Romney failed to disclose Swiss bank account on financial forms
posted at 6:00 pm on January 26, 2012 by Allahpundit
You know who this doesn’t benefit?
“An amendment is being filed to address this minor discrepancy,” a campaign official told ABC News in an email Thursday in response to questions about the apparent omission.
The discovery that the Romneys had $3 million in an account with the Swiss bank UBS came only after the Republican presidential candidate released his tax returns for 2010 on Tuesday. The campaign had maintained that it was not necessary to disclose the Swiss account because Romney’s money manager, Brad Malt, had shuttered it in early 2010.
Several Republican election lawyers told ABC News Thursday that the account still needed to be disclosed because a Romney trust earned about $1,700 in income on the account during 2010. The campaign’s decision to amend the forms was first reported by the Los Angeles Times.
Go figure that Team Mitt wasn’t eager to advertise a Swiss bank account just as the class war to end all class wars, starring Mitt Romney as the Monopoly guy in Democratic attacks ads, is heating up. Follow the link up top and read down a bit and you’ll see that Newt actually has a shady nondisclosure problem of his own — somehow more than a quarter million dollars of wages he earned from one of his holding companies went unreported on his own financial forms. Kudos to whichever eagle-eyed lawyers and/or accountants in the Gingrich campaign spotted the issue with Romney’s Swiss bank account and fed it to the media. It’s a brilliant bit of distraction from Newt’s error, and it sets Newt up perfectly to push his class attacks on Mitt at tonight’s debate. A sneak preview from the Times:
“I think someone who owns stock in a place that forecloses on Floridians has a lot of gall to start raising the issue,” Mr. Gingrich said. “We ought to find how much money has he made over the years foreclosing on Floridians.”
Mr. Gingrich was referring to a report on, of all places, the left-leaning Web site Think Progress on Wednesday, which claimed that an examination of Mr. Romney’s personal financial disclosure from last year showed he and his wife owned shares of a Goldman Sachs fund that invested in mortgage-backed securities. It linked the fund to “thousands” of foreclosure proceedings against Floridians…
“We have to ultimately focus on beating Barack Obama,” he said, “but we’re not going to beat Barack Obama with some guy who has Swiss bank accounts, Cayman Island accounts, owns shares of Goldman Sachs that forecloses on Floridians, is himself a stock-holder in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac while he tries to think the rest of us are too stupid to put together the dots to understand what this is all about.”
Romney has an interest in a mutual fund that owns shares in Fannie and Freddie, but there’s some confusion about whether he controls the fund’s shares or whether a trustee does. The lefty PAC American Bridge points to this Boston Globe article from September alleging that, unlike most of his investments (which are held by a blind trust), Romney does in fact control the Fannie/Freddie fund. Earlier this week, though, Romney’s campaign said that isn’t true, that a trustee handles it. Maybe the funds were transferred from Romney to the trust between then and now? It’s bizarre to me that his trustee would have had the political savvy to shut down the Swiss bank account because it looked bad for Romney’s campaign but that Romney himself would have maintained a mutual fund investment in, of all things, the engines that drove the global financial crisis. Whoever’s managing the Fannie/Freddie fund now should have dumped it ages ago, especially given how small the investment is. $250-500,000 is chump change for Romney.
If only there was a potential VP out there whose own personal trouble with mortgages could shield Romney by adding an in-touch-with-the-people element to the ticket. If only. While we wait for the debate, here’s the terrible, terrible new anti-Romney video from MoveOn.org starring Justin Long (the Apple guy in the “I’m an Apple, I’m a PC” commercials). If this is what the left has in the pipe for fall, we can rest easy, my friends.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
I’m not suggesting that Switzerland is the final destination. Just a parking place. I’m no expert, but I assume you can transfer money from your account to another account. No?
RBMN on January 26, 2012 at 7:12 PM
That doesn’t make any sense at all. It’s still 2010. Why wouldn’t it go on the 2010 tax return?
