Pelosi: Nothing brings more money to the Treasury than education

posted at 6:40 pm on January 16, 2012 by Tina Korbe

At the El Paso County Democratic Party 2012 Hall of Fame banquet on Friday night, former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi delivered a razzle-dazzle keynote address filled with profound and unprecedented ideas. A sampling:

  • This is “the most important election of our generation.”
  • “The American people want jobs.”
  • “They want us to work together.”

Actually, she did manage to say something highly original — but I’m still not sure what she meant by it. First, the quote, then the context.

“Nothing brings more money to the Treasury of the United States than the education of the American people,” Pelosi said.

How so? She doesn’t explain. Perhaps she means that a correlation exists between education and income and, thus, between education and the amount of taxes a person pays. In general, the higher the level of educational attainment, the higher the income. The higher the income, the higher the tax bracket.

But she made the statement as part of an argument for greater “investment” in education at every level, including early childhood education, which suggests she thinks “increased spending” and “improved educational outcomes” are also correlated. Unfortunately, they’re not. Plus, her mention of early childhood education puts me in mind of her promise to “do for childcare what we did for healthcare.” She might as well say it: Let the brainwashing begin as soon as possible!

Do I care about education? You betcha. Do I want more of my taxpayer dollars to go to top-down educational programs? Sorry, no. If and when Nancy Pelosi and other progressives want to engage in a parent-and-teacher-driven discussion of what kind of educational reform is needed, I’ll begin to listen to what she has to say on this subject. Until then, she’ll continue to sound like Charlie Brown’s teacher to me.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Is the witch doped or drunk, or both?

Schadenfreude on January 16, 2012 at 6:43 PM

Some Americans want jobs, far too many others just want YOU to get a job and send them half your paycheck.

Bishop on January 16, 2012 at 6:43 PM

Math is hard.

hillbillyjim on January 16, 2012 at 6:44 PM

What a putz.

Sorry to use that language, but she is.

Aizen on January 16, 2012 at 6:44 PM

When she turns her head, you can hear Ocean Beach.

Roy Rogers on January 16, 2012 at 6:45 PM

So the NEA should pay higher taxes ?

William Amos on January 16, 2012 at 6:45 PM

Nothing brings more money to the Treasury than nationalizing all private industry, and thanks to the quality of today’s public education, that may be possible in the near future.

RBMN on January 16, 2012 at 6:47 PM

AND unemployment checks…

golfmann on January 16, 2012 at 6:47 PM

As always. CUNNING STUNT Nancy!

400lb Gorilla on January 16, 2012 at 6:47 PM

What a putz.

Sorry to use that language, but she is.

Aizen on January 16, 2012 at 6:44 PM

Why be sorry?I think she is a lying skank.

docflash on January 16, 2012 at 6:48 PM

By the way, Tina,

Until then, she’ll continue to sound like Charlie Brown’s teacher to me.

Thanks a million for ruining my Charlie Brown’s schoolteacher fetish.

Is nothing sacred?

hillbillyjim on January 16, 2012 at 6:48 PM

“money for education” from Pelosi can be translated into “money for Democrats” and “minds for Democrats” for years to come. It’s easy to be benevolent with other people’s money and when it funds your power grabs.

truth

ted c on January 16, 2012 at 6:49 PM

This is the same face which believes that food-stamps and unemployment checks are good for the economy , right ??

burrata on January 16, 2012 at 6:49 PM

http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/index.html

ED currently administers a budget of $69.9 billion in discretionary appropriations (including discretionary Pell Grant funding) under the FY 2011 Continuing Resolution annualized level and operates programs that touch on every area and level of education.

That said, it is important to point out that education in America is primarily a State and local responsibility, and ED’s budget is only a small part of both total national education spending and the overall Federal budget

William Amos on January 16, 2012 at 6:49 PM

Is the witch doped or drunk, or both?

Schadenfreude on January 16, 2012 at 6:43 PM

Botoxed.

