never really a Communist.

Communism is always for the other guy.

Sidebar: Do you think that Obamuh has a dacha, on the Black Sea?

OhEssYouCowboys on March 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM

This is Opompous up to his usual hypocrisy: Do as I say, not as I do. The silver lining is that if he keeps up the false appearance that he’s getting plenty of campaign donations, perhaps many who might have donated will conclude he has enough and won’t donate, thus diminishing the fill in the already receding coffers.

stukinIL4now on March 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM

Obama to Dems: Get your own campaign cash

LOL!

First time I’ve laughed in days. Thanks King Putz.

Flora Duh on March 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM

The bills won’t pay themselves after PBHO leaves office, you know, and Imelda Obama needs her shoes lobster tails.

Bishop on March 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM

LOVE the tagline Ed :)

cmsinaz on March 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM

Either Barack Obama is so self-absorbed that he can’t share the wealth himself, or his fundraising is going so poorly that his campaign has little wealth to share.

We know from the past 3 years or so just how self-absorbed Mr. President is. We can only hope that he’s not sharing because there isn’t much to spare. That would make sense, given his less than stellar performance, but give these liberals time…they’ll end up kicking in because he’s the only thing they’ve got. No one else has come forward to run against him so they’ll have to support him. They may not have to give money, but they’ll support him or their free condoms will fly out the window.

scalleywag on March 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM

This is a good strategy.

You can’t sell bad beer (e.g. Bud Light) without a robust marketing effort, nor can you sell a bad president.

NoDonkey on March 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM

“It’s all about me.” /PBHO

Khun Joe on March 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM

How much will be set aside to fund his private life after 2012? Golf courses ain’t free dontcha know!

Ukiah on March 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM

Both conclusions Ed,

cmsinaz on March 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” congressmen are good, but Presidents are better!

magicbeans on March 5, 2012 at 1:27 PM

What is shows is a president who’s destroying his party.

cpaulus on March 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM

What is shows is a president who’s destroying his party.

cpaulus on March 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM

Hope he succeeds magnificently.

stukinIL4now on March 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM

Wait, isn’t his famous line: “This isn’t about me.”

scalleywag on March 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM

Is it to much to hope that this is his way of telling them to retire? Reid is irrelevant, and Pelosi has set women’s rights back nearly a decade with some of her comments.

Blacksoda on March 5, 2012 at 1:29 PM

How much money is the main stream media, the labor unions, every leftist special interest group, academia, and Hollywood worth…?

Seven Percent Solution on March 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM

Really, really large bus this time. He’s going to lose in Nov.

jeanie on March 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM

Either Barack Obama is so self-absorbed that he can’t share the wealth himself, or his fundraising is going so poorly that his campaign has little wealth to share.

that is just too rich.

Just like in 2010, Obama expected all the congress Dems to walk the plank for him (and they did). Obama has no fellow democrats, there is only Obama as Democrat.

ted c on March 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM

He’s gotta give his “fair share”!!

ted c on March 5, 2012 at 1:31 PM

what about “fairness”?

ted c on March 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM

Hope he succeeds magnificently.

stukinIL4now on March 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM

I have a friend on the Hill who works in a Democrat’s office. He has told me flatly that he’s worried about what Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have done to the Democrats. He said that Obama has no idea how to lead an organization, let alone a country and that he never calls congressmen, not even Democrats, to try and work on legislation.

cpaulus on March 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM

Obama’s election is the worst thing to ever happen to the democrat party, and Obamacare will be it’s doom.

Mord on March 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM

Pelosi and Reid should pull out the tents and “occupy” the south lawn of the White House until Obama practices what he preaches when he channels his inner Jesus and makes the claim that Christ told him to increase taxes.

Happy Nomad on March 5, 2012 at 1:33 PM

But Barack is over his head and is a nice guy according to our nominee Mitt.

BroncosRock on March 5, 2012 at 1:33 PM

Funny how liberals don’t mind reaching into your pocket to make a difference but it’s a whole different story when it comes to their pocket.

Axion on March 5, 2012 at 1:34 PM

Nothing a few million anonymous $198.23 donations can’t fix.

Archivarix on March 5, 2012 at 1:34 PM

You can polish a turd until it shines, but it’s still a turd…………..

vietvet68 on March 5, 2012 at 1:35 PM

Think of all of the poor people he could feed with that campaign cash.

