Holder, Breuer connected to players in foreclosure fraud?
posted at 10:25 am on January 20, 2012 by Ed Morrissey
For years, the Left has asked why the Obama administration hasn’t pursued prosecutions against lenders who arguably engaged in fraud when foreclosing on mortgages in the wake of the housing-bubble collapse. It turns out that these lenders had friends in high places in the Department of Justice. Reuters reports that both Attorney General Eric Holder and his lieutenant Lanny Breuer, who ran the DoJ’s criminal division, were partners in a law firm that worked on behalf of those very same firms (via JWF’s Just A Grunt):
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, were partners for years at a Washington law firm that represented a Who’s Who of big banks and other companies at the center of alleged foreclosure fraud, a Reuters inquiry shows.
The firm, Covington & Burling, is one of Washington’s biggest white shoe law firms. Law professors and other federal ethics experts said that federal conflict of interest rules required Holder and Breuer to recuse themselves from any Justice Department decisions relating to law firm clients they personally had done work for.
Both the Justice Department and Covington declined to say if either official had personally worked on matters for the big mortgage industry clients. Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said Holder and Breuer had complied fully with conflict of interest regulations, but she declined to say if they had recused themselves from any matters related to the former clients.
Holder and Breuer aren’t alone. Reuters lists a couple more former Covingtom & Burling associates at the DoJ that have since returned to their law practice, including Holder’s deputy chief of staff John Garland and Breuer’s deputy chief of staff Steven Fagell. The law firm itself lists almost two dozen former attorneys now working in the DoJ and another dozen in US Attorney offices around the country. That’s quite an impressive footprint of influence for Covington & Burling, and a valuable one for its clientele.
It’s not as if the fraud was particularly esoteric, either. Reuters began its own reporting on massive numbers of forged endorsements, part of the robo-signing scandal that halted foreclosure processing for more than a year. Those forgeries got submitted to courts on many occasions as part of the foreclosure process. Despite this, Holder has done nothing — at least publicly — to press an investigation into these forgeries, and as Reuters reports today, more are on their way:
Recent calls for a wide-ranging criminal investigation of the mortgage servicing industry have come from members of Congress, including Senator Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., state officials, and county clerks. In recent months clerks from around the country have examined mortgage and foreclosure records filed with them and reported finding high percentages of apparently fraudulent documents.
On Wednesday, John O’Brien Jr., register of deeds in Salem, Mass., announced that he had sent 31,897 allegedly fraudulent foreclosure-related documents to Holder. O’Brien said he asked for a criminal investigation of servicers and their law firms that had filed the documents because they “show a pattern of fraud,” forgery and false notarizations.
I suspect this information will animate the Left against Holder much more than Operation Fast & Furious, but both need extensive investigation. Perhaps this will be the straw that broke the camel’s back and convinces Barack Obama to get a new Attorney General. If not, Republicans and Democrats alike will have plenty of opportunity to ask Obama why his Department of Justice seems more interested in cover-ups and political machinations than in law enforcement.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
I’m shocked, SHOCKED to hear that Holder could be connected to fraud!
wildcat72 on January 20, 2012 at 10:27 AM
The Fox in charge of the hen house!
KOOLAID2 on January 20, 2012 at 10:27 AM
We wignuts just arn’t getting it.
This is a democrat we are talking about. I am sure he didn’t MEAN to do anything wring and for the democrat party, their supporters and the LSM that is all the really matters.
Everyone knows only republicans are truly capable of evil.
This will go nowhere. I will be ton it.
Skwor on January 20, 2012 at 10:29 AM
The hits keep coming
LeftCoastRight on January 20, 2012 at 10:31 AM
I think its time we start selecting our representatives and government officials by lottery, with everybody’s name in the pot.
I can’t imagine it would produce worse results.
BobMbx on January 20, 2012 at 10:31 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6_1Pw1xm9U
Bmore on January 20, 2012 at 10:32 AM
Most transparently corrupt administration ever.
You still don’t think Dear Liar is in on this?
rbj on January 20, 2012 at 10:32 AM
This Republican Congress is incapable of holding Eric Holder and the DOJ accountable to anything.
Holder just laughs in their face and so does their boss.
John Boehner’s Congress couldn’t argue a traffic ticket.
NeoKong on January 20, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Excellent. Another scandal in this administration and justice department that will be ignored by the GOP.