Del Dolemonte on January 16, 2012 at 6:49 PM

I thought food stamps was the big money maker for the Treasury?

Flange on January 16, 2012 at 6:49 PM

Libeals are not required to posses a rational thought process . . . or any other rational behavioral characteristic.

rplat on January 16, 2012 at 6:51 PM

Last week it was unemployment checks. Before that it was deficit spending. Before that healthcare. And before that environmental controls. All wrong. It is private industry. Nothing else.

pat on January 16, 2012 at 6:51 PM

Ok, what kind of pork is she angling for now. We know its for her biggest contributors. Just like her staff said after her daughter misspoke about getting out.

jake49 on January 16, 2012 at 6:52 PM

Why be sorry?I think she is a lying skank.

docflash on January 16, 2012 at 6:48 PM

Because, I usually don’t like stooping to the level of the Left by engaging in personal, childish attacks, but that woman is as intelligent as a bag of doorknobs.

Aizen on January 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM

Nancy, you are an obvious product of public education with that statement.

If you paid for college, you should ask for a refund.

Robert Jensen on January 16, 2012 at 6:54 PM

Any reason, valid or not … to suck more money from people.

The party of leeches.

darwin on January 16, 2012 at 6:56 PM

But she made the statement as part of an argument for greater “investment” in education at every level

I’m a firm supporter of education. I also think that we need more options for youth who are not cut out to go to college straight after high school. For whatever reason society as decdided that all our kids are college material and that is just crap. We need more options for those that are not.

That being said, let us remember what Democrats like Pelosi mean when they talk about investing in education. They mean more money for teachers which by extension means more money for the teacher unions that are major investor in commies like Nancy Pelosi.

Happy Nomad on January 16, 2012 at 6:58 PM

My guess is that she means the higher the education, the better the pay, the higher the taxes. But this doesn’t work if the economy sucks and unemployment is high. So I really don’t know what she’s driving at (that’s a good thing — for me, yes?).

She just can’t believe she’s no longer Speaker, that the deficit under her “guidance” has never been greater, and that she’s the most despised politician (and rightfully so) in America. Trying to stay relevant when she’s not. Damn ex-hippie. Can’t wait till they’re all gone. The most miserable and failed generation.

RobertMN on January 16, 2012 at 6:58 PM

Her contribution to the treasury must be zero.

msupertas on January 16, 2012 at 6:59 PM

Because, I usually don’t like stooping to the level of the Left by engaging in personal, childish attacks, but that woman is as intelligent as a bag of doorknobs.

Aizen on January 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM

And just as attractive.

Happy Nomad on January 16, 2012 at 6:59 PM

Alynski.

Key West Reader on January 16, 2012 at 7:01 PM

“Nothing brings more money to the Treasury of the United States than the education of the American people,” Pelosi said.

Why? Are they taxing colleges now! (The way tuition has sky-rocketed over the last few years, and have you seen what one book costs for a class?) Plenty of revenue there! So, education is to the Treasury…what unemployment checks are, to stimulating the economy. If only, she were President! The San Fransico treat!

KOOLAID2 on January 16, 2012 at 7:02 PM

Don Taint her because she’s ..beautiful

Key West Reader on January 16, 2012 at 7:03 PM

Please, someone throw a bucket of water on her already and get it over with.

Tuari on January 16, 2012 at 7:03 PM

Dear Mrs Pelosi,
Congratulations!! Democrats for Suicide have accepted you into a rather exclusive club! Enclosed you will find the many various ways upon which you too can join others in offing themselves to preserve this precious republic you’ve helped destroy! Newly inducted honorees in your class include Richard Trumka, George Soros, and John Edwards (who we’ve heard is slowly poisoning himself to avoid prosecution!!). So, again, many congratulations and good luck with the enclosed present from Smith and Wesson!

Sincerely,

The People of the United States

JP1986UM on January 16, 2012 at 7:04 PM

Please.

Nancy Pelosi?

I feel like occupying something.

