Video: Newt gets emotional; Update: “I won’t cry,” says Romney; Update: More context; Update: Video added
posted at 5:00 pm on December 30, 2011 by Allahpundit
Touching and obviously heartfelt, yet naturally processed by politicos as a potential gamechanging “Hillary moment” for Gingrich on the eve of a big vote. I doubt it’ll change much. Hillary had to beat one guy in New Hampshire when she welled up; Newt has to beat four, all of whom have been trending upwards in the polls while he sinks. He needs more than a sweet, humanizing interlude to rally the base.
Maybe he needs … this:
Gingrich, speaking Wednesday during a conference call with conservative voters hosted by Ralph Reed’s Faith and Freedom Coalition, was asked by one of the attendees whether he would consider Palin as a running mate.
“She is certainly one of the people you would look at. I am a great admirer of hers and she was a remarkable reform governor of Alaska, she’s somebody who I think brings a great deal to the possibility of helping in government and that would be one of the possibilities,” Gingrich said, according to Right Wing Watch…
“There are also some very important Cabinet positions that she could fill very, very well,” Gingrich said. “I can’t imagine anybody who would do a better job of driving us to an energy solution than Gov. Palin, for example. Tell her that she would certainly be on the list of one of the people we would consider.”
She nearly rescued one big-government conservative’s failing candidacy three years ago. Second time’s the charm?
Your amazing stat of the day comes courtesy of CNN, which reports that nearly half of all political ads that ran in Iowa this month were attacks on Gingrich. Exit quotation: “Politics has become a really nasty, vicious, negative business and I think it’s disgusting and I think it’s dishonest.”
Update: Really? Tweaking the guy for getting choked up about his dead mother?
Here in Merrimack, Romney started talking about his parents and what they meant to him, and how they taught him to love America — and said, “No, no, I won’t cry.”
Update: Actually, without more context, it’s hard to tell if Romney was aiming that at Gingrich. Goofing on a guy for tearing up about his mom is in poor enough taste that I’d guess Romney would resist for strategic reasons even if he was tempted to do it. It may be that he’s been so busy on the trail today that he hasn’t even heard yet about what happened to Newt. Maybe he was just making a joke about how reminiscing about mom and dad is apt to make anyone a little misty. Maybe?
Update: To put it another way, why would a guy as famously, robotically on-message as Romney risk generating a sympathy vote for Gingrich at the last minute by goofing on him for crying? Every move he makes seems carefully plotted to maximize his advantage. He might be this nasty in private, but in public? Four days before the big vote? It would be a catastrophic, uncharacteristic lapse in his usual M.O.
Update: Turns out Romney didn’t bring up crying, a questioner did. And even when he replied, he was careful to say there’s nothing wrong with it:
The context of the Romney comment came, amid his discussion of his parents, with a voter saying, “Don’t cry.” Romney repeated it, saying, “No, no, I won’t cry,” and then followed up with, “There’s no harm in that.” Romney’s camp argues strenuously that he was not in any way tweaking Gingrich, and that he made that clear.
This guy’s not going to take needless risks.
Update: Here’s the clip.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 18 Next »
I guess my point above is that the party establishment has been full of soft loser moderates for decades. They have been dismissive and insulting towards conservatives in the party for pretty much my entire life.
It’s only when the people rise up against them and force conservative candidates down their throats that we get victory and the change we want. And even then they do what they can to undermine them (see: Gingrich in the ’90s and the Tea Party). What we are going through right now isn’t new at all and we can’t wait for the party to reform, we have to ignore them and elect the right candidates in spite of them.
29Victor on March 16, 2013 at 3:54 PM
He was had been in a very tight race with dewhurst and iirc dewhurst beat him in the primary. Perhaps she has a touch more influence than local political talk show hosts.
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 3:55 PM
ROFL. How about Cruz’s own words then?
