Quotes of the day
posted at 9:00 pm on January 1, 2012 by Allahpundit
“While Iowa-watchers obsess over Rick Santorum’s miniature surge and Mitt Romney’s late strength, there’s one other candidate on an upward trajectory: Rick Perry.
“Aided by millions of dollars’ worth of television ads boosting him and tearing down his rivals, the thoroughly humbled Texas governor has crept up in Iowa polling in recent weeks, improving from his crash-and-burn to reliably score in double digits…
“As the days to the caucuses wane, Perry has things other candidates would kill for: Crowds who want to meet him, ads all over the airwaves, a decent ground organization, an anti-Washington message people are hungry for, and terrific hair. The question is whether it’s too little, too late, to get through the crowded pack ahead of him.”
“A few months ago, who would have believed that Gov. Rick Perry would spend his last five days before the Iowa caucus running attacks on Rick Santorum? But there Perry was, in a tiny room upstairs at Doughy Joey’s Peetza Joynt in Waterloo, uncorking a mini stem-winder, assaulting Santorum for his time in Washington: Santorum voted for pork barrel projects and earmarks, including a teapot museum in North Carolina and Alaska’s Bridge to Nowhere. Santorum also voted—multiple times—to raise the debt ceiling. (Perry has an ad up on the air hitting Santorum on these same points.)
“It was the kind of performance that reminds you why Perry is still dangerous. He was forceful, direct, and fluid. The crowd of 100 interrupted him with applause. Both before and after the speech, he worked the room with smooth professionalism. Perry hasn’t won every election he’s entered since 1985 by accident.”
“Aside from Iowa frontrunners Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, Perry is thought to be the only Republican candidate here with the kind of sophisticated ground game to pull off a much-needed comeback…
“As of Friday, the Texas governor had signed up 1,500 precinct leaders in Iowa, a source inside the Perry campaign told CNN…
“The Perry camp also has 470 out-of-state volunteers descending on Iowa this weekend (including Perry’s own family, which flew in on Friday).
“The source said that by caucus night, ‘we will easily have over 2,000 Perry volunteers’ fanning out across the state knocking on doors and speaking for Perry at their voting sites.”
“A flat tax. A part-time Congress. An ad that praised celebrating Christmas in schools and scorned gays in the military. A sharpened stance against abortion. And this week, Perry barnstormed Iowa with a conservative rock star, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona, condemned by the Obama Justice Department for alleged civil rights abuses.
“Ever since Perry vaulted to the top of the pack upon entering the race in September — and tumbled almost as quickly in part because of a series of erratic, and sometimes downright comedic, debate performances — he’s been groping for a way to get hot again. And more than any other candidate in the field, he’s resorted to the kind of gimmick plays that can sometimes turn things around, but can just as easily backfire…
“Perry has pledged other seemingly Herculean feats. He vowed to balance the budget by 2020, in part by capping federal spending at 18% of gross domestic product — a cap so low that most economists have dismissed it as impossible. He told one attendee at an event in Creston that if he failed to balance the budget by then, he’d slash his own executive salary — never mind that 2020 would be the final year of a second Perry term…
“Supporter Bill Thomas, 63, of Indianola was impressed, saying Perry had overcome his debate foibles. ‘Yeah, he’s getting better,’ Thomas said. ‘It’s not so much what they say; it’s what they’ve done.’”
“Almost all the candidates had one or another of these factors working in their favor. Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker, was named the most knowledgeable, for instance, Mr. Romney the most electable, and Representative Ron Paul of Texas the most likely to reduce the size of government. Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Rick Santorum, the former senator of Pennsylvania, rated well on the attribute of relating to ordinary Iowans.
“Mr. Perry was the exception; he did not lead the field in any of the nine categories. For all his swagger, in other words, Mr. Perry is failing to stand out from the crowd. Despite spending $4.3 million in advertising, his brand has become poorly differentiated from the other Republican contenders…
“In turning his attention to Mr. Santorum and to socially conservative voters, Mr. Perry may have helped to entrench his status as a second-tier candidate, competing for a fraction of the electorate that can help a candidate to win Iowa but becomes less relevant outside of it.”
