Romney wins Wyoming caucus, Santorum poised for Washington win
posted at 9:50 am on March 1, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
Mitt Romney sailed to an easy win in Wyoming last night, capturing nearly 40% of the vote in the state caucus. The victory provided Romney some claim to momentum after his Tuesday sweep in Arizona and Michigan:
Mitt Romney has won a nonbinding vote of Republican activists who turned out for precinct caucuses across Wyoming during the past two weeks.
The former Massachusetts governor was the favorite of 39 percent of the 2,108 caucus goers, while former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum finished second with 32 percent. Texas Rep. Ron Paul had 21 percent, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had 8 percent.
The caucuses also elected delegates to county conventions, which meet next week to select 12 delegates and 11 alternates to the Republican National Convention. Twelve county conventions will elect one delegate each, and the other 11 will each select an alternate.
The caucus was, as most are, non-binding. No delegates got assigned from this vote, although the actual delegate assignment will take place more quickly in Wyoming than in other caucus states. Iowa and Minnesota, for instance, won’t get around to officially assigning delegates until later in the spring, and even though Rick Santorum won both, the delegates to their state conventions have no obligation to vote for Santorum when they elect delegates to the national convention.
The next event on the Republican schedule is the caucus in Washington on Saturday, which Santorum is expected to win. He will campaign there today, even as Super Tuesday looms:
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum will be in the Tri-Cities tomorrow. He will be speaking at the Red Lion Hotel in Pasco at 6 p.m. It’s estimated 1,000-1,500 people will attend the event. The number of attendees will be capped at 1,500 and any additional people will be turned away.
Santorum comes off a tough loss in Michigan, but also off of a very successful fundraising month in February, raising $9 million. A win in Washington won’t add any bound delegates to Santorum’s total, but it could give him an argument that he’s connecting better in tough-to-win places for Republicans. My friend Eric Ostermeier at Smart Politics offers an interesting analysis of Santorum’s performance in the primaries:
Mitt Romney has won more contests than Rick Santorum, has received 740,000+ more votes, and has amassed approximately twice as many delegates in the early stages of the 2012 Republican primary season.
There is, however, one metric on Romney’s electoral scorecard in which he is losing quite badly to his chief challenger – a metric which perhaps symbolizes his inability thus far to unite Republican voters behind his campaign.
A Smart Politics tabulation of voting through the first 11 Republican primaries and caucuses of the 2012 presidential cycle finds that Rick Santorum has won more than twice as many counties (360) as Mitt Romney (145) and nearly 60 percent of all counties to date.
Five candidates have carried counties in the contests thus far, with Newt Gingrich in third with 79 (all but two from South Carolina and Florida), Ron Paul with 31, and Rick Perry with two.
Obviously, it’s votes that count and not counties, but it’s still an interesting look at the basis of support for both men. At any rate, now that we’re pushing through to more actual primaries — seven of the ten Super Tuesday contests are binding primaries that directly produce delegate assignments — these caucuses will become much less important … as they should be.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Report: Oversight on IRS targeting came from Washington all along

DOJ seized logs for five Fox News phones, possibly James Rosens’ parents’ house






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Cool beans
cmsinaz on April 8, 2013 at 6:44 PM
Wait till Panetta hears about a government job he hasn’t had yet.
I swear, that guy is the George Plimpton of politics.
BobMbx on April 8, 2013 at 6:45 PM
Chelsea considers run….awesome
Lynne considers run…..outrage
-lsm
cmsinaz on April 8, 2013 at 6:45 PM
Sorry Liz
Where is that adult beverage
cmsinaz on April 8, 2013 at 6:47 PM
go baby go!
KOOLAID2 on April 8, 2013 at 6:47 PM
Hmmm, In a world where politicians’ offspring, Liz Cheney and Chelsea Clinton vie in a distant presidential campaign. :)
hawkeye54 on April 8, 2013 at 6:49 PM
Yeah… Love Lynn!
melle1228 on April 8, 2013 at 6:49 PM
Oh goody, political dynasties are sprouting all over the place. We have the Clintons on the left, and the Bushies and Cheneyites on the right. Somehow, it reminds me of N.Koreas political dynasty. Lol
tommy71 on April 8, 2013 at 6:51 PM
…she could take them both on!…on the Capitol floor…or in a street fight…AND… KICK… THEIR… A$$ES!!!!
