Maria Conchita Alonso to Sean Penn: Let’s face it, you’re a communist A-hole
posted at 5:26 pm on December 20, 2011 by Allahpundit
Via the New York Post, which has an account of their angry exchange at LAX, 15 solid minutes of hippie-punching goodness. Skip ahead to 5:30 for the meaty bits. She wrote an open letter to Penn last year unloading on him for his cretinous Chavista apologetics and I guess he must have remembered because allegedly the word “pig” ended up being thrown around during their chat — and not by Alonso. Quoth the NYP:
Penn, traveling from Haiti, told us: “I only knew that a hostile woman was nonsensically berating me. I didn’t realize it was that actress. I think I worked with her once. But she looks really different. She was uninformed and impolite to all the other passengers.” The two starred in the 1988 film “Colors,” as lovers on different sides of the gang war in Los Angeles.
If you’ve never seen it, go watch Penn defend Chavez’s decision to deny a broadcasting license to an opposition Venezuelan TV station in 2007. The pretext for that was the station’s alleged complicity in a coup attempt against Chavez in 2002, a charge that was never proved in court; the regime’s decision not to renew its license was wildly unpopular in Venezuela and among international media rights groups but Chavez went ahead with it anyway. The interesting thing about the old Penn clip isn’t that he backs Chavez on it — that’s simply a useful idiot being a useful idiot — but that he accuses the station of having regularly called for Chavez’s assassination. That’s never been part of the case against them from what I’ve read on the subject; it smells like propaganda that Chavez or one of his apparatchiks might have fed to Penn for occasions just like this, thinking that he’d eat it up and regurgitate it as necessary. Darned if they weren’t right.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Indeed
workingclass artist on May 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM
I wonder who would have come out on top..
Obama or Mitt..
Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM
Biteme or Paul
Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM
McCain or Obama
Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:04 PM
Sarah or Biteme
Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:04 PM
Boehner or Botox..
Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:05 PM
West or Hank
Electrongod on May 1, 2013 at 8:07 PM
We need tazers in the senate. And, a cage in the house.
Only ONE can survive!
RovesChins on May 1, 2013 at 8:07 PM
Keep duking it out, you might not get control but you may get more of a say in what goes on. The owwie looks like it hurts.
Cindy Munford on May 1, 2013 at 8:11 PM
Do you think Ted Cruz and Paul Ryan can be out of politics by then?
Yeah. Me neither.
WryTrvllr on May 1, 2013 at 8:13 PM
A leftist, is a leftist, is a leftist.
rob verdi on May 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM
And I didn’t think Venezuelan politics could take another black-eye. Silly me.
Flange on May 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM
We can only pray that our conservative legislators, in both chambers, would do the same. I can’t tell you how much I’d give to see some jabs and right hooks on the faces of some of the wussy-Ds and -Rs, for that matter.
This would be must-see TV, for sure, and would raise the Q-factor among the LIVs for the Republicans who threw some great punches and groin kicks.
TXUS on May 1, 2013 at 8:37 PM
Flashback to 2007: “Turkish MPs fight during election reform debate.”
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on May 1, 2013 at 8:44 PM
They need a new permission structure.
Curtiss on May 1, 2013 at 8:48 PM
When Chavez got couped when first elected, the plotters failed the de gracie part. All this trouble would not be occurring if Hugo would have been given the dirt nap in 2002.
arnold ziffel on May 1, 2013 at 9:10 PM
Eh. In Ukraine, this is simply how the chairman calls for new business. It’s so common there, that the opposition even has a ringer. Alas, he has too much class to participate.
Of course, over there it’s mostly flabby guys weakly wailing on each other, as opposed to PSUV thugs toppling and kicking women.
Gingotts on May 1, 2013 at 9:23 PM
Don’t bet on it. As Alvaro Vargas Llosa & Co. point out in Guide to the Perfect Latin American Idiot, this is typical of caudillo rule in the region.
Elections there operate on the twin principles of “One man, one vote- once” and “It doesn’t matter if you win or lose, it matters that I win”. This is especially true of leftist regimes. Purges of opponents are the default action of such governments, and have been since before United Fruit Co. existed. (It exploited existing conditions; it did not create them.)
Or in other words, they’re behaving exactly as they did under Chavez’.
Expecting Maduro to behave differently than his former boss is what I would expect from progressives. Anyone else should have figured out by now that in a culture which tends to breed brutal dictators, those who can count on apologists from the ranks of the “enlightened” in the developed world will feel the freest to indulge themselves in their Platonic/Robespierresque fantasies.
clear ether
eon
eon on May 1, 2013 at 9:32 PM
Lindsay Grhamnesty, John “My Friends” McCant, and John Bohenor all fight like girls.
Myron Falwell on May 1, 2013 at 9:44 PM
And why I qualified my remarks. Agreed.
TXUS on May 1, 2013 at 9:55 PM
The question that I BELIEVE this leaves us with is:
Has there been ENOUGH Violence in Venezuela Over This?
williamg on May 1, 2013 at 10:04 PM
…I know some politicians in DC…I would like to look like that!
…I wouldn’t mind being their make-up artist!
KOOLAID2 on May 1, 2013 at 10:04 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preston_Brooks
unclesmrgol on May 2, 2013 at 12:12 AM
For a split second I read that as Charles Schumer, and found myself rooting for the guy.
Seriously though, easy to notice even back then that it tends to be the opponents of freedom that always jump to beating. Nasty freedom lovers standing in the way with their principles? Time to resort to thuggery. Original rabid supporters of slavery, 20th and 21st century union thugs and corruptocrats forcing us all into slavery, Venezuelan tinpot dictators overseeing a nation of slaves… nothing new under the sun.
Gingotts on May 2, 2013 at 1:25 AM
Not that I want our government to engage in unneccessary spending, especially now, but… I may be misinterpreting this article, but it sounds like this is a test or prototype fuel cost for a evaluation test program. I am assuming the company supplying the fuel is not in regular production with this fuel. The cost per gallon is not really out of line with my experience with the cost of prototype parts for my industry versus standard production costs. In our case we do not have production tools yet and there are a lot of slow & expensive prototype processes. In the case of a prototype fuel I would imagine they either run a small batch refining process or have to shut down production equipment and set up a short run, then clean the system out to go back to standard production product. Both ways would be a much more expensive process. Again I don’t think we should be doing this testing while we are running monster deficits, but the costs are probably not too far out of line. FWIW
long dogs on May 4, 2013 at 12:20 AM