Video: Gingrich gets heckled by Occupiers in Iowa

posted at 1:25 pm on December 15, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

Because nothing says anti-fascism like hijacking and shouting down a political event, right? When Newt Gingrich tried speaking to students at the University of Iowa yesterday, a group of Occupiers disrupted the event — to the disgust and amusement of most of the audience. At one point, someone shouts, “How many people would like to hear Mr. Gingrich speak today?”, a question answered by loud applause:

“I’m going to try to talk over them,” Gingrich finally said, after several minutes. From there, the audience began to quiet down. The candidate made a coy allusion to Occupy Wall Street’s “We Are the 99%” slogan, saying, “I appreciate the fact that 95 percent of you — maybe even 99 percent of you — try and have an intelligent discussion.”

“Not a fat chance!” [s]omeone yelled in response.

“Rather than the 1 percent who try to impose their will by making noise,” Gingrich continued.

After that, the former House Speaker began an uninterrupted lecture, given without notes, that addressed the deleterious effect of Alzheimer’s and other brain-degenerative diseases on the economy and on the American public. In Gingrich’s view, our ability to study and understand the brain is rapidly developing; he suggested that creating incentives for new brain research would be a cornerstone of his domestic policy.

“This is a very big idea in an area that not many political leaders are willing to tackle,” he said. “It will lead to a dramatic explosion of new science that will lead directly to a better quality outcome for health, which would lower the cost of health care, which would help solve our long-term budget problems and would create a huge new zone for growing American jobs.”

I’m not sure that the Occupiers want to take on Newt Gingrich, who has already demonstrated his ability to demolish them in debate. Of course, that wasn’t what the Occupiers were offering. In fact, I am almost positive that Gingrich would love to take them on in a debate, and probably would have done so at the University of Iowa if the Occupiers had promised to behave themselves and let him speak.  I’d pay cash money to see that event.

While Gingrich campaigns in Iowa and appears to be losing some momentum, Politico asks whether Team Gingrich has taken the state seriously enough, and uses the UI appearance as one of its points:

Gingrich is getting pounded on Iowa TV by both a pro-Mitt Romney super PAC and Ron Paul’scampaign and is doing little to fight back against ads which take direct aim at him. Less than three weeks before the caucuses, the former speaker is airing a single commercial with little money behind it.

And while Gingrich’s top rivals here flood the airwaves, three of his lesser challengers — all vying for the same swath of undecided conservative votes — began barnstorming the state in an intensive retail push before the January 3rd vote.

Gingrich’s response suggests a lack of urgency: on Wednesday he held a wonky seminar on brain science in this liberal college town. He had plans to return to Washington for a book-signing after Thursday’s debate in Sioux City, without scheduling any public events in the conservative-heavy northwest corner of the state. …

Gingrich promised to do more retail events – he teased a post-Christmas bus tour – and said he’d do more ads.

But he also offered a mix of nonchalance and high-road confidence in explaining that he didn’t have enough money to match his rivals’ ad campaign and, in any event, wasn’t inclined to engage in traditional back-and-forth on the airwaves.

This looks less to me like a candidate not taking the task seriously, and more like one making a virtue out of necessity.  Although fundraising has certainly picked up for Gingrich, his campaign debt has hampered his ability to mount a media campaign on the same scale as his better-funded opponents, Mitt Romney and Rick Perry (and Ron Paul, too).  The return to Washington is curious; perhaps the book-signing event is part of a fundraiser, or scheduled around one?  At a time when Perry has decided to drive a thousand miles and make dozens of personal appearances to increase an interesting rise in his polling numbers, Gingrich’s return to DC doesn’t exactly look engaged, unless it’s to raise money for the home stretch in Iowa.

Gingrich does have a new ad out today, another positive spot coming to us from Jim Geraghty, called “We Deserve Solutions”:

These are challenging and important times for America. We want and deserve solutions. Others seem to be more focused on attacks rather than moving the country forward. That’s up to them. I believe bold ideas and new solutions will unleash America’s creative spirit. When I was Speaker, our budget was balanced and 11 million jobs were created. We can do it again and rebuild the America we love. I’m Newt Gingrich and I approve this message.