NoDonkey on March 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM

This new autopage reloading sucks. Give people the freedom to reload their own page when they want. With Drudge and RCP I have to close out the pages it’s so extreme. Just my 2 cents.

anotherJoe on March 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM

They mark down tickets (maybe downgrade is a better term) to see him at every event he attends and in some cases resort to trying to give tickets away for free or dragging people in off the nearby sidewalks.

Why would the entitlement mentality crowd >>>PAY for a ticket to see him?

He must be seriously strapped for cash.

dogsoldier on March 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM

Nothing a few million anonymous $198.23 donations can’t fix.

Archivarix on March 5, 2012 at 1:34 PM

He needs sugar daddies willing to back those type of donations. I think many of his 2008 donors are fleeing for the exits.

NotCoach on March 5, 2012 at 1:37 PM

Doesn’t he think at some point he’s raised enough money?

LoganSix on March 5, 2012 at 1:37 PM

I have a friend on the Hill who works in a Democrat’s office. He has told me flatly that he’s worried about what Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have done to the Democrats. He said that Obama has no idea how to lead an organization, let alone a country and that he never calls congressmen, not even Democrats, to try and work on legislation.

cpaulus on March 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM

The real worry is what he’s doing to the COUNTRY.

search4truth on March 5, 2012 at 1:37 PM

Tough choice…

… Do you actually ask Obowma for money, where he would insist on campaigning for you, or do you go it alone and try to distance yourself from him?

/

Seven Percent Solution on March 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM

Obama to Dems: “I’ve got your back.”

Christien on March 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM

This is perfectly rational. Obama doesn’t need Congress anymore–he’s figured out how to do everything he wants through waivers and administrative mandates. There’s no chance the Republicans will reach 60 seats in the Senate (which would be enough to block Obama), and virtually no chance the Democrats will retake the House (which would be enough to pass legislation and provide him the fig-leaf of democratic consent), so the 2012 Congressional results are utterly irrelevant. Frankly, the Democrats should all be turning their campaign coffers over to him.

Fabozz on March 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM

All he has left are the unions and blacks–and not all of the latter. He’s after the ladies but is forgetting that half of those are conservative and would vote anyone BUT him. Insulting to think gals can be bought by free contraceptives. He thinks they are pretty cheap dates.

jeanie on March 5, 2012 at 1:39 PM

I have a friend on the Hill who works in a Democrat’s office. He has told me flatly that he’s worried about what Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have done to the Democrats. He said that Obama has no idea how to lead an organization, let alone a country and that he never calls congressmen, not even Democrats, to try and work on legislation.

cpaulus on March 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM

Change.

visions on March 5, 2012 at 1:39 PM

Typical liberal: YOU should share more….ME, not so much.

search4truth on March 5, 2012 at 1:39 PM

What does it say about the character of a man if he ardently believes that everyone is for sale.

jeanie on March 5, 2012 at 1:40 PM

Priceless!

KMC1 on March 5, 2012 at 1:40 PM

He said that Obama has no idea how to lead an organization, let alone a country and that he never calls congressmen, not even Democrats, to try and work on legislation.

cpaulus on March 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM

Well fortunately Dems have Debbie Wasserman Schultz to help with the leadership responsibilities. Of course, it is fortunate for Republicans.

Happy Nomad on March 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM

Joe the Plumber is still confused.

Rovin on March 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM

All I can picture is Daffy Duck: “It’s all MINE! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine!…”

Barack Obama on how to tell the Democratic Party that it is all about him, now… the rest of you pipsqueaks have served your purpose.

ajacksonian on March 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM

That headline is priceless, by the way. :) It speaks of his childishness (selfishness).

scalleywag on March 5, 2012 at 1:44 PM

… isn’t it a little hypocritical for the man who once famously intoned that “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money” to tell his fellow Democrats that they can’t ask him for a little income redistribution from his election effort?

