Shocking. Another electric car recall.

posted at 10:30 am on December 31, 2011 by Jazz Shaw

Earlier this month we talked about the various problems being experienced by car and automotive component manufacturers who had received taxpayer dollars to put “greener” vehicles on the road. The question also arose as to whether or not the White House was playing politics with a potentially deadly safety concern, as some batteries in these electric cars were demonstrating an annoying tendency to go up in flames.

One of the manufacturers was, as we noted, at least producing a few cars, though… Fisker Automotive. (Of course, they were making them in Finland.) Well, the revolutionary company is back in the news again.

Electric car company that received a $529M federal loan recalls vehicles

An electric vehicle manufacturer that received a $529 million loan from the Energy Department is recalling 239 vehicles.

The Transportation Department’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said Thursday that the company, Fisker Automotive, will recall its Karma vehicles made between July 1, 2011, and Nov. 3, 2011, because of a faulty electric battery component that could cause a fire.

“Within the high-voltage battery, certain hose clamps may have been positioned incorrectly during assembly. If positioned incorrectly, the batter compartment cover could interfere with the hose clamps, potentially causing a coolant leak from the cooling hose,” NHTSA said in its recall notice Thursday.

“If coolant enters the battery compartment, an electrical short could occur possibly resulting in a fire.”

It’s a tough call to say which carries more irony here: the fact that they named their car “Karma” or the name of the company itself. (For those not familiar, the Urban Dictionary definition of “fisking” notes: The word is derived from articles written by Robert Fisk that were easily refuted, and refers to a point-by-point debunking of lies and/or idiocies. )

If and when alternate technology vehicles are ready for market and financially viable for the consumer, they will flourish if the demand exists for them and the price point is tolerable for drivers. But the “up in smoke” results of these experiments in Washington picking winners and losers on the taxpayer dime is instructive, if expensive. A123 Systems received $380 million of your money to produce batteries for cars and was also supposed to produce a lot of jobs. Instead, they’ve laid off a large portion of their workforce. A second battery maker, EnerDel, cashed in to the tune of $118 million in the form of a federal grant to make batteries for Think. They are now bankrupt. The list goes on from there.

Is anyone listening? And will they remember these stories next November?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I think that’s my Ford Escort after my ex girlfriend found out I was cheating on her.

rickyricardo on December 31, 2011 at 10:33 AM

If you are smart and care about the planet you will buy a $40,000 exploding car.

CorporatePiggy on December 31, 2011 at 10:35 AM

The entire Green Economy was nothing more than a boondoggle payoff for politically connected democrats and donors.

We all got screwed, they got rich.

Neomom on December 31, 2011 at 10:36 AM

They should sell these things to Iraq and Afghanistan. Why make an IED when you can buy a factory built one funded by the Great Satan?

CorporatePiggy on December 31, 2011 at 10:38 AM

This is just the tip of the iceberg – I’d like to think that Americans are starting to get an idea of the true extent of the perversion of government trying to act like entrepreneurs and venture capitalists. For each of these cases that burst on to the news scene there are hundreds of other such failures that cruise under the radar.

alQemist on December 31, 2011 at 10:40 AM

Is anyone listening? And will they remember these stories next November?

Solyndra… A123 Systems… EnerDel… a billion dollars.

What’s that got to do with my entitlement check?
/sarc

VietVet_Dave on December 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM

They should just start giving out marshmallow s’more’s kits with each car. Turn a negative into a positive. It’s a car! It’s a snack!

Fallon on December 31, 2011 at 10:42 AM

I’m sure that the MSM will be covering all these green scams as the election approaches./s

Kaffa on December 31, 2011 at 10:43 AM

Just read where Government Motors has to recall some vehicles because they forgot to put brake pads on. Makes me want to buy a bicycle.

JimboHoffa on December 31, 2011 at 10:45 AM

Just another example of liberals doing the best they can, which is spending billions on cars that catch fire.

I suggest a new line of vehicle names for the electric car industry:

Fiero
Nova
Firebird
Blazer
etc.

BobMbx on December 31, 2011 at 10:46 AM

..the beat goes [incessantly] on and yet the American Idol Public may turn out for a man who they believed would pay their rent and would cause Unicorns to crap Skittles in their front yard.