Spectreman on January 20, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Wow! I am so shocked, no way this could be!
bgibbs1000 on January 20, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Laws for thee but not for me.
magicbeans on January 20, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Bad day for Holder
topdog on January 20, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Holder is a scumbag who belongs in jail for lots of things but this “foreclosure fraud” is ridiculous. They make it try and sound as if people who were paying their mortgages and up to date were suddenly being ejected from their homes and foreclosed on. That is a joke. The people who were foreclosed on deserved it and the robo-signing was a necessity of the sheer numbers.
Holder should be wearing an orange jumpsuit for many reasons, but this isn’t one … though his lack of disclosure is one, but that’s distinct from the alleged “fraud”, itself.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on January 20, 2012 at 10:35 AM
Remember when Holder ordered Elian Gonzales be taken at gun-point so he could be returned to slavery in Cuba?
That was the first clue as to who this guy is… nothing after that is shocking.
batterup on January 20, 2012 at 10:35 AM
All the newspapers and networks will jump on this…right away!
….(the day after the election)
News service?…Reuters? What’s a Reuter?…Sorry!…We use AP wire services!
KOOLAID2 on January 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Holder sucks, but it’s hard for me to be outrageously outraged on this issue.
People didn’t pay their mortgage and they got foreclosed on…so what.
Deafdog on January 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Count me among those ‘not surprised.’ Thanks Ed And will this be reported????
CoffeeLover on January 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM
I’d like to see Eric Holder in shackles and chains, but I’m sure that makes me racist.
VibrioCocci on January 20, 2012 at 10:38 AM
Obama and his justice department have made crime and corruption and acceptable family value. This poor Republic is very sick
rplat on January 20, 2012 at 10:39 AM
Might also ask why Obama himself has turned a deaf ear.
jeanie on January 20, 2012 at 10:39 AM
Since this is the only near scandal we have heard about,I don’t see much coming from it.
/
docflash on January 20, 2012 at 10:40 AM
I’ll need more evidence of failure to enforce the law on this one.
Just noting that Holder and Brewer worked for a big law firm with lots of clients does not prove a connection. All law firms represent some unsympathetic clients – it is what lawyers do.
Show me somthing more proof, and maybe we can finally get this joke of an AG to FINALLY resign.
WhatNot on January 20, 2012 at 10:40 AM
Uh, no. Holder is a racialist Progressive in a position of power. Dead bodies, fraud…not important. Don’t forget, Holder is a “good guy” fighting for Social Justice. That’s all that matters to the Left. Check their track record.
This will never, ever happen. Eric Holder represents everything that Obama stands for. To dump Holder would be to refute Obama’s ideology itself. You think Obama is going to do that?
visions on January 20, 2012 at 10:40 AM
Mr. Holder,
On behalf of the people of the United States of America, I will accept your resignation.
Turtle317 on January 20, 2012 at 10:40 AM
“Oh darn, a scandal.”
Sincerely,
Brendan Nyhan
/
hillsoftx on January 20, 2012 at 10:40 AM
Spec! Oh come on! You know it is more important to see the tax returns of the GOP candidates, and concentrate on things they may have done 10-20 years ago! Come on! Get with the program!
KOOLAID2 on January 20, 2012 at 10:40 AM
Like ever scandal attatched to Holder this one will fall by the wayside just like the rest.As far as Sotero replacing him-Ain’t gonna happen no way no how.These two are inseperable.
jeffinsjvca on January 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM
can someone explain to me how the GOP leadership gets away with sticking their hands up their @$$, while all this and much worse just continues to go on and on. i sit here and i am just dumbfounded while i am told i have to wait till November to possibly vote all these scumbags out. i just do not get it anymore.
GhoulAid on January 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM
I thought that was Janet Reno that did that?
KOOLAID2 on January 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM
Michelle Malkin, again, is way ahead of the curve. She wrote an etire book about Barack’s circle of crooks.
SouthernGent on January 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM
Holder is going NOWHERE. Obama needs him in place to help squash voter fraud investigations and redo redistricting in the Democrat’s favor.
michaelo on January 20, 2012 at 10:45 AM
Thick as thieves. And we have so many choices to anoint the one to end that cabal.
democratsarefools on January 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM
Well played.
cicerone on January 20, 2012 at 10:52 AM
I’m going to need some help, folks. Why would they do this? Is it strictly the billable hours and fees? Did all of these homes really meet whatever standards are applicable for foreclosure? Sorry for my ignorance and I realize there has to be large amounts of money involved but this seems to be on a ridiculously large scale.
Cindy Munford on January 20, 2012 at 10:52 AM
The law can be ignored, as a matter of convenience, when deemed necessary by whom?