Sorry that unlike Cruz you aren’t man enough to admit the truth.
unseen on March 16, 2013 at 3:55 PM
What on earth would a pathetic leftist like you know about commonsense? Or Conservatism for that matter?
Bmore on March 16, 2013 at 3:55 PM
One of the RINO and Democrats BFF!
bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 3:55 PM
Whaaaat?! Was that idiot fundie partly responsible for that…that national mashup of “EEK Gubbamint death panelz!” and ultra-extreme ‘pro-life’ dipwads that made a deluded laughingstock of so many people?
Oh man, now I have one more good reason to hate him.
MelonCollie on March 16, 2013 at 3:55 PM
The TEA Party Patriots WORKED to get Romney elected in 2012. Will ‘moderate’ republicans at least try to support TEA Party candidates, or will we AGAIN get “I can’t do that” in 2014?
DannoJyd on March 16, 2013 at 3:56 PM
Good speech. Wish she had run in 2012, still hope she will in 2016, but guess we’ll see.
I’m pretty confident she’ll be advancing the cause, though, and that 2014 will see her in the trenches trying to make sure some grassroots/Tea Party candidates get publicity & $ to make a run for it.
As to the speech- I think one of the best lines was something about “never have our challenges been greater… or our leaders smaller.”
Hammer, meet head of nail…
cs89 on March 16, 2013 at 3:56 PM
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 3:53 PM
Once again:
1. Romeney failed to rally the factions, after fighting his own side better than the leftists ever could.
2. All who brung/kept Obama, no matter who you are, may he destroy you.
I don’t know how to explain this better.
I love the TEA (taxed enough already) and never mentioned it negatively, her, nor anywhere else.
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 3:56 PM
S/b TEA party
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 3:57 PM
herhere, nor anywhere elseSchadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 3:58 PM
The first flag officer in the chain-of-command has to authorize any travel. I’m not saying it is right but this is the reality under Obama’s sequestration decisions. No White House tours but spending nearly $1M for the rat-eared bastard to travel to Chicago to attack Republicans is an acceptable expense.
Just wait until the 22nd (next Friday). That’s when the DoD drops its furlough notices on civilian employees.
Happy Nomad on March 16, 2013 at 3:58 PM
He’s most likely meeting with Jebbie and the RINOS trying to figure out what to do about Paul, Cruz, Lee, Walker and…now, Sarah!! LOL
bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 3:58 PM
I was somewhat underwhelmed. The problem may be one of expectations. It appears Palin is settling into the role of the female Will Rogers of the Republican party — developing a familiar and crowd-pleasing style and patter seemingly for some purpose other than defining herself as a serious agent of change or future leadership. I’ve heard much of the essential content of this speech before. It was fun and sharp and is always good to hear, but I was hoping for more, and something with more gravity and pounds per square inch on the downward bite. But that may not be what she wants for herself.
rrpjr on March 16, 2013 at 3:58 PM
I didn’t get that from your first comment but there’s no point in arguing with someone who agrees with you. Happy st. pats.
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 3:59 PM
Like I said, I was there. And here on HotAir noting the exact moment she endorsed him when he was well ahead. I’d look it up if I cared.
She seems to have a good knack though for pulling everyone over the finish line (but herself).
Marcus on March 16, 2013 at 3:59 PM
unseen on March 16, 2013 at 3:59 PM
Bmore, I have a photoshop idea for your “booklet”.
Consider, pls., a theme of O-Transparency. One c/b the Chinese wall and Oaf behind it, in his red tie…and so forth, with other examples. Maybe folks here can contribute to it.
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 3:59 PM
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 3:59 PM
Happy St. Patrick, for tomorrow!
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 4:00 PM
The only race she “lost” was mccain’s, and even steve schmidt conceded McCain would have lost much, much worse without her.
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 4:00 PM
.
What lonestar1 said.
.
.
.
.
Weren’t they GREAT, folks? … Give ‘em a hand !
listens2glenn on March 16, 2013 at 4:02 PM
I think a lot more people are in a more angrier mood than in 2012.