Like, um. Her mansion.

Key West Reader on January 16, 2012 at 7:04 PM

Charlie Brown’s teacher….and I quote: “WAAAAAAA WAAAAAA WAAAAA WAAAAAA WAAAAAA WAAAAAAA”. Yup, there it is! SSDD or should I say, SSDBS? ;)

sicoit on January 16, 2012 at 7:05 PM

Tuari on January 16, 2012 at 7:03 PM

lol
:)

cmsinaz on January 16, 2012 at 7:05 PM

sicoit on January 16, 2012 at 7:05 PM

+1

hey you’re on margarita duty tonight…won’t be able to watch the debates with you, depending on you and the rest of the crew to keep us informed in the open thread

k?

cmsinaz on January 16, 2012 at 7:06 PM

Are suggesting that it is not enough to toss buzz words and phrases in a pile helter skelter but that the utterance should make some contact with reality?

They’ll never agree to that.

kunegetikos on January 16, 2012 at 7:06 PM

Why why do ppl insist on sticking that ugly frozen face on the news every time she opens her ignorant mouth? Its like looking at Holder it just raises my blood pressure!

angrymike on January 16, 2012 at 7:07 PM

And by “education” she means insider trading.

SouthernGent on January 16, 2012 at 7:07 PM

Where in the world does this woman come up with such inane crap?

GFW on January 16, 2012 at 7:08 PM

cmsinaz on January 16, 2012 at 7:06 PM

Ugh, I would loooooooovvvveeeee to help, but I can’t either. Have some work to do. Just checkin in to see wazzup. Hey, wait, I’ll bet seven percent solution can do it! I’ll be popping in from time to time as well, to see what’s going on. Have a great debate y’all! Keep us sufficiently posted. Thanks! :)

sicoit on January 16, 2012 at 7:08 PM

Education is best kept very local, where people take pride and ownership of their own education product. Keep the feds out. Eliminate the Dept of Education.

anotherJoe on January 16, 2012 at 7:09 PM

And just as attractive.

Happy Nomad on January 16, 2012 at 6:59 PM

At least you can touch a doorknob.

Buh-zing!

Aizen on January 16, 2012 at 7:10 PM

And by “education” she means insider trading.

SouthernGent on January 16, 2012 at 7:07 PM

+1

kunegetikos on January 16, 2012 at 7:10 PM

We’ve doubled or tripled education spending per pupil in the last 30 years and have not seen any improvements in the results.

We’ve tried throwing money at the problem long enough to know it won’t work. Let’s start looking at the alternatives while drawing down federal, state, and local education budgets

18-1 on January 16, 2012 at 7:11 PM

Is the witch doped or drunk, or both?

Schadenfreude on January 16, 2012 at 6:43 PM
Botoxed.

Del Dolemonte on January 16, 2012 at 6:49 PM

EVERYTHING you mention is INJECTED directly into her head.
Nothing goes into her body through any open orifice.

KOOLAID2 on January 16, 2012 at 7:12 PM

One thing I’m surprised that hasn’t happened yet is a government attempt to set price controls via student aid limits. Imagine, for example, if the government would only give aid to students going to colleges that charged 30k or less year? You’d quickly see tuition capped at most schools at 30k.

I’m not a fan of price controls in general, but if we can’t get the government out of lending to students in the short term, which is exactly what is causing tuition to rise, perhaps this would be a way to force costs down. Price controls generally set an artificial low price for resources causing black market activities, but by giving such massive aid sums the government is already distorting the market the other way such that there is no impetuous to improve efficiency.

18-1 on January 16, 2012 at 7:17 PM

sicoit on January 16, 2012 at 7:08 PM

good idea :)

see you in the open thread…

cmsinaz on January 16, 2012 at 7:17 PM

“Nothing brings more money to the Treasury of the United States than the education of the American people,” Pelosi said.

This isn’t so far off from Rick Santorum saying we need to raise the national birthrate … and therefore give more in the form of child tax credits.