“The two Iowa surveys released this week (from CNN/Time/ORC and NBC/Marist) have each shown Romney, Ron Paul and Rick Santorum in the top three. Senior Romney advisers argue, convincingly, that if those three ultimately constitute Iowa’s top tier the order in which they finish won’t matter much: any of those combinations would benefit Romney. The reason is that such a finish would deny an Iowa boost to Newt Gingrich or Rick Perry.
“Each man, for all of his struggles in the race, still probably has more residual potential to attract a broad coalition against Romney in other states than Paul or Santorum. But given the wounds Gingrich and Perry have accumulated (many self-inflicted), neither is likely to revive enough to present such a threat without a strong injection of momentum from Iowa. Even that might not be enough to really earn them a second look in other states, but without such a boost their odds of making a last stand against Romney could dwindle toward the microscopic…
“What’s more, it’s highly possible that even if Santorum finishes near the top here, the outcome will be too jumbled to convince Gingrich or Perry, and maybe even Michele Bachmann, to quit the race before making a last-stand in South Carolina. That would create what the Romney camp considers ‘an ideal situation, to be blunt,’ as one puts it: the possibility that several candidates to his right will continue to fragment conservative voters in New Hampshire and especially in South Carolina.”
“‘We have Fred Thompson to thank for McCain as the Republican nominee in 2008,’ wrote Lane, who said he sees Santorum playing a similar role this time by undercutting better-funded opponents.
“Referring to the local social conservative leaders in Iowa who have endorsed the former Pennsylvania senator in recent weeks, Lane continued, ‘If Santorum gets traction, we’ll have Santorum (and the IA ‘Family Policy Boys’) to thank for Romney as the Republican nominee in ’12, and the reelection of Obama on Nov. 6, 2012.’
“In an email to POLITICO, Lane elaborated: ‘Right now it looks like 2008. Evangelicals, generally speaking, don’t understand politics.’”
“Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry will skip New Hampshire Wednesday, hours after the nation’s first presidential contest in Iowa, to campaign in South Carolina — a strong sign the Texas governor is depending on the Palmetto State to help keep him in the race…
“‘Why use resources in a state where there is no fit?’ said the source close to the Perry campaign, who requested anonymity because he had not been cleared to comment by Perry’s national campaign. ‘The effort is being made to focus and hunt where the ducks are. For Rick Perry, those ducks are clearly in South Carolina. For Mitt Romney, those ducks are clearly in New Hampshire.’”
“Two thousand twelve was supposed to be the year the Tea Party picked a Republican presidential candidate. It was supposed to be this great, historic opportunity for conservatives to finally get a nominee without compromising. But the two candidates who would probably be judged the most pure of all could be days away from seeing their campaigns ended, and the two candidates who are seen as having strayed the most from the party line over the years are leading nationally.
“Lots of factors combined to bring us to this point, but the simplest explanation is that Republicans are going for intellect — which brings with it a sense of competence — over ideology. Bush fatigue probably explains a lot of that, as does the desire to beat Obama, who is far less intellectual than he is made out to be, but who is nonetheless a sharp and nimble adversary. Republican voters seem to be seeking a nominee who is sharper than Obama and more competent than Bush, and judging both Bachmann and Perry as inadequate by both measures.”
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


State Dept spokeswoman protecting “my building leadership” joins their ranks

Video: Why has Cindy Thomas not been called to testify on IRS corruption?






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
I can honestly say I’ve never been more excited about the rising GOP crop. I think Rubio, Paul, Jindal and Ryan are all excellent. We are fortunate. After Obama who the Dems have as future leaders of the party?
terryannonline on March 21, 2013 at 1:39 PM
What a load of GARBAGE.
Conservatives split the vote and the moderate squishes through every time. It’s as simple as that.
With Rubio, Walker, Paul, Dr. Carson running its not hard to imagine the unthinkable.
Bush receiving the entire Allahpundit block and winning the nomination.
Commence gnashing of teeth.
Conservatives have to agree on a candidate or the same gut-wrenching cycle will play out again.
Who should it be? Good question.
With the embarrassment of riches we’ll have to choose from in ’16, it will be hard to choose.