Unchangeable in all this madness is Ed Morrissey’s infallible ability to mate timely blog post pictures with truly funny taglines.

Ed, my sincere thanks to you for this AND the incredibly perceptive dissection of polls, BLS statistics, and deconstruction of the mounds of Bravo Sierra that is shovelled our way by the MSM.

You are a welcome daily companion as I trudge through this shabby existence.

The War Planner on December 31, 2011 at 10:46 AM

They can’t come up with a non-conductive cooling fluid for an electric car? I guess these grant recipients aren’t rocket scientists – or chemists?

Resolute on December 31, 2011 at 10:47 AM

What a great investment!!!
/WH

ted c on December 31, 2011 at 10:47 AM

Fallon on December 31, 2011 at 10:42 AM

Hmmmm, s’mores!!!!!

Cindy Munford on December 31, 2011 at 10:49 AM

Is anyone listening? And will they remember these stories next November?

Nope.

They should just start giving out marshmallow s’more’s kits with each car. Turn a negative into a positive. It’s a car! It’s a snack!

Fallon on December 31, 2011 at 10:42 AM

:) Introducing the all-new Nissan Hibachi.

Axe on December 31, 2011 at 10:50 AM

Lol… ludxite magnets. Thats good. Not too obvious.

speekr on December 31, 2011 at 10:50 AM

The War Planner on December 31, 2011 at 10:46 AM

Um, this one was from Jazz, not Ed…

Neomom on December 31, 2011 at 10:51 AM

They fired the guy at GM who had a good thing going with hydrogen.

All the electrics are junk.

Natural gas. No subsidies. Bonds or excise tax on gasoline as we go.

IlikedAUH2O on December 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM

Hurry, quick, ship these cars to Iran.

pabo on December 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM

There is a video metaphor for this. Be sure to read the description.

Mord on December 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM

Um, this one was from Jazz, not Ed…

Neomom on December 31, 2011 at 10:51 AM

..seems I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue — or something.

*turns deep shade of red*

The War Planner on December 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM

Dumb proles can just dammed well drive what “our betters” tell us to drive. Besides, along with rationed ObamaCare, we’ll get rid of the older generations much more quickly, thus saving Social Security for future generations.

GarandFan on December 31, 2011 at 10:54 AM

And someone in L.A. is helping out with the non-electric cars already.

profitsbeard on December 31, 2011 at 10:54 AM

We all got screwed, they got rich.

Neomom on December 31, 2011 at 10:36 AM

Your comment reminded me of a book, $1000 & and an Idea by billionaire Reublican Sam Wylie. The book is feel-good christian capitalism until the last chapter when he touts the Carbon Exchange and the family’s fleet of Prius’s.

No question. I got screwed for reading his book.

bettycooper on December 31, 2011 at 10:54 AM

Is this really a sensible way to go?

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/06/rare-earth-elements/folger-text/1

Cindy Munford on December 31, 2011 at 10:56 AM

240 vehicles, hell that’s nothing, Government Motors is recalling 4,000 Sonics because those overworked and underpaid UAW’s forgot to put on brake pads.

lowandslow on December 31, 2011 at 10:56 AM

Not a bug, its a feature, makes planet greener by killing of extra population.

anikol on December 31, 2011 at 10:57 AM

Introducing the all-new Nissan Hibachi.

Axe on December 31, 2011 at 10:50 AM

I sooooo want one, lol.

Fallon on December 31, 2011 at 10:57 AM

lowandslow on December 31, 2011 at 10:56 AM

You can’t make this stuff up! I haven’t read any first hand accounts, doesn’t it seem like a driver would notice right away?

Cindy Munford on December 31, 2011 at 11:00 AM

So cars on fire from defective electric batteries causes less pollution and carbon footprint than my 10 year old car…got it!!! I am on it, I’m on it.

seymour01 on December 31, 2011 at 11:00 AM

These solar power topics are always Luddite-magnets.

nice_poltergeist on December 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM

So opposing the government taking my money and throwing it at crony-connected companies that all seem to fail = Luddite?