Hope we can all work across the nation like we did in 2010.
bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM
This is seriously a MASTERFUL speech. She’s wrong, of course, about everything. But the #SHADE is *masterfully* done.
libfreeordie on March 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM
How about a shot from behind of some (literally faceless) bureaucrat leaving the Oval Office with a caption about Richard Windsor meeting with the President to discuss climate change.
Happy Nomad on March 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM
Thanks for the summary. I can’t see this vid on this computer and wanted some idea of what she said. I was doing an internet search to see if there was an embedded video somewhere (there wasn’t) and came across the …..”Wonkette” site ??. They are simply going nutz over there………she mustuv done somethun right. Heh!
Gig ‘em, Sarah!
avagreen on March 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM
of course.
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM
A little wee weed up?
idesign on March 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM
I’ve challenged you before to provide evidence to support your claim that Mitt Romney attacked Palin. Put up or shut up.
Basilsbest on March 16, 2013 at 4:04 PM
She is right, and you know it, no matter what perspective the “right” is meant to be interpreted from.
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 4:04 PM
Palin……Best Republican speaker going. Most talented female politician I have ever seen. Doesn’t stand with the establishment. Is such a threat to the establishment that they and the media try and destroy her. Sad country we live in.
KMav on March 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM
And you’d be right! :D
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM
That is my hope as well. And I think, honestly, it is the Dems greatest fear as they see this administration act in such a ham-handed and tone deaf way to push through controversial legislation.
Happy Nomad on March 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM
David Keene NRA President on CPAC, TV C-Span on now.
bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM
And, for the record, Nomad, I say stupid sh!t all the time. I know how easy it is.
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:06 PM
Happy Nomad on March 16, 2013 at 4:03 PM
That’s the spirit.
Maybe libnotfree can contribute samples too.
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 4:06 PM
Be charitable. Be kind. The “UnSkewedPolls.com”-types are the short bus students of today’s Republican party. ;)
Kent18 on March 16, 2013 at 4:08 PM
Seems the Romney supporters here are not happy with Palin’s speech….
I wonder why that is?
idesign on March 16, 2013 at 4:08 PM
Sometimes there is a flicker of hope.
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 4:09 PM
Thanks for the link to The Hill. It’s a good place to read, but from personal experience I’ve discovered several posters that have no ID nor profile that make posts that stir up a lot of replies. I’m disappointed in The Hill as these obviously their employees throwing out garbage to get extra posts.
*sad*
avagreen on March 16, 2013 at 4:10 PM
Well Schmidt ‘Dr. Evil’ and Nicole Wallace ‘norma desmond’ are mostly condottieri, detailed from the Bushes, but Madden and Mike ‘Iceberg’ murphy, were in Mitten’s inner circle,
narciso on March 16, 2013 at 4:10 PM
– excerpted from Peggy Noonan’s WHAT I OVERHEARD AT THE ROMNEY INAUGURAL BALL
Kent18 on March 16, 2013 at 4:10 PM
To be fair, she had a mighty large anchor weighing her down. It was called McCain.
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:11 PM
I know you don’t care about facts, but …
Pork-Chop on March 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM
LOL! She is reading Karl Rove for blood honey, YAAS!
libfreeordie on March 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM
What? You mean Mr. “You have absolutely nothing to fear from Barack Obama in the White House“…? The devil you say. ;)
Kent18 on March 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM
…shut-up and keep your hand busy!
KOOLAID2 on March 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM
Happy Nomad on March 16, 2013 at 3:51 PM
Santorum’s home state is Pennsylvania, and he was on the ballot there.
Remember the Cain assassination – how all of it miraculously went away when he quit the primary.
PJ Emeritus on March 16, 2013 at 4:14 PM
libdie! How’s it going?
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:14 PM
Amazing, isn’t it? Just when her enemies think she’s done, she comes bursting out again. She really should charge them all rent, LOL Now they are all talking about her and making B.O. soooo jealous, LOL
Go Sarah!!
bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 4:14 PM
I have added it to the queue.
