Top donor: You just watch, Santorum will be frontrunner “very soon”
posted at 5:00 pm on January 27, 2012 by Tina Korbe
The foremost funder of Rick Santorum’s Super PAC, says Santorum will be in or near the lead of the GOP primary “very soon.”
“I believe Rick Santorum will become one of the front-runners very soon,” Foster Friess, a major donor to the Red White and Blue Fund, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television.
True, that’s not a particularly daring prediction: At this point, any one of the GOP Final Four could claim to be an overall “frontrunner.” Even the last-place finisher in Florida could claim to be “near” the lead. But that’s obviously not what Friess meant.
The businessman has donated $700,000 to Santorum’s political campaigns over the years and now says he has an “open checkbook” from which he’s willing to draw continually for the sake of Santorum’s presidential bid. At the same time, though, he’s prepared to donate in the general election to whoever becomes the GOP nominee. He just prefers Santorum, he said, because he has known him for more than 15 years on a personal basis.
Meantime, even though Rick Santorum won Iowa and performs better and better in debates, the former Pennsylvania senator hasn’t received the kind of media scrutiny to which Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich are routinely subjected. For a brief period of time after his win in Iowa, a number of critics accused him of “big government conservatism,” but, since then, Santorum-specific news has been fairly scarce.
Yesterday, though, someone called my attention to this 1994 article, which seems to suggest that Santorum at one time did favor requiring individuals to purchase health insurance. That’s important because, in recent days, Santorum has made a point to draw a contrast between himself and his competitors on this issue, saying that he has never supported an individual health care mandate. You’d think his competitors’ opposition researchers would have said something if Santorum did, in fact, support a mandate in the past — but, then again, you’d also think Santorum’s then-staff wouldn’t have let this article go at the time without asking for a correction if, in fact, it falsely portrayed Santorum’s positions. I’ve reached out to the Santorum campaign to see what Santorum’s response to that long-ago story is, and will let you know what I find out.
Update: Thanks for all the comments and especially for the link to the video at The Right Scoop. The article appears to be a one-off misinterpretation of Santorum’s positions and, according to an initial quick response from Santorum’s campaign, has a number of holes in it. That was my hunch, but I wanted to verify. Again, I appreciate your responses.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4
I haven’t seen Santorum harp obsessively about Newt Gingrich’s adultery. That’s what a moralist does.
The point is, you post a lot, and you don’t consider that spamming. If I post a lot, it’s spamming. You want to have it both ways.
Dr. Tesla on January 28, 2012 at 11:00 PM
I post, replying to people. You make dozens of general comments directed at nobody in particular, trying to get attention. Think up everything you want to say and put it one post. Is it that f**king hard?
MadisonConservative on January 28, 2012 at 11:07 PM
I think everybody posting on here is trying to get attention. You love attention which is why you make absurd charges such as “Santorum is a theocrat statist”. That’s being over the top for the purpose of gaining attention and getting your column promoted from the Green Room. I know what motivates you.
Some are more successful at it than others at getting attention without begging for it, as you do.
Dr. Tesla on January 28, 2012 at 11:29 PM
It’s just for the purpose of getting attention, huh? Or was it because he actually is a statist theocrat, as the majority of people who replied to the article agreed with?
Again, I’m in utter awe that you can claim to hate moralists but defend Santorum, who is a moralist.
MadisonConservative on January 29, 2012 at 12:48 AM
You are an attention whore. I’m sure the atheists social libs like you who read your column did agree with but the Hotair people didn’t promote it, I’m assuming A) it’s the worst sort of hyperbole, dishonest at it’s core and B) you cut and pasted it from Red Staters.
You don’t even come up with your own hack material. You plagiarize it from lightweight websites like RedState.
You think Santorum is a statist b/c he has said he wants schools to teach intelligent design along with evolution. You don’t even understand what the word means. You are a Ron Paul nutjob.
Dr. Tesla on January 29, 2012 at 1:35 AM
I’m not an atheist, you empty-headed mutant. You’re currently the dumbest poster on this site. Have fun.
MadisonConservative on January 29, 2012 at 4:42 AM
Wait…I missed this…wow. Just f**king wow. You have absolutely no goddamned idea who you’re talking to.
MadisonConservative on January 29, 2012 at 4:43 AM
I hope his kid is OK.
I wish he would drop out race, however.
lexhamfox on January 29, 2012 at 5:02 AM
He has absolutely not goddamned idea about much of anything.
MelonCollie on January 29, 2012 at 12:12 PM
Madison Conservative thinks he is George Washington or something and people have spent time in school studying his life and words. Nobody cares what you think, and you are a mindless blowhard if you are throwing out nonsense like “Santorum is a statist theocrat” like that is rational.
There is nothing in his voting record that backs that up. He’s always been the man on tax cuts and I never heard of a pro-tax cut statist.
When you start whining about Santorum wanting intelligent design taught in schools as though this is some kind of attack on freedom, I think it’s logical to assume you are some kind of militant atheist. I don’t think you could articulate the evolution theory accurately and provide proof it’s scientifically true….you’d have to run over to some other website and cut and past their arguments here. But you have no problem with evolution being taught in science classes. You don’t have a background in biology, chemisty, or engineering. You are are some business major.
Dr. Tesla on January 29, 2012 at 2:02 PM
I’m amazed that Hotair promoted this MadCon to the Greenroom.
He sounds like an adolescent most of the time on here. “You have no goddamn idea of who you are messing with, I’m the mad MadCon”
This guy thinks he is Milton Friedman or F. A. Hayek or somebody intelligent simply b/c they run his little stupid columns on the Green Rooom from time to time. You are an obscure nobody and you will always be that way.
Dr. Tesla on January 29, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4