Yoop on January 20, 2012 at 10:53 AM
That’s about as likely as Tom Shipley and bayam getting the Democrat Presidential/VP nomination this summer.
Del Dolemonte on January 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM
I’m pretty sure I’d rather have the Mob running the DoJ; at least the corruption would be minimized.
BKeyser on January 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM
I struggle with who I want as the nominee, but the reason I kind of like Newt is that he is the most likely of the 4 remaining candidates to go after Holder. People need to start going to jail for things like Fast and Furious and I don’t really see Mitt aggressively pursuing this.
Flange on January 20, 2012 at 10:55 AM
I don’t want to upset you Turtle, but you don’t speak for me. I don’t want his resignation. I want his indictment and conviction. I want to see him arrested, handcuffed, frogmarched in front of cameras for all the world to see and thrown into jail.
Oldnuke on January 20, 2012 at 10:55 AM
First thing Newt should do as POTUS is clean house at DOJ and start indicting all of the Obama crooks.
they lie on January 20, 2012 at 10:56 AM
This is a scandal free administration
-lsm
cmsinaz on January 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM
Now would be a great time for Holder to harness the power of stupid, and deliver a speech about how his opponents are poopy headed racists.
Democrat voters would lap it right up!
MNHawk on January 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM
Great…but where are we with Fast and Furious…it seems these things are brought up…than dropped…
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Moved on from V. Jones to Holder. Obama shouldn’t have appointed any black men at all in his administration
residentblue on January 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Ed and Co. might want to write an exposition of these charges.
As an attorney, the use of a robo-pen to sign pleadings is perfectly acceptable.
LOTS of other things…such as bogus notary signatures are not.
I don’t have the details on the allegations.
And, while people in default are subject to foreclosure, they are also assured due process. If that was not provided, the lawyers and the banks they serve are liable to both civil and criminal penalties, depending…
Ragspierre on January 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Will the next headline be
Just saying.
Xiphos on January 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Yeah, but, yeah but, Newt had a divorce a decade ago…
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM
Man, this is some seriou….HOLY CRAP! Have you seen Sarah Palin’s new hairstyle? I hope the media gets some people on that right away, because I think she might have gotten it colored as well; major, major scandal.
Bishop on January 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM
What a goofy statement.
Cindy Munford on January 20, 2012 at 11:01 AM
Holder was working for Reno – there are quite a few things he did while working for her, including reviewing and finding no wrong doing in the Government massacre in Waco.
batterup on January 20, 2012 at 11:01 AM
“Move on, nothing to see…”
sadatoni on January 20, 2012 at 11:01 AM
I posted too soon, look at the new postings…
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Curious that you are the first commenter to mention Holder’s skin color.
Bishop on January 20, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Why are Dems so racist? Why do you continue to judged people by the color of their skin, and not by the content of their character?
Fallon on January 20, 2012 at 11:02 AM
.
I don’t ever want to read any whine from you that “I got screwed because of paperwork!” Part of the reason robosigning was challenged was that the lawyers and “lenders” couldn’t produce legally required bills of sale to confirm that there was a mortgage in default. When they got to the foreclosure hearing, required paperwork was missing, misplaced, didn’t exist or was otherwise defective.
.
There is a lot more to this robosigning situation than “Oh c’mon, they deserved it!” The violations of due process were so bad that there was a year-long moratorium on foreclosures for some types of mortgages in some areas of the country.
ExpressoBold on January 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Bingo!
You now have all you need to know to run a major D.C. law office. All else follows from this prime directive.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on January 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Another dem. troll trying hard…didn’t you dress up in Arab garb at a NASCAR race?
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Eh, I’m with those who say these allegations of “forgery” are a nothingburger. If they didn’t recuse themselves that would be egregious, but my concerns with Eric Holder & Covington and Burling have to do with representing Gitmo Terrorists, not banks:
Buy Danish on January 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM
Issa issued some new subpoenas this week which really is about all they can do. He and his committee are still on that trail. Until they get the smoking gun that will make it an open and shut case, I really don’t think much can be done than has been done until the GOP takes over the DOJ.
Voter from WA State on January 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM
“Unprecendented”
WashJeff on January 20, 2012 at 11:08 AM
No sooner had I posted that, than the new blog was thrown up…if I was some posters here I would state: “Looks like Issa is reading what I wrote and made a decision”…or something like that.
I just hadn’t heard anything for awhile and was hoping it wasn’t placed on the back burner…it looks like the timing is set to “go off” just before the primaries.
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 11:10 AM
Just another scandel for this “most open and ethical” adminstration that the MSM WILL NOT cover. BO MUST GO !!!
