Rep. Chaffetz: Sometimes Romney is a little “too perfect”

posted at 6:00 pm on February 23, 2012 by Tina Korbe

On “Starting Point with Soledad O’Brien” this morning, conservative Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, an ardent Mitt Romney supporter, said he thinks that, if Romney has a problem at all, it’s that he’s “too perfect.”

“Well, I look at it and I see him as the most qualified person to be the president of the United States. He’s got the right background,” Chaffetz begins. “I think he’s — you know, he gets a criticism sometimes unfairly. He’s almost too perfect. He’s got this wonderful, beautiful wife, this great family, this great business record. He’s been highly successful in business. He’s been very blessed in his life. And people are trying to look for this fallacy that they can find. He’s pretty darn good. And so, I think he tries to fight and overcome that. But he’s just by far in my mind the best person to lead this nation.”

Chaffetz’ statements echo an argument Kathleen Parker made a couple weeks ago — that Romney’s biggest vulnerability is his lack of vulnerability. She wrote:

What’s wrong with this guy? Nada. Which is precisely the problem. Romney could use a limp.

To humanize him, helpful critics have suggested that he smile less during debates and try to show a little anger. Thanks to a new coach, he has become more aggressive and has begun punching back. Even so, audiences know instinctively that this is not the real Mitt. He’s just not that mad, and why should he be?

He has earned enough money never to have to work again. His investments produce multiples of millions in barely taxable income. When he looks in the mirror, he gets to rest his eyes on a relentlessly handsome face.

For most everyday Americans, life is less tidy. Half have been or will be divorced. Someone in the family is an alcoholic or a drug user. Most can barely pay their bills, and there’s not much to look forward to. When most Americans of Romney’s vintage look in the mirror, they see an overweight person they don’t recognize.

Parker concludes that it’s not that Romney can’t connect with the people; it’s that the people can’t connect with him.

This idea that Romney’s perfection is his biggest flaw might help to explain why even many members of “the Establishment” have a problem with the guy. None of us like to be reminded of all that we are not, and — as most of us are not fantastically rich, incredibly good-looking and conspicuously vice-free — Romney serves as just such a reminder to most of us.

Presumably, most conservatives would say they oppose a Romney nomination because he provided the blueprint for Obamacare, because he supported TARP, because he went along with taxpayer funding for abortion (his supporters would say he had no choice), etc., etc., etc.

But it’s worth examining how our subconscious jealousy of Mitt Romney might play a part in our disdain for him. What really is so much worse about him than about any of the other GOP candidates? Is it just that he’s “too perfect”?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Frequented any Palin threads lately? You may notice a few of your fellow Romney supporters and they’re not there to love on her, I assure you.

Kataklysmic on February 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM

I think that Palin and Romney have similar problems. How dare she be beautiful, successful, rich, self-confident and happily married.

Gelsomina on February 23, 2012 at 7:40 PM

Santorum and Newt wouldn’t even have made it past IA in any normal primary. For some reason the Truecon(TM) establishment has decided that it’s going to depict Romney as the second coming of the black plague personified to the point where many of the Truecon(TM) masses are so brainwashed they’re willing to vote for anybody up to and including the Bedroom cop, the Moonbase Commander, and in some cases even Obama just to stop the “moderate”.

Swerve22 on February 23, 2012 at 7:40 PM

To call a man myself soulless who has devoted so much to his family, his church and his countryto continually spam Hotair with paid talking points right out of Romney campaign headquarters is really disgusting.

You should be I’m so ashamed, Nomobo of myself.

bluegill on February 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM

Fixed for accuracy.

JPeterman on February 23, 2012 at 6:29 PM

Actually this is more accurate..

To call a man soulless who has devoted so much to his family, his church and his country is really disgusting.

You should be ashamed, Nomobo.

bluegill on February 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM

But thanks for your personal insults.

rich801 on February 23, 2012 at 7:41 PM

Santorum and Newt wouldn’t even have made it past IA in any normal primary. For some reason the Truecon(TM) establishment has decided that it’s going to depict Romney as the second coming of the black plague personified to the point where many of the Truecon(TM) masses are so brainwashed they’re willing to vote for anybody up to and including the Bedroom cop, the Moonbase Commander, and in some cases even Obama just to stop the “moderate”.

