Gingrich: It seems I have no choice but to go nuclear on Mitt Romney
posted at 5:25 pm on January 2, 2012 by Allahpundit
His aides have been begging him to start throwing some punches and now, finally, he’s ready. This is being phrased, of course, not as a case of going negative but of simply “drawing a contrast,” which is the standard boilerplate anytime a candidate goes negative. Let’s see how “drawing a contrast” worked out this past weekend, shall we?
“Speaker Gingrich, do you think that Mitt Romney is buying the election?” a reporter asked the candidate after he accused Romney of attempting to buy votes earlier in the day.
“No, I didn’t say he was. I said he would if he could,” Gingrich told the reporter as he was leaving a campaign event. “He would buy an election if he could.”
More from Politico:
Newt Gingrich, the clear Iowa front-runner just three weeks ago, typically delivers wide-ranging speeches — and is regularly more than 30 minutes late for his scheduled events. His campaign bus was forced to pull over Thursday so the former speaker could conduct a tele-town hall meeting because his cell phone dropped the call. At other town hall meetings, Gingrich has been forced to respond to queries about President Barack Obama’s citizenship and a man who suggested Gingrich is a polygamist because the Bible doesn’t account for divorce.
Gingrich’s campaign sees the distinctions between the two campaigns as a virtue.
“He’s not a robot,” spokesman R.C. Hammond said. “We’re not Mitt Romney and it shows.”
Mitt’s a soulless, filthy-rich automaton who’d gladly use his wealth to subvert democracy if he could — and that’s just Newt “drawing a contrast.” Imagine when he really gets nasty.
Two points. One: That GOP debate in New Hampshire on Saturday night will be insane. There’s no doubt who the target will be, regardless of what happens in Iowa, and you’ll have at least three and possibly four candidates onstage — Paul, Santorum, Huntsman, and Gingrich — desperate to pull him back towards the pack by throwing everything they’ve got at him. (Only Perry, who’s focused on marginalizing Santorum in South Carolina, won’t be heavily invested in attacking Mitt.) I get the sense that Gingrich is itching to damage Romney over the next few weeks even if his own campaign quickly ends up looking like a lost cause. He’s already written off his chances of winning Iowa but is treating it as a moral victory simply for having survived Romney’s attack-ad onslaught; he’s also taken to complaining bitterly at pressers about being “Romney-boated.” If there’s any candidate who’s likely to drop out before South Carolina and throw his support to a rival to consolidate the Not Romney vote, I’m thinking Newt is it.
Two: Do either of the coming week’s big primaries really matter? At this point, the only way Iowa complicates things for Romney is if he finishes behind either Perry or Gingrich, but his share of the vote in the big Des Moines Register poll this weekend was equal to their two shares combined. Just doesn’t seem likely that he’d fade that badly, especially when Santorum’s surge is likely pulling undecideds away from Perry and Newt. As for New Hampshire, Romney’s polling has actually gotten better there over the past two weeks despite Paul’s and Santorum’s surges. His favorable rating in NH is 69/27 compared to just 47/42 for Paul, and in some polls he leads Santorum (who’s still in the low single digits) by nearly 40 points. Hard to believe anyone’s going to get such a boost of momentum from Iowa that they take him out. All of which means that the only meaningful primary at this point is South Carolina, since that’ll be the acid test of whether any Not Romney can beat him on turf favorable to conservatives. The only candidates who are likely to be out by then are Huntsman and Bachmann, so prepare yourselves for a fun 10 days after New Hampshire of arguing about which two among Santorum, Perry, and Gingrich should drop out and endorse the third in the interest of creating a strong challenger to Romney.
Exit question: Should righties unhappy with a choice between Romney, Santorum, and Paul be rooting for a long contested race between the three? That’s the only shot we’ve got at no one winning a majority of delegates followed by a brokered convention. Second look at Ryan/Rubio? Click the image below to watch.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Chris Matthews: Ugh, Morning Joe is so “open to all people’s points of view”

EU officials now fretting over Europe’s conspicuously higher energy prices








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Deflection, its what they do.
rob verdi on April 7, 2013 at 3:37 PM
You do err, Mr. Jazz: it’s the future war.
The ‘kill Romney /Occupy’ strategy will be in effect until the 2014 mid term elections in order to sway the LoFo voters to switch the House to democrat control.
locomotivebreath1901 on April 7, 2013 at 3:37 PM
Why does it have to be a Romney plan? Lots of people won and lost last year, they’ve got plenty to choose from. ^_^
Oxymoron on April 7, 2013 at 3:41 PM
Jobs’ Report? What Jobs’ Report? Hey, Look! Gay Marriage And A Squirrel Playing The Banjo!
Resist We Much on April 7, 2013 at 3:41 PM
So now Romney is the new blamestick? Fine by me, I never want to hear Bush blamed again.
nobar on April 7, 2013 at 3:46 PM
Never assume that Obama wants something good for the USA.