Bmore on March 16, 2013 at 4:15 PM
.
There’s no fooling you, is there ?
listens2glenn on March 16, 2013 at 4:15 PM
Yep,there is simply no one on any scene today better at riling them up. Whether they be haters or lovers. ; )
Bmore on March 16, 2013 at 4:17 PM
You know, if the GOP could ever actually have a cadre of candidates who, as Palin suggests, were divorced from major corporations, who genuinely articulated free markets rather than “pro business” who argued that those within a state had a right to directly benefit from their own natural resources, that critiqued campaign contributions for influence trading and raised money in ways that matched those arguments AND combined them with the charisma and charm of this speech, it would be a very formidable opponents for Democrats.
The problem of course is that Palin either doesn’t know (or doesn’t care) that the cost of modern day campaigning means it would be impossible to actually field those kinds of candidates. If they are independently wealthy than there is no question they have ties to crony capitalists and if they aren’t, how will they ever get on a ballot without corporate money? The question is, does or does she not know the impossibility of that? If she knows it, then this is incredibly cynical. If she doesn’t…where has she been?
libfreeordie on March 16, 2013 at 4:17 PM
Libs on twitter are going nuts too. Something about this woman just sets ‘em off.
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 4:18 PM
B-b-b-but…. obama raised all his money via grassroots! $250 or less! From all those people who wanted ‘change’!
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:19 PM
You obviously don’t know me very well…
d1carter on March 16, 2013 at 4:19 PM
Just because it was too hard for your hero to keep his principles doesn’t mean it’s too hard for everyone.
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM
That is so awesome. Thanks for sharing.
bluefox on March 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM
Lets see the GOP do it.
libfreeordie on March 16, 2013 at 4:22 PM
it costs about $350 to get on the ballot.
unseen on March 16, 2013 at 4:22 PM
OK which one of you taseed bluegill. Confess.
katy the mean old lady on March 16, 2013 at 4:22 PM
LOL, at the childish name calling. Trust me…most that post here are embarrassments as well. 5 year old cheeto eaters.
rubberneck on March 16, 2013 at 4:23 PM
Actually McCain abided by the campaign laws, what a sucker he was, while Obama scooped every spare dollar, from AIG to Washington Mutual.
narciso on March 16, 2013 at 4:24 PM
@SarahPalinUSA: I posted 8 photos on Facebook in the album “CPAC 2013″ http://t.co/g262uhKnHT
idesign on March 16, 2013 at 4:24 PM
C’mon, libdie. You remember how obama was gonna change the world? You remember? Other countries were gonna love us? We were gonna have jobs out the wazoo? The ‘rich’ were gonna pay their ‘fair’ share? There was gonna be the most transparent administration in history?
MUST I post this quote again? And, bear in mind, all these idiocies were from his campaign or first year in orifice:
I wouldn’t say that Palin is definitely a moron because she drew a blank at perky Katie’s question about what periodicals she read. I’d like to see more well-documented, recorded blunders before dismissing her as a mindless talking head.
Did she call Europe a “country?” Did she say Austrians speak “Austrian?” Did she say Hawaii is in Asia? Did she say that there are 57 states? Does she think we need more “Arabic translators” in Afghanistan so we can understand the natives? Does she believe we have an “intercontinental” railroad?
Does she think the Constitution was written “20 centuries ago?” Did she claim that Emma Lazarus raised funds to build the Statue of Liberty? Does she think Mexico was a nation before the US was even an idea? Did the American army liberate Auschwitz?
Does she celebrate “Cinco de Cuatro”, admire the Penn State “Nitally” Lions, and root for the White Sox (not a one of whom she can identify by name) while reminiscing about the good ol’ days at “Cominskey Field?” Does she commend navy “corpse-men” and give a shout-out to the many fallen heroes who are in her audience? Does she lament the 10,000 dead in a Kansas storm when the death toll is actually 12? Does she really think a payment can decrease by 3000%? If she has asthma, does she grab for her “breathalyzer?”