Swerve22 on February 23, 2012 at 7:40 PM

You MittBot Noncon(TM) establishment types never cease to disappoint.

Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:45 PM

You know, Tina, not everyone has disdain for Romney. He’s gotten plenty of votes this primary season. But thanks for being so upfront about your feelings for the man, and for rallying all the haters behind you.

I’m sick to death of the rightwingers screaming about Romneycare. If he had admitted to a mistake, you all would still be ragging on him for doing another flip-flop. The truth is you hate him, many of you for his religion, and if you didn’t have Romneycare you would just find something else to hammer him with.

He has said he will get rid of Obamacare. None of you believe him because you don’t WANT to believe him.

You just want to tear the man down, even if the result is four more years of the worst POTUS ever.

Bottom line–no, he’s not perfect, but he sure is a helluva lot better than Obama. Too bad that you can’t see that truth through your hate. Or your “disdain”–right, Tina?

Meredith on February 23, 2012 at 7:46 PM

rich801 on February 23, 2012 at 7:41 PM

Nah, JPeterman was far more accurate than you want to admit.

Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:47 PM

bluegill on February 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM

But thanks for your personal insults.

rich801 on February 23, 2012 at 7:41 PM

Are you bluegill too?

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 7:47 PM

Presumably, most conservatives would say they oppose an Obama nomination because he provided the Obamacare Mandate, because he supported TARP, because he went along with taxpayer funding for abortion (his supporters would say he had no choice), etc., etc., etc.

But it’s worth examining how our subconscious racism of Barak Obama might play a part in our disdain for him. What really is so much worse about him than about any of the other GOP candidates? Is it just that he’s “Black”?

;)

Durka-Durka on February 23, 2012 at 7:48 PM

You MittBot Noncon(TM) establishment types never cease to disappoint.

Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:45 PM

Tell me, what’s an “establishment type” other than somebody who supports Romney.

The only “establishment” I see is all the self proclaimed Trucons who have waffled back and forth among every available candidate (after throwing the most conservative candidate in the race Michelle Bachmann under the bus) justifying their big government washington insider ways and liberal positions/flip flops while relentlessly hammering Romney for it (even though in many cases he did it to a lesser extent).

Swerve22 on February 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM

Isn’t this the same sort of crap that Obama sycophants have been saying since 2008?

Obama’s just too brilliant to be understood by mere mortals.

Obama’s just too sensitive…too nuanced…too humble…too gracious…etc.

Besides, there will only been one Mr. Perfect: Curt Hennig.

Left Coast Right Mind on February 23, 2012 at 6:33 PM

If you were the least bit observant you would know that the differences are that Obama is bright, not brilliant, and lazy, not industrious, and has no significant accomplishments. Romney, on the other hand has succeeded at most everything he’s tried, including in the very difficult world of venture capitalism.

Despite his accomplishments, Romney is the target of derision from anonymous self-described conservatives who obviously struggle with their sanity. None of them has anything close to Romney’s accomplishments and I’m sure few have led the kind exemplary life he has led. People as angry as them generally can’t cut it. Which explains their anger.

Romney is the most qualified candidate for the Presidency in the last 200 years.

Basilsbest on February 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM

You forgot who you were on as didn’t you?

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 7:51 PM

He has said he will get rid of Obamacare. None of you believe him because you don’t WANT to believe him.

You just want to tear the man down, even if the result is four more years of the worst POTUS ever.

Bottom line–no, he’s not perfect, but he sure is a helluva lot better than Obama. Too bad that you can’t see that truth through your hate. Or your “disdain”–right, Tina?

Meredith on February 23, 2012 at 7:46 PM

Look, I could give two craps about the guy’s religion. I just think his supporters are naive when they fret about Santorum gettting hammered over his Catholic beliefs and they think Romney’s faith will somehow get a pass from the media.
Do you have a link for where he said he would repeal Obamacare? Serious question because I’ve heard his supporters say it but cannot find a clip or interview where he outright says that. I have seen the Washington post quote where he defends the mandates though. If you have the link, please share. I’m not being snarky here, I’d like to see it.

And again, some of the Romney supporters are so over the top nasty to people I’m starting to think that they are being paid by the other candidates. It’s not helping your guy.

BakerAllie on February 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM

You know, Tina, not everyone has disdain for Romney.

