Romney in Iowa: “We’re going to win this thing”
posted at 8:08 pm on January 2, 2012 by Allahpundit
For any other candidate, this would be shrugged off as the motivational boilerplate that it is, but for Mr. Cautious, who usually treads lightly lest he be seen as gloating over his apparent inevitability, it’s uncharacteristic. Gingrich could get away with predicting that he’ll be the nominee because that sort of braggadocio is typical Gingrich and because there’s no real political cost in him saying so. But Romney? The last thing he wants to do is give grassroots conservatives even more motivation to take him down a peg.
“You guys, I need you tomorrow night,” he told more than 600 people packed into an asphalt company’s truck garage. “I need every single vote in this room, and I need you to get a couple of other votes in your neighborhood, get them to caucus. I need a great showing here in Cedar Rapids. We’re going to win this thing with all our passion and strength and do everything we can to get this campaign on the right track to go across the nation and to pick up the states and to get the ballots I need and the votes I need to become our nominee. That’s what we’re going to get, with your help.”
Romney’s campaign has worked for months to keep expectations down, trying to prevent a repeat of the 2008 campaign, in which he was favored but came in a disappointing second place in the caucuses. But the candidate has been leading recent polls, and he was feeling his oats tonight in front of an enthusiastic crowd that clapped and whistled after several lines of his stump speech.
One of his staffers claimed afterward that he was predicting he’d win the nomination, not necessarily the caucus, but that’s not how the media will spin this tomorrow night if he finishes more poorly than he’s supposed to. They want some sort of excitement to write about through Super Tuesday, so if Romney leaves them an inch of room for a “disappointing expectations” storyline, they’ll lunge for it. Here’s tomorrow night’s inch.
Romney’s reportedly campaigning in Democratic areas of Dubuque tonight in hopes of turning out disgruntled O-bots tomorrow. If he can afford to spend time there instead of in redder districts, he really, really must be feeling it. If nothing else, he might be able to lock down a few votes that would otherwise go to Ron Paul; at best, he’ll get some Obama voters to commit to him now in hopes that they’ll stay with him in November. That’s why, I take it, he’s been spending at least as much time with liberal media as he has with conservative media. He’s already looking ahead. The Fox News viewers will come around eventually simply because they have to, but the sooner he can reach out to independents and center-leftists through their own preferred media, the sooner he can start to make the case against Obama to true undecideds. A nice luxury.
Via News Busters, here’s Scarborough predicting bloodsport among the base if Romney sweeps Iowa and New Hampshire. Exit quotation: “Iowa is about eliminating Gingrich and Perry without us having to spend a lot of money to do so.”
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

DOJ seized logs for five Fox News phones, possibly James Rosens’ parents’ house

Uber DC won one regulatory battle, but they still haven’t won the regulatory war

Ireland: Yes, we have sweet international tax incentives, sorry we’re not sorry





Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Now there’s a dusty old name…I haven’t seen that sketch for at least ten years. Still remember it was funny!
MelonCollie on March 16, 2013 at 7:35 AM
Cheers:)
There is some amazing irony in your commentary – someone who sounds remarkably like a spoiled child calling me “juvenile” and “deliberately obtuse” for not being able to make sense of your delusional fantasies. I’ll have to leave it to others to make sense of your blatherings – which begin with the false premise- that the narcissistic Marxist grifter Obama and Romney are like ideological fraternal twins. It then wanders off into something I can’t comprehend. I gather it has something to do with being pissed off that Sarah Palin didn’t run as a third party Tea Party candidate, and thus being left with no choice but to stomp your foot, pick up your ball, and stay home? Or maybe you had Ron Paul in mind? Who the hell knows. I’m not going to waste any more time trying to make sense of your nonsensical ‘analysis’.
Buy Danish on March 16, 2013 at 8:37 AM
Romney did not rise to the occasion in the election, so why expect him to do so here?
Sherman1864 on March 16, 2013 at 11:40 AM
He lost by 3%, not a blow out, but a loss is a loss. He is a good and accomplished man who would have been a far better president than Obama who had no real accomplishments before his political life began. Romney isn’t a conservative and maybe that is why he lost but he is a respectable and humble man.
Dollayo on March 17, 2013 at 2:05 AM
He should be sorry he lost because he passed on the opportunity to unseat the Liar of Benghazi (oh, yes, where is that report now? What has the admnistration discovered?).
In a sense, this lack of political judgment disqualified him. We should have known not to nominate a person unable to beat McCain.
virgo on March 17, 2013 at 3:55 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2