Well, it’s mostly positive; it does take a swipe at “others” running negative ads in Iowa as a differentiation, but the ad mainly focuses on Gingrich’s real accomplishments as Speaker. It’s very possible that this will get drowned in the saturation ad campaigns from Romney and Perry, though, unless Gingrich gets on the ground in earnest to augment the argument in person.

Update: Chris Lacey forwards me this calculation of candidate time in Iowa, and it looks like Gingrich has taken Iowa pretty seriously indeed.  Through yesterday, Gingrich spent 44 days in 28 separate visits to the state.  That far outstrips Perry at 18/10, although Perry didn’t get into the race until three months after Newt.  Mitt Romney has only visited 8 times for 10 days, which I would presume are almost all debate-related appearances.  Tops on the list are Rick Santorum, who has spent 83 days in 30 separate visits to Iowa, and Michele Bachmann, with 60 days in 28 visits.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

At least they didn’t poop on him.

Ward Cleaver on December 15, 2011 at 1:28 PM

Now, if someone where to shout them down and stop them from spouting their Socialist agenda rants…..

Chip on December 15, 2011 at 1:28 PM

They may have been hungry!

KOOLAID2 on December 15, 2011 at 1:29 PM

If Newt ‘behaves’ tonight, and stays positive, he can outfox Mitt.

Both are not conservatives to the extreme but Newt is the nastiest of all the R candidates and deserves to be beaten for this alone.

To call a peer “zany” and “rich” is surreal.

Schadenfreude on December 15, 2011 at 1:30 PM

Correction!!!

but Newt Mitt is the nastiest of all the R candidates and deserves to be beaten for this alone.

Schadenfreude on December 15, 2011 at 1:31 PM

Newt needs to be booted instead of booed for his progressive ways.

The true proven conservative: Rick Perry 2012

bzip on December 15, 2011 at 1:34 PM

There’s another debate tonight? Oy vey.

lorien1973 on December 15, 2011 at 1:35 PM

Poor occupiers … all they want is someone to pay off their student loans, and give them free health care, and food, and internet, and cell phones, and a really nice rent free place to live in, and free weed.

Oh … they’d like some spending money too.

darwin on December 15, 2011 at 1:38 PM

Schadenfreude on December 15, 2011 at 1:31 PM

Bachman almost won you over with her Newt Romney, didn’t she.

cozmo on December 15, 2011 at 1:38 PM

Imperfect FEARLESS, CONSISTENT, CONSERVATIVE……

Not Open Borders, not calling people “heartless” if they don’t want to lay out the freebies for illegals.

NO NEWT
NO MITT
NO HUNTY HUNT HUNT

PappyD61 on December 15, 2011 at 1:39 PM

Shouting down someone else’s efforts to put forward their ideas is a tactic for which I have zero patience. I’ve been a Newt critic, but everyone should have a united front against these goofuses.

And oh yes — nice line, Newt, about how the real 99% want civil dialogue, and the disrupters are their own pathetic 1% minority.

Chuckles3 on December 15, 2011 at 1:39 PM

I was at a Gingrich event when all six members of Occupy Jacksonville showed up. Here’s the quick video I shot. At least they waited until the very end but it was just too pathetic.

joekenha on December 15, 2011 at 1:40 PM

I’m surprised one of the Occupy nuts didn’t throw their baby at him in an attempt to keep him from speaking.

Flange on December 15, 2011 at 1:40 PM

Wouldn’t surprise me if Mittens send out the goons.

angryed on December 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM

Bachman almost won you over with her Newt Romney, didn’t she.

cozmo on December 15, 2011 at 1:38 PM

No, that was actually very stupid, I thought at the time, instantly. She lost me with the Gardisil nuttiness, and her nastiness against Pawlenty. Gone.

