Rasmussen in MI: Opening for a surprise?

posted at 12:10 pm on February 3, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

Republicans have seven contests in February, two of which fall on the last day of the month and which come just seven days before Super Tuesday, when ten states simultaneously go to the polls in the presidential sweepstakes.  Arizona and Michigan are the final opportunities to have game-changing moments in votes that could swing momentum in a short period of time.  A new poll by Rasmussen in Michigan suggests that Newt Gingrich — or Rick Santorum — might have an opportunity to generate just that kind of result:

Mitt Romney, coming off his big win in the Florida Primary on Tuesday, is the clear front-runner in the first Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of the Republican presidential race in his home state of Michigan. Voters in this hard hit state see Romney as the much better choice to manage the economy. The Michigan Republican Primary is on February 28.

Romney earns 38% support from Likely Republican Primary Voters in Michigan, with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich a distant second with 23% of the vote. Seventeen percent (17%) prefer former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum, and nearly as many (14%) favor Texas Congressman Ron Paul. One percent (1%) like some other candidate in the race, and six percent (6%) are undecided.

Yes, Romney’s leading by double digits in this poll, so it’s not bad news — but Michigan should be a stronger state for Romney.  His father was a popular governor, and Romney got about 39% of the vote in the 2008 primary closer to the beginning of that cycle, beating John McCain by nine points and Mike Huckabee by 23.  At least in this poll, it doesn’t appear that Romney has gotten any stronger, and the blowout win in Florida doesn’t seem to be influencing Michigan voters.

This looks like an opening for one of the two conservative alternatives to get their potential game-changer.  Arizona certainly doesn’t; Romney has a 24-point lead and almost half of the voters at 48%.  For that reason, although the February 22nd debate will be in Arizona, expect the candidates to talk a lot about Michigan and blue-collar, Reagan Democrat issues.  The question will be which of the two can make that case best and hope to steal a big prize from Romney, weakening him before Super Tuesday.

Santorum has better favorability than Gingrich, although that’s hardly news by now, and in Michigan the difference is a little narrower: 65/27 and 55/44, respectively.  The most important issues to Michigan voters are the economy (50%) and fiscal issues (23%), and Gingrich has a ten-point lead over Santorum on handling the economy (21/11), although Romney has a wide lead over both (43%).  Santorum does much better on social issues than Gingrich (27/16, with Romney at 32%) but only 6% of likely voters believe that to be the most important issues in the election.  Santorum does have an opening on the auto bailouts, of which a majority of likely voters disapprove by a wide margin, 35/54, and his character number is the best in the field at 40%, against 30% for Romney and 6% for Gingrich.

Both Gingrich and Santorum will undoubtedly spend time in both Arizona and Michigan in the two-week gap between the other contests in February and those two primaries.  Don’t be surprised to see them spending most of it it Michigan, though, and I’d suspect that Santorum especially might use the strategy with which he succeeded in Iowa to try to turn out the vote and seek a miracle.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

We should’ve annexed Mexico when we had the chance.

eva3071 on April 4, 2013 at 4:42 PM

Drone surveillance reveals: Border Patrol capturing less than 50% of illegals in parts of southern Arizona

Huge waste of time and money. These pols have no interest whatsoever in managing this border.

Dr. ZhivBlago on April 4, 2013 at 4:44 PM

But Napolitano says our border is as secure as it’s ever been! Did we always suck at defending our border? Or did we just lay out a banquette of free government benefits and dare foreigners to walk over and take some?

Socratease on April 4, 2013 at 4:49 PM

Time to let the military control the border…the boys in camo-pants know how to hold and defend a line in the sand!

powerpickle on April 4, 2013 at 4:49 PM

Drone surveillance reveals: Border Patrol capturing less than 50% of illegals in parts of southern Arizona

They’re still capturing that many?

Doomberg on April 4, 2013 at 4:53 PM

They don’t care about the “illegals.” They care about us.

http://www.examiner.com/article/dhs-confirms-it-s-spying-on-anti-government-americans

rrpjr on April 4, 2013 at 5:02 PM

That’s the plan.