Cincy Conservative on January 20, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Very true. Robo-signatures cannot be notarized. That is strictly forbidden. I know that some notaries are a bit lax about having the actual person in front of them signing a document, but it does make the document null and void if it can proven that it happened.
Just not a smart move by some people.
Voter from WA State on January 20, 2012 at 11:12 AM
Given the extensive network of perjurious testimony from officials of the DoJ (among many others), why should this be any different? Most Americans have no clue how corrupt is ChicagØbama and his “fellow travelers”.
Call in the Pest Control Co. and clean out everything associated with ChicagØbama. Meanwhile, ØbahØlder will skate away unaffected as usual.
Wake UP, America!
~(Ä)~
Karl Magnus on January 20, 2012 at 11:14 AM
Most ethical administration evah!
BacaDog on January 20, 2012 at 11:14 AM
I am not sure it was ever put on the back burner, but things like this just don’t move as fast as you would like it to move.
Voter from WA State on January 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM
We don’t need a new Attorney General, just leave him in there until the next Administration takes over and let them indict him. Remember when Obama and company were so anxious to investigate the CIA interrogators? Well, turn-about is fair play, especially in their case.
We’ve been told, by the press, that Obama is a constitutional scholar. My guess is he failed the course, which is why you haven’t seen his grade transcripts.
bflat879 on January 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Meanwhile the Republicans in Congress are:
a) asleep at the wheel,
b) “letting the media” handle this one,
c) adopting the “its just a distraction” tactic of Obama,
d) trying hard to forget what they were doing on the last Democrat scandal. “Fast & Furious” what?
Obama keeps claiming the Republicans have so much power in Congress, but surely he chuckles every time he says it.
albill on January 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM
getalife
Del Dolemonte on January 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM
HA! That would imply that we have a president who cares about hiring honest people to hold office in his administrations, and holding his people accountable when they fail.
Book on January 20, 2012 at 11:18 AM
They aren’t talking about using a robo-pen here. In this case, robosigning means that multiple people have signed the same name to a bunch of documents. For example, the infamous “Linda Green” signature that was signed in 22 different handwriting styles.
It’s kind of stupid to refer to forged signatures as robosigning though, it just confuses the issue.
PetecminMd on January 20, 2012 at 11:19 AM
Must have gone to Mozilla with spell check.
Cindy Munford on January 20, 2012 at 11:20 AM
I would suspect just as many Reps are complicit, just that Holder et al are more visible to the public eye.
herm2416 on January 20, 2012 at 11:24 AM
Maybe but then the media would be going harder at it. If Republicans are involved with wrong doing, they must go.
Cindy Munford on January 20, 2012 at 11:28 AM
Meanwhile…. Obama does Disney.
Will the day come Mickey takes the 5th?
Has it come to that?
golfmann on January 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM
“Oh Eric and Lanny are just kinda disorganized. You should see their desks!”
Akzed on January 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM
Be grateful for some links here, as I know few details (as my earlier post indicated).
Ragspierre on January 20, 2012 at 11:36 AM
Republicans are too busy attacking each other in debates to pay much attention to the liberals’ illegal shenanigans.
It’s like they’re so used to the Democrat crap, they just ignore it. Forget about holding libs accountable.
Book on January 20, 2012 at 11:37 AM
LOL! And their socks!!
Cindy Munford on January 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM
I’ve been using Mozilla’s Thunderbird e-mail program for several years now, and every day I am amazed at how illiterate its spell check is.
However I must admit I like the new Firefox 9.0 browser, which I just installed yesterday.
Del Dolemonte on January 20, 2012 at 11:40 AM
It would be nice to get the truth from Holder for a change rather than his usual obfuscating BS, aren’t there any waterboards left in Washington?
oregano on January 20, 2012 at 11:47 AM
It isn’t a question of whether these people were paying their mortgages in most cases, your value judgement of them notwithstanding. But the law doesn’t simply allow ANYONE to take back property without showing a perfected title and documentation linking the lender to the title.It would be like taking your word for anything as FACT without substantial and compelling proof.
DevilsPrinciple on January 20, 2012 at 11:54 AM
I can’t get too worked up about these “fraudulent” robosigned documents until it is shown that large numbers of them were inaccurate or were otherwise improper. Did they result in large numbers of foreclosures that were not legitimate? If so, then there’s a real problem. If not, it’s a technicality.
The real fraud was in the mortgage applications where people knowingly entered all kinds of false information and in rating these mortgages and the bonds based on them as AAA.