I have no favorite, just despise Obama with utmost passion, for the sake of the land.

Schadenfreude on December 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM

I liked the ad and I am sure Newt will do well tonight…

… If he stays positive, and keeps his attacks to Obowma and his failed ideology and policies, then he will get the votes, and Mittens and Grandpa Loon will bees seen as the children throwing temper tantrums in the corner that they are.

Seven Percent Solution on December 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM

There’s another debate tonight? Oy vey.

lorien1973 on December 15, 2011 at 1:35 PM

There are more debates than there are elections in Wisconsin. And that’s hard to do.

angryed on December 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM

I’m surprised one of the Occupy nuts didn’t throw their baby at him in an attempt to keep him from speaking.

Flange on December 15, 2011 at 1:40 PM

I think they’re saving their babies for the Republican Convention.

darwin on December 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM

Newt apparently has not been as successful raising campaign funds as his campaign hinted previously.

Kermit on December 15, 2011 at 1:43 PM

. He had plans to return to Washington for a book-signing after Thursday’s debate

And they made fun of Herman Cain!

Say Good Night, Newt.

JPeterman on December 15, 2011 at 1:44 PM

Not Open Borders, not calling people “heartless” if they don’t want to lay out the freebies for illegals.

PappyD61 on December 15, 2011 at 1:39 PM

Perry is NOT open borders.

John the Libertarian on December 15, 2011 at 1:44 PM

I’m surprised one of the Occupy nuts didn’t throw their baby at him in an attempt to keep him from speaking.

Flange on December 15, 2011 at 1:40 PM

Come to think of it, I’m surprised they have babies at all. I thought babies were a burden and verboten for the left.

darwin on December 15, 2011 at 1:44 PM

It’s very possible that this will get drowned in the saturation ad campaigns from Romney and Perry, though, unless Gingrich gets on the ground in earnest to augment the argument in person.

I could care a less if newt tours the state via plane, bus, horseback or on foot. All so yesterday and the establishment hacks all seem to think they have to. There is plenty of information out there and I would prefer my candidate take care of current events rather than glad hand me while picking my pocket.
I am more interested in the candidate that will relentlessly bash the Lyin kING and take him to task everyday for each and every new tear down America policy the regime enacts.
Even the Siuox City Journal editorial board implores Mittens to bash newt.
Wrong strategery!
I want a positive candidate who knows the enemy is the Progressives mostly in the Rat party but some of whom are hiding in the republican establishment ranks and doing a very poor job of hiding by the way.

ConcealedKerry on December 15, 2011 at 1:45 PM

Not Open Borders, not calling people “heartless” if they don’t want to lay out the freebies for illegals.

NO NEWT
NO MITT
NO HUNTY HUNT HUNT

PappyD61 on December 15, 2011 at 1:39 PM

“Freebies”? It’s a tuition rate for people who pay the sales taxes that fund the schools alongside everyone else in the state.

Words mean things. Please be more careful in the future.

capitalist piglet on December 15, 2011 at 1:45 PM

By the way…

… If I am ever at an event waiting to hear someone speak and these goons start with the “Mic Check” crap, they would find me six inches in front of their faces yelling at the top of my lungs to “SHUT THE FU%K UP!!!” until they did so.

We shall see how they like it…

Seven Percent Solution on December 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM

Who the hell else in this campaign has had the insight to talk about the effect of brain senescence on the medicare and social-security budgets today?

I thought he dealt well with the occupoopers, too.

MrLynn on December 15, 2011 at 1:49 PM

Admittedly I am not a political scholar and I have yet to find a simple, direct to the point explanation, or any explanation for that matter, as to why Iowa is so damned important. Iowa only represents 1/57th of our nation!

Rude Ram on December 15, 2011 at 1:49 PM

Darwin, they need to have some babies to keep the teachers unions employed and to use as human shields during their protests.

Flange on December 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM

These people are so strange. It amuses me that have I close child hood friends that act like this and actually believe in this tripe. Of course they all went to Columbia, Berkley, etc. All have several degrees in Social get over gendre.

A more salient point is that they all still supported by their parents, as they near 50.

I mean really…..mic check….

RAGIN CAJUN on December 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM

I think they’re saving their babies for the Republican Convention.

darwin on December 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM

Let’s not forget that they wanted to use Molotov Cocktails last time.

joekenha on December 15, 2011 at 1:51 PM

These OWS are Obama’s people, and like Obama they have no respect for the American people.

Kini on December 15, 2011 at 1:52 PM

This “movement” just gets more pathetic every day. They really are just noise at this point.

VinceOfDoom on December 15, 2011 at 1:53 PM

Today’s NY Post:

While other GOP White House hopefuls have been hustling at fund-raisers and campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire as they prepare for the primaries, Newt Gingrich was hobnobbing with Washington insiders at a holiday party for his consulting firm, The Gingrich Group, at tony Cafe Milano in Georgetown on Tuesday. Behind a closed curtain in a private room, Gingrich and his wife, Callista, hosted 40 people, a spy says. Eyebrows were raised when Gingrich and his wife steered away from the campaign trail and attended the Kennedy Center Honors in Washington last week where he mingled with the capital crowd. Gingrich planned a book signing in DC last Friday but canceled due to public safety concerns. “Holiday parties, book signings and movie screenings are not what you want to be doing 20 days before the Iowa caucus,” a political insider said. “He’s trying to live his life while running for president.” Some criticize Gingrich for not pounding the pavement and lackluster fund-raising. But despite that, he’s still top of the GOP polls. His rep didn’t respond.

Meredith on December 15, 2011 at 1:54 PM

Headline should be:
Time Magazine People Of The Year Squeek In Iowa

ConcealedKerry on December 15, 2011 at 1:55 PM

In Gingrich’s view, our ability to study and understand the brain is rapidly developing; he suggested that creating incentives for new brain research would be a cornerstone of his domestic policy.

He sure talks pretty.

But I don’t want politicians “creating incentives”.

Have we learned nothing from the incredible mess the politicians we elected have gotten us in, in large part by “creating incentives”?

novaculus on December 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM

There’s another debate tonight? Oy vey.

lorien1973 on December 15, 2011 at 1:35 PM

The astronomical number of GOP debates this cycle must be Newt’s brainchild. He seems to be benefitting the most from these practically-free campaign stops.

bettycooper on December 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM

Gingrich gets heckled by Occupiers in Iowa

Well, that ought to be good for a 5 point bump in the next poll.

hillbillyjim on December 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM

Ward Cleaver on December 15, 2011 at 1:28 PM

That job is already taken. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-253uBJap8

Bmore on December 15, 2011 at 1:57 PM

Maybe Newt could scoot over to the Journalism department and do a little slapping of JournoTard Professor Fail Stephen Bloom.

MNHawk on December 15, 2011 at 2:00 PM

I never hear OWS’ers demand free showers.

NapaConservative on December 15, 2011 at 2:00 PM

If Newt ‘behaves’ tonight, and stays positive, he can outfox Mitt.

Both are not conservatives to the extreme but Newt is the nastiest of all the R candidates and deserves to be beaten for this alone.

To call a peer “zany” and “rich” is surreal.

Schadenfreude on December 15, 2011 at 1:30 PM

If I’m not mistaken Romney has also pointed out Newt’s wealth and RP is zany.

dmn1972 on December 15, 2011 at 2:02 PM

You won’t see Occupiers at a Rick Perry speech – remember he supports gun control – he uses both hands.

redguy on December 15, 2011 at 2:02 PM

Open Borders Perry would still be better than Obama.

Illegals should be DEPORTED.

It’s called the LAW.

They shouldn’t be given Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Drivers Licenses, Free public education, etc.

The Pappy Plan is simple and it involves Illegals.

1. Seal the border.
(Saves entitlements and budgets by the score).

2. 10% across the board federal spending cuts.
(REAL CUTS, not the cut in the GROWTH of the spending increase).
If the budget is $3 trillion, cut it to $2.7 trillion. Then the following year cut it to $2.4 trillion, and so on.

This two step plan will save the argument about opposing freebies for Illegals, it will save Open Borders Perry from having to call people that oppose his amnesty plan “heartless”. And let’s not forget about the ***CRIME that will not happen because Illegals are back in their own country.

***last year in our community a young pregnant Mom was killed by a Drunk ILLEGAL and the little daughter survived (as did the drunk). Unfortunately for the little girl she will grow up without her MOM and her sibling. She’ll probably grow up wishing we had sealed the southern border.

IT MATTERS America…………seal the border.

It’s not HEARTLESS.

It’s the right thing to do to protect ourselves.

PappyD61 on December 15, 2011 at 2:03 PM

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/15/rasmussen-iowa-poll-gingrich-falls-behind-romney/

Newt is falling faster than a dead squirrel out of a hickory tree.

Long haired country boy on December 15, 2011 at 2:04 PM

This mic check thing they like to is even more annoying than drum circles and puppets. also, as hillbillyjim said, stuff like this only helps Gingrich in the polls.

juliesa on December 15, 2011 at 2:05 PM

By the way…

… If I am ever at an event waiting to hear someone speak and these goons start with the “Mic Check” crap, they would find me six inches in front of their faces yelling at the top of my lungs to “SHUT THE FU%K UP!!!” until they did so.

We shall see how they like it…

Seven Percent Solution on December 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM

I was thinking I would probably start singing a nice rousing rendition of God Bless America. I’m sure the entire audience would join in and drown these jackwagons out.

Flora Duh on December 15, 2011 at 2:05 PM

juliesa on December 15, 2011 at 2:05 PM

Nuhn uh. Watch for MSM soundbites of him getting heckled.

Long haired country boy on December 15, 2011 at 2:08 PM

Less than three weeks before the caucuses, the former speaker is airing a single commercial with little money behind it.

The return to Washington is curious; perhaps the book-signing event is part of a fundraiser, or scheduled around one?

Gingrich’s return to DC doesn’t exactly look engaged,

“He’s not following the official campaign playbook”

“He’s not a serious candidate”

“He’s only trying to sell books”

“He’s looking for a TV gig on FOX”

“He’s an embarrassment to the GOP”

Oh.. I thought this was a Cain thread…

Texas Gal on December 15, 2011 at 2:08 PM

There is only the awesomeness of Ron Paul.

troyriser_gopftw on December 15, 2011 at 2:00 PM

The Tiffany diamond-encrusted campaign literature didn’t help, I am sure.

JohnGalt23 on December 15, 2011 at 2:09 PM

The astronomical number of GOP debates this cycle must be Newt’s brainchild. He seems to be benefitting the most from these practically-free campaign stops.

bettycooper on December 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM

I don’t really mind the number of debates; it’s just that each one is exactly the same. They all say the same crap over and over again. The format is the problem. The candidates should be asking questions of each other; the moderators are useless and ask leading (generally leftist) questions that are designed to elicit a certain response.

lorien1973 on December 15, 2011 at 2:13 PM

If Newt ‘behaves’ tonight, and stays positive, he can outfox Mitt.

Both are not conservatives to the extreme but Newt is the nastiest of all the R candidates and deserves to be beaten for this alone.

To call a peer “zany” and “rich” is surreal.

Schadenfreude on December 15, 2011 at 1:30 PM

If I’m not mistaken Romney has also pointed out Newt’s wealth and RP is zany.

dmn1972 on December 15, 2011 at 2:02 PM

Read Schadenfreude’s correction here.

hillbillyjim on December 15, 2011 at 2:13 PM

The Tiffany diamond-encrusted campaign literature didn’t help, I am sure.

now that was funny

gerrym51 on December 15, 2011 at 2:15 PM

Newt is falling faster than a dead squirrel out of a hickory tree.

