Good Perry ad: “America is calling”

posted at 4:55 pm on January 3, 2012 by Allahpundit

Well done, and almost certainly too late to do him any good. Although how much good would it have done him, really, if he’d started airing it a month ago? Offhand I can’t think of a single positive ad that’s changed the game for any candidate. The gamechanging moments in the campaign have all come at the debates or after an onslaught of negative ads. Which reminds me: If Romney ends up winning tonight and sweeps through New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Florida this month, here’s a fun fact out of Iowa that’ll haunt you forever.

Mitt Romney has long been considered the frontrunner for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, but if he wins Iowa’s caucuses on Tuesday, it will be partly because of one extraordinary fact: Not one of his Republican rivals ran a negative TV ad against him in the state.

Sure, Romney was sometimes mentioned in the onslaught of attack ads that swept Iowa airwaves in the final days of the campaign. Ron Paul ran a television ad trashing Romney and Newt Gingrich as members of the status quo who won’t bring the leadership necessary to really change Washington. And Make Us Great Again, a super PAC backing Rick Perry’s candidacy, ran ads that took aim at Romney and Gingrich, questioning their conservative credentials.

But none of Romney’s 2012 rivals ran an ad solely taking on the former Massachusetts governor—a sign that they perhaps underestimated his rise in Iowa.

That will all change dramatically in New Hampshire, of course, but by then it might be too late to stop Mittmentum. Go look at this chart of how much each candidate spent in Iowa. Contrary to popular belief, it wasn’t the rich guy who buried the state in advertising dollars. It was … Rick Perry. And somehow, unbelievably, neither he nor Ron Paul nor Gingrich ever got around to taking a shot at the one person in the field poised to wipe them all out before Super Tuesday. Says Byron York, “If voters are looking for the best alternative to Romney, they probably want to identify the candidate who can make the best case against Romney. Yet the potential anti-Romneys spent their time attacking each other. In the end, they didn’t help themselves and they let Romney off scot-free.” Try to find some comfort in this if/when a Romney victory tonight seals our fate: Unlike the rest of the field, Romney and his team at least could beat a bunch of five-year-olds in a strategic battle of wits.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Cindy Munford on January 3, 2012 at 6:24 PM

Thanks for the post, great read! I certainly hope Perry stays in the fight, we need him more than he may know!

OldWeaselKeeper on January 4, 2012 at 6:43 AM

Perry: “we gotta get it right”. Problem is, he didn’t get it right. He ridiculed the border fence and E-verify. He forced Texans to pay/supplement the college education of illegal immigrants. People didn’t forget that. They won’t forget it in S. Carolina, either. DD

Darvin Dowdy on January 4, 2012 at 7:26 AM

Go look at this chart of how much each candidate spent in Iowa. Contrary to popular belief, it wasn’t the rich guy who buried the state in advertising dollars. It was … Rick Perry.

Didn’t stop Bill “Tool” Burton from claiming Romney spent $14M in Iowa and DWS this morning accusing Romney of spending $4M (his campaign only spent $1.4, the 3rd party PACs put the figure over $4M).

It’s nice to lie and disinform as a matter of course when challenged. Kind of like a 9-yo.

the_souse on January 4, 2012 at 9:20 AM

What might have been and what still may be in another state!

http://yfrog.com/odz8ujrj

cheetah2 on January 4, 2012 at 12:57 PM

As much as I like Perry, and respect his decision, I was sad to see he decided to stay in the race today. I cannot see the rationale behind that decision: He is a successful governor in Texas, and I am sure he has loyal supporters that will get him 5-10% in a few more states. He might have been a fine candidate and president, but sadly, all he’s doing now is helping Mitt Romney. Michelle Bachmann did the right thing today, freeing up her supporters to chose another candidate in the upcoming primaries. My admiration for her only rose because of what she said and did today. Let’s hope that Governor Perry changes his mind before Mitt Romney is the inevitable candidate.

Captain Obvious on January 4, 2012 at 4:03 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3