True. We call them, “losers.”

I’m sick to death of the rightwingers screaming about Romneycare. If he had admitted to a mistake, you all would still be ragging on him for doing another flip-flop. The truth is you hate him, many of you for his religion, and if you didn’t have Romneycare you would just find something else to hammer him with.

What a pathetic red herring. The LDS has nothing to do with my opposition to Romney, ROMNEYCARE IS THE MEANS OF MY OPPOSITION.

Next, you’re going to say that opposition to Mitt is a hate crime. Sick. Just sick.

He has said he will get rid of Obamacare. None of you believe him because you don’t WANT to believe him.

No, we don’t believe him because he is a repeated flip-flopper who is non-committal on everything. He lies all the time.

You just want to tear the man down, even if the result is four more years of the worst POTUS ever.

Or the result is a more conservative candidate in Rick or Newt who WILL DEFEAT OBAMA and advance the conservative movement in a way that Mitt would NEVER do.

Bottom line–no, he’s not perfect, but he sure is a helluva lot better than Obama. Too bad that you can’t see that truth through your hate. Or your “disdain”–right, Tina?

Meredith on February 23, 2012 at 7:46 PM

A Mitt nomination results in FOUR MORE YEARS of Obama. The man is untrustworthy, disingenuous and incapable of winning.

Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM

Romney is the most qualified candidate for the Presidency in the last 200 years.

Basilsbest on February 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM

Right up there with Herbert Hoover.

Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:54 PM

The only “establishment” I see is all the self proclaimed Trucons who have waffled back and forth among every available candidate (after throwing the most conservative candidate in the race Michelle Bachmann under the bus) justifying their big government washington insider ways and liberal positions/flip flops while relentlessly hammering Romney for it (even though in many cases he did it to a lesser extent).

Swerve22 on February 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM

One of the most incoherent statements I’ve heard in a long time. Right out of MSNBC headquarters…

Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM

Wow…A stalker..

rich801 on February 17, 2012 at 7:16 PM

You responded to ME, puddles.

Magic 8-Ball Says: “FAIL.”

Kent18 on February 17, 2012 at 7:17 PM

My very own stalker…Boy am I impressed.

rich801 on February 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM

This is too easy.

You helped by not changing back to bluegill though. Thanks.

To call a man myself soulless who has devoted so much to his family, his church and his countryto continually spam Hotair with paid talking points right out of Romney campaign headquarters is really disgusting.

You should be I’m so ashamed, Nomobo of myself.

bluegill on February 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM

Fixed for accuracy.

JPeterman on February 23, 2012 at 6:29 PM

Actually this is more accurate..

To call a man soulless who has devoted so much to his family, his church and his country is really disgusting.

You should be ashamed, Nomobo.

bluegill on February 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM

But thanks for your personal insults.

rich801 on February 23, 2012 at 7:41 PM

Rich801, why would your first comment in the thread be to Peterman who was talking to bluegill and why would you consider that a personal attack. You forgot who you were posting as didn’t you?

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:05 PM

You MittBot Noncon(TM) establishment types never cease to disappoint. Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:45 PM

As a born optimist you always disappoint Myron. Congratulations. You have plenty of stiff competition from other morons on this site but I vote you MOST DERANGED. As you said last night: YOU HATE ROMNEY.

You are a sad case. Go and watch kids play little league. Or go to a Soup Kitchen and volunteer. It may help you to recover your sanity.

Basilsbest on February 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM

Some people over analyze.

rubberneck on February 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM

Look, I could give two craps about the guy’s religion. I just think his supporters are naive when they fret about Santorum gettting hammered over his Catholic beliefs and they think Romney’s faith will somehow get a pass from the media.

Catholics do not believe that the state has a legitimate interest in what goes on in the bedrooms of the nation. Santorum’s Catholicism is not a problem. His extremism, indeed fascism on this issue, makes him a problem to those who believe in liberty from religious oppression. This Catholic finds his views offensive. He is unelectable.

Basilsbest on February 23, 2012 at 8:17 PM

You should be ashamed, Nomobo.

bluegill on February 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM

Anyone who would support that lying corrupt serial adulterer Gingrich doesn’t feel the same level of shame that most folks do. They can’t. They would have to suspend their conscience to vote for Gingrich when there are three honest people left to choose from.