See his dummy capo too.
p.s. Obama is out golfing.
Schadenfreude on April 7, 2013 at 3:51 PM
Romney was also responsible for Benghazi!
Because, remember, he tried to assign blame to the Obama Administration pre-emptively. Before the blame was warranted by the slowly-leaked and media-ignored facts.
And now, thanks to that premature designation of culpability to Obama and Hillary, Romney deserves more blame than they do… for blaming them… or something.
profitsbeard on April 7, 2013 at 3:54 PM
He’s a ginger!!1!!!
Blake on April 7, 2013 at 3:55 PM
Wonder if bho’s team gets tired of blaming everyone in the US for krappy policies? They all must be programed to put the blame on everyone else but bho? I know I sure am tired of bho’s pass on blame! You got re-elected bho YOU OWN it now!
L
letget on April 7, 2013 at 3:58 PM
President Sibilant Esses would just as soon forget regular order and issue a royal decree. But now, of course, it’s his focus. Like a laser.
Lest we all forget, compromise means Obama gets whatever he wants and the GOP gets to like it.
Curtiss on April 7, 2013 at 4:01 PM
What expiration date? Everyone knows Bush is actually Emmanuel Goldstein & the eternal personification of right wing fascist evil. There is no expiration date on this Hate Object for the True Believers.
novaculus on April 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM
Oh, and this guy Pfeiffer is the same guy who scolded the Press for quoting stories on Drudge, which is an aggregator of stories written by the Press.
He’s one of Obama’s senior advisors. How old are Obama’s junior advisors?
Curtiss on April 7, 2013 at 4:07 PM
GWB started the Arab’spring’ in Iraq, don’t you know?
Obama owns it, in full!!!
Name one people who are free/freer due to Obama, I triple dare you.
Schadenfreude on April 7, 2013 at 4:10 PM
Hey, Danny. The Republicans already did compromise. Were you in a coma 3 months ago when they caved on tax hikes? Obama got his long sought after higher taxes, so now it’s his turn to give a little on spending and entitlements.
Doughboy on April 7, 2013 at 4:12 PM
Illegal immigrant felons.
Curtiss on April 7, 2013 at 4:15 PM
its not america’s duty to free other people.
I’d much rather obama focus on fixing america than worry about liberating some other country.
nonpartisan on April 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM
Yep. Including extra-special treatment for dirtbags Auntie Zetuni and drunk-driving Uncle Omar.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on April 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM
Barky wants to “fix” America like a dog gets fixed. You’re too much, hoping that the anti-American, anti-Western, third-world dog-eating retard wants to help the people he hates with every single one of his 84 IQ points … LOL.
Maybe he’s busy working on those “profit AND earnings ratios” or spending time mucking up health care but “reduc[ing] premiums by 3000%!!” You idiots are too funny. I just wish you would all be funny in some other country that deserves your useless existence.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on April 7, 2013 at 4:20 PM
The only thing Ogabe is fixing, is his eyes on Reggie Love’s chucks.
tom daschle concerned on April 7, 2013 at 4:22 PM
LOL – I am thinking of renouncing my America citizenship – flying to Mexico and then crossing back in as an undocumented Democrat….I would probably be that much further ahead of the gringos…
redguy on April 7, 2013 at 4:29 PM
…”the private sector is doing fine!”
KOOLAID2 on April 7, 2013 at 4:32 PM
Wallace let him get away with selling his strawmen and snake oil on pretty much every point.
Why is that?
Mimzey on April 7, 2013 at 4:35 PM
Funny. I figured you’d be downright indignant with Pfeiffer, after professing your love for Romney yesterday. Troll.
CycloneCDB on April 7, 2013 at 4:43 PM
Whats wrong with America?
Mimzey on April 7, 2013 at 4:44 PM
Why does this adolescent troll interject himself in every single thread with some idiotic statement.
BeachBum on April 7, 2013 at 4:46 PM
Its a way of feeling important. Cleaning the hair out of mom’s bathtub for an allowance and french fry money is bad for the ego.
Mimzey on April 7, 2013 at 4:48 PM
obama abomination, err I mean administration = everyting political, the country be damned!
losarkos on April 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM
Forgive me but before the guy said a word he was rubbing me the wrong way.
KBird on April 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM
…you trying to induce a brain aneurism on noforeskin?
KOOLAID2 on April 7, 2013 at 5:22 PM
Lon Chaney, the silent film actor, was called The Man of a Thousand Faces. Obama is The Man of a Thousand Excuses” … … and just as many lies.
VorDaj on April 7, 2013 at 5:31 PM
No reply, he replied.
Mimzey on April 7, 2013 at 5:36 PM
I wonder why this is not getting more press? /sarc
rottenrobbie on April 7, 2013 at 5:44 PM
Some good nuggets in Jazz’s short post yet you post what you posted?
Yes, you’re partisan. You’re nic is a joke.
CW on April 7, 2013 at 5:45 PM
Rhetorical question, right?
AZfederalist on April 7, 2013 at 5:50 PM
Conservative media thats for sure. They continue to stoke the ignorance already inbred in most conservatives.
HotAirLib on April 7, 2013 at 5:59 PM
Yeah…’spose so.
Mimzey on April 7, 2013 at 6:11 PM
Er, um, who was President while Romney was running for the job? I don’t recall Mitt being given any of the policy or executive authority of the President while he was campaigning. Did I miss something?
ss396 on April 7, 2013 at 6:12 PM
There’s no information in that.
Can you provide the examples that was the basis of that reply?
Thanks.
Mimzey on April 7, 2013 at 6:12 PM
Just for HAL
Schadenfreude on April 7, 2013 at 6:17 PM
Too bad that there isn’t some parallel universe where Obama could do his ‘royal decree’ thing, while we sit back and watch. It would be downright hilarious to watch him scamper from decree to decree, frantically trying to contain the massive Unintended Consequences that would result. (But, oh, those poor folks in that alternate universe.)
ss396 on April 7, 2013 at 6:19 PM
American Pie
Schadenfreude on April 7, 2013 at 6:21 PM
Coming soon
Schadenfreude on April 7, 2013 at 6:22 PM
This venomous little toad is not worthy of acknowledgement.
pat on April 7, 2013 at 6:22 PM
nonpartisan = nobrain, the 40% unempl. black youth, the 50 million on real and faux disability, the unemployed, all 90 million of them…they R calling on you, you scum.
Schadenfreude on April 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM
But MSNBC is cool, go figure.
Schadenfreude on April 7, 2013 at 6:26 PM
PFEIFFER: Well, there are a couple of things here, George. First is, the House has passed a budget, the Senate passed a budget. The hope is that the House and Senate can come together and work to try to find a compromise. The president’s focus, in addition to the regular order process that members of Congress say they want, is to try to find a caucus of common sense, folks who are willing to compromise, that don’t think compromise is a dirty word, and try to get something done. And – but if Speaker Boehner’s position, as he said it in that statement, remains his position, then we will not make progress, because what this president will not do is come in, right after getting reelected, and enact a Romney economic plan, which is what the Republicans in the House are proposing.
Elections. Consequences.
Key West Reader on April 7, 2013 at 6:28 PM
HAL’s middle name IS vacuous.
CW on April 7, 2013 at 6:29 PM
Heh. I hope Glenn Reynolds picks this up.
Key West Reader on April 7, 2013 at 6:30 PM
Fixed, unfortunately.
The One does not “give”. He “decrees”, and “takes”, as he sees is his just due.
His definition of “compromise” is “I get what I want- you give it to me.” Period. He is utterly incapable of conceiving that anyone who disagrees with him might have a point. And he is utterly devoted to the principle of “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs- as I define both.”
Reason and compromise are not part of this man’s makeup. All that is there is power lust, and hatred of anyone and anything he perceives as different from himself.
He makes Marat look almost rational. And Lysenko look almost intelligent.
clear ether
eon
eon on April 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM
I always wonder why more isn’t made of the way Obama whistles when he talks. I keep googling “Obama Parselmouth” but come up empty.
PortlandJon on April 7, 2013 at 7:30 PM
The Obama administration, and Hillary, are to BLAME FOR the attack in Benghazi! They BOTH PROMOTED that attack by apologizing for FREEDOM of speech in the USA! Once the Islamists in Benghazi heard that, they scheduled their attack as they saw Obama’s words as a direct concession.
Which is EXACTLY why Romney stated it was BAD POLICY to APOLOGIZE for FREEDOM of speech!
These FACTS were totally twisted up by the propagandists in the media. Their assult started on the very first day before the truth could get in front of their lies!
I wonder when the 350+ BILLION in TAX INCREASES implemented this year will be identified as an economic MISTAKE? Will this take as long to ‘identify’ as Roosevelt’s economically incompetant tax increases of 1937 did? We already have a media that is blaming a cut in increased spending, that has yet to be implemented, for the economic failure that these higher taxes are leading us into.
Freddy on April 7, 2013 at 7:43 PM
Who the hell would take this child seriously, given his dress?
Your suit sucks bad, kid…and you need lessons on neckties.
Looks like a 15 yr. old who busted into Dad’s closet for some Student Body President campaign.
Effin’ amateurs from the ground up.
a5minmajor on April 7, 2013 at 9:53 PM
Drug cartel gangmembers? Illegal aliens? Muslim Brotherhood?
Midas on April 7, 2013 at 10:08 PM
Drug cartel gangmembers? Illegal aliens? Muslim Brotherhood?
Midas on April 7, 2013 at 10:08 PM
Plus the others, you forgot the Black Panthers and the union capos. I already know about these groups.
Next time I’ll be more specific and say “nation people”.
Schadenfreude on April 7, 2013 at 10:23 PM
So Preezy and staff is blaming Romney’s shadow illuminati gubmint…
Forward!
workingclass artist on April 8, 2013 at 12:38 AM