SoulGlo on January 26, 2012 at 7:13 PM
Orlando Bloom is a fantastically lucky man.
antisense on January 26, 2012 at 7:16 PM
All his money has been in blind trust for 10 years. Clearly his guy set it up. It isn’t an excuse, but it wasn’t something Romney asked for.
csdeven on January 26, 2012 at 7:16 PM
how many questions from wolfie and king will we hear about this?
cmsinaz on January 26, 2012 at 7:22 PM
I’m
yeah, I heard he has business ties with a bunch of Somali pirates…
jimver on January 26, 2012 at 7:22 PM
Which one is just like the other?
MontanaMmmm on January 26, 2012 at 7:24 PM
Heh.
whatcat on January 26, 2012 at 7:25 PM
So you’re saying that Romney…can only become Treasury Secretary?
John Kettlewell on January 26, 2012 at 7:28 PM
If it is in a safe deposit box and is undeclared, yes.
If it is in a bank account and you declare it, no.
But “Swiss Bank Account” has taken on a shady connotation because of previous crooks hiding funds in safe deposit boxes that were simply being cloaked from taxing authorities.
And because the Swiss were de facto collaborators with Hitler’s Reich by being his faithful money launderers throughout the war (“Hans, why do these ingots look suspiciously like a mass of compacted gold teeth?” ” “Shhhhh!”)
And the fact that Swiss bankers stole millions [billions?} from “abandoned” accounts that the owners never reclaimed (having died in the Holocaust).
profitsbeard on January 26, 2012 at 7:32 PM
R. Bradford Malt is his moniker….
I don’t blame them for going with Brad Malt.
I wonder what the R. is, Reginald?
golfmann on January 26, 2012 at 7:33 PM
What more needs to be said?
TQM38a on January 26, 2012 at 7:55 PM
I am not sure whether it is a winner for Newt. When Newt’s campaign staff found that unreported $1700 and fed it to the media, in the same story it reported Newt did not report $250,000 wages from his company. It may also lead to reopening of the accounting trick Newt used to avoid paying his whole share of payroll tax. Remind me of the old say about people in glass house throwing stone.
galtani on January 26, 2012 at 8:03 PM
He closed it in January which was why there was only 1,700.
Meanwhile Newt failed to disclose a quart mil.
1punchWill on January 26, 2012 at 8:04 PM
I can see why the item can easily be missed if the account was closed in Jan of 2010, and the tax return was prepared in 2011, and it is $1700 of over $ 20 millions, But by drawing attention to it, Newt called into attention of his own not reporting over $250,000. I echo Newt’s statement: Newt, we are not so stupid and you are not so smart.
galtani on January 26, 2012 at 8:15 PM
we are Americans and (for now) can choose to put money anywhere we please. as long as the income was reported on his tax returns and he filed the required TDxxxx form (I forget the form number…9022 or something like that) with the IRS, seems his only “oops” was on yet another disclosure required only of people in public office or aspiring to do so.
but all of these omissions (both sides) are telling in one respect…none of them understand basic accounting records (2 year degree people would know how to track accounts). maybe that’s why we have a debt problem?
teejk on January 26, 2012 at 8:31 PM
Another “coincidence” up to a couple of weeks ago (and maybe still) Goldman Sachs was Mitt’s number one financial contribute…also another “coincidence”, they were a large recipient of TARP money, you know the policy that Mitt coincidentally heavily supported.
A lot of “coincidence” in that Mitt campaign…and of course coincidentally he had left out the Swiss Bank, and forgot that Newt was innocent on all the charges and that all the details are on line and have been…coincidentally…
right2bright on January 26, 2012 at 8:41 PM
Big deal. I’m sure some of my retirement funds invested in mortgage-backed securities, too.
Newt’s running with the Left’s pitiful 1% argument in such ridiculous fashion has seriously turned off this Florida Republican voter.