I don’t think Luddite means what you think it means.

iurockhead on December 31, 2011 at 11:00 AM

The ‘Green energy’ bubble is stating to make the dot com bubble look sane. Problem is, the Green bubble is involuntarily participated in by taxpayers as opposed to private investors.

michaelo on December 31, 2011 at 11:00 AM

These companies are obviously either idiots when it comes to electricity or are intentionally trying to screw them up. Ive electrified numerous vehicles while in the desert. Very simple and cheap. Regenerative breaking, windtunnels with fan generators basically anywhere on the vehicle. Multiple power and recharge circuits. And I did it all with current off the shelf equipment thats cheap. I wonder why these degree holders cant figure this out? This is nothing compared to my next project which involves a tesla turbine. If I can do this unsupported by the govt in my garage, then why cant they do it in their research facilities?

speekr on December 31, 2011 at 11:00 AM

The GOP, if they had any smarts/guts, would create an ad that lists all of the Obama companies that got rich from our taxes and then went bankrupt. It could be silent. Just a “credit roll” of all the cronies who helped themselves at the taxpayer trough.

If they had any.

PattyJ on December 31, 2011 at 11:01 AM

If only democrats would burst into flames then we could simply recall them.

darwin on December 31, 2011 at 11:03 AM

Mord; great burnout at that link!

ted c on December 31, 2011 at 11:05 AM

Shocking. Another electric car recall.
POSTED AT 10:30 AM ON DECEMBER 31, 2011 BY JAZZ SHAW

I see what you did there, Mr. Shaw. /Goldfinger

Libraritarian on December 31, 2011 at 11:10 AM

Does Ford make one of these electric cars?

I would not be surprised in the least if they did.

http://switchfires.com/

CW on December 31, 2011 at 11:13 AM

Because electric cars are recharged with power generated from moon beams and unicorn farts.

locomotivebreath1901 on December 31, 2011 at 11:16 AM

Unsafe At Any Amp

vamoose on December 31, 2011 at 11:16 AM

This page loaded an ad for a test-drive fire of the Nissan Leaf – an electric car.

Gotta love the computer ad placement.

WhatNot on December 31, 2011 at 11:16 AM

I suggest a new line of vehicle names for the electric car industry:

Fiero
Nova
Firebird
Blazer
etc.

BobMbx on December 31, 2011 at 10:46 AM

You forgot the Pinto… BOOM!

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:17 AM

These solar power topics are always Luddite-magnets.

nice_poltergeist on December 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM

As a new home builder I was installing solar panels on my spec houses back in 1978-1981 and they haven’t improved the technology one bit since then. You want to give me a good reason why after 30 freaking years the public/consumer still don’t want them? I’ll give you a hint:

They don’t freaking work.

Tim Zank on December 31, 2011 at 11:18 AM

BobMbx on December 31, 2011 at 10:46 AM

You left out Fireball XL5.

Tommy_G on December 31, 2011 at 11:20 AM

These companies are obviously either idiots when it comes to electricity or are intentionally trying to screw them up. Ive electrified numerous vehicles while in the desert. Very simple and cheap. Regenerative breaking, windtunnels with fan generators basically anywhere on the vehicle. Multiple power and recharge circuits. And I did it all with current off the shelf equipment thats cheap. I wonder why these degree holders cant figure this out? This is nothing compared to my next project which involves a tesla turbine. If I can do this unsupported by the govt in my garage, then why cant they do it in their research facilities?

speekr on December 31, 2011 at 11:00 AM

The subsidies go to friends of Obama, who hire their friends. This results in a collection of idiots or intentional screw ups.

You live in a different world, which is a good thing.

WhatNot on December 31, 2011 at 11:21 AM

They don’t freaking work.

Tim Zank on December 31, 2011 at 11:18 AM

OMG… don’t get me started. California morons put them on their houses up here… With snow on top of them and the lack of daylight, WTF do they do other than weigh down the roof when it is already a heave snow year?

I just laugh. I laughed harder when they didn’t shovel the roof with the panel and the damn roof fell in.

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM

The good thing about California ex-pats using an electric car in Alaska is that the range is very limited, so they can walk home when it dies.

Also, they can warm up by the fire.

WhatNot on December 31, 2011 at 11:27 AM

If you are smart and care about the planet you will buy a $40,000 exploding car.
CorporatePiggy on December 31, 2011 at 10:35 AM

No, you’ll buy a $300,000 exploding car.

But you’ll only pay $40,000 of your own money.

logis on December 31, 2011 at 11:28 AM

They can’t come up with a non-conductive cooling fluid for an electric car?

Resolute on December 31, 2011 at 10:47 AM

You mean like water?

Oldnuke on December 31, 2011 at 11:28 AM

“Within the high-voltage battery, certain hose clamps may have been positioned incorrectly during assembly. If positioned incorrectly, the batter compartment cover could interfere with the hose clamps, potentially causing a coolant leak from the cooling hose,” NHTSA said in its recall notice Thursday.

It’s the robot’s fault!

Dusty on December 31, 2011 at 11:29 AM

Does not matter to Obama.
It is the initial praising of Obama headline that counts everything about that is just clutter.

albill on December 31, 2011 at 11:30 AM

These solar power topics are always Luddite-magnets.

nice_poltergeist on December 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM

Much hubris here. Link needed to pictures of the solar panels and wind generator that powers your home.

chemman on December 31, 2011 at 11:30 AM

Also, they can warm up by the fire.

WhatNot on December 31, 2011 at 11:27 AM

they can’t sit by a fire. Gorebull Warming.

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:31 AM

“fisking” notes: The word is derived from articles written by Robert Fisk that were easily refuted, and refers to a point-by-point debunking of lies and/or idiocies.

You don’t suppose that the Finns were getting drunk and high during their work day do ya? You know like the UAW dyslexic thugs in Michigan? Chrysler, Government Motors, etc. have been busted by local Detroit news station re: partying at lunchtime and then returning to work “buzzed”.
To be sure, I love Finland, but maybe my Swedish are right about them:
“All they do is drink Vodka and fight with knives”.

Sure, let’s subsidize even more boondoggles.

~(Ä)~

Karl Magnus on December 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM

I wonder what the deprecation is on one of these suckers?

Cindy Munford on December 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM

I suggest a new line of vehicle names for the electric car industry:

Fiero
Nova
Firebird
Blazer
etc.

BobMbx on December 31, 2011 at 10:46 AM

Flame
Wildfire
Zippo
Flash

TXUS on December 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM

These green cars are destroying the ozone, killing innocent baby seals by the thousands, making the polar bear extinct, and melting the polar caps. That’s just for starters! Wait until these huge batteries start draining into the world’s drinking water supplies…though the battery polluted air will probably kill humans off before the polluted water does.

Karmi on December 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM

You forgot the Pinto… BOOM!

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:17 AM

Reminds me of the funniest bumper sticker I ever saw on a car.

On the rear bumper of a Pinto: FLAMMABLE

Peri Winkle on December 31, 2011 at 11:36 AM

Swedish friends
~ä~

Karl Magnus on December 31, 2011 at 11:36 AM

I wonder what the deprecation is on one of these suckers?

Cindy Munford on December 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM

They have to pay you to take it off their hands.

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:36 AM

The battery car is very environment-friendly right up to the moment it bursts into flames which then forces it’s owners to walk, bicycle or hitch hike. Soon, the walker-biker-hitch hiker accidentally wanders into a feral flashmob that is seeking Air Jordans and the walker-biker-hitch hiker is beaten to death. That’s why I drive a Ford Expedition.

Voice on December 31, 2011 at 11:36 AM

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM

LOL. You don’t roof mount them in serious snow climate. When your only experience is Southern California with its year round sunny weather you don’t think about those things.

chemman on December 31, 2011 at 11:38 AM

This doesn’t strike me as much of anything. They’ve got to fix the assembly of the cooling plumbing in the battery pack.

Fisker is actually run by people who know the auto industry – unlike, say, Tesla.

Never mind that the 10%-alcohol gasoline that’s being sold (the subsidy’s gone but the mandate remains) destroys fuel systems in older cars and causes fires, or that the 15% blend the EPA would like to approve is even worse.

JEM on December 31, 2011 at 11:39 AM

LOL. You don’t roof mount them in serious snow climate. When your only experience is Southern California with its year round sunny weather you don’t think about those things.

chemman on December 31, 2011 at 11:38 AM

They do in Alaska, because there is no regulation that says you can’t.

Please keep the cali-morons there…. they are ruining my shoot radius!

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:40 AM

Now, now, Obama warned there might be some green failures…ah, a few faulures…ah, maybe several failures…well hell, come on people, we can live with 50/50 can’t we? Because we so awesome and unprecedented!

Oracleforhire on December 31, 2011 at 11:40 AM

They can’t come up with a non-conductive cooling fluid for an electric car? I guess these grant recipients aren’t rocket scientists – or chemists?

[Resolute on December 31, 2011 at 10:47 AM]

Maybe they could go air-cooled, but other than that, I would think you’d be adding several more grand to the cost and then the EPA would require a hazmat team be aboard during operation.

Dusty on December 31, 2011 at 11:42 AM

We all got screwed, they got rich.

Neomom on December 31, 2011 at 10:36 AM

Same old sh1t, different day. The gubmint has screwed us so many times, we couldn’t poop in a dump truck.

Long haired country boy on December 31, 2011 at 11:45 AM

Here in NC, http://www.wbtv.com/story/15986760/duke-energy-puts-electric-charging-station-program-on-hold-after-house-fire
I haven’t heard anything regarding the conclusion of the investigation.

lynncgb on December 31, 2011 at 11:46 AM

upinak on December 31, 2011 at 11:36 AM

At $47K for a Volt, the “pay off” of $4,500 isn’t going to get it.

Cindy Munford on December 31, 2011 at 11:46 AM

The GOP, if they had any smarts/guts, would create an ad that lists all of the Obama companies that got rich from our taxes and then went bankrupt. It could be silent. Just a “credit roll” of all the cronies who helped themselves at the taxpayer trough.

If they had any.
PattyJ on December 31, 2011 at 11:01 AM

So true, so true. How easy it would be to counter the coming attacks on Bain Capital with simple repetition of these facts. Unfortunately, I am afraid the GOP will once again be guilty of criminally negligent stupidity.

horatio on December 31, 2011 at 11:49 AM

You people are just being too harsh on an emerging technology. Well, I mean new …uh…re imagined old technology reiterated into a new design. Sure, batteries and electricity has been around for a hunert years, but this is a new adaption with new manufacturing methods and materials.

You just have to give them some time to work out the technical flaws in this new beta release.

It’s obvious that none of you people have ever built anything yourself or you wouldn’t be snarking like this.

Ya, I know, it’s not cost efficient or energy efficient, but it’s certainly a cool idea and it doesn’t use that evil hydrocarbon nor feed those evil oil barons.

Skandia Recluse on December 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM

While I am not in favor of government guaranteed loans to these so-called green companies, a few points need to be clarified:

1) Fisker Automotive was founded by Henrik Fisker, a former BMW designer who designed the BMW Z8, Aston Martin V8 Vantage and Aston Martin DB9. There is a long tradition of naming car companies after a founder, e.g., Ford, Buick, Bugatti, Ferrari, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Duesenberg, etc.

2) The Karma is a plug-in, gas/electric hybrid, and not a pure-electric car. IMO, it’s good-looking, but expensive, too heavy (2 1/2 tons,) and because of its small interior, considered a subcompact. Despite the fact that it’s several times more expensive than the Chevy Volt, rich “greenies” will buy it based on the tech and the looks.

Finally, I don’t consider improperly installed hose clamps as a reason to damn the car, because other manufacturers deal with manufacturing issues like this all the time.

Reno_Dave on December 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM

GET THEM, While they’re HOT !

Huckleberry Mike on December 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM

Anybody else catch the numbers: 239 cars of that model in 4 months? That’s just shy of 60 vehicles per month. Wow! Now that’s a high volume line right there.

AZfederalist on December 31, 2011 at 11:54 AM

Finally, I don’t consider improperly installed hose clamps as a reason to damn the car, because other manufacturers deal with manufacturing issues like this all the time.

Reno_Dave on December 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM

Then go buy one and let us know how you like it.

Oldnuke on December 31, 2011 at 11:57 AM

The entire Green Economy was nothing more than a boondoggle payoff for politically connected democrats and donors.