AmeriCuda on March 21, 2013 at 1:39 PM
I suspect the “you don’t have a heart” defense of his giving children of illegals tuition breaks did more damage.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM
Slightly OT but relevant. If we’ve so forgotten about how the Vietnam War effected America CBS sees nothing wrong with this, then how can we conservatives win in 2014/16 by talking about Reagan instead of talking about the principles he espoused. We can’t.
From FNC:
The popular CBS reality show “The Amazing Race” is under fire for featuring an episode set in Hanoi, Vietnam, where contestants go to a B-52 Memorial, which is the wreckage of an American bomber plane shot down during the Vietnam War, to find the next clue in their televised round-the-world journey.
Their challenge there is to sing a song praising the Vietnamese Communist Party. I thought at first I was reading The Onion.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM
I should add that I think there will be an opening for one should the GOP collapse, Whig-style (and right now it seems to me to be headed for collapse). We just need to make sure they don’t turn us into a one party state via amnesty before they implode.
And yet you guys managed to screw up 2006, 2008, 2012. Seems to me like there just might be problems besides the evil “socons.”
Doomberg on March 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM
You use the same old stale snark that Kis Kids use against Palin, and then deny that she’s been “victimized”. The lack of self-awareness is stunning.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM
*Kos Kids
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:41 PM
Just got a letter from the RNC today asking for money. Here’s how it starts:
I’m going to send it back with the quote from Boehner that he completely trusts Obama.
Wigglesworth on March 21, 2013 at 1:41 PM
Sound the horns, hide the wimmins and childrens.
We have a talking point #12 coming through!!!
kim roy on March 21, 2013 at 1:41 PM
Thank you.. Completely forgot about that. Yeah that was a bigger deal to mean than the HPV thing and I am a socon..
melle1228 on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Hillary, who will obliterate any of the above.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Seeing as the only slate, that won were backed by her, Fischer, Cruz,
Flake, whereas Rove doubled down with Allen, Berg, Thompson, et al, did I miss anyone, how Rove pulled 5 million over night out of Missouri, or how he trumpeted all of the mostly discredited attacks against O’Donnell, now prattles on about Angle, but he took her under his wing,
narciso on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Thanks. If I ever want post-election analysis from the liberal point of view, I’ll be sure to ask you for it.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
I totally agree novaculus totally answered Noemie Emery’s question.
SWalker on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
No, Perry kneecapped himself during the debates. The terrible debates were what crashed his numbers.
Doomberg on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
MOST of America will hear only demonized versions of the most conservative candidate and polished versions of the most statist. You can’t win when the media is owned by the Democrats.
The media must be boycotted, destroyed and/or replaced.
Everything else mentioned is secondary to the media control.
The media accounts for at least five points in the election.
GardenGnome on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
People din’t think Reagan was conservative at the time.
IlikedAUH2O on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Like I said last night, the GOP wouldn’t know fiscal sanity if it hit them upside the head, but the socons are the problem.. Doh!
melle1228 on March 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Nice touch!
Liam on March 21, 2013 at 1:43 PM
Paul might have a shot if amnesty doesn’t pass and he doesn’t screw up anymore. He’s very charismatic. But he’ll never be allowed near the nomination, so it’s probably a moot point.
Doomberg on March 21, 2013 at 1:44 PM
On the question above.
Because a conservative Republican at the jump has 30% or more of the votes aginst him as the ones who slup up the tax money via the Ear Marks and other pig trough deals know the Conservative Republican will not be bought off by the kick back re-election money for the over spending in Washington D.C..
All back to the fact that as of now we are ruled by the incest of a Two Party Evil Money Cult.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on March 21, 2013 at 1:44 PM
No, they thought he was John Birch-fascist at the time. This crappy Reagan-as-moderate graverobbing crap has gone on long enough.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM
There is a lot more material on suspect Governor Palin motives than any Republican insider vendetta. Google Malia Littman.
IlikedAUH2O on March 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM
Be sure to mention how often Boehner got behind closed doors and sold the GOP down the river too.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM
I’m convinced that the indoctrination in the public schools has infected everybody, including the tots who might identify with the GOP.