Politicians determined that their pet projects must somehow be needed by the entire society…

MeatHeadinCA on January 16, 2012 at 7:18 PM

Where in the world does this woman come up with such inane crap?

GFW on January 16, 2012 at 7:08 PM

I think she scoops it up, when she gets off her BIDET!

KOOLAID2 on January 16, 2012 at 7:19 PM

senile

reshas1 on January 16, 2012 at 7:19 PM

Wh

ere in the world does this woman come up with such inane crap?

GFW on January 16, 2012 at 7:08 PM

Um…HELLO! The woman lives in San Francisco, California. Tell me what is more inane crap than that?

Happy Nomad on January 16, 2012 at 7:21 PM

So, Nan is the senior Sith Lord and Deb is the apprentice… Okay, I can see that.

Roy Rogers on January 16, 2012 at 7:21 PM

She might as well say it: Let the brainwashing begin as soon as possible!

Bingo!

BPinNC on January 16, 2012 at 7:21 PM

If all this money that has been put into educational ‘improvements’ had worked then we would have a literacy rate greater than the 1950′s when poor Johnny couldn’t read.

Guess what?

The literacy rate hasn’t budged.

When you throw money at a problem and it remains, then money is not the answer to the problem.

ajacksonian on January 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM

I think Nancy made alot more sense when she was alive.

Horace on January 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM

So if “nothing brings more money to the Treasury than Education”, why does Pelosi back Obama’s education “reforms” that will do nothing to improve student learning but will give the federal government a lot more control over public education? Why do so many Republicans in Congress not realize that when they continue to fund Race to the Top, they’re allowing Obama’s federal takeover of education to continue – are they so dense that they don’t realize that the Democrats want to continue RttT because it allows them to circumvent existing education law?

KimS on January 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM

Whoa..she looks like she is trying out for one of those zombie movies…it’s in her eyes…

tinkerthinker on January 16, 2012 at 7:34 PM

Tuna!!!

Bmore on January 16, 2012 at 7:43 PM

Government run education, the bucket’s bottom

tarpon on January 16, 2012 at 7:44 PM

Underemployment figures prove that the American work force is highly trained… but in the wrong fields.
Women’s studies degrees enrich the Leftist faculty Public Employee Democrats with Tenure, they don’t get you hired.

DANEgerus on January 16, 2012 at 7:46 PM

When considering that fact that the federal government owns over $1 trillion in student loans, and that when an indebted ex college student gets a job, whether they finished with any kind of degree or not, they begin to pony up a significant percentage of their income, thus entering into a kind of indentured servitude to the federal government until that loan is paid off, it may well be that she was talking about the student loan racket.

Students pay a percentage of their income based on the particular repayment plan that they choose. That payment is above their living expenses and taxes. So any student who owes money on a loan against their education who is fortunate to get a job will pay taxes on their income, as well as a payment every month to the federal government on that loan. If they fail to make that loan payment, they are in default and hauled up on charges. Their income can be garnished and they can even be visited by the DOE police.

Those who finish a BA, or four years of school, often have student loans that amount to the mortgage on a modest home. Those who go on to grad school will have a loan that is substantially larger. $50,000-$80,000 is common. That’s why the loan repayment plans go up to 25 years to pay it off. A good chunk of most people’s adult, working life.

Of course, if the student gives over their life to working in public service for 10 years, that loan will be forgiven.

Its very easy for people to become college and/or university students these days, and the schools almost automatically sign the students up to get these federal loans. It feeds a continual rise in fee and tuition rate hikes at the institutions, thus compelling the student to borrow even more money from the federal government to stay in school.Interest rates on these loans have also risen substantially in the last decade. Now that the Department of Education has taken over the Student Loan business in this nation, they have a monopoly on higher education and on the income that it generates.

thatsafactjack on January 16, 2012 at 7:52 PM

Where in the world does this woman come up with such inane crap?