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 6:39 PM

This freaking idiot is talking to itself?

What does it take to get this fool banned?

Lanceman on February 23, 2012 at 8:19 PM

Leave my grandson out of it, psycho.

kingsjester on February 23, 2012 at 6:47 PM

How does anyone even know you have a grandson? Oh that’s right, you used him to prove you aren’t a 45 year old pimple faced shut in who obsesses on anonymous people on the intertubes.

You know what, I don’t believe you have a grandson. You ARE a pimple faced 45 year old shut in who obsesses on anonymous people on the interweb.

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 8:20 PM

MJBrutus on February 23, 2012 at 6:45 PM

+1!!!!

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 8:22 PM

Some people over analyze.

rubberneck on February 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM

And then some people are really good at reading other people. Like the folks who study writing and speaking patterns. And behavior patterns. I can bet csdeven or bluegill will be on any minute.

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:24 PM

Oh, a little slow on that one.

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:25 PM

Rep. Chaffetz: Sometimes Romney is a little “too perfect”

Tell us more Rep Chaffetz how is Romney more robotic than human?

Why doesn’t Romney appear on Imus in the Morning? Haven’t they noticed that Imus knows how to humanize a candidate? Ask Gov Chris Christie.

Dr Evil on February 23, 2012 at 8:27 PM

What does it take to get this fool banned?

Lanceman on February 23, 2012 at 8:19 PM

Whine a bit louder you little Nancy-boy. And while you’re obsessing, try some Ritalin.

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 8:29 PM

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 8:20 PM

Why don’t you leave his grandson out of it?

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:29 PM

Do you have a link for where he said he would repeal Obamacare? Serious question because I’ve heard his supporters say it but cannot find a clip or interview where he outright says that.

He says it in every debate and every stump speech. Here’s a clip of him promising repeal last night.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/t/video/romney-elected-repeal-obamacare-15770916

RepublicanInMA on February 23, 2012 at 8:31 PM

Why don’t you leave his grandson out of it?

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:29 PM

Because she’s a filthy piece of crap.

Lanceman on February 23, 2012 at 8:31 PM

Lanceman, I’m pretty sure unless you banned bluegill and Rich801 too, maybe rubberneck, he’d still be here.

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:32 PM

Look, I could give two craps about the guy’s religion. I just think his supporters are naive when they fret about Santorum gettting hammered over his Catholic beliefs and they think Romney’s faith will somehow get a pass from the media.
BakerAllie on February 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM

Why do you think Santorum is being hammered over his “Catholic beliefs” but not Gingrich?

joana on February 23, 2012 at 8:32 PM

Look, I could give two craps about the guy’s religion. I just think his supporters are naive when they fret about Santorum gettting hammered over his Catholic beliefs and they think Romney’s faith will somehow get a pass from the media.

Romney doesn’t wear his faith on his sleeve, nor does he use judgemental statements regarding how others chose to live their lives. Santorum is guilty of both. The media may try to paint his religion as “crazy-culty” but they’ll look awfully foolish as our side gets a free pass to bring up Obama’s “faith”.

BettyRuth on February 23, 2012 at 8:33 PM

Lanceman, I’m pretty sure unless you banned bluegill and Rich801 too, maybe rubberneck, he’d still be here.

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:32 PM

How ’bout just cdseven and the panfish?

Lanceman on February 23, 2012 at 8:40 PM

One of the most incoherent statements I’ve heard in a long time. Right out of MSNBC headquarters…

Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM

Typical answer from a room-temperature IQ hack who thinks that pointing out that the self proclaimed “truecons” threw Bachmann under the bus in scorn and then trampled en-mass to RINO candidate after RINO candidate in a search for the perfect “anti-establishment” hero somehow equates to MSNBC hate speech.

Have fun with Obama for another 4.

Swerve22 on February 23, 2012 at 8:40 PM

He says it in every debate and every stump speech. Here’s a clip of him promising repeal last night.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/t/video/romney-elected-repeal-obamacare-15770916

RepublicanInMA on February 23, 2012 at 8:31 PM

Thanks!
The ABC link didn’t load for me, but I’ll look it up. I was in and out during the debate last night so didn’t catch everything.