The virus has simply invaded the body, and killed any Reaganesque tots.
The Compassionate Conservative tots survived.
OhEssYouCowboys on March 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM
BS. The media was getting hysterical about his religious views and ‘warmongering’ then too.
sharrukin on March 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM
I’ve got a daughter and can forgive a man for panicking in what he thought was a serious health crisis. But there were other missteps Perry had. He should have come clean that he was on pain pills during the debates, because his performance was horrible. Or he should have insisted on sitting down. The man had just gone through back surgery, for cryin’ out loud.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM
Nope. Jeb or Rubio. Rand’s the allowed shiny object for the rubes to latch onto before the official anointing of one of the former.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:46 PM
Some people drink the kool-aid, looks like you have an IV drip of it. The Fifth Column Treasonous Media told you what to think, and you still believe their lies.
SWalker on March 21, 2013 at 1:46 PM
Please. There are those that treat any deviation from conservative orthodoxy as an apostasy not to be forgiven. Perry’s a great example. Michelle Malkin herself led the charge over the vaccine thing. He went from the One who’d save us from Romney to unacceptable in short order. Part of that was driven by his own missteps, but much was due to the idea that this issue meant he just wasn’t good enough.
changer1701 on March 21, 2013 at 1:46 PM
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM
Yep. Nobody liked him, but the American people.
Hmmm. Sounds familiar.
kingsjester on March 21, 2013 at 1:46 PM
100% correct.
Robert_Paulson on March 21, 2013 at 1:46 PM
Easy answer: two many conservatives run. Last time Romney had the the mushy middle to himself. Also, Mitt was able to outspend each of his primary opponents by a margin of about 5-1 and he carpet-bombed them via his PACs.
bw222 on March 21, 2013 at 1:47 PM
This doesn’t impacted people as much as it used to. That is the sad truth. Republicans can’t run on “fixing problems”. They need to run on offering MORE in the terms of quality of life and part of that is freeing people up to make dumb choices.
antisense on March 21, 2013 at 1:47 PM
Reagan was not conservative on a few issues, but tell me this isn’t conservative:
Fenris on March 21, 2013 at 1:47 PM
A HuffPo blogger? Hell, I can Google Andrew Sullivan while I’m at it.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:48 PM
You are either a willful liar or weren’t there.
SWalker on March 21, 2013 at 1:49 PM
Exactly. Sometimes it is the GOP candidates inability to think practical when they campaign that hinders them. We all wondered why the man who had won numerous campaigns in Texas was suddenly a stuttering idiot at times. Well had he just admitted that he needed medical treatment nobody would have faulted him. HPV thing could have been dealt with as well. I can’t remember if there was an opt out option or not. The illegal immigrant comment was a little harder to get around. Sounded a little to Demmish to me.
melle1228 on March 21, 2013 at 1:50 PM
I don’t understand this. His moniker is I liked Goldwater. Reagan was a direct disciple of Goldwater.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 1:50 PM
Do you think the elites believe that they have the vote of one who voted for:
Reagan- twice
Bush, Sr.- twice
Dole
Bush, Jr.- twice
McCain
&
Romney?
They would be wrong.
I would rather lose with dignity than ever vote for Mr. Electable -and lose- again.
M240H on March 21, 2013 at 1:50 PM
Hitlery, and if the polls I read are to believed, she can beat either Rubio or Jeb Bush in Florida.
Don’t count your chickens before the hen lays the eggs.
bw222 on March 21, 2013 at 1:50 PM
@ddrintn Maybe its just me optimsitic but I don’t think Hillary is as strong as a candidate as some perceive. I think you put her against someone young and fresh like Rubio or Paul and she will have a difficult time like she did with Obama.