GFW on January 16, 2012 at 7:08 PM

She worked on polishing this latest oratory during her recent Hawaiian vacation.

For the “progressives” education, beginning as young as one can start the process, means deep indoctrination into the party doctrine.

onlineanalyst on January 16, 2012 at 7:54 PM

“Nothing brings more money to the Treasury of the United States than the education of the American people,” Pelosi said.

Let’s start with Pelosi’s peculiar premise: Why should our goal be to bring more money to the Treasury of the United States?

Shouldn’t we be insisting that our goal is to promote Americans having more money into their own pockets, money that they have earned, than to think that it belongs to the US Treasury?

onlineanalyst on January 16, 2012 at 7:59 PM

When you throw money at a problem and it remains, then money is not the answer to the problem.

ajacksonian on January 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM

Sort of like the War on Poverty that has never delineated an exit strategy…

onlineanalyst on January 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM

I thought unemployment checks were the number one action to bring money into the treasury.

This woman is crazy, really crazy and was the second most powerful person in the USA. Her results brought 8 trillion dollars in debt and 12 million less jobs in the USA. No surprise there but how in the hell did she get into a position to cause such damage?

jukin3 on January 16, 2012 at 8:11 PM

Whats a “scrunt”?

Mimzey on January 16, 2012 at 8:12 PM

Mimzey on January 16, 2012 at 8:12 PM

Apparently as I learned the other night it is a mill avoidance technique.

Bmore on January 16, 2012 at 8:14 PM

O/T Is anyone else disturbed by Valerie Jarrett’s politicizing the pulpit in Atlanta and stumping for her lad, Obama? (linked at Drudge) This church rah-rah session was followed by a voter-registration drive.

onlineanalyst on January 16, 2012 at 8:17 PM

She’s a blooming idiot!

MCGIRV on January 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM

Pelosi: Nothing brings more money to the Treasury than education

CORRECT! Smart individuals making money are forced to part with their earnings at the point of the government’s gun/threat of jail.

Now…. the public school system poorly educates students with regard to life, finances, proper moral choices, accurate history, proper, profitable human social and business interactions etc… so education occurs mostly by caring, sacrificing parents/mentors who EDUCATE their children as they should. The public school system does little to EDUCATE children. It does much to fill the teacher union’s coffers and thus the democrat’s coffers and does much to indocrinate and dumb down the future of America.

So the two do not equal one another.

And the GOP thinks that we need to compromise with this dangerous woman…. there is no compromise with people to be had with people who purposefully distort the education of children to suit their own nefarious power purposes rather than to educate with the intent of best preparing children for their own success, both personally and professionally.

glidingone on January 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM

Pelosi: Nothing bringstakes more money tofrom the Treasury than educationors.

All Treasuries–especially local ones.

FIFY, Nancy.

Steve Z on January 16, 2012 at 8:29 PM

Apparently as I learned the other night it is a mill avoidance technique.

Bmore on January 16, 2012 at 8:14 PM

Thanks………boy!..was I way off. I thought it meant a scrawny….uhh..never mind.

Mimzey on January 16, 2012 at 8:29 PM

More like “nothing brings more money to incompetent bottom-dwelling public school teachers”.

I doubt most employers give a rat’s ass how well Johnny slips a condom over a cucumber, or how much Mary knows about transgendered identity issues.

Having taught at the University level, I can tell you most of the little gems coming out of American schools are pathetic skin bags. Foreign students consistently blow them out of the water. Moreover, those foreign students are more polite, harder working, and do not feel that the universe owes them anything.

Gag.

Mr Galt on January 16, 2012 at 8:34 PM

She is disgusting… her lies, her hand gestures, the fact that our taxes more than likely contributed to the fact that she can no longer close her eyes. WHY CANT SHE GO AWAY? And take that ried guy with her…..

Squidly Diddley on January 16, 2012 at 8:36 PM

Let’s start with Pelosi’s peculiar premise: Why should our goal be to bring more money to the Treasury of the United States?

Shouldn’t we be insisting that our goal is to promote Americans having more money into their own pockets, money that they have earned, than to think that it belongs to the US Treasury?

onlineanalyst on January 16, 2012 at 7:59 PM

Excellent point!

Mimzey on January 16, 2012 at 8:38 PM

“Nothing brings more money to the Treasury of the United States my bank account than the education of the American people insider information,” Pelosi said.

There, that makes more sense.

Mr. Arkadin on January 16, 2012 at 8:38 PM

Pelosi went on to state that 1+1=POTATO.

jukin3 on January 16, 2012 at 8:42 PM

“Nothing brings more money to the Treasury of the United States than the education of the American people,” Pelosi said.

TRANSLATION: We need to pay our (unionized) teachers more money.

Just as the Obama/Ayers spending of over $1 million in foundation funds led to the miraculous transformation of the Chicago school system. Oh, wait. It didn’t. We don’t know what happened, other than $1 million got spent – and accomplished NOTHING. But a lot of liberal beaks got to dip into the money.

GarandFan on January 16, 2012 at 9:03 PM

This glib statement by the swamp queen & VISA IPO loving Pelosi is just standard liberal noise with no real meaning behind it other than more taxpayer money to keep the teacher unions happy.

I saw a network special recently on improving education the upshot of which is that the best education would consist of teacher and computer assisted individual instruction where each student learns at his or her own pace as exemplified already by certain limited programs. Great idea, but there’s no way Pelosi’s Democrat party would allow this to happen in public education generally since black children on average would, as expected, progress the slowest with this and the NAACP, the great & powerful champion of standards lowering, would strongly object.

The great unspoken principle of liberal educationists is that education is like ice cream that can be dished out in equal amounts – as oppose to a process in the students head – and so the cry would be that the children must be given “equal education” (like equal portions of ice cream). Since education is so politicized the “equal education” nonsense will always win out while taxpayers get ever more money extracted from them for no progress. There seems to be no way out of this. I mean who could be against providing “equal education”?

Chessplayer on January 16, 2012 at 9:11 PM

I think Nancy was talking about the treasury of the DNC.

bflat879 on January 16, 2012 at 9:15 PM

400lb Gorilla on January 16, 2012 at 6:47 PM

O NO U DIN’T, GIRLFRIEND!!!

Nah..u did, and its true.

MooCowBang on January 16, 2012 at 9:18 PM

ONLINEANALIST:

Yeah… I caught that, too. Odd maneuver coming from the same people who are continually shrieking about ‘separation of church and state’ and promote the whole secular ‘holiday tree’ vs Christmas tree argument. Also, after three years of ignoring church except for the rare occasion, and the several blatant attempts to court the pastors to back up the political agenda, Obama finally starts attending… when he’s running for re-election. Still, stumping from the podium in church, and actively registering voters afterward pushes it to the limit.

thatsafactjack on January 16, 2012 at 9:23 PM

“Nothing brings more money to the Treasury of the United States than the education of the American people,” Pelosi said.

I think she confused Treasury and DNC coffers. She does it often.

Archivarix on January 16, 2012 at 9:27 PM

Let’s start with Pelosi’s peculiar premise: Why should our goal be to bring more money to the Treasury of the United States?

Shouldn’t we be insisting that our goal is to promote Americans having more money into their own pockets, money that they have earned, than to think that it belongs to the US Treasury?

onlineanalyst on January 16, 2012 at 7:59 PM

Can’t believe I had to scroll down so far to read this comment.

Sharke on January 16, 2012 at 9:28 PM

This is why your college tuition is so high, and your student loans cannot be discharged through bankruptcy. You don’t mess with Uncle Sugars rice bowl.

liquidflorian on January 16, 2012 at 9:30 PM

Well, with a great deal of imagination one might surmise that Pelosi was thinking that handouts to school districts are recycled back to support of the economic geniuses in the Democrat Party (good for the economy generally) or to Treasury through income taxes (yes, I know, I know, but consider the source).