Of course not. Laws are for the little people, not kings. Rex Lex.

jwolf on March 5, 2012 at 1:44 PM

Good one ajacksonian

cmsinaz on March 5, 2012 at 1:45 PM

What does it say about the character of a man if he ardently believes that everyone is for sale.

jeanie on March 5, 2012 at 1:40 PM

I’m not sure I’d make the claim that Obama has any character at all. He just isn’t that deep. Obama is an empty suit whose entire political career up to now has been of the same pattern. Get elected and then get elected to something else before you have to run on a record. Part of the difference between 2008 and 2012 is that the bastard will have to stand for office by defending his record.

That has never happened before and it might be interesting to see how the thin-skinned Obama reacts when the general campaign kicks into gear. He has a hissy fit if a reporter asks a less than adoring question.

Happy Nomad on March 5, 2012 at 1:48 PM

Obama to Dems: “I’ve got your back.”

Christien on March 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM

The better to twist the knife in.

Happy Nomad on March 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM

Obama to Dems: Get your own campaign cash

Obama to Axelrod: “We’re going to need a larger bus”

Rovin on March 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM

isn’t it a little hypocritical for the man who once famously intoned that “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money” to tell his fellow Democrats that they can’t ask him for a little income redistribution from his election effort?

It’s his method, over and over again. Senator Obama railing against increasing the debt limit as a failure of leadership. Candidate Obama exceeding federal spending limits he supports. Obama embracing super PACs he once derided. Keeping Guantanamo Bay open, which he opposed. Ignoring his statement his $700B stimulus, all borrowed money, would keep unemployment under 8%. He lies with impunity.

Paul-Cincy on March 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, have privately sought as much as $30 million combined…

I don’t see this as any big deal, really.

Pelosi and Reid can probably win re-election from now until the end of time, without spending one red cent on campaigning, because of the stupidity of their constituents.

Now, 0bama on the other hand…. he’s going to need all the help he can get. He better spend his money wisely.

UltimateBob on March 5, 2012 at 2:02 PM

All I can picture is Daffy Duck: “It’s all MINE! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine!…”

ajacksonian on March 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM

“Consequences, Schmonsequences. As long as I’m President.”

UltimateBob on March 5, 2012 at 2:04 PM

I have a friend on the Hill who works in a Democrat’s office. He has told me flatly that he’s worried about what Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have done to the Democrats.

cpaulus on March 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM

Kinda like what the Bushes, McCain and Romney have done to the GOP.

UltimateBob on March 5, 2012 at 2:07 PM

I’ll go with poorly, Alex, for $2.00.

Kissmygrits on March 5, 2012 at 2:08 PM

Wait, why does the president have a say in what happens to those funds, anyway? Wouldn’t that decision ultimately be made by the chairs of the OFA or the DNC?

scalleywag on March 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM

Nothing a few million anonymous $198.23 donations can’t fix.

Archivarix on March 5, 2012 at 1:34 PM

The so called millions of average folk are making a choice,donate to him or buy gas and eat.

docflash on March 5, 2012 at 2:19 PM

Why does Obama need so much campaign cash, when he can (and does) fire up the ol’ AF1 and AF2 anytime he or the mooch want to go somewhere on taxpayer money? He’s got plenty of taxpayer slush fund cash available to him just by writing Executive Orders for whatever he wants. Laws? What does he care for laws?

Harbingeing on March 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM

The GOP campaign commercials are writing themselves… take his 2008 campaign rhetoric and compare it to his rhetoric as President and even the idiots will have to see the Emporer has no clothes. I don’t think there is any amount of money he can raise to change that.

Two years of super-majorities and they have nothing to show for it. No budget, no tax relief, no jobs, and no prospects for a turnaround that will add jobs. Zilch. Deep down the Dems know they have no plan, and they have to spend the next 8 months convincing VOTING Americans that they really do have a plan without telling us what the plan is.

The independents know the score, and despite what they say in public so that they aren’t called racists, they will be pulling the GOP lever in Nov. You can’t piss on people and tell them it’s raining. The jig is up.

There is no amount of money that can save them.

goflyers on March 5, 2012 at 2:25 PM

All I can picture is Daffy Duck: “It’s all MINE! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine!…”

ajacksonian on March 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM

aside, I introduced my son to that cartoon this weekend. One of my all time favorites. Bugs Bunny is Aesop’s Fables for moderns.

perries on March 5, 2012 at 2:26 PM

Oblowme humming Pink Floyd:

Money
Well, get back
I’m all right Jack
Keep your hands off of my stack

Money
It’s a hit
Don’t give me that do goody good bull$hit
I’m in the high-fidelity first class traveling set
I think I need a Jumbo jet

Money
It’s a crime
Share it fairly
But don’t take a slice of my pie

Dexter_Alarius on March 5, 2012 at 2:27 PM

I’m in the high-fidelity first class traveling set
I think I need a Jumbo jet

That would be “an Air Force jet”.