I also think Rubio and Paul will be ten times better than McCain and Romney at running a modern campaign.
terryannonline on March 21, 2013 at 1:50 PM
Rick Perry =’s http://www.corridorwatch.org
Rick Perry =’s “Back Scratching X’s 1000″
APACHEWHOKNOWS on March 21, 2013 at 1:51 PM
Well, in one sense the SoCons are the problem. They provide a common target for both establishment Republicans and Dems. All they have to do is stop being so crunchy when it comes to sodomite relationships, preferred citizenship for illegal aliens, protecting unborn life, and all the other stuff that gets in the way of the establishment GOP’s goal of becoming just like the Democrats but with a cooler logo.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM
Reagan and GWB were easily some of the most conservative candidates in their primaries. Bush was probably the most expressly religious President we’ve had in a century. Reagan made mistakes with amnesty and a budget compromise with Democrats, and Bush definitely increased the size of government, but his tax cuts remain popular for the most part and he also tried to reform Social Security and the GSE’s which caused the sub prime loan collapse.
The real question is, has there ever been a moderate who didn’t pretend to be a Conservative to win the nomination?
Daemonocracy on March 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM
Oh, is that all? LOL!
kingsjester on March 21, 2013 at 1:53 PM
It’s hard to be any worse.
Perry would’ve been a formidable candidate if he had started early, had really wanted to run, and hadn’t been cajoled into it by a group of people who were simply desperate to keep Palin on the sidelines, regardless of whether ever intended to run or not.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM
@bw
At this point I think polls are pointless.
terryannonline on March 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM
Speaking of the elites, I saw an interesting comment on another site:
“Having Reince Priebus and the consultants perform the ‘autopsy’ on the 2012 election is like having a doctor who murders his wife perform that autopsy.”
bw222 on March 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM
Yes, there was an opt out, but people were outraged it wasn’t an opt in program. So that was a mistake. His mistake on the tuition breaks was that he didn’t plainly state that the long-term economics were much better for educating these kids, rather than make it a “compassion” issue. Don’t know if that would have helped much, though.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM
ROFL, that’s good. Hits the nail right on the head.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:55 PM
I’m with you except I was a liberal in my younger days and I am a little younger, so my voting record looks like this:
Clinton twice
Bush twice
McCain
Romney
And I ask for forgiveness everyday for those two Clinton votes, although I would take him everyday and Sunday over Obama.
melle1228 on March 21, 2013 at 1:55 PM
There was room for both, and Sarah is much quicker on her feet than Perry. I would have canvassed the neighborhoods if she’d gotten in, but she didn’t, and I’m still disappointed.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 1:56 PM
…and Lincoln was a Confederate.
Daemonocracy on March 21, 2013 at 1:56 PM
I’d also say that’s some of the damage Palin herself inflicted with her months-long will-she-or-won’t-she thing. Her supporters never could really get behind any alternative.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 1:57 PM
Exactly, Reagan was a Goldwater Conservative, an utterly unapologetic Conservative and EVERYONE knew it. He was a deeply Religious Social Conservative and EVERYONE KNEW it (Remember the AIDS Scandal where Reagan refused to make AIDS research a high priority because 90 percent of those who contracted it were gay and Reagan totally and publicly opposed homosexuality?). The Fifth Column Treasonous Media tried to demonize him for it, and Reagan mocked them publicly for their attempts.
SWalker on March 21, 2013 at 1:57 PM
Without getting in to inside baseball, Reagan’s California heritage and other facts had the south doubting him. This was true esp. in fundraising.
The Bircher Fascist stuff came later, when the left discovered him.
IlikedAUH2O on March 21, 2013 at 1:57 PM
http://www.corridorwatch.org
Rick Perry did what?
APACHEWHOKNOWS on March 21, 2013 at 1:57 PM
I think that you are making assumption for which there is no evidence of being true.
A national campaign is a huge undertaking. Where do you think the staffers and advisors for 2016 are going to be coming from? They will be veterans from the McCain and Romney campaigns. And frankly, I think both campaigns’ staff sucked and gave bad advice. The key to victory is the ground game and organization at the local level including poll watchers, a willingness to contest the results in every single precinct in the nation if necessary, and a passionate get-out-the-vote cadre of supporters. In all honesty the only one I saw that came close to this in 2012 was Ron Paul (non-starter from the outset) and Herman Cain for the brief time he was in the race.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM
I blame in part Fox News and Talk Radio. They want a horse race and give valuable airtime to every Republican who is hawking a book, hawking a tv show, trying to make money for themselves…all in the name of “conservatism”.
Maybe not Rush because he doesn’t have many guests, but really all our failed primary candidates wind up on Fox News or Talk Radio. Thompson, Huckster, Palin, Gingrich, Santorum, Cain…have I left anyone out?
monalisa on March 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM
Lincoln is now leading the conspiracy against Sarah Palin and Rick Perry.
IlikedAUH2O on March 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM
I haven’t seen a conservative run in the primaries since 1984
unseen on March 21, 2013 at 1:59 PM
Anyone engineering the primaries for Romney was helped by the caliber of his opponents, and potential opponents.
Sarah Palin served less than three years as the Governor of a sparsely populated geographically isolated state.
Rick Santorum lost his bid for reelection in a swing state by seventeen points, and thinks contraception is a bad idea.
Rick Perry has to deny reports that he was high on painkiller medication during primary debates.
Herman Cain never served in elected office, and a woman he met with on a weekly basis for 13 years without telling his wife claimed that they were sleeping together.
Michelle Bachmann had a propensity for saying stupid and untrue things. Those are not good attributes for a potential president. She also had no accomplishments to speak of in a twelve year legislative career.
I wouldn’t blame Romney. I’d blame the opposition for failing to field a competent opponent.
It is kinda telling that Jim Demint didn’t seek the nomination
Mister Mets on March 21, 2013 at 1:59 PM
I wasn’t politically aware when the AIDS research effort took place. But my understanding of it wasn’t that Reagan was punishing people for homosexuality, but that the amount of AIDS cases were so small at the time and the demands for funding so huge and exorbitant that it just didn’t make sense. So the liberals did what they do best and smeared him as a homophobe, even though his son Ron is gay.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 1:59 PM
I would like the point that today most polls are pointless. Scientific polling has actually reduced credibility. You tell me what result you want and I’ll find a sampling and word the question in such a way that I will get the result you want.
We may have some “great” candidates (I don’t agree that all the ones you named are great) but there are many people like me who are so p!ssed at the RNC that they won’t vote Republican. Mitt Romney wasn’t my cup of tea, but I not only voted for him but also sent him $35. In 2016, for the first time in my life, I may not vote for the GOP candidate.
bw222 on March 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM
Have Noemie Emery develop a complete Bibliography of the transgressions of evil performed by HER class – The Media – against Sarah Palin. Tell her to make sure to include:
1. The complete list of lies and transgressions promulgated about her in The Media.
2. The total number of transgressions and lies promulgated about her in The Media
3. The RATE at which those transgressions and lies were promulgated after the announcement that she was the VP nominee.
4. The number of un-fact-checked lies and transgressions about her that have appeared in The Mainstream Media
5. The total number of reporters sent to Wasilla after announcement of her as the nominee
6. The number of lawsuits initiated against her and the State of Alaska by liberal sock puppets since announcement of her as the nominee AND after the election was over. Include details of funding by liberal and media groups to initiate these activities
…..THEN talk to her and see if the drugs have worn off, Yes, “gravity” is old, too – but it is the TRUTH
williamg on March 21, 2013 at 2:01 PM
Yeah, because Rove’s record in 2012 was awesome, right? Crikey, I want that guy to go away.
Physics Geek on March 21, 2013 at 2:01 PM
MONEY.
MONEY.
MONEY.
Mitt became the nominee by outspending the Conservatives 10-1.
MONEY. Money and making sure the entire GOP machine is run by only the most Centrist of Republicans.
Karl Roves MONEY seldom wins the General but it does a great job in the Presidential Primary. Not just his MONEY either. The MSM does a bang up job promoting the most Centrist GOP candidate possible. They pretend he will be hard to beat in piece after piece so correct that.
Mitt outspent Conservatives 100-1 when you add in free MSM air time.
Steveangell on March 21, 2013 at 2:02 PM
…..THEN talk to her and see if the drugs have worn off, Yes, “gravity” is old, too – but it is the TRUTH and it is The Law of Physics and it is STILL the reason many things happen!
williamg on March 21, 2013 at 2:02 PM
Screw your inside baseball, I campaigned for Reagan, I went door to door for Reagan. You are so full of it you sound like Barky O’Dogeater.
SWalker on March 21, 2013 at 2:02 PM
It depends on which consultants Rubio and Rand hire. McCain and Romney had basically the same guys behind the scenes and it showed. I would think Rubio would hire the bushie friends like McCain and Romney did. And I wouldn’t expect a different result if Rubio did so. Rand might not hire those guys his father had his own team and I would imagine many of them would go over to rand. So I don’t know… as long as the GOPe has a say in the campaign I don’t see much hope. Rove et all need to be sidelined before we win a national election.
unseen on March 21, 2013 at 2:03 PM
Reagan was always considered the conservative? No.
Now Goldwater was..yes!
Some history from Wikki:
Reagan had promised, if nominated, to name Senator Richard Schweiker of Pennsylvania as his running mate, in a bid to attract liberals and centrists in the party. This move backfired, however, as many conservatives (such as Senator Jesse Helms) were infuriated by Reagan’s choice of the “liberal” Schweiker, while few moderate delegates switched to Reagan. Helms promptly began a movement to draft Conservative Senator James L. Buckley of New York as the presidential nominee.
IlikedAUH2O on March 21, 2013 at 2:03 PM
Still, Palin’s tenure was preferable to Romney’s. If Palin had run, she would’ve mopped the floor with Mitt and would’ve won the nomination. I don’t think we’ll ever know the full story of what went on behind the scenes in 2011-2012.
ddrintn on March 21, 2013 at 2:03 PM
A quick google search I found this tidbit:
“First, according to the Congressional Research Service, federal spending on HIV/AIDS began at $8 million in fiscal year 1982 (remember that President Reagan was inaugurated on January 20, 1981). By the time Reagan left office, the fiscal 1989 budget contained $2.322 billion for HIV/AIDS. Overall, between fiscal years 1982 and 1989, the Reagan Administration spent $5.727 billion on HIV/AIDS.”
melle1228 on March 21, 2013 at 2:05 PM
That might come as a shock to his wife.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 2:05 PM
Mister Mests,
Jim Demint said from the first time he ran he would not stay in D.C. .
APACHEWHOKNOWS on March 21, 2013 at 2:06 PM
Not to mention a) open primaries in which DEMOCRATS also vote for our candidates, and b) the primary process that cinches the deal for a front-runner long before a majority of people even get a chance to vote in a primary.
As a Texan, I’m not sure the last time Texas actually had a say in who that final candidate was going to be – they’ve all been picked by Iowa, New Hampshire, blahcetera – all those bastions of conservative voting behavior…
Midas on March 21, 2013 at 2:06 PM
Jim DeMint doesn’t have the personality or charisma to compete in a Presidential campaign and he realized it. Paul Ryan doesn’t have the personality or charisma to compete in a Presidential campaign, but probably is too egotistical to realize it. Ryan added nothing to the 2012 campaign.
bw222 on March 21, 2013 at 2:06 PM
The problem is that real conservative policies are very hard for politicians to actually pass. Politicians’ natural instinct is to “do things” in response to economic or societal problems; conservative economic policy requires minimal regulation or other intervention. Likewise, conservative policy requires serious cuts to the welfare state and entitlement spending. But it’s really, really hard to take government goodies away from the “takers” of society–just look at the European riots.
We might be turning the corner now, though. We’ve got some unabashedly conservative governors out there enacting conservative governing policies that are turning around states like WI, OH, MI, IN, and LA, and continuing the growth in TX and elsewhere. The Dems can demagogue all they like, but the results speak for themselves.
Outlander on March 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM
REAGAN WAS A SUCCESSFUL GOLDWATER!
I didn’t say that President Reagan did not become the greatest standard bearer of the right in modern American history.
I didn’t say that I don’t love the man and always will.
I didn’t say that I don’t support his friggin’ library!
IlikedAUH2O on March 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM
The little woman is always the last to know.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM
in a bid to attract liberals and centrists in the party.
If what you claim is true then this makes no sense.
What you claim isn’t true.