BakerAllie on February 23, 2012 at 8:41 PM

Romney doesn’t wear his faith on his sleeve, nor does he use judgemental statements regarding how others chose to live their lives. Santorum is guilty of both. The media may try to paint his religion as “crazy-culty” but they’ll look awfully foolish as our side gets a free pass to bring up Obama’s “faith”.

BettyRuth on February 23, 2012 at 8:33 PM

If there’s one thing to be certain of about the MSM, it’s that our side never gets a “free pass”. They can and they will paint
Mitt’s faith as a crazy cult any way they can. They are saving it for the general election. They will outright make things up if they have to.

BakerAllie on February 23, 2012 at 8:44 PM

What else can explain the unhinged hatred folks have for the guy? Santy’s not my guy, but I dont think he’s evil, or stupid, or liberal, like many have called romney here- theres lots of romney haters, but no santy/gingrich haters. Why is that?

drballard on February 23, 2012 at 6:07 PM

Stick around, they will all be covered:-) Maybe even some that aren’t running anymore, LOL

bluefox on February 23, 2012 at 8:45 PM

How ’bout just cdseven and the panfish?

Lanceman on February 23, 2012 at 8:40 PM

I think it would be good to get rid of all our his socks. Read the top of this thread. He posted as Rich801 thinking he was bluegill. He’s got quite a few. Csdeven’s character has crossed the line with the commenter Kingjester though.

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:47 PM

If there’s one thing to be certain of about the MSM, it’s that our side never gets a “free pass”. They can and they will paint Mitt’s faith as a crazy cult any way they can. They are saving it for the general election. They will outright make things up if they have to.

BakerAllie on February 23, 2012 at 8:44 PM

They’d have to tread lightly on that, given Jeremiah Wright.

And if they decided to go after him anyway, all he has to do is point out that he and Harry Reid share a religion.

Syzygy on February 23, 2012 at 9:01 PM

We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d nominated Romney 4 years ago. Let’s try not to screw it up this time.

Buck Turgidson on February 23, 2012 at 9:04 PM

Chaffetz is my congress critter. You can bet you bippie I’m voting for any sane opponent against him in the primary. What an embarrassment. First he pulls a protracted “will he or won’t he” re running against Orrin, then he wimps out and promptly endorses both Hatch and Romney, well before either was necessary.

Spineless.

At least Mike Lee has made Mitt wait for an endorsement.

Y-not on February 23, 2012 at 9:20 PM

Romney is a squish and will cave at the slightest resistance. Think Arnie here in California.

multiuseless on February 23, 2012 at 6:23 PM

If he’s such a squish, what in his psyche do you attribute it to?

What’s your explanation for why a flip-flopping super-wimp like Romney has been resolute in his defense of Romneycare, the issue which has been hurting him the most? When Romney gave the perfect answer about how he’d deal with China (neither overagressively nor passively) in an earlier debate, do you believe he was only posturing, and that when the chip were down with China, he’d fold and crumble like you believe he has with everything else, save for Romneycare? If it’s true that he’s as much of a weakling as you say he is, who caves “at the slightest resistance”, how could he ever possibly have become a successful business – how could he ever have been the big, bad, heartless, ‘vulture capitalist’ meanie, who relished firing his employees, that Newt and Perry accused him of being?

Hopefully, you won’t end up wussing out by avoiding any of those questions, and you’ll offer up coherent explanations for Mitt’s behavior, and for why his biggest critics on the Right, who, for some yet-unknown reason, are judging Mitt & his political positions which have changed over the years by a different standard than they are Newt’s and/or Santorum’s, pretty much as though Newt and Santorum have never wavered in any of theirs.

Bizarro No. 1 on February 23, 2012 at 9:23 PM

Tell me, what’s an “establishment type” other than somebody who supports Romney.

Swerve22 on February 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM

An “establishment type” is someone who, like a leftist, believes in the power of the government, the state, and the bureaucracy over the power of the people. Romney wants to be CEO of the country and tell everyone what to do and have the government fix all of our problems.

Rather than the government being the problem, Romney and his ilk believe that government is the solution, if applied properly. That is not conservatism. Period. It’s not that he’s not a “true conservative.” It’s that he is not a conservative, at all. He is a center-left statist. That’s who you want to run against the far-left statist.