KOOLAID2 on April 8, 2013 at 6:51 PM
I like Liz Cheney even though I’m not a big fan of her foreign policy these days (neocon to the core). I would love to see her in Washington slapping down the libs, but there’s no room for her in Wyoming. she needs a wedge issue to bump off an incumbent, how is Enzi on Amnesty? For that matter, where does Liz stand on amnesty?
Daemonocracy on April 8, 2013 at 6:51 PM
Ugh.
What a pansyass way to run for a seat.
Move somewhere uber-safe and try and take on some halfway decent GOP’ers.
Absurd. Barrasso has been decent as has Enzi.
Go for Governor.
budfox on April 8, 2013 at 6:51 PM
At least when Liz Cheney talks, she has some extremely intelligent things to say. Not so for Chelsea….
SailorMark on April 8, 2013 at 6:52 PM
I’m currently eyeing wy to move to. and no I’m not from co or ca.
tom daschle concerned on April 8, 2013 at 6:52 PM
SWEET!
gophergirl on April 8, 2013 at 6:53 PM
Would like to hear from some Wyomingites on this. I have nothing against her, but don’t want to make a reliable seat iffy.
Mark1971 on April 8, 2013 at 6:53 PM
I needed this great news!!! TY!
Unlike McAmnesty, Vice President Cheney’s daughter actually has something intelligent to add to the conversation and will represent WY and the republic well.
I’m sure when the time comes it will still be be easier to donate to her campaign than buying a box of 45 ACP ammo.
GreatCommunicator on April 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM
I don’t think Liz Cheney should launch a primary fight against an incumbent. However, if the incumbent chooses not to seek reelection, then she should feel free to toss her hat in the ring and see how it goes. As long as she meets the residency criteria, then it’s fair game. She’ll have to face questions about her commitment to Wyoming, but she’ll also have lots of name recognition that she’s built in her own right. She’s a forceful and articulate advocate for the GOP. We need all we can get!
Jill1066 on April 8, 2013 at 6:59 PM
YES!
ctmom on April 8, 2013 at 6:59 PM
I would donate to her.
Enzi has some marks against him…
http://heritageactionscorecard.com/scorecard/index.html#E000285#member
dforston on April 8, 2013 at 7:00 PM
If we’re lucky, in the near future, we may have a primary fight between the Clintons and Obamas on the left, and the Bushies, Cheneyites and Paulians on the right. Not something I’m looking forward to. Slowly but surely, we’re transforming into a banana republic.
tommy71 on April 8, 2013 at 7:04 PM
Nice!
The Notorious G.O.P on April 8, 2013 at 7:05 PM
Me likey…
Seven Percent Solution on April 8, 2013 at 7:06 PM
Oh the irony.
Fenris on April 8, 2013 at 7:07 PM
Please move to South Carolina and run against Grahamnesty!
SouthernGent on April 8, 2013 at 7:07 PM
Good. She’s a chip off the old block.
mchristian on April 8, 2013 at 7:08 PM
Hey troglocons, what is Liz’s stance on gay marriage?
Archivarix on April 8, 2013 at 7:09 PM
That’s the best news I’ve heard all day
MMinCanonCity on April 8, 2013 at 7:09 PM
Liz is fantastic, I’ve met her a couple of time in Jackson, Wyo. Enzi definitely has some marks against him, but he and his wife Diana have both been very kind and engaging to me when I met them. They used to be small biz people (shoe stores) and Diana gave me lots of advise on being an entrepreneur in Wyo. I think he’s still the only accountant in the Senate.
Cynthia Lummis is a STAR and I would support her hands down for whatever she ran for.
Jackalope on April 8, 2013 at 7:10 PM
Also I’ve heard that Enzi isn’t running again…but it was probably 2 years ago that I heard that; obviously things can change.
Jackalope on April 8, 2013 at 7:12 PM
..and Dick Morris explodes on Hannity like latter-day Mr Creosote.
The War Planner on April 8, 2013 at 7:17 PM
Rubio is hawkish for fighting for Muslims or more specifically having other Americans fighting for Muslims. Fighting for America and Americans … … not so much.
VorDaj on April 8, 2013 at 7:25 PM
Forget the Senate – I’m for putting Liz up against Shrillary Rotten clinton in the Presidential contest.
TeaPartyNation on April 8, 2013 at 7:27 PM
Interesting that AP wouldn’t bring up the issue of same-sex marriage in a post about Liz Cheney. Her support for SSM is, I believe, somewhat less clear than her dad’s, but from what I understand, it’s there. If she were elected, she’d be another pro-SSM GOP senator. And no matter how conservative Wyoming is, its libertarian streak would make it not so much of an issue there. My uncle lives in Wyoming, and according to him, he and the state as a whole tend to be pretty conservative but not so much socially, at least not on an issue like this. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a state like Wyoming elect pro-SSM candidates or approve SSM before many bluer states do.
MinnesotaSlinger on April 8, 2013 at 7:28 PM
Run, Liz, run!
De Oppresso Liber on April 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM
Rubio was probably the number one pusher for America to use military force to kill Gaddafi which brought real Muslims to power and, among other things, lead to Benghazi. Now he wants to do the same in Syria, in between working toward his main goal of “earnesty” for tens of millions of illegal criminal alien invaders. The man is the plague.
VorDaj on April 8, 2013 at 7:30 PM
As smart as her father and more conservative.
Jaibones on April 8, 2013 at 7:33 PM
“Effin LESBIAN! I mean…what..oh shiite! Uh…whitey!”
-lib
Bishop on April 8, 2013 at 7:39 PM
If you could erase that neo-con portion of her brain (you know, like in the only good movie Jim Carrey ever made) she would be an awesome candidate. If she goes into it as an Iraq war/Super Daddy apologist, she may be surprised at the result.
AmeriCuda on April 8, 2013 at 7:52 PM
Ah I hope she isn’t the Lindsey Graham of the west.
Wigglesworth on April 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM
You Go, Girl!
Another Drew on April 8, 2013 at 8:03 PM
Not a good idea..:)
Dire Straits on April 8, 2013 at 8:11 PM
Remember when American didn’t have political dynasties?
Yeah, me neither.
Who’s next? Jenna Bush? Sasha Obama? Malia? Tricia Nixon?
PappyD61 on April 8, 2013 at 8:14 PM
Don’t think she’ll try to “push” someone out of the way prematurely, but if the door opens I hope she runs right through it.
cs89 on April 8, 2013 at 8:17 PM
The thought of Senator Cheney is the happiest political I have had in ages.
thuja on April 8, 2013 at 8:28 PM
I’d vote for a Cheney/Palin ticket in either order.
Knott Buyinit on April 8, 2013 at 8:32 PM
Cheney/Cheney 2016
HumpBot Salvation on April 8, 2013 at 8:49 PM
Hell no.
iwasbornwithit on April 8, 2013 at 8:51 PM
Hell no.
iwasbornwithit on April 8, 2013 at 8:51 PM
hepatitis c? HIV? what mentally debilitating disease were you born with?
tom daschle concerned on April 8, 2013 at 9:06 PM
Liz, please move here to Phoenix, get established and in 4 years kick our “maverick” senator into a long overdue retirement. Our bench here in the “Valley of the Sun” is so weak any new blood would be welcome.
Fynxbell on April 8, 2013 at 9:08 PM
Or maybe enough sense not to nominate another liberal GOP legacy to anything higher than dog catcher.
iwasbornwithit on April 8, 2013 at 9:11 PM
Wyoming likes their Senators and their Rep. However if anyone may be vulnerable, it would be Enzi. The problem Cheney may have is that we have a popular governor, Matt Mead, that I think will be turning an eye towards Washington soon.
Squarestate on April 9, 2013 at 12:21 AM
Finally, some really great news!! Go Liz!!!
LASue on April 9, 2013 at 1:05 AM
Then you don’t talk to a lot of freedom activists. His support of the Patriot Act put him at odds even with many hawks.
alwaysfiredup on April 9, 2013 at 10:38 AM
Being against gay marriage does not equal living in a cave. Some people are more biologically and sociologically aware than others.
alwaysfiredup on April 9, 2013 at 10:41 AM
Liz Cheney is running for the Senate? Where do I send my check to?
Conservative4Ever on April 9, 2013 at 12:02 PM