Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads

posted at 8:00 am on January 22, 2012 by Allahpundit

The battle of South Carolina ends, the battle of Florida begins. Newt’s scheduled to appear only on “State of the Union” and Romney’s not scheduled to appear at all (two surrogates, Stuart Stevens and Chris Christie, are set for “Fox News Sunday” and “Meet the Press,” respectively), but that’ll probably change as the scramble to spin last night’s results turns frantic.

Here’s the full list via WaPo.

Update: Here come the late additions: Newt will appear on “Meet the Press” as well.

NBC’s Meet the Press: Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ); Joe Scarborough, msnbc; Mike Murphy, Republican strategist; Katty Kay, BBC; Chuck Todd, NBC; Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter; Washington, DC Mayor Vincent Gray

ABC’s This Week: Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum; George Will, ABC; Matthew Dowd, political strategist and ABC News analyst; Ron Brownstein, National Journal; Katrina vanden Heuvel, The Nation

CBS’ Face the Nation: former Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour; Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Joe Klein, Time Magazine; Kelly Evans, Wall Street Journal, John Dickerson, CBS News

CNN’s State of the Union with Candy Crowley: Rick Santorum; Newt Gingrich; Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC); Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC)

Fox News Sunday: Stuart Stevens, chief Romney strategist; Rep. John Boehner, (R-OH); Liz Cheney, Fox News; Liz Marlantes, Christian Science Monitor; Karl Rove, former Bush White House senior adviser and Fox News; Joe Trippi, Fox News

Tags: , , , ,

Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 … 3 4 5

Or are we just so corrupt and soulless ourselves that we no longer even expect better?

Murf76 on May 7, 2013 at 10:03 PM

.
Ditto that.
How does one embrace that which we have asked others to reject?

Today anyway,
Ich bin ein Democrat

What is that smell ?

FlaMurph on May 8, 2013 at 7:48 AM

Sanford is a flake for sure. And, there is no good explanation for his behavior, other than men (like me) are suckers for beautiful women.

But, at least we have another vote in the House for fiscal sanity. And, we beat back the progs.

That’s not nothing. If they can have JJ, Jr. and Charlie Rangel, we can have Sanford.

johnboy on May 8, 2013 at 7:59 AM

Well the Dems finalllyyyy have it right, “It really is Busch’s fault!”

el Vaquero on May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM

Congratulations Mark Sanford!! Isn’t it strange how every Dem kept knocking Sanford’s personal life but not a word came out about Busch being a Jail Bird! That’s right! She was locked up in the 1980s for contempt of court in her divorce case. Isn’t it ironic that a person seeking to become a member of the ‘Ruling Authority’ gets locked up for showing contempt for the same Authority? Thanks to the Obama Media, this fact was not made known!

The only person I know of who made this fact public is radio talk show Host Mike Galagher! Thanks Mike!!

Jersey Dan on May 8, 2013 at 10:50 AM

jimgeraghty @jimgeraghty
$1.2 million in donations to Colbert Busch, $929,000 on independent expenditures against Sanford… FLUSH…

Yeah, except the execs and other employees at many media outlets who profit from those ad buys make the vast majority of their political donations right back to dems/libs/proggies.

So instead of FLUSH it’s more like LATHER – RINSE – REPEAT…

Marcola on May 8, 2013 at 11:57 AM

My opposition to Sanford from the get-go stems from my admiration for the man who held this seat before him.

alchemist19 on May 7, 2013 at 9:46 PM

You loved Arthur Ravenel? You’re a strange bird! Arthur was about as conservative as Sen. Lindsey Graham is–but as a House member, that’s not very strong.

//

I know you’re referring to 2014. But I’m referring to 1992, when a man like Tim Scott was still in his impressionable years, learning from the strongest conservative representative this district had ever had–Mark Sanford.

Y’sll young’uns that think “it’s all about today!” or “it’s all about the Founding Fathers!” fail to realize that there’s been some significant contributions made in the 230+ years since our nations’ founding.

Conservatism didn’t start out conservative. It came into existence as the only way to preserve our founding principles when the progressive engineers tried to run the national train off its tracks.

rwenger43 on May 9, 2013 at 11:03 AM

Not sure if this was already posted, Daily Caller:

People Elizabeth Colbert Busch may actually have a chance of beating

entagor on May 9, 2013 at 12:38 PM

Comment pages: 1 … 3 4 5