New Romney web video aims to get out the vote in Iowa

posted at 12:45 pm on January 2, 2012 by Tina Korbe

If the Iowa caucuses seem at all remote or uninteresting after the holiday season, just watch this video. It snaps the impending vote into sharp focus. A blatant get-out-the-vote effort, the spot aims less at acquiring new supporters than at mobilizing the supporters Mitt Romney has already acquired in Iowa. It’s a smart move by the Romney camp even if, as a web video, the spot won’t be viewed much. Winning any election doesn’t require winning over a majority of people; it just means turning out more voters than any other candidate.

As more and more Iowa voters appear to be excited to vote for dark-horse candidate Rick Santorum, Romney really has no alternative but to stay focused on shoring up his own support. Santorum’s surge has been fueled by belated commitment to him from Tea Partiers and evangelicals, voting blocs that Romney was never likely to win over completely anyway. Meantime, among all likely caucus-going Republicans, Romney continues to lead comfortably in the polls. If he turns out all the folks who pick him in surveys, he’ll win the Hawkeye State.

Based on his rhetoric at least, though, his campaign won’t be too affected even if another candidate does pull off a surprise win. At least, it won’t be as much of an embarrassment as it was in 2008, when Romney really, evidently wanted Iowa. This year, he’s worked just hard enough to show he cares but not so hard as to render Iowa unduly significant to his presidential bid.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

besser tot als rot on January 2, 2012 at 5:16 PM

So let’s see if I have this right. Having taxpayers pay more to finance credits and exemptions for banks and other industries with the right political connections is a good thing and ending that preferential treatment is a tax hike. Reducing taxes on capital gains and dividends for those same taxpayers who have been taking up the azz is not a tax cut, it is socialism. Got it.

MJBrutus on January 2, 2012 at 5:40 PM

With Supreme Court nominees and ruling by executive order, an Obama 2nd term would be absolutely devastating.

csdeven on January 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM

Yes and it will happen if people can’t start voting country first.

Right now everything is about republicans, and the republican brand this country is more important then the republican party.

Dr Evil on January 2, 2012 at 6:23 PM

You don’t have it right. Higher taxes is not a conservative position. You are presenting a false choice that assumes someone has to pay higher taxes. That is a false premise that anyone who believes in limited government would reject. Oh, yeah, Government commanded mandates are not limited government, non-statist policy either.

besser tot als rot on January 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3