Pelosi’s mission (and many others) is not to convey ideas and provoke thoughtful discussion, but to mind-wipe an audience and give those zombies something to chant on the picket lines. It’s insane.

FerdtheMoonCat on January 16, 2012 at 9:32 PM

What we need is for teachers and school administrators to pay more attention to parents and to educating our children.

What we need is no teacher unions perverting the education process.

That is why we need to support and encourage charter schools and home schooling.

slp on January 16, 2012 at 9:54 PM

Libeals are not required to posses a rational thought process . . . or any other rational behavioral characteristic.

rplat on January 16, 2012 at 6:51 PM

In fact, ‘liberal ideology’ and ‘rational thought processes’ exist in more of a oil and water style relationship. They simply don’t co-exist/mix well.

Midas on January 16, 2012 at 10:20 PM

What we need is for teachers and school administrators to pay more attention to parents and to educating our children.

Yeah, they are all for parental input until they actually get some. Then they tell you “well, I’M A PROFESSIONAL EDUCATOR!”

They don’t give a wit about children or their education. It’s all about them, their pals in the Capitols, and their perverted agenda.

The only way to fix it is to burn it down and start over. You can’t make chicken salad outta chicken shit.

Mr Galt on January 16, 2012 at 10:45 PM

To borrow SanFan Nan’s own phrase, “Are you serious? ARE YOU SERIOUS?!? Oddly, inane statements like this come as no surprise from someone who looks habitually surprised…

ghostwalker1 on January 16, 2012 at 10:57 PM

My guess is that she meant it literally (education -> treasury) ever since the power grab by which they took over administration of student loans.

firegnome on January 16, 2012 at 11:24 PM

Theoretically she is correct. However, since liberals own public education, they have managed to destroy that as well.

stevelockridge on January 17, 2012 at 12:12 AM

Pelosi=biggest liar in politics… with a slight lead on hypocrite Harry Reid.

Epic liar Wasserman Schultz bringing up the rear.

Disgusting…

litebeam1 on January 17, 2012 at 1:46 AM

revolting Pelosi video

I prefer watching soldiers pee on the taliban

BigSven

BigSven on January 17, 2012 at 7:51 AM

Isn’t it this intellectual Nancy that claimed natural gas is not a fossil fuel?

seven on January 17, 2012 at 8:43 AM

Simple explanations are often the best explanations: she is a political hack (there is a correlation between public funding of public employee unions and donations to the Democrat party) and stupid (she thinks no one will notice her hackiness).

Wake me when she’s gone please.

MTF on January 17, 2012 at 9:22 AM

Well, once again The Madame ignores significant facts:

1.) How many children live in her district? Hint: very few.
2.) How much more money does The Madame propose to give away to San Francisco area colleges? That State is bankrupt.
3.) Will The Madame pay for all those defaulted student loans she encourages so that the Bay Area continues to be a magnet for slackers seeking post-graduate degrees in the tanking economy she helped create?
4.) The Treasury already collects on defaulted student loans.
5.) In HER, economy and that of her HerØ, how’s her hubby doing in comparison to her constituents?

The botoxed, nipped-tucked Queen of Losers lives on OPM (other people’s money). Not to mention the outrageously lavish perks.
Of all the noive.
Who in their right mind wants the Queen of San Francisco having anything to do with educating other people’s offspring?

The Madame is soooo out of touch with the vast majority of Americans, she should be shunned, ignored, and put out to pasture.
Soon!

~(Ä)~

Karl Magnus on January 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM

Here you go Nancy, pick out the ones that produce anything that is taxable to put in the treasury.

http://www.usa.gov/directory/federal/index.shtml

Now check the ones that are a drain on the treasury.
Get back to me on your results.

mixplix on January 17, 2012 at 10:45 AM

Now I’m confused. I thought she said unemployment brings in lots of money….

dentarthurdent on January 17, 2012 at 11:19 AM

Comment pages: 1 2