Those are just a handful of idiocies I can pull off the top of my head.
But, of course, Sarah Palin did not utter them.
Please don’t say Palin doesn’t ‘know’.
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:24 PM
Santorum is from Pennsylvania but most nights he puts his head to pillow in a different commonwealth. He has been living near Leesburg for years.
Gingrich is from Georgia but he too has been living in the Old Dominion for years.
Both Santorum and Gingrich ran such bad campaigns they could not get on the ballot here. We got to choose between Mitt Romney and Ron Paul in the primaries. If VA was such a battleground you think that Santorum and Gingrich would have done a better job of pulsing this particular electorate. A win could have potentially changed the whole dynamic.
Happy Nomad on March 16, 2013 at 4:25 PM
Meh. Weak. CW has called me Lance-boy on many occasions. I just chuckled quietly to myself. Never called him out on it.
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:26 PM
libfreeordie on March 16, 2013 at 4:17 PM
Your objectivity will note that Obama is bought and sold by crony capitalims, Wall Street and banks.
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 4:26 PM
“Merely because a cloud has passed over the sun, is not an impetus for me to need to prove to you that the sun still exists. Let your own foolishness deny you eviidence of The Universe.”
…..you are an IDIOT!
williamg on March 16, 2013 at 4:26 PM
Here ya go.
Bmore on March 16, 2013 at 4:27 PM
Does this mean that you gave up on Obama’s principles?
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 4:27 PM
My, look how excited the kids are.
Sarah Palin, still the patron saint of the Republican low information voters. Just another way she has never been anything but the Republican Obama, without the media love obsession.
She shouldn’t say anything about bad reality TV anyway. What’s next, making fun of someone’s big hair?
She lost that Fox News money. Time to crank up the fan club for another gig.
Moesart on March 16, 2013 at 4:27 PM
People want to dismiss Palin because she shows up most of the rest of the parasites in politics as the do-nothing pretenders they all are. Did you know that this woman fulfilled ALL of her campaign promises as governor BEFORE she stepped down? But of course it’s the politicians who spend their entire lives in politics and never do anything who are to be preferred to the “quitter.”
Aitch748 on March 16, 2013 at 4:27 PM
I couldn’t expect “the GOP” to do anything uniformly. If Palin were to mount a presidential run, her fundraising operation would be stellar and much cleaner than mr. “I don’t verify the addresses of online donors” obama.
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 4:27 PM
Yet another thing you know 0 about. Trust. Laughable though.
Bmore on March 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM
Looks like a campaign ad to me..:)
@SarahPalinUSA: Please SHARE this image if you agree that we need to rebuild our country! http://t.co/pFidoReJaW
idesign on March 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM
Heh! Someone left the irony on!
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM
Dang, you’re good/quick.
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM
Okay, I missed this earlier but it definitely gets at least honorable mention as best post of the day.
Happy Nomad on March 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM
I would expect a quip from her about big hair. Her humor is self-deprecating, and you clearly don’t get it.
alwaysfiredup on March 16, 2013 at 4:29 PM
Meanwhile my share of the R party is growing. Thanks in large part to Sarah. The side I detest is on the wane.
Bmore on March 16, 2013 at 4:29 PM
My record of critiquing Obama’s ability to gobble up Wall Street money during the 2008 campaignand his willingness to serve their interests in a variety of ways is well documented here and in other forums. I mean you can direct the “you drank the kool-aid” in my direction if you want, it may make you feel better than doing it to the Obama-phile in your life. But, just recognize you’re not speaking to anyone who ever was sucked in. The announcement of Tim Geithner erased any thought that this was going to be an “of the people” administration. I’m not responsible for the media narrative around his campaign funds.
libfreeordie on March 16, 2013 at 4:29 PM
…the man with the lance…is back!