We all got screwed, they got rich.

Pretty much the story. They get good PR for supporting “Green” but positive results were always secondary to padding politicians campaign accounts and the accounts of high end donors and cronies.

The GOP, if they had any smarts/guts, would create an ad that lists all of the Obama companies that got rich from our taxes and then went bankrupt. It could be silent. Just a “credit roll” of all the cronies who helped themselves at the taxpayer trough.

Most likely the finger probably can be pointed to too many in the GOP who also helped themselves and fellow cronies to some of that slop in the taxpayer trough.

hawkeye54 on December 31, 2011 at 11:57 AM

I love the liberal double standard. Go ahead and drive a vehicle that may or may not kill you due to a design flaw. But, since it is in the name of mother earth, the cost of a few peoples lives are worth the gains to the environment. But, run a pipeline through a wetland, displace one snail darter, or upset the mating ritual of a caribu, then you are the most evil, hated person on the earth.

Human life is meaningless to a liberal cause unless it is there own.

Mo_mac on December 31, 2011 at 12:00 PM

Sounds like electric cars need fire-suppression systems, like jet engines.

cane_loader on December 31, 2011 at 12:03 PM

introducing the Fisker
Crude missile
It’ll burn your a$$

angrymike on December 31, 2011 at 12:05 PM

The only way taxpayers will remember in November is if the Pubbies with their PACs get off their collective duff and hammer it home on TV. But don’t hold your breath waiting for the Pubbies to take the gloves off!

Bob in VA on December 31, 2011 at 12:06 PM

Huckleberry Mike on December 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM

Nice.

Cindy Munford on December 31, 2011 at 12:08 PM

You mean like water?

Oldnuke on December 31, 2011 at 11:28 AM

Now you are just being silly. Don’t over-complicate things. Next you’ll be suggesting complicated “forced air” systems with fancy schmancy fans and “switches” and what not.

Axe on December 31, 2011 at 12:10 PM

You left out Fireball XL5.

Tommy_G on December 31, 2011 at 11:20 AM

Thanks for that. Now I get to spend New Years Eve re-inflating my skull, having everything useful sucked out by that song.

BobMbx on December 31, 2011 at 12:12 PM

You mean like water?

Oldnuke on December 31, 2011 at 11:28 AM

Now you are just being silly. Don’t over-complicate things. Next you’ll be suggesting complicated “forced air” systems with fancy schmancy fans and “switches” and what not.

Axe on December 31, 2011 at 12:10 PM

Thermocouples. Although you’ll need to tow a battery to power the cooling system. And then cool that battery.

BobMbx on December 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM

They can’t come up with a non-conductive cooling fluid for an electric car? I guess these grant recipients aren’t rocket scientists – or chemists?

You mean something like DISTILLED WATER!

LeftCoastRight on December 31, 2011 at 12:15 PM

I think that’s my Ford Escort after my ex girlfriend found out I was cheating on her.

rickyricardo on December 31, 2011 at 10:33 AM

I doubt it since you obviously weren’t in it at the time….

Kraken on December 31, 2011 at 12:17 PM

Ya, I know, it’s not cost efficient or energy efficient, but it’s certainly a cool idea and it doesn’t use that evil hydrocarbon nor feed those evil oil barons.

Skandia Recluse on December 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM

Oh, and adding to Skandia…..the plastic is organic from a plastic farm in the Czech Republic, not from petroleum leftovers. And those leather seats? Paper-based.

And the tires are made from recycled ceramics. They don’t hold up to well but man, they hold their shine a lot longer.

BobMbx on December 31, 2011 at 12:19 PM

Then go buy one and let us know how you like it.

Why would I want to buy one when I wrote that it was, “… expensive, too heavy (2 1/2 tons,) and because of its small interior, considered a subcompact”?

There may be a market for this car, just as there is for the Maybach, the Koenigsegg Agera and the various cars of the Morgan Motor Co..

But again there shouldn’t be government support for ventures like this, (IOW, let the market decide,) and manufacturing glitches — such as the possibility of wheels falling off your Ford Fusion are to be expected, though not desired.

