PPP: Santorum up by 10 among election-day voters in MI
posted at 8:40 am on February 28, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
How close will tonight’s contests in Arizona and Michigan be? The Arizona primary looks so much like a blowout for Mitt Romney that the Arizona Republic didn’t bother to write a front-page story about it, only offering a not about checking the paper’s website for election results later tonight. Michigan will be the battleground tonight, and Public Policy Polling says that Rick Santorum may have recaptured the momentum over the weekend — but with a twist:
It’s always good to be cautious with one night poll numbers, but momentum seems to be swinging in Santorum’s direction. Romney led with those interviewed on Sunday, but Santorum has a 39-34 advantage with folks polled on Monday. The best sign that things have gone back toward Santorum might be that with those polled today who hadn’t already voted, Santorum’s advantage was 41-31.
Much has been made of Democratic efforts to turn out the vote for Santorum and we see evidence that’s actually happening. Romney leads with actual Republican voters, 43-38. But Santorum’s up 47-10 with Democratic voters, and even though they’re only 8% of the likely electorate that’s enough to put him over the top. The big question now is whether those folks will actually bother to show up and vote tomorrow.
It’s not all due to Operation Chaos, or Insanity, or whatever it’s called. Romney may have booted Michigan over the weekend:
Romney hasn’t made a good last impression on Michigan voters. His favorability in Sunday interviews was 57/36, but in Monday interviews it was only 47/48. Santorum saw little difference in his reviews between the two days: 54/39 on Sunday and 56/36 on Monday. If Romney does indeed end up losing tomorrow there’s not much doubt he will have blown it in the final 48 hours.
It might also be that Santorum has been emphasizing economics the last few days in Michigan. He took to the pages of the Wall Street Journal to compare tax plans. Santorum borrowed Newt Gingrich’s criticism that Romney only wants to tinker around the edges, and added a swipe at Romney’s “last-minute conversion” to tax reform as well as repeating the accusation of Romney being an “Occupy Wall Street” candidate:
Meanwhile, my opponent in the Republican primaries, Mitt Romney, had a last-minute conversion. Attempting to distract from his record of tax and fee increases as governor of Massachusetts, poor job creation, and aggressive pursuit of earmarks, he now says he wants to follow my lead and lower individual as well as corporate marginal tax rates.
It’s a good start. But it doesn’t go nearly far enough. He says his proposed tax cuts would be revenue neutral and, borrowing the language of Occupy Wall Street, promises the top 1% will pay for the cuts. No pro-growth tax policy there, just more Obama-style class warfare.
Will this be enough to carry Michigan over the lead Romney presumably has built in early voting? Having a ten-point advantage on Election Day would be significant if it remains, especially since only 17% of PPP’s sample say they have voted early — but Romney has a 27-point lead among them, 56/29. Assuming that the Monday-only numbers and the early voting figures from PPP are accurate and predictive, a turnout like the one in 2008 would result in a narrow victory for Santorum, 38.9% to 35.2%. That would produce a nearly even split in delagates, but give Santorum a boost heading into Super Tuesday. If he can’t close the deal in Michigan, then next week will be a very tough sell.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
We should’ve annexed Mexico when we had the chance.
eva3071 on April 4, 2013 at 4:42 PM
Huge waste of time and money. These pols have no interest whatsoever in managing this border.
Dr. ZhivBlago on April 4, 2013 at 4:44 PM
But Napolitano says our border is as secure as it’s ever been! Did we always suck at defending our border? Or did we just lay out a banquette of free government benefits and dare foreigners to walk over and take some?
Socratease on April 4, 2013 at 4:49 PM
Time to let the military control the border…the boys in camo-pants know how to hold and defend a line in the sand!
powerpickle on April 4, 2013 at 4:49 PM
They’re still capturing that many?
Doomberg on April 4, 2013 at 4:53 PM
They don’t care about the “illegals.” They care about us.
http://www.examiner.com/article/dhs-confirms-it-s-spying-on-anti-government-americans
rrpjr on April 4, 2013 at 5:02 PM
That’s the plan.
NeoKong on April 4, 2013 at 5:02 PM
Well duh… Barky O’Dogeater won’t let anyone enforce our immigrations laws, how could border security possibly get better?
SWalker on April 4, 2013 at 5:03 PM
No, we only started sucking at defending our borders when the Marxist’s infiltrated our government.
SWalker on April 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM
Looks like we need armed drones for that task.
Obama is so good at whacking Talibanese, I wonder how well he’d do against the rabblke scooting across the border in Arizona?
dockywocky on April 4, 2013 at 5:12 PM
The bill will be be deficit neutral just like Obamacare and you can take that to the bank!
Wigglesworth on April 4, 2013 at 5:25 PM
50% is like a SOLID B+ for 0bama.
BTW, how many jobs were lost or not created by not building the fence that the will of the people Congress authorized. 0 sure is adding a precedent for the next president to ignore any and all legislation from previous congress’s. Not sure why the next president couldn’t refuse all of 0bama HellCare bill because he thinks it unconstitutional.
jukin3 on April 4, 2013 at 5:31 PM
What really bugs me is the poll at the top of the LA Times story that asks if drones should be used to patrol the border. 92% are in favor. Ok great, but if you have good desert survival skills and can evade the drone technology more than 50% of these people are in favor of giving these border jumpers a path to citizenship? Morons!
Wigglesworth on April 4, 2013 at 5:38 PM
Ya know, that was an almost done deal back after the Mexican American War. There was the concern though of all those Mexicans we’d have to accept as citizens, Catholics to boot, and both the culture and fact that we’d have millions more Catholics, who, at the time, weren’t especially liked by the majority of US citizens, most being Protestant and intolerant if not bitterly loathing of Catholics put the kabosh on the whole annexation thing, IIRC.
hawkeye54 on April 4, 2013 at 5:55 PM
Perhaps it’s time to call out the unorganized militia?
Another Drew on April 4, 2013 at 6:42 PM
Could someone politely explain to Senator Rubio that he is in grave danger of becoming Florida’s next Charlie Crist?
Another Drew on April 4, 2013 at 6:45 PM
Nothing to see here. These are simply undocumented border crossings by unnamed unmentionable entities that we don’t apprehend, see or even acknowledge. Until they are registered Democrats.
ghostwalker1 on April 4, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Well for now. Once that great and grand utopia has been put into place and the leftist have perpetual control of government, and just about everything else, we’ll see how fast the borders are manned and managed……to keep all the producers in our paradise.
Just remember who built the Berlin Wall and who installed the wire and guard towers on the East German border……it wasn’t the West Berliners attempting to keep all those communists out.
hawkeye54 on April 4, 2013 at 6:58 PM
When ya set back and think about it, its way, way, past time.
If only.
hawkeye54 on April 4, 2013 at 6:59 PM
410/7333 =/= 50%!!!
abobo on April 4, 2013 at 7:29 PM
LOL. Based on what?
Anyone who believes any numbers that come out of this lying, sack o’ sh!t government deserves what they get.
How about some fraud prosecutions? Sure …
I do like the “64%” to make it sound as if the number is based on something other than “pull it out of my azz”. It reminds of Barky’s junta claiming that their porkulus had created 3,231,873.32 jobs. Okey doke.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on April 4, 2013 at 8:51 PM