Syzygy on January 26, 2012 at 9:03 PM
It’s going to be SO funny when it’s down to Romney and Obama, and Romney’s getting pummeled, and the Mittbots don’t have Newt to use as a focus for their Two Minutes Hate.
ddrintn on January 26, 2012 at 9:11 PM
$1700 interest income as a portion of his $20,000,000 annual income is about 0.01%. It would be like someone making $20,000 per year failing to report $1.70 in tips. It’s not clear to me why financial success is such a horrible attribute in a president.
talkingpoints on January 26, 2012 at 9:32 PM
Smooth one, Mitt. A few more of these and Obama will coast to victory in november. (sarcasm)
At least Mitt paid his taxes, which if I recall correctly is more than Obama’s first three picks for Treasury Secretary remembered to do.
How come nobody’s bringing that up?
Gearbox on January 26, 2012 at 10:05 PM
Once again Romney will relate so well with middle class and blue collar workers….
They too have stashed cash in Switzerland, right?
Look, this would not be problem if he could articulate capitalism to common folks in a way they could understand, but he can’t or won’t and will continue everyday in this primary, and if wins the nomination the general election, why he is the living stereotype of a wall street warlord.
William Eaton on January 26, 2012 at 10:20 PM
Let the primary games drag on until we can find an adult to step in and put an end to the silliness.
AH_C on January 26, 2012 at 10:21 PM
Tell me why I’m in a blog with some of my co-conservatives and we all looking at an issue with Romney’s Swiss bank account together
apocalypse on January 26, 2012 at 10:35 PM
UBS has substantial operations and takes deposits in the US, as do many foreign banks. I would not necessarily conclude that Romney’s money is actually in Switzerland.
rockmom on January 26, 2012 at 11:28 PM
Nice sideshow, this.
Meanwhile- we still don’t have a budget after over 1000 days, the dipwad so called president just asked for ANOTHER raise in the debt ceiling, said dipwad is in open defiance of a subpoena from a court in Georgia, the brain dead VP just insulted the entire community of Indian Americans with his “impression”, and dipwad is openly advocating legislation to push natural gas powered trucks which benefits Soros in a pathetic example of crony capitalism.
But Romney’s tax returns are waaaaaaaaay more important than any of the above.
Disgusting.
GrassMudHorsey on January 27, 2012 at 7:40 AM
Can we please move the discussion back to the topics at hand and start bashing Zero for his job killing policies instead of this nitpicking about who has how much money and where it is banked. Newt tried to do this last night but got no help from Mittie who wanted to go all snarky about FNM.
Kissmygrits on January 27, 2012 at 8:52 AM
It sounds like Gingrich is in Florida, acting like he is for Occupy wallstreet and populist class warfare.
Fleuries on January 27, 2012 at 10:40 AM
If Romney is the nominee, his utter destruction by Obama, would be remembered in the history of Presidential elections forever. His destruction is going to be so big and it will shock to the core the fools who thought that this Romney is “electable”. Obama is going to put the chain called “Bain Capital” around Romney neck and drag him on the political floor without mercy.
mnjg on January 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM
And hence his absolute destruction by Obama in the general elections if he is the nominee.
mnjg on January 27, 2012 at 10:57 AM
Allah, you couldn’t be more wrong on that commercial.
The impression of Romney is dead on. The characterization is devastating… Romney is just like that obnoxious boss from the office, except even more out of touch. And, somehow, the whole thing is funny and light hearted. If they have more of this stuff in the pipe for the fall, we are totally screwed, my friends.
bitsy on January 28, 2012 at 10:11 AM
Is this headline really correct, the accounts were money in accounts at USB and didn’t say conveniently: “Top Secret Hidden Fund account in a Swiss Bank” They were not hidden, and they were taxed, you idiots.
Also, it does not say on the Bain funds: “Totally Legal and above board, fully taxed account in the Caymens.”
Sound bite journalism.
Fleuries on January 30, 2012 at 9:38 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3