NeoKong on April 4, 2013 at 5:02 PM

Actually, none of that proves that the feds’ 2011 numbers are inaccurate. It might simply mean that border security is … getting worse.

Well duh… Barky O’Dogeater won’t let anyone enforce our immigrations laws, how could border security possibly get better?

SWalker on April 4, 2013 at 5:03 PM

Did we always suck at defending our border?
Socratease on April 4, 2013 at 4:49 PM

No, we only started sucking at defending our borders when the Marxist’s infiltrated our government.

SWalker on April 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM

Looks like we need armed drones for that task.

Obama is so good at whacking Talibanese, I wonder how well he’d do against the rabblke scooting across the border in Arizona?

dockywocky on April 4, 2013 at 5:12 PM

The bill will be be deficit neutral just like Obamacare and you can take that to the bank!

Wigglesworth on April 4, 2013 at 5:25 PM

50% is like a SOLID B+ for 0bama.

BTW, how many jobs were lost or not created by not building the fence that the will of the people Congress authorized. 0 sure is adding a precedent for the next president to ignore any and all legislation from previous congress’s. Not sure why the next president couldn’t refuse all of 0bama HellCare bill because he thinks it unconstitutional.

jukin3 on April 4, 2013 at 5:31 PM

What really bugs me is the poll at the top of the LA Times story that asks if drones should be used to patrol the border. 92% are in favor. Ok great, but if you have good desert survival skills and can evade the drone technology more than 50% of these people are in favor of giving these border jumpers a path to citizenship? Morons!

Wigglesworth on April 4, 2013 at 5:38 PM

We should’ve annexed Mexico when we had the chance.

Ya know, that was an almost done deal back after the Mexican American War. There was the concern though of all those Mexicans we’d have to accept as citizens, Catholics to boot, and both the culture and fact that we’d have millions more Catholics, who, at the time, weren’t especially liked by the majority of US citizens, most being Protestant and intolerant if not bitterly loathing of Catholics put the kabosh on the whole annexation thing, IIRC.

hawkeye54 on April 4, 2013 at 5:55 PM

Perhaps it’s time to call out the unorganized militia?

Another Drew on April 4, 2013 at 6:42 PM

Could someone politely explain to Senator Rubio that he is in grave danger of becoming Florida’s next Charlie Crist?

Another Drew on April 4, 2013 at 6:45 PM

Nothing to see here. These are simply undocumented border crossings by unnamed unmentionable entities that we don’t apprehend, see or even acknowledge. Until they are registered Democrats.

ghostwalker1 on April 4, 2013 at 6:57 PM

Huge waste of time and money. These pols have no interest whatsoever in managing this border.

Well for now. Once that great and grand utopia has been put into place and the leftist have perpetual control of government, and just about everything else, we’ll see how fast the borders are manned and managed……to keep all the producers in our paradise.

Just remember who built the Berlin Wall and who installed the wire and guard towers on the East German border……it wasn’t the West Berliners attempting to keep all those communists out.

hawkeye54 on April 4, 2013 at 6:58 PM

Perhaps it’s time to call out the unorganized militia?

When ya set back and think about it, its way, way, past time.

If only.

hawkeye54 on April 4, 2013 at 6:59 PM

410/7333 =/= 50%!!!

abobo on April 4, 2013 at 7:29 PM

In contrast, the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, estimated in January that the Border Patrol had caught 64% of those who illegally crossed into the Tucson sector in 2011…

LOL. Based on what?

Anyone who believes any numbers that come out of this lying, sack o’ sh!t government deserves what they get.

How about some fraud prosecutions? Sure …

I do like the “64%” to make it sound as if the number is based on something other than “pull it out of my azz”. It reminds of Barky’s junta claiming that their porkulus had created 3,231,873.32 jobs. Okey doke.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on April 4, 2013 at 8:51 PM