JayDick on January 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM
The fact that Obama is getting away with this scar-free makes me sick.
yhxqqsn on January 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Whoa…!!!
So, anytime you are accused of a crime, or given a traffic ticket, you are guilty, and the courts should just put you away because of the “sheer numbers”.
Damn.
“Due process” is a term that belongs engraved in the heart of anyone who calls themselves a Conservative.
Without it, you are left to tyrants, thieves, and the merely lazy and stupid.
Ragspierre on January 20, 2012 at 12:04 PM
I’m glad to see that you have finally picked up on foreclosuregate Ed but have you offered any background to this? It really is a horrible tale of unintended consequences of government actions. The administration decides to start their programs for home owners who are underwater on their houses. They contract banks to administer the program. Banks having a lot of bad press decided to allow virtually everyone who applies temporary access to the programs while they were being evaluated.
The home owners had their mortgages payments adjusted for about 6 months before they were booted out of the program. Once booted out of the program the banks required them to immediately make up the difference in their loan payments. Meaning that if their original payment had been 1000 a month and their adjusted payment had been 500 a month for 6 months then they owed 3000 dollars in back payments, and as icing on the cake the banks charged them late fees since they technically hadn’t paid their accounts in full on time. This would of course put people who were borderline making it underwater immediately. A program that was suppose to help was doing devastating damage, but this still doesn’t explain why the banks set up foreclosure fraud sweatshops.
The government wanted to quickly dispose of the houses that went into foreclosure while in this program, so they offered the banks that were administrating the program %25 of the revenue generated from the foreclosure and resale of the home. That’s right folks the government paid huge sums of money for the banks to foreclose on you, and that’s the why behind these foreclosure mills.
DFCtomm on January 20, 2012 at 12:09 PM
Yes there was real fraud rampant fraud, and it’s just now coming to light. The banks were selling and repacking mortgages on a routine basis, but they didn’t want to pay the local fees to amend the deeds, so they didn’t. They attempted to use MERS to establish the ownership chain but that’s fell through in bankruptcy court, so now many of the mortgages aren’t attached with the correct chain of ownership to the property, and to top it off many of the originators of the mortgages are out of business so they can’t go back and fix the paperwork.
DFCtomm on January 20, 2012 at 12:16 PM
I’ll repeat my post from up thread and perhaps you will provide an answer.
The law can be ignored, as a matter of convenience, when deemed necessary by whom?
Yoop on January 20, 2012 at 10:53 AM
Yoop on January 20, 2012 at 12:25 PM
Geithner and Holder are professinal sock puppets for Obama. They are told what to say and what to cover up.
If you are a student of reading expressions, you can tell on their faces they are not telling what they believe is true.
seven on January 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM
Wrong assumption, I understand how long, look at my posts, it is more not being in the public eye…the public has a short attention span.
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 12:37 PM
This will go nowhere. Just like every other fraud perpetrated by this admin. They’re the largest criminal organization ever to grace the US, and they have unlimited power right now. Nobody in the MSM to call them out, and they’ve dumbed down the electorate so they have no idea what any of this means.
CycloneCDB on January 20, 2012 at 12:40 PM
Show them no quarter. Do everything by the book and if there is reason to believe there has been criminal activity, prosecute them to the full extent of the law, no matter who they are. That’s what the DOJ would do to us.
Mr. Grump on January 20, 2012 at 12:41 PM
He is a major SOB then! He is an American…right?????
KOOLAID2 on January 20, 2012 at 12:41 PM
…and the banks make money on the foreclosure because of the subsidies.
The banks lose nothing, and in fact make money.
It is a repulsive scheme, and it was heavily supported (naive, stupid, or just plain conniving) by both sides of the aisles, so to get to the bottom will take decades.
This is like many government programs gone awry, they will drag this out, obfuscate it until the actual victims are “gone” one way or the other.
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 12:42 PM
And both sides are complicit…a lot of Republicans were for this, which is why no one has been brought to any justice, let alone even been investigated.
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 12:44 PM
Crickets…
right2bright on January 20, 2012 at 12:44 PM
If not, Republicans and Democrats alike will have plenty of opportunity to ask Obama why his Department of Justice seems more interested in cover-ups and political machinations than in law enforcement.
Um… because Obama is the Godfather, Holder is his consiglieri, and most of the DoJ are his soldiers?
RebeccaH on January 20, 2012 at 12:56 PM
I LOVE Firefox between the spell check and the ad block it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. Now if it could only proofread some the crazy stuff I type…….
Cindy Munford on January 20, 2012 at 12:56 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »