<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox News: The TV source Americans trust the most AND the least</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: billrowe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5332191</link>
		<dc:creator>billrowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5332191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Fox is the most trusted TV news source for 34% of voters, followed by PBS at 17%, CNN at 12%, ABC News at 11%, CBS News at 8%, MSNBC at 5%, and Comedy Central and NBC each at 4%.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Er, Comedy Central? Comedy Central?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Fox is the most trusted TV news source for 34% of voters, followed by PBS at 17%, CNN at 12%, ABC News at 11%, CBS News at 8%, MSNBC at 5%, and Comedy Central and NBC each at 4%.</p></blockquote>
<p>Er, Comedy Central? Comedy Central?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5331659</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5331659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Not to defend the Hillary camp here, but Insight never really gave any proof at all that Hillary was behind the Obama-raised-in-radical-madrassa-story. Claiming that she was behind it is a convenient way of sliming someone you don’t like and passing responsibility off on someone else. It’s kind of like if the NYT ran a BS story claiming that Gingrich beat his wife, and when they get called out on it, throwing their hands up and saying, “HEy, Mitt told us about it.”

Cordell on January 19, 2012 at 11:12 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, Leftist Josh Marshall (Talking Points Memo) claimed at the time that:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A day after the Hillary campaign hit the Obama camp for bullying voters in nasty phone calls, the Hillary crew has just acknowledged that an Iowa county chair volunteering for the campaign passed along the now-notorious email that smears Obama as a Muslim by repeating the false claim that he attended a madrassa as a child.

The Hillary campaign confirms that they are asking the county chair to step down from the campaign.

The charge was made by a Daily Kos diarist who identified himself as planning to “caucus” for Chris Dodd, suggesting that this happened in Iowa.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course, Marshall has since completely scrubbed his old story, which had this URL

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/hillary_campaign_acknowledges_that_hillary_backer_passed_along_obama_madrassa_email.php

In the now vanished link, TPM also said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;But it quotes Clinton’s respected internet media coordinator Peter Dao (we’ve linked to his stuff for years and he is a solid pro) as confirming, yes, it came from a Clinton campaign worker. This does NOT mean, by the way, that it was a decision from high-up in the Hillary Clinton camp.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Not to defend the Hillary camp here, but Insight never really gave any proof at all that Hillary was behind the Obama-raised-in-radical-madrassa-story. Claiming that she was behind it is a convenient way of sliming someone you don’t like and passing responsibility off on someone else. It’s kind of like if the NYT ran a BS story claiming that Gingrich beat his wife, and when they get called out on it, throwing their hands up and saying, “HEy, Mitt told us about it.”</p>
<p>Cordell on January 19, 2012 at 11:12 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, Leftist Josh Marshall (Talking Points Memo) claimed at the time that:</p>
<blockquote><p>A day after the Hillary campaign hit the Obama camp for bullying voters in nasty phone calls, the Hillary crew has just acknowledged that an Iowa county chair volunteering for the campaign passed along the now-notorious email that smears Obama as a Muslim by repeating the false claim that he attended a madrassa as a child.</p>
<p>The Hillary campaign confirms that they are asking the county chair to step down from the campaign.</p>
<p>The charge was made by a Daily Kos diarist who identified himself as planning to “caucus” for Chris Dodd, suggesting that this happened in Iowa.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, Marshall has since completely scrubbed his old story, which had this URL</p>
<p><a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/hillary_campaign_acknowledges_that_hillary_backer_passed_along_obama_madrassa_email.php" rel="nofollow">http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/hillary_campaign_acknowledges_that_hillary_backer_passed_along_obama_madrassa_email.php</a></p>
<p>In the now vanished link, TPM also said:</p>
<blockquote><p>But it quotes Clinton’s respected internet media coordinator Peter Dao (we’ve linked to his stuff for years and he is a solid pro) as confirming, yes, it came from a Clinton campaign worker. This does NOT mean, by the way, that it was a decision from high-up in the Hillary Clinton camp.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5331434</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5331434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Cordell on January 19, 2012 at 11:08 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree with you in one respect, The Five is a terrible show. A worthwhile offering to the liberals that won the content battle with the spaghetti-spined Murdoch and Ailes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Cordell on January 19, 2012 at 11:08 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with you in one respect, The Five is a terrible show. A worthwhile offering to the liberals that won the content battle with the spaghetti-spined Murdoch and Ailes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cordell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5331062</link>
		<dc:creator>Cordell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5331062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;.” You called Fox as the Only source! You lied!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to defend the Hillary camp here, but Insight never really gave any proof at all that Hillary was behind the Obama-raised-in-radical-madrassa-story.  Claiming that she was behind it is a convenient way of sliming someone you don&#039;t like and passing responsibility off on someone else.  It&#039;s kind of like if the NYT ran a BS story claiming that Gingrich beat his wife, and when they get called out on it, throwing their hands up and saying, &quot;HEy, Mitt told us about it.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>.” You called Fox as the Only source! You lied!</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to defend the Hillary camp here, but Insight never really gave any proof at all that Hillary was behind the Obama-raised-in-radical-madrassa-story.  Claiming that she was behind it is a convenient way of sliming someone you don&#8217;t like and passing responsibility off on someone else.  It&#8217;s kind of like if the NYT ran a BS story claiming that Gingrich beat his wife, and when they get called out on it, throwing their hands up and saying, &#8220;HEy, Mitt told us about it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cordell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5331026</link>
		<dc:creator>Cordell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5331026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The couple of shows I saw, had three republicans, a democrat woman and Beckel… hardly that unfair.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There isn&#039;t any democrat woman I&#039;m aware of that regularly appears on The Five.  The Five consists of Andrea Tantaros (Republican strategist), Greg Gutfeld (conservative comedian), Eric Bolling (self-described Reagan Republican), Dana Perino (Bush&#039;s former press secretary) and Beckel.

That&#039;s four Republicans and one drunk.  Seriously.  It&#039;s kind of a laugh to claim that that&#039;s a balanced political program.  It&#039;s a circlejerk.  I&#039;d rather see another lib on so there would be serious debate.  It&#039;s seriously awkward watching the program because Beckel has to play the foil on other subject when the other four all agree with each other.  You can hear four sets of eyeballs roll when its his time to talk.  It&#039;s just AWKWARD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The couple of shows I saw, had three republicans, a democrat woman and Beckel… hardly that unfair.</p></blockquote>
<p>There isn&#8217;t any democrat woman I&#8217;m aware of that regularly appears on The Five.  The Five consists of Andrea Tantaros (Republican strategist), Greg Gutfeld (conservative comedian), Eric Bolling (self-described Reagan Republican), Dana Perino (Bush&#8217;s former press secretary) and Beckel.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s four Republicans and one drunk.  Seriously.  It&#8217;s kind of a laugh to claim that that&#8217;s a balanced political program.  It&#8217;s a circlejerk.  I&#8217;d rather see another lib on so there would be serious debate.  It&#8217;s seriously awkward watching the program because Beckel has to play the foil on other subject when the other four all agree with each other.  You can hear four sets of eyeballs roll when its his time to talk.  It&#8217;s just AWKWARD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael73501</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5330924</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael73501</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5330924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see....

Megan Kelly (totally hot!) versus that Bashir person (a bitter closet bed-wetter).

No contest!

(Hey - you gotta have priorities here...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;.</p>
<p>Megan Kelly (totally hot!) versus that Bashir person (a bitter closet bed-wetter).</p>
<p>No contest!</p>
<p>(Hey &#8211; you gotta have priorities here&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GWB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5330728</link>
		<dc:creator>GWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5330728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The sample skewed conservative and Democrat, with a liberal/moderate/conservative breakdown of 28/27/44 and a Democrat/Independent/Republican breakdown of 41/24/35.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I call blarney on this. Almost 10% of Conservatives and 3% of moderates are Democrat?

&lt;blockquote&gt;yetanotherjohn on January 19, 2012 at 9:11 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Welcome to the ranks of the 1%ers. You are now (well, way back when) wiser than 99% of the population. Expect to be asked to share that wisdom with the 99%. (Not.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The sample skewed conservative and Democrat, with a liberal/moderate/conservative breakdown of 28/27/44 and a Democrat/Independent/Republican breakdown of 41/24/35.</p></blockquote>
<p>I call blarney on this. Almost 10% of Conservatives and 3% of moderates are Democrat?</p>
<blockquote><p>yetanotherjohn on January 19, 2012 at 9:11 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Welcome to the ranks of the 1%ers. You are now (well, way back when) wiser than 99% of the population. Expect to be asked to share that wisdom with the 99%. (Not.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5330580</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5330580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Fox just did a hatchet job on Andrew Sullivan and won’t even have him on to defend himself. You don’t have to like Sullivan to know that that’s just not fair.

chumpThreads on January 18, 2012 at 10:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;Hatchet Job&quot;, Gracie?

I didn&#039;t see the report you&#039;re whining about but after a Google search from what I can figure Fox News&#039; &quot;hatchet job&quot; was showing the Newsweak cover and blocking out his name.

Oh, and I did find this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;On Tuesday’s America Live, Megyn Kelly questioned whether readers should expect Newsweek articles to be written by “an actual journalist … as opposed to someone who is saying Sarah Palin didn’t give birth to her own child.” &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Everything Kelly said in that quote I cite is Settled Science Fact; Andrew Sullivan has absolutely no formal journalistic training. He got his Bachelors in Modern History and Modern Languages, a Masters in Public Administration, and a Piled High and Deep in Government.

And as wiki tells us:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In August, 2008, Sullivan wrote on his blog about a widespread rumor circulating on the Internet that Palin faked her fifth pregnancy, the baby was actually her daughter&#039;s, and that this was motivated by political reasons.&lt;/strong&gt; After a photograph surfaced in which she appeared to be pregnant in the appropriate time period, Sullivan admitted that she was most likely pregnant, but &quot;not in the last year&quot; and continued with questions about whether she actually gave birth to the child. The Politico called him &quot;a man possessed&quot; in his support for the theory, noting intensive coverage of the issue in his blog over a short period. The Wall Street Journal reported that according to people familiar with discussions among Palin&#039;s advisers, Palin considered a libel suit against him over the issue, but eventually decided against it.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

As for Fox News having Sullivan on to defend himself, how do you know whether or not they even asked him to appear? My guess is that if they did, he&#039;d just say no.

Remember, in 2010 Sullivan basically compared Bill O&#039;Reilly to Goebbels. He never gave Bill a chance to defend himself.

INC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Fox just did a hatchet job on Andrew Sullivan and won’t even have him on to defend himself. You don’t have to like Sullivan to know that that’s just not fair.</p>
<p>chumpThreads on January 18, 2012 at 10:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Hatchet Job&#8221;, Gracie?</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see the report you&#8217;re whining about but after a Google search from what I can figure Fox News&#8217; &#8220;hatchet job&#8221; was showing the Newsweak cover and blocking out his name.</p>
<p>Oh, and I did find this:</p>
<blockquote><p>On Tuesday’s America Live, Megyn Kelly questioned whether readers should expect Newsweek articles to be written by “an actual journalist … as opposed to someone who is saying Sarah Palin didn’t give birth to her own child.” </p></blockquote>
<p>Everything Kelly said in that quote I cite is Settled Science Fact; Andrew Sullivan has absolutely no formal journalistic training. He got his Bachelors in Modern History and Modern Languages, a Masters in Public Administration, and a Piled High and Deep in Government.</p>
<p>And as wiki tells us:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>In August, 2008, Sullivan wrote on his blog about a widespread rumor circulating on the Internet that Palin faked her fifth pregnancy, the baby was actually her daughter&#8217;s, and that this was motivated by political reasons.</strong> After a photograph surfaced in which she appeared to be pregnant in the appropriate time period, Sullivan admitted that she was most likely pregnant, but &#8220;not in the last year&#8221; and continued with questions about whether she actually gave birth to the child. The Politico called him &#8220;a man possessed&#8221; in his support for the theory, noting intensive coverage of the issue in his blog over a short period. The Wall Street Journal reported that according to people familiar with discussions among Palin&#8217;s advisers, Palin considered a libel suit against him over the issue, but eventually decided against it.</p></blockquote>
<p>As for Fox News having Sullivan on to defend himself, how do you know whether or not they even asked him to appear? My guess is that if they did, he&#8217;d just say no.</p>
<p>Remember, in 2010 Sullivan basically compared Bill O&#8217;Reilly to Goebbels. He never gave Bill a chance to defend himself.</p>
<p>INC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benaiah</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5330575</link>
		<dc:creator>Benaiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5330575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t trust a word that Fox or MSNBC tell me. I&#039;m wary of ABC, CBS, CNN, etc but not as much as the other two. If they tell me anything I have to go get the &lt;em&gt;full&lt;/em&gt; story from elsewhere. Not just the half they are telling me that fits their narrative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t trust a word that Fox or MSNBC tell me. I&#8217;m wary of ABC, CBS, CNN, etc but not as much as the other two. If they tell me anything I have to go get the <em>full</em> story from elsewhere. Not just the half they are telling me that fits their narrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knott Buyinit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5330555</link>
		<dc:creator>Knott Buyinit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5330555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#039;why&#039; is more interesting than the &#039;is&#039; in this case. Why do ABC, CBS, and NBC just concede the center-right ground to Fox News? So they can lose money for their shareholders? Huh? Why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;why&#8217; is more interesting than the &#8216;is&#8217; in this case. Why do ABC, CBS, and NBC just concede the center-right ground to Fox News? So they can lose money for their shareholders? Huh? Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pecozbill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5330300</link>
		<dc:creator>Pecozbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5330300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with all the complaints about &#039;Fox news alerts&#039; as false alarms. On the other hand, if I get frustrated with FOX and go to my local news channel in this city of 2 million, with only 22 minutes of news time in the half hour broadcast, we too, have to watch that same damned cat caught up in a tree in Georgia somewhere - instead of local news I can use.....

My other frustration with FOX news (besides Alan Colmes) is the constant reminders of &#039;whats coming up&#039; promo&#039;s, that never appear until the last 30 seconds of the newscast. The noon hour blond is most guilty of this.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all the complaints about &#8216;Fox news alerts&#8217; as false alarms. On the other hand, if I get frustrated with FOX and go to my local news channel in this city of 2 million, with only 22 minutes of news time in the half hour broadcast, we too, have to watch that same damned cat caught up in a tree in Georgia somewhere &#8211; instead of local news I can use&#8230;..</p>
<p>My other frustration with FOX news (besides Alan Colmes) is the constant reminders of &#8216;whats coming up&#8217; promo&#8217;s, that never appear until the last 30 seconds of the newscast. The noon hour blond is most guilty of this&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5330117</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5330117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your suggestion to &quot;check multiple sources&quot; struck a chord with me. Back in the dark ages, before the internet, I remember watching a CBS story about Nicaragua. The story was about an American killed in Nicaragua when the helicopter he was in was shot down during an attack on a school. 
The story made me stop and question my support for the contras. If we were helping people to attack kids, we were probably helping the wrong side. So I did some more digging. It turned out every word of the CBS story was true, but the facts put the story in a new light. The school was an officer training school. That is a school, but a legitimate target of war. The helicopter was shot down, but it was not directly involved in the attack. Rather, the helicopter was acting as a medical evacuation means (I never did find out if it was marked with Red Cross or not). It wasn&#039;t clear if the shoot down was during the attack or after the attack was completed, but I&#039;ll give CBS a pass on parsing things that fine. The timing was in relatively close proximity.
I stopped watching CBS news after that (I had been a daily watcher). I suspect that declining viewership for the news comes at least in part from their violating the trust their viewers put in them. As near as I could tell CBS took the unvarnished word of the Sandinistas with out questioning or investigating. That to me was journalistic malpractice brought on by a leftist sympathy with one side of the news story. Of course years later Dan Rather was caught doing a similar breach of journalistic malpractice with the &quot;Rathergate&quot; papers meant to harm Bush. Then, finding out the real facts was much easier due to the internet.
Today we are blessed because we have multiple sources of news and checking up on stories is much easier. If I come across a story that makes me question what I should or shouldn&#039;t support, then it is much easier to investigate further.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your suggestion to &#8220;check multiple sources&#8221; struck a chord with me. Back in the dark ages, before the internet, I remember watching a CBS story about Nicaragua. The story was about an American killed in Nicaragua when the helicopter he was in was shot down during an attack on a school.<br />
The story made me stop and question my support for the contras. If we were helping people to attack kids, we were probably helping the wrong side. So I did some more digging. It turned out every word of the CBS story was true, but the facts put the story in a new light. The school was an officer training school. That is a school, but a legitimate target of war. The helicopter was shot down, but it was not directly involved in the attack. Rather, the helicopter was acting as a medical evacuation means (I never did find out if it was marked with Red Cross or not). It wasn&#8217;t clear if the shoot down was during the attack or after the attack was completed, but I&#8217;ll give CBS a pass on parsing things that fine. The timing was in relatively close proximity.<br />
I stopped watching CBS news after that (I had been a daily watcher). I suspect that declining viewership for the news comes at least in part from their violating the trust their viewers put in them. As near as I could tell CBS took the unvarnished word of the Sandinistas with out questioning or investigating. That to me was journalistic malpractice brought on by a leftist sympathy with one side of the news story. Of course years later Dan Rather was caught doing a similar breach of journalistic malpractice with the &#8220;Rathergate&#8221; papers meant to harm Bush. Then, finding out the real facts was much easier due to the internet.<br />
Today we are blessed because we have multiple sources of news and checking up on stories is much easier. If I come across a story that makes me question what I should or shouldn&#8217;t support, then it is much easier to investigate further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petefrt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329934</link>
		<dc:creator>petefrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;What’s amusing is that they have FOX News Alerts for the most insignificant things (FOX News Alert: Firemen try to save cat stuck in tree),
McDuck&lt;/blockquote&gt;