Long haired country boy on December 15, 2011 at 2:04 PM

Dan Rather, is that you?

MNHawk on December 15, 2011 at 2:21 PM

As the so-called debates come to an end and the actual caucuses and primary voting begins, it seems to have all boiled down to:
1. Mitt “Have I got a deal for you – one owner, local” Romney
2. Newt the Hoot – “Wanna sit on my lap next time, Nancy?”
3. Jethro Bodine from Texas – “Heeewwwww doggies!”
4. Crazy Uncle Ron up in the attic.
5. Michelle “Only Slightly Nuts” Bachmann

They should all ride to the debate together in one of those tiny clown cars and all come tumbling out at the curb. Wacka-Wacka-Wacka

Oh, the entertainment value has some worth, I reckon.

Horace on December 15, 2011 at 2:24 PM

For all of the good polling, it is apparent Newt doesn’t have much good will built up in any state (other than Georgia).

Tater Salad on December 15, 2011 at 2:34 PM

Newt is falling faster than a dead squirrel out of a hickory tree.

Long haired country boy on December 15, 2011 at 2:04 PM

Been watching a dukes of hazzard marathon, have you?

lorien1973 on December 15, 2011 at 2:39 PM

Occupiers heckling Newt is good for his campaign. Conservatives should be asking why they’re not heckling Romney.

I refuse to believe that conservatives change their minds based upon attack ads. I don’t believe polls especially since they can be manipulated to create whatever result desired by whomever is paying for the results.

Romney is a good guy, but is a McCain clone. Haven’t we served up enough RINOs already? Either we win (Bush and Bush RINOs) or we get our clocks cleaned (McCain RINO). I’d rather see Bachmann, Perry or Santorum, but they’re just not going to make the final cut. Paul has some great constitutional ideas, but he’s terrible on foreign policy and he can’t beat Obama. That only leaves Gingrich for me. I’m betting that tonight’s debate will “seal the deal” for him in Iowa. It will be a FOX debate so I’m not expecting a lot of red meat being thrown out to entice the candidates to attack each other.

As usual, there are plenty of trolls and Paul Bots posting today. Either we elect the most conservative candidate capable of beating Obama, or we continue to spiral as a nation and an economy. That’s the choice folks.

cajunpatriot on December 15, 2011 at 2:49 PM

Newt is falling faster than a dead squirrel out of a hickory tree.

Long haired country boy on December 15, 2011 at 2:04 PM

lorien1973 on December 15, 2011 at 2:39 PM

Oh come on, you know that’s funny lorien. And it’s not like you have been attached Newt for very long since he only peaked this month from around 5%. I doubt you were part of that group.

scotash on December 15, 2011 at 2:51 PM

lorien1973 on December 15, 2011 at 2:39 PM

Nope. I am a LONG HAIRED COUNTRY BOY.

Long haired country boy on December 15, 2011 at 2:51 PM

lorien1973 on December 15, 2011 at 2:13 PM

Agree 100%

MrLynn on December 15, 2011 at 1:49 PM

Though not on the campaign trail, AARP, that’s who.

bettycooper on December 15, 2011 at 2:54 PM

. . . if the Occupiers had promised to behave themselves and let him speak.

These are leftists you’re talking about. A promise means nothing to a leftist. And, as they’re basically spoiled, overgrown children, there’s not going to be much in the way of self-control and good behavior, either.

MisterElephant on December 15, 2011 at 2:59 PM

Didn’t Bachmann run off the stage when she was heckled a while back?

tinkerthinker on December 15, 2011 at 2:59 PM

Tell these idiots that when there is an orderly process for someone to speak or when there is an invited speaker that your freedom of speech does not trump that orderly process or the right of the invited person to actually speak. Your right to speech does not include depriving others of the right to be HEARD. Of course that doesn’t mean anyone will LISTEN TO THEM which is why we have freedom of speech.

As for Newt: sorry I’m not fond of Executive Orders, ‘incentives’ of any sort, nor trying to ‘streamline’ an authoritarian government.