NoDonkey on March 5, 2012 at 2:27 PM

I’m sorry, he just can’t spare a square…

He doesn’t have a square to spare.

JoeBrowns on March 5, 2012 at 2:28 PM

But he’s good for all the free pills and condoms they need.

de rigueur on March 5, 2012 at 1:24 PM

No, he’s good for someone else to buy all the free pills and condoms they need.

parke on March 5, 2012 at 2:30 PM

But speaking of sharing the wealth … isn’t it a little hypocritical for the man who once famously intoned that “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money” to tell his fellow Democrats that they can’t ask him for a little income redistribution from his election effort?

That’s Obama sharing OUR money with his friends, it was never meant to be him sharing HIS money.

RJL on March 5, 2012 at 2:33 PM

Kinda like what the Bushes, McCain and Romney have done to the GOP.

UltimateBob on March 5, 2012 at 2:07 PM

Kind of, but not in the same way. The Bushes were competent and actually passed legislation. W created or system of fighting against terrorism out of whole cloth, which he doesn’t get credit for because some of it didn’t work or went too far. He also got a second term and expanded GOP majorities. You can blame Hastert for having a balanced budget as much as you can blame Bush.

Obama is a completely different animal. While Bush wanted to push legislation though and work with Congress and help the GOP gain house seats, etc, Obama really doesn’t care. He couldn’t care less if the Democrats lose or there’s no budget. He’s not competent enough to lead and is moving the Democrats outside of the mainstream (something Bush never did to the GOP). Obama’s taken the Democrats to a place where moderately liberal people don’t recognize where they are and no one in their party will stand up to him (Shuler tried and now he’s gone). Bush’s mess-ups hurt the GOP for 2 elections,

Obama’s looking at literally destroying the Democratic Party. None of their leadership represents a mainstream view of America according to my buddy. The best way to look at it is this: Bill Clinton we disagreed with, but he still worked with Newt and accomplished some good things because he wanted to be president of the entire country. His views remained in the mainstream for the most part. BUt, today, there’s no one in a leadership position in the Democratic Party that represents ordinary, mainstream liberal-leaning people. People like my buddy say they want Obama to win, but in reality, what they want is for them to get smoked so that Cuomo can pick up the pieces in 2016. If Obama’s re-elected, someone like Cuomo, who’s been fairly fiscally conservative, could very well lose a primary to someone like Elizabeth Warren, who would have no chance at winning a national election.

cpaulus on March 5, 2012 at 2:34 PM

You can buy a lot of arugala with a billion dollars.

NoDonkey on March 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM

Can you believe they want him to spread it around a little after how hard he has worked for it?

Schlepping back and forth to fundraisers all across the country, turning on the charm and making nice-nice day after day, and night after night?

Flippin’ moochers, looking for handouts. It’s like they think that at a certain point, you’ve made enough money and it’s time to redistribute it to the people who haven’t put in the same effort.

perries on March 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM

It has always been about ‘The One!’ He doesn’t care a fig if the rest of the Dems in the House and Senate go under – it’s all about him, him, him. Remember those Greek columns, Dems? It’s all about his Godhead. Just eat you peas, Dems, and STFU!

Bob in VA on March 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM

You can buy a lot of arugala with a billion dollars.

NoDonkey on March 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM

“Have you seen the price of arugula at Whole Foods?!”
– Some out-of-touch Pol

Dexter_Alarius on March 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM

He better share it while he can, all that cash won’t do him much good when sheriff Joe hauls him off in cuffs and issues him some pink panties!

What happens to all that cash by the way, raised under false pretenses, by an unqualified con man, donate it to the deficit?

ConcealedKerry on March 5, 2012 at 3:26 PM

Presnit Oky doky, gonna go to da hoky poky!

ConcealedKerry on March 5, 2012 at 3:32 PM

Good news, but I thought trillions in transfer, Soros, those super fund pacs, and unlimited untraceable open credit card/gift card/website donations were going to be enough to fund Obama. Not to mention free fawning media.

AnotherOpinion on March 5, 2012 at 3:37 PM

He’s after the ladies but is forgetting that half of those are conservative and would vote anyone BUT him. Insulting to think gals can be bought by free contraceptives. He thinks they are pretty cheap dates.

jeanie on March 5, 2012 at 1:39 PM

I severly doubt that half the ladies are socialy conservative enough to vote on those convictions. Millions have already been bought on the issue of abortion, and millions more think it is a good idea, without thinking too deeply that is. Millions look to government instead of a husband, etc. If what you said were true, he’d not have won as many women as he did the first time around.

AnotherOpinion on March 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM

It looks like Obama is going with the “Seagull Strategy.”

evilned on March 5, 2012 at 3:58 PM

He needs sugar daddies willing to back those type of donations. I think many of his 2008 donors are fleeing for the exits.

NotCoach on March 5, 2012 at 1:37 PM

I think many of his 2008 donors graduated from college and discovered reality…..with the arrival of that first federal school loan re-payment envelope.

BobMbx on March 5, 2012 at 4:15 PM

Typical half white person.

Buttercup on March 5, 2012 at 4:16 PM

Good news, but I thought trillions in transfer, Soros, those super fund pacs, and unlimited untraceable open credit card/gift card/website donations were going to be enough to fund Obama. Not to mention free fawning media.

AnotherOpinion on March 5, 2012 at 3:37 PM

Do you really believe that the $1.2B that John Corzine ‘lost’ at MF Global just went ‘poof’?

slickwillie2001 on March 5, 2012 at 4:31 PM

The hypocrite in chief.

What else would one expect from a dictator wannabee and liberal socialist progressive? (aside from the ongoing shredding of the constitution that is).

Wolfmoon on March 5, 2012 at 4:41 PM

No – Corzine did lose that money because he believed Europe was too big to fail and while Europe hopes that as well they are struggling to stay above water. Corzine’s money is gone.

This all comes down to how much George Soros wants to spend. I would say Wisconsin has not worked well – Ohio did better but Obama will still be lucky to take it after his catholic church attack.

Making the unions fight a retreating action took lots of money – rent o mobs don’t come cheap. And OWS has been a complete disaster. And assuming Obama’s latest actions have finally convinced Kennedy that the SC needs to stop this guy, even if he wins election Obamacare is done. The only question will be whether they kill the mandate or all of it. Even democratic reps are co-sponsoring legislation eliminating pieces of it.

So watch Soros. If he decides to quit spending, Obama is toast. and strangely, one advantage Romney does have is that I think he will really cut into what is left of the Wall Streeters who will give Obama the time of day.

Then we need to work the hastening of the bankruptcy of the big networks and the NYT before 2016 so as to kill the MSM’s built in 7 to 10 points of advantage for every Dem candidate. Killing the teacher’s unions and taking our schools back from the union thugs would also help us start teaching kids instead of allowing the libs to indoctrinate them.

Zomcon JEM on March 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM

Yeah, Barry has always been about “being fair” and “sharing”.

Just as long as he’s talking about somebody elses money.

GarandFan on March 5, 2012 at 6:32 PM

All I can picture is Daffy Duck: “It’s all MINE! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Mine!…”

ajacksonian on March 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM

aside, I introduced my son to that cartoon this weekend. One of my all time favorites. Bugs Bunny is Aesop’s Fables for moderns.

perries on March 5, 2012 at 2:26 PM

You are so right!
And Coyote vs Roadrunner is not too shabby as political commentary as well.

AesopFan on March 5, 2012 at 7:22 PM

One more conclusion:

President Obama is an arsehole par excellence.

Sherman1864 on March 6, 2012 at 1:43 AM

Gee! What ever happened to Obama’s Joe-the-Plumber comment: “when you spread the wealth around it’s good for everybody.”

Dr. Charles G. Waugh on March 6, 2012 at 2:30 AM

Regarding your last question, it’s not hypocritical at all. President Obama said that at some point you’ve made enough money. He never said there’d be a point at he’smade enough money.

Jeff A on March 6, 2012 at 6:25 AM