There is an argument to be made for voting for the center-left statist over the far-left statist, but when you lie to people and tell them that you’re a conservative, while calling reform of SS a “Perry Scheme”, claiming that a government imposed, top-down mandate is “fundamentally conservative”, promoting inflation adjusted minimum wage, etc., you do yourself a disservice, because nobody believes you and then they have a choice between a far-left statist, and a center-left, statist liar.

besser tot als rot on February 23, 2012 at 9:34 PM

Or the result is a more conservative candidate in Rick or Newt who WILL DEFEAT OBAMA and advance the conservative movement in a way that Mitt would NEVER do…

A Mitt nomination results in FOUR MORE YEARS of Obama. The man is untrustworthy, disingenuous and incapable of winning.

Myron Falwell on February 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM

And you think Santorum, King of Social Conservatives whose idea of government entails playing peeping tom in every American bedroom, and Newt Gingrich, easily one of the most disliked politicians in American history, have a better chance than Romney of defeating Obama and the Chicago Machine?

No, Myron, I doubt you believe either of those men, Santorum or Gingrich, is remotely electable, not against Obama. Few of you do. I think the reason most of you Not Romneys are opposed to his candidacy because you think–wrongly–that some rich fatcat elites are sitting around a pool sipping pina coladas, scheming a way to force their Annointed One down your collective throats.

You Not Romneys think you’re being pushed around, treated like a nobodies by the rich and powerful, and you’re not having it. You’ll show them–the elites–that nobody can tell you who to vote for even if it means we lose to Obama. The point will have been made, by God.

As it is, Mitt Romney is the most electable of all the candidates still standing. By all accounts, he’s a good man in his private life, unlike Gingrich, and–unlike Santorum–he’s not a whiny religious zealot likely to alienate the daylights out of independent voters largely unconcerned with social issues, whose support is crucial in a close election.

Vote for whom you like, of course, but at least know why you’re doing it.

troyriser_gopftw on February 23, 2012 at 9:35 PM

He has earned enough money never to have to work again…When he looks in the mirror, he gets to rest his eyes on a relentlessly handsome face.

Funny, that was true (except the part about earning money instead of inheriting it) of Roosevelt and Kennedy, but it didn’t seem to stop them.

bgoldman on February 23, 2012 at 9:39 PM

csdeven – I’m asking again, leave my grandson out of this…you lunatic.

kingsjester on February 23, 2012 at 10:59 PM

Why don’t you leave his grandson out of it?

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:29 PM

He’s a liar. He doesn’t have a grandson. He just said that to try and convince us that he really isn’t a 45 year old pimple faced shut in who obsesses on anonymous people on the interwebs.

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 11:07 PM

Because she’s a filthy piece of crap.

Lanceman on February 23, 2012 at 8:31 PM

Awwwwww….is your widdle tum-tum still hurting widdle baby?

lol

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 11:08 PM

smoothsailing on February 23, 2012 at 8:47 PM

The truth will set you free!

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM

csdeven – I’m asking again, leave my grandson out of this…you lunatic.

kingsjester on February 23, 2012 at 10:59 PM

Just for you!

Found this picture of you.

csdeven on February 23, 2012 at 11:22 PM

If you were the least bit observant

Let’s see, begins post with condescension…I wonder which candidate this person supports.

Romney is the most qualified candidate for the Presidency in the last 200 years.

Basilsbest on February 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM

Oh…well, I guess you have a point. I mean the Presidents over the past 200 years didn’t win a bid for the Olympics or make scads of money at Bain Capital.

Left Coast Right Mind on February 24, 2012 at 12:33 AM

I really used to like Chaffetz, that is, until he became a RepublicRAT TURNCAOT!?! In a year that a CONSERVATIVE Daffy Duck would beat the snot out of the Jackass-In-Chief, Chaffetz and the RepubllicRAT establishment jam RINO Romney down our throats. “A little too perfect??” More at TOO LITTLE conservative!?! I guess it’s all about the money, huh, Jason??? Willard (from the RAT movie of the same name) will get his lunch handed to him. Axelrod and the MSM about Racism/Cultism in Mormonism, Soros and his OWS and Moveon minions about the quintescential 1%er(!!!), and all Obama has to do is put his hand on Willard’s shoulder and say “Thank you for RomneyCare!?!” GAME OVER!!!!!

Colatteral Damage on February 24, 2012 at 4:29 PM

Comment pages: 1 2