KOOLAID2 on March 16, 2013 at 4:30 PM
Happy Nomad on March 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM
Hey “black smoke” might be racist and un-PC now :)
Schadenfreude on March 16, 2013 at 4:31 PM
McLame lost his own race when he decided to reign in Sarah. We could have won Michigan IF Juan didn’t keep her out of my state!
I lost count of the number of people who made their first visit to our GOP Victory HQ because of the lady, and she is still regarded most highly amongst the TEA Party Patriot GRASS ROOTS WORKERS.
In 2012 I heard bupkiss about Willard at either of the MIGOP Conventions, and even less at the GOP Victory HQ. Draw your own conclusions as I have.
DannoJyd on March 16, 2013 at 4:31 PM
Hey, maybe you need to start posting at The Huffington Post or Gawker…
You sound like a deranged liberal..:)
idesign on March 16, 2013 at 4:31 PM
Only on the easy ones. ; )
Bmore on March 16, 2013 at 4:32 PM
Did you vote for him?
Lanceman on March 16, 2013 at 4:32 PM
and I told you to do some research.
unseen on March 16, 2013 at 4:33 PM
Awesome. I really love the photo of Phyllis and Sarah!
Pork-Chop on March 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM
MSNBC just reported that they will get back to their viewers when the find out what was in Sarah Palin’s big cup.
I’m serious…LOL
idesign on March 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM
Eleventy thousand or bust!
BallisticBob on March 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM
Some of these Establishment folks around here need to get over it!! This is the third time Ted Cruz has stated emphatically that Sarah was key to him being elected. He also reminded folks that she was instrumental in other candidates winning in 2010 and 2012. She helps and not hurt conservatism. While the Republican Establishment in D.C. loses and loses and just want to maintain power, not to destroy liberalism but just to retain that power, Sarah and others are doing the heavy lifting around the country rallying folks for a common cause. She is Mrs Irrelevant because the media, the libs and the GOPE want her to be and she ain’t going away!!!!!
journeymike on March 16, 2013 at 4:37 PM
Yeah, I remember “no-drama Obama”….only about 6 months in, simply detailing the mundane, everyday action of doctors cutting off people’s feet for extra scratch.
This is yet another thing started by his sycophantic media.
Axeman on March 16, 2013 at 4:37 PM
The TEA Party Patriots WORKED to get Romney elected in 2012. Will ‘moderate’ republicans at least try to support TEA Party candidates, or will we AGAIN get “I can’t do that” in 2014?
Willard?
Willard?
Willard?
DannoJyd on March 16, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Yes, you are, rubber head.
RovesChins on March 16, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Romney didn’t say one bad word about Chris Christie.
I like Romney and Palin, but the Palinistas don’t make it easy. The only way to maintain my respect for Palin is to ignore the Palinistas. That’s why I usually try to avoid the Palin threads. It’s a pity.
Gelsomina on March 16, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Liberals remain dependent on the welfare provided by the more capable people. Didn’t you get the memo?
DannoJyd on March 16, 2013 at 4:41 PM
The first time evah commenting on a Sarah post [gritting teeth]…
The Governor certainly is fiscally and socially conservative, unlike the majority of modern-day Republicans.
I certainly don’t view her as a victim–although she certainly has been victimized by the below-the-belt TACTICS of the tyrannical socialists in the media-entertainment complex.
Frankly, I think she’d be a great president. However, I believe that the attacks by the leftists have succeeded, and made her unelectable for a major public office. She can be of best help to the conservative cause by remaining out of electoral politics, and firing regular m0rtar rounds from the sidelines.
[bracing for return fire]
FlatlanderByTheLake on March 16, 2013 at 4:42 PM
Palin ran for Governor on a shoestring budget made up of lots of tiny donations against a deeply-entrenched Republican incumbent flush with cash from big donors, and she trounced him. So she knows firsthand that it is possible, because she’s done it.
Walter Sobchak on March 16, 2013 at 4:42 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 18 Next »