The only proven way that government has actually done anything is through the prize system, in which a stated set of goals has an offered prize or an amount the government is willing to pay for services that meet a certain requirement. This worked for the aviation industry by this thing known as ‘airmail’ and helped competition in the industry by setting standards and an amount of service that would be garnered by meeting certain standards. The prize system for aviation advances and safety gave us the DC-3… which won both prizes and contracts due to its certified safety capabilities… government didn’t help to design it, only gave the requirements of safety and how much airmail would go to those having safe vehicles to fly with one engine out. Prizes to cross the Atlantic, the Pacific or make certain routes under a certain time in all weather conditions also helped the aviation industry out no end. These were not ‘incentives’ but prizes open to anyone who could meet the end goal… they didn’t need tax breaks but moolah for doing something within a certain period of time.

The DARPA challenges have used this for autonomous vehicles and have gotten the unmanned vehicle systems for air, ground and aquatic system. The self-driving vehicle challenges have spurred on the state of the art without giving a single damned tax break but awarding cash money in prizes. The private X-prize system for space has also done wonders and is a demonstration of how this works.

That is how you can help get these things done: offer cash money.

Be crass. Set goals with time limits to get the cash.

Offer those prizes to ANYONE who meets those goals within the time limits… make the goals hard to meet. Multiples past the post systems gets you this thing known as: competition.

‘Incentives’ get you a crony system that is corrupt.

ajacksonian on December 15, 2011 at 3:02 PM

Because nothing says anti-fascism like hijacking and shouting down a political event, right?

Or shutting down the filming of a Law and Order (Special Victim’s Unit) segment in the name of “free speech”.

Speaking of Occupiers using the “fascist” word (h/t Neal Boortz) you all will enjoy this excellent instructional video (A Voters Guide to Republicans) from Bill Whittle (the guy who invented the wonderful phrase, “Bitterness Studies” to describe what these dopes major in).I promise you, it’s really good… ENJOY.

Buy Danish on December 15, 2011 at 3:04 PM

As a strong supporter of Newt Gingrich, I hope this video goes viral. The more Republicans see this, the better Newt’s standing in the polls will be. :D

Reggie1971 on December 15, 2011 at 3:04 PM

Horace on December 15, 2011 at 2:24 PM

Good one! Funniest post I’ve seen here in a while.

MrLynn on December 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM

MrLynn on December 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM

Weak sauce, IMHO.

Christien on December 15, 2011 at 3:19 PM

scotash on December 15, 2011 at 2:51 PM

You’re right. It was funny.

Buy Danish on December 15, 2011 at 3:32 PM

Are all Iowans so passive? These moron should’ve been escorted out by the scruff of the neck within 15 seconds. I was at a Newt event in Staten Island (no I don’t support Newt), where the Occuzombies started in. Dozens of us were out of our seats in seconds to shout them down and toss them out. They spent the rest of the time outside in the cold begging passing cars to honk for their misspelled signage.

Like the schizo who shot at the WH, it’s only a matter of time before one of these Occucultists goes overboard in an irretrievably dangerous way. Of course, Chebama says nothing to tamp it down, because he’s the spiritual progeny of Princip, Guiteau, Czolgosz, and Sirhan. And Ayers would be soooo disappointed if he did.

Western_Civ on December 15, 2011 at 3:37 PM

Gingrich has actually held up extremely well considering the unprecedented level of attacks from all sides.

Any lesser candidate would have imploded.

If he get’s a top 3 in IA, top 2-3 in NH, he’ll have enough support to dominate in SC where he has his largest firewall, the largest campaign staff.

Common_Cents on December 15, 2011 at 3:51 PM

Are all Iowans so passive? These moron should’ve been escorted out by the scruff of the neck within 15 seconds.

Western_Civ on December 15, 2011 at 3:37 PM

kinder, gentler elephants… :/

litebeam1 on December 15, 2011 at 4:52 PM