FNC News Alert 8:20 AM: Costa Concordia&#039;s Captain (aka &#039;Chicken of the Sea&#039;) may have been boinking some young bimbo at time of crash]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What’s amusing is that they have FOX News Alerts for the most insignificant things (FOX News Alert: Firemen try to save cat stuck in tree),<br />
McDuck</p></blockquote>
<p>FNC News Alert 8:20 AM: Costa Concordia&#8217;s Captain (aka &#8216;Chicken of the Sea&#8217;) may have been boinking some young bimbo at time of crash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329903</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Neil Cavuto or nothing at all is where I finally landed, although at times I can endure an hour with Greta.

hillsoftx on January 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agree - Neil Cavuto is great. And I do watch Greta from time to time. She is good too, but the format of the show... needs a little pick me up. Last Call ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Neil Cavuto or nothing at all is where I finally landed, although at times I can endure an hour with Greta.</p>
<p>hillsoftx on January 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Agree &#8211; Neil Cavuto is great. And I do watch Greta from time to time. She is good too, but the format of the show&#8230; needs a little pick me up. Last Call ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329862</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;DSchoen on January 19, 2012 at 6:17 AM

Poor reading comprehension continues to be the scourge of the internet.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>DSchoen on January 19, 2012 at 6:17 AM</p>
<p>Poor reading comprehension continues to be the scourge of the internet.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSchoen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329780</link>
		<dc:creator>DSchoen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Why are you lying about what I’ve stated? At no point did I call out Fox as the “worst offender.”&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
Really? 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, considering that Fox ran a retraction after the story was debunked, I’ll cite Fox itself as a source. 
humili mente on January 18, 2&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No you said fox lies and then attributed the story to FNC as the  source of the lie.  Even MMFA points out the story came from the Hillary camp! 

&lt;blockquote&gt;On January 17, InsightMag.com published an article claiming that &quot;researchers connected to&quot; Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) disclosed that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) &quot;spent at least four years in a so-called Madrassa, or Muslim seminary, in Indonesia.&quot; The story claimed that &quot;sources close to [a] background check,&quot; which was supposedly &quot;conducted by researchers connected to Senator Clinton,&quot; said that &quot;[t]he idea is to show Obama as deceptive.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What was the point of lie that “Fox itself as a source”?  You didn&#039;t name any other possible source
“&lt;blockquote&gt;At no point did I call out Fox as the “worst offender&lt;/blockquote&gt;.” You called Fox as the Only source!  You lied!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why are you lying about what I’ve stated? At no point did I call out Fox as the “worst offender.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Really? </p>
<blockquote><p>Well, considering that Fox ran a retraction after the story was debunked, I’ll cite Fox itself as a source.<br />
humili mente on January 18, 2</p></blockquote>
<p>No you said fox lies and then attributed the story to FNC as the  source of the lie.  Even MMFA points out the story came from the Hillary camp! </p>
<blockquote><p>On January 17, InsightMag.com published an article claiming that &#8220;researchers connected to&#8221; Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) disclosed that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) &#8220;spent at least four years in a so-called Madrassa, or Muslim seminary, in Indonesia.&#8221; The story claimed that &#8220;sources close to [a] background check,&#8221; which was supposedly &#8220;conducted by researchers connected to Senator Clinton,&#8221; said that &#8220;[t]he idea is to show Obama as deceptive.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What was the point of lie that “Fox itself as a source”?  You didn&#8217;t name any other possible source<br />
“<br />
<blockquote>At no point did I call out Fox as the “worst offender</p></blockquote>
<p>.” You called Fox as the Only source!  You lied!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSchoen</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329755</link>
		<dc:creator>DSchoen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox is the most trusted TV news source for 
Fox 34% of voters, followed by 
PBS at 17%, 
CNN at 12%, 
ABC News at 11%, 
CBS News at 8%, 
MSNBC at 5%, and 
Comedy Central and NBC each at 4%. 

Kinda sorta follows their ratings don&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox is the most trusted TV news source for<br />
Fox 34% of voters, followed by<br />
PBS at 17%,<br />
CNN at 12%,<br />
ABC News at 11%,<br />
CBS News at 8%,<br />
MSNBC at 5%, and<br />
Comedy Central and NBC each at 4%. </p>
<p>Kinda sorta follows their ratings don&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greataunty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329713</link>
		<dc:creator>greataunty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When? How so?, I’ve never seen them any more inaccurate than the others, and far more likely to correct any mistake.. ever see an on air retraction and apology from MSNBC?

I never have, and distort is their watchword.

mark81150 on January 18, 2012 at 7:52 PM


I get it.
Satire...right?
Surely you jest.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When? How so?, I’ve never seen them any more inaccurate than the others, and far more likely to correct any mistake.. ever see an on air retraction and apology from MSNBC?</p>
<p>I never have, and distort is their watchword.</p>
<p>mark81150 on January 18, 2012 at 7:52 PM</p>
<p>I get it.<br />
Satire&#8230;right?<br />
Surely you jest&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerPaw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329677</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerPaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I’d rather be alerted when they find a cat skeleton in a tree.

trigon on January 19, 2012 at 12:13 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt; boo hiss! Dead cat jokes are not funny.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’d rather be alerted when they find a cat skeleton in a tree.</p>
<p>trigon on January 19, 2012 at 12:13 AM</p></blockquote>
<p> boo hiss! Dead cat jokes are not funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strike Hornet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329628</link>
		<dc:creator>Strike Hornet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was thinking the same thing...isn&#039;t SNL where most of the left gets it&#039;s political pov?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote></blockquote>
<p>I was thinking the same thing&#8230;isn&#8217;t SNL where most of the left gets it&#8217;s political pov?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trigon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329415</link>
		<dc:creator>trigon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I’d rather be alerted to ‘cat being saved from tree’ stories than the usual doom and gloom catastrophe, mass murder, jet liner crashing, or economic/jobless news stories.

TigerPaw on January 18, 2012 at 11:42 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d rather be alerted when they find a cat skeleton &lt;em&gt;in&lt;/em&gt; a tree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’d rather be alerted to ‘cat being saved from tree’ stories than the usual doom and gloom catastrophe, mass murder, jet liner crashing, or economic/jobless news stories.</p>
<p>TigerPaw on January 18, 2012 at 11:42 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d rather be alerted when they find a cat skeleton <em>in</em> a tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerPaw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329293</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerPaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;What’s amusing is that they have FOX News Alerts for the most insignificant things (FOX News Alert: Firemen try to save cat stuck in tree),
McDuck&lt;/blockquote&gt; That is totally significant! 

I&#039;d rather be alerted to &#039;cat being saved from tree&#039; stories than the usual doom and gloom catastrophe, mass murder, jet liner crashing, or economic/jobless news stories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What’s amusing is that they have FOX News Alerts for the most insignificant things (FOX News Alert: Firemen try to save cat stuck in tree),<br />
McDuck</p></blockquote>
<p> That is totally significant! </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather be alerted to &#8216;cat being saved from tree&#8217; stories than the usual doom and gloom catastrophe, mass murder, jet liner crashing, or economic/jobless news stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark81150</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-2/#comment-5329288</link>
		<dc:creator>mark81150</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Cordell on January 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 The couple of shows I saw, had three republicans, a democrat woman and Beckel... hardly that unfair. But ask Beckel how hard it is to get lefties to appear regularly on FOX, they get harassed by their own team for even appearing.

I&#039;d love a reasoned debate too... 

But when the lefties who do come on are the loudest least intelligent ones, that&#039;s kind of tough. Juan Williams is probably the best of the left on FOX, the rest are third string at best. If they have the courage of their convictions, you&#039;d think they&#039;d love to come and debate,... but most that do, start off by throwing verbal molotov&#039;s then spout talking points endlessly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Cordell on January 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> The couple of shows I saw, had three republicans, a democrat woman and Beckel&#8230; hardly that unfair. But ask Beckel how hard it is to get lefties to appear regularly on FOX, they get harassed by their own team for even appearing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love a reasoned debate too&#8230; </p>
<p>But when the lefties who do come on are the loudest least intelligent ones, that&#8217;s kind of tough. Juan Williams is probably the best of the left on FOX, the rest are third string at best. If they have the courage of their convictions, you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d love to come and debate,&#8230; but most that do, start off by throwing verbal molotov&#8217;s then spout talking points endlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cordell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-1/#comment-5329208</link>
		<dc:creator>Cordell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not really surprising.  To be honest, it&#039;s kind of hard to say with a straight face that Fox is balanced when you have a show like The Five on at five o&#039;clock, in which four Republicans sit around beating up on poor, drunk Bob Beckel.

I don&#039;t feel the need to be coddled.  I can handle watching a serious debate, not a circlejerk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not really surprising.  To be honest, it&#8217;s kind of hard to say with a straight face that Fox is balanced when you have a show like The Five on at five o&#8217;clock, in which four Republicans sit around beating up on poor, drunk Bob Beckel.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel the need to be coddled.  I can handle watching a serious debate, not a circlejerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark81150</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/18/fox-news-the-tv-source-americans-trust-the-most-and-the-least/comment-page-1/#comment-5329057</link>
		<dc:creator>mark81150</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175343#comment-5329057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Dante on January 18, 2012 at 10:15 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My working theory, is you not only have no Honor, you can&#039;t even grasp why you should.

The one true thing about Paul, he&#039;ll never amount to more than he is now, because his supporters like you alienate absolutely everyone you talk to. Obnoxious doesn&#039;t begin to cover the contempt and condescension shown by you and the others. Way to win friends Dante.. I bet you were a very very lonely kid growing up with that kind of personality.

I kinda fell sorry for you now..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dante on January 18, 2012 at 10:15 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>My working theory, is you not only have no Honor, you can&#8217;t even grasp why you should.</p>
<p>The one true thing about Paul, he&#8217;ll never amount to more than he is now, because his supporters like you alienate absolutely everyone you talk to. Obnoxious doesn&#8217;t begin to cover the contempt and condescension shown by you and the others. Way to win friends Dante.. I bet you were a very very lonely kid growing up with that kind of personality.</p>
<p>I kinda fell sorry for you now..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>