Sharron Angle voices support for Rick Santorum
posted at 4:45 pm on February 2, 2012 by Tina Korbe
For what it’s worth, former Tea Party Senate candidate Sharron Angle today endorsed Rick Santorum for president:
Angle, a tea party favorite who failed in her 2010 bid to unseat Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, praised Santorum’s character in a statement released Thursday by his campaign.
“He is a strong fiscal and social conservative who stands on principles above politics,” Angle said in the release. “His continuous opposition to Amnesty, Obamacare, the bail-outs, and cap and trade are a perfect fit with our main street Tea Party movement.”
Santorum said her backing will be a “terrific boon to our campaign as the Nevada Caucus approaches.”
Angle’s words in praise of Santorum ring true — and echo the reasons Michelle Malkin cited for her support of the former Pennsylvania senator. But it’s questionable as to whether Angle’s endorsement really will be a “boon” to Santorum’s effort in the Silver State.
Remember: This is a former candidate whose horribly mismanaged campaign and subsequent loss to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid led to a severe case of GOP buyer’s remorse. This is a former candidate who toyed with the idea of running for president herself and whose rumored bid for the House of Representatives made GOPers nervous.
Then again, most endorsements strike me this way: They always carry the risk that they will turn off voters who aren’t fans of the endorser. That’s as true of a Donald Trump or Sarah Palin endorsement as a Sharron Angle endorsement. The biggest takeaway of Angle’s announcement of support for Santorum is that he’s actively campaigning in states he thinks could yield delegates for him — and, unlike Angle, his approach is very disciplined. He hasn’t descended into senseless attacks of his competitors and he’s continually stuck to the issues. If and when he takes off, the voters who’ve supported him in an early state will be able to depend on him not to implode in the very next state or the general.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
So what if a nutty freak loser endorsed a doomed closet case religious fanatic frothy mixture?
Your Mamma loves me on February 2, 2012 at 8:57 PM
I’m not cheering Obama on. If it’s so vital to get Obama out of office, why is the GOP on the verge of nominating a guy who’s essentially a recently-converted pro-life Democrat?
ddrintn on February 2, 2012 at 9:10 PM
A few facts on Reid’s victory over Angle:
1. RNC bungled the general campaign, maybe even sabotaged it, by
advisingdictating an ad strategy totally not her style that won the primary, when Angle almost DOUBLED the vote of the #2 candidate, Lowden, who had establishment GOP support. Heard in DC right after Angle won the primary and met GOP leaders:Mitch McConnell: “I can WORK with Reid.”
2. Casinos in Las Vegas (the one city alone has 75% of the entire state’s votes!!) have 60,000 employees who must sign voter registration cards when accepting a job. They are bused to the polls en masse, or allowed to vote at their OWN CASINO, under watchful eyes. Remember the “arm twisting email?? Every Republican starts off with -60,000 votes. Angle lost by 40,000 statewide.
3. Polls and “variance”: Angle slowly but steadily climbed from down by more than 5% up to +4% or +5% by election day, but lost by 9%. Now THAT is “variance”. That set a state record for variance. ACORN was alive and well in NV that election.
If you think NV had a fair election, and Angle had genuine support from the RNC, I have a bridge….
fred5678 on February 2, 2012 at 10:37 PM
I reject, renounce, and DEFY your premise that:
Talking like that only implies an ulterior motive on your part, not his.
listens2glenn on February 3, 2012 at 1:09 AM
Exactly! Well articulated, thank you.
SailorMark on February 3, 2012 at 12:00 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2