Reno_Dave on December 31, 2011 at 12:22 PM

Thermocouples. Although you’ll need to tow a battery to power the cooling system. And then cool that battery.

BobMbx on December 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM

I was thinking a SNAP reactor. They only weigh about 5000 lbs, use mercury as a coolant and put out a whopping 30 watts of power. Makes as much sense as using a gasoline generator to charge a battery to power an electric motor to turn a drive train.

Oldnuke on December 31, 2011 at 12:27 PM

Ya, I know, it’s not cost efficient or energy efficient, but it’s certainly a cool idea and it doesn’t use that evil hydrocarbon nor feed those evil oil barons.

Skandia Recluse on December 31, 2011 at 11:52 AM

A battery stores a potential. The potential has to be created. The potential is created by evil hydrocarbons and oil barons.

It might be more efficient to just skip the whole lossy process of creating, transmitting, and storing the potential, and just use the hydrocarbons directly to generate mechanical energy. For the moment.

. . . We might also walk, or have people carry our boxes on their shoulders, according to social station, weather, and distance.

Axe on December 31, 2011 at 12:29 PM

But again there shouldn’t be government support for ventures like this, (IOW, let the market decide,)

Reno_Dave on December 31, 2011 at 12:22 PM

We agree on that! I disagree that there’s any real market for these things though. The Maybach is a rich man’s toy electric cars are just oddities and I think they’re just going to go away.

Oldnuke on December 31, 2011 at 12:30 PM

It might be more efficient to just skip the whole lossy process of creating, transmitting, and storing the potential, and just use the hydrocarbons directly to generate mechanical energy. For the moment.

Axe on December 31, 2011 at 12:29 PM

Luddite! Why do you hate polar bears…and children?

Oldnuke on December 31, 2011 at 12:32 PM

Oldnuke on December 31, 2011 at 12:32 PM

lol … they sneak into my garden and munch my tomatoes :)

You got everything I wanted to say into one line, anyway. I’ll just sip punch and be quiet.

Makes as much sense as using a gasoline generator to charge a battery to power an electric motor to turn a drive train.

Axe on December 31, 2011 at 12:40 PM

It seems that Fisker Automotive is going to have a short life.

Electric cars are Finnish ed …

… all due to bad Karma …

Arbalest on December 31, 2011 at 12:46 PM

I wonder what the deprecation is on one of these suckers?

Cindy Munford on December 31, 2011 at 11:35 AM

100% as soon as you drive in off the lot.

Rod on December 31, 2011 at 12:52 PM

It might be more efficient to just skip the whole lossy process of creating, transmitting, and storing the potential, and just use the hydrocarbons directly to generate mechanical energy. For the moment.

There are many losses in a standard powertrain. IIRC, horsepower measured on a chassis dyno is 10% – 15% lower than the rated horsepower of the engine due to frictional losses in the transmission and final drive.

The hybrid benefits from recapturing kinetic energy using regenerative braking, which is one of the reasons why city mileage is usually better than highway mileage. Conventional brakes swap kinetic energy for heat, which is wasted in the process.

The gas engine in a plug-in hybrid like the Volt and Karma can be much smaller than the engine in a “normal” car, because it only has to be sized for average energy consumed, since the peaks caused by acceleration and ascending grades can be covered by the higher HP electric motors using battery charge. Also, the engine can be designed to run at it’s most efficient in a relatively limited RPM range.

Still, while I think that these cars are interesting from an engineering perspective, I’m still not sure they make sense from a cost and “overall” energy consumption standpoint, i.e., the energy required to manufacture, operate over the service life, and (eventually) to dispose or recycle the car and power systems.

FWIW, I drive a 2006 BMW 325Ci. It gets roughly 20MPG city, and 31MPG Hwy. I’d rather have it than a Karma or Prius.

Reno_Dave on December 31, 2011 at 1:13 PM

So opposing the government taking my money and throwing it at crony-connected companies that all seem to fail = Luddite?
I don’t think Luddite means what you think it means.
iurockhead on December 31, 2011 at 11:00 AM

Opposing leftists’ statist theology and failed, mush-brained scams =”luddite”.

Dr. Carlo Lombardi on December 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM

Comment pages: 1 2