Reagan was seen as very conservative.
sharrukin on March 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM
yeap. the game is fixed before anyone gets on the field.
unseen on March 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM
Can’t even grasp the significance of what you post. Conservatives felt that Reagan who EVERYONE KNEW was a stanch Conservative would be watering down his CONSERVATIVE credentials, they felt it was unacceptable compromise.
SWalker on March 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM
Reagan has a free spending commie Democrat House of Rep’s to deal with, all they did was spend all he could do was veto and then they with the help of RINO’s in the Senate would over ride his vetos.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on March 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM
I kid, of course. I blame Coulter for that misunderstanding on my part.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM
Ronald Reagan was the greatest of all American presidents or guaranteed in the top THREE!
IlikedAUH2O on March 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM
… because the past few cycles all of the conservative candidates have had incredibly weird, turn-off personalities and one or two “colorful” policy positions that caused even the diehard supporters to question them?
ZachV on March 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM
Palin had several reasons for not running. She wanted to see Obama defeated more than anything else. First Bachmann announced, then Newt, then Perry announced. I believe Palin felt that by running she would only further delute the conservative vote.
bw222 on March 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM
Actually he had a huge budget for AIDS research that grew while he was in office. Furthermore, the first case of AIDS wasn’t even seen in the United States until 1981 and wasn’t even coined with a name until 1982. The need for research is usually needed after the disease becomes epidemic. AIDS is one of the only diseases that got attention immediately upon coming on the scene.
melle1228 on March 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM
Nothing demonstrates the arrogance, sanctimony and political naivete of rightwing conservatives more than their continued and unabated adoration of Sarah Palin–a woman who will never win a national election.
Ms. Emery’s article is spot on. She sounds like she could be acquainted with HA and the constant post-election whining of conservatives. It’s ironic that they so dislike Obama and his propensity for always finding someone else to blame for his failures when they are so spectacularly guilty of the same thing.
Meredith on March 21, 2013 at 2:11 PM
Politicians generally go into, and at least stay in, for power. Big business leaders generally get involved in politics for the benefit of their business (crony capitalism). Why would anyone be surprised that these “insiders” would be so strongly opposed to limited government. It is diametrically opposed to their interests in politics. Meanwhile, solid citizens who want limited government, want nothing to do with government, and just want government to leave them alone.
“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.”
–Plato
besser tot als rot on March 21, 2013 at 2:11 PM
OMG. All I meant was that there was carping. Senator Jesse Helms and others were suspicious of him. The problem was his early Democrat work and coming from the state of California.
IlikedAUH2O on March 21, 2013 at 2:13 PM
Now all we need is bluegill for the “bitter women hatred of Sarah Palin” duo to be complete.”
melle1228 on March 21, 2013 at 2:13 PM
And the ironic thing is that being gay wouldn’t even rank in the top ten of ways Ron Reagan Jr. would be a huge disappointment to his dad.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 2:13 PM
Exactly. And numbers dictate research funding. AIDS got far more research funding per capita/case. I will concede our understanding of the immune system has vastly increased because of it.
John the Libertarian on March 21, 2013 at 2:13 PM
Pls. also add the Boehner quote from last Sunday “we don’t have a debt problem now”.
Tell him that you won’t support two Obama, and to grow a pair, or to just go home or join Obama.
Schadenfreude on March 21, 2013 at 2:14 PM
Just because I live in Texas and have been in political fights with the RINO’s of Texas….
http://www.corridorwatch.org
Rick Perry tried to do what to the toll roads in Texas, who would have thought the msm would cover that up.
Sell out to a Spanish Toll Road company, rake in money for New York bond sellers, and even use Rudi Giuliani and his law firm to tie up loose ends.
Wow,
APACHEWHOKNOWS on March 21, 2013 at 2:14 PM
LOL– Like someone said, I would have an easier time accepting my son if he was gay then if he was a liberal. He he :)
melle1228 on March 21, 2013 at 2:15 PM
so true.
one of the total victories of the Bush GOPe was to equate being probusiness as the same as being pro-free market. It opened up K street and crony capitalism on steriods. the no bid contracts was a nice touch also. It’s time that conservatives understand that free market means less government not too big to fail companies.
unseen on March 21, 2013 at 2:15 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »