Time’s POTY: “The Protester”
posted at 8:44 am on December 14, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
Really? The most influential and newsworthy person of the year currently occupies space in urban downtown areas, unless you’re on the West Coast, where you can find them hanging out at the docks, blocking traffic and making your cost of goods needlessly increase. At least that’s how Time Magazine sees it, and they get there by conflating the Arab Spring protests with the labor-driven Occupy “movement,” which is collapsing from its own meaninglessness:
Once upon a time, when major news events were chronicled strictly by professionals and printed on paper or transmitted through the air by the few for the masses, protesters were prime makers of history. Back then, when citizen multitudes took to the streets without weapons to declare themselves opposed, it was the very definition of news — vivid, important, often consequential. In the 1960s in America they marched for civil rights and against the Vietnam War; in the ’70s, they rose up in Iran and Portugal; in the ’80s, they spoke out against nuclear weapons in the U.S. and Europe, against Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, against communist tyranny in Tiananmen Square and Eastern Europe. Protest was the natural continuation of politics by other means.
And then came the End of History, summed up by Francis Fukuyama’s influential 1989 essay declaring that mankind had arrived at the “end point of … ideological evolution” in globally triumphant “Western liberalism.”
Oh, please. First, the idea that political protest originated in the 1960s is nothing but nostalgic nonsense, and quoting the long-debunked Fukuyama at this point is almost self-parody. America has seen plenty of grassroots protests throughout its history, nor is the US alone. From our own history, we had massive anti-war and anti-draft protests in the 60s … the 1860s, in New York. It had the same effect as anti-war protests in the 1960s, which was that the war continued apace (and the nation elected a Republican as president in the next national election).
In 2009, Time had the same opportunity to pick “the protester” when the protests were the Tea Party and Iran’s Green Revolution, which followed from Ukraine’s Orange Revolution, and so on. Who did they pick? Ben Bernanke. When the Tea Party movement actually delivered results at the ballot box in 2010 in a historic midterm drubbing of Barack Obama’s Democrats — they lost 68 seats, the worst outing since 1938 — they could have hailed The Protester then, too. Who did they pick? Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.
So they’re a little late to “the protester” story in terms of real impact. And what impact has “the protester” actually had in 2011? Has the Occupy Movement, such as it is, had any kind of ground-breaking impact on politics in the way the Tea Party did in 2010 and still does in this cycle? Not even close, and even people on the Left have begun washing their hands of the literally pointless display. The Arab Spring protesters have had somewhat more impact, but the two dictators they overthrew in Tunisia and Egypt look to be replaced by Muslim Brotherhood theocrats. In Libya, Moammar Qaddafi didn’t get taken down by “protesters,” but by an armed insurrection that combined several militia forces with NATO’s air power dropping bombs on the capital for several months. In Syria, the Assad regime is mowing down the protesters while the US and Europe stand idly by. In that sense, it’s exactly like Iran in 2009 — when Time passed on the opportunity to name the martyred Neda as their person of the year.
Who should it have been? I’ll admit that there aren’t any slam-dunk choices. Nicolas Sarkozy might be one good choice for championing the mission to unseat Qaddafi. Angela Merkel and her nearly singlehanded effort to keep the EU from melting down and creating another global financial crisis might be another. Instead of picking an actual person who had a real impact on the world this year, though, Time instead chose to highlight one of the media’s most overblown stories and dress it up a little with a nonsense connection to protests in the Arab world that were prompted by completely different issues.
So, anyway, here’s Time’s idea of the Person of the Year. Enjoy.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air
Who’s the mystery man at the IRS who issued the directive to focus on conservative groups?
Video: Say, how about having only one pilot on commercial flights?
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Don’t worry, they will be back on their knees by next week.
Alabama Infidel on May 15, 2013 at 11:53 AM
Not inclined to waste cells on it and not into entertainment at this time, but she has a pretty appropriate nom, the duncette.
Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 11:54 AM
I still think they could make better arguments. And why do some of them bother trying to convince us they have an open mind? I guess it’s hard to steal talking points from the paid hacks while HotAir and others are refuting them.
Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 11:56 AM
…and a 1st Amendment these creeps live well off of, and which they encouraged to be destroyed (not to diminish the other amendments, but this applies to their existence).
They brung/kept Obama, along with all the other dunces, from both sides. May he destroy all, in full.
Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 11:57 AM
You will seldom see me request the ban hammer. I’m completely interested in differing opinions. Just wondering where the middle ground on the ability to convey those different opinions could be found.
Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 11:59 AM
Liam on May 15, 2013 at 11:07 AM
You spoke too soon. The “glee over the white Boston bomber” showed up, ahead of you. Glee must have vanished, all of a sudden.
Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 12:02 PM
Yeah, that’s it. Sure. He’s not enough of a people person. He’s too aloof. If he only slapped some more backs, the media would all be supporting him more. Where’s LBJ when you need him? (sarc)
This analysis by Politico is stupid and wrongheaded on too many levels to count.
Burke on May 15, 2013 at 12:03 PM
Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 11:59 AM
He’ll hang himself. He’s good for HA Capitalism.
I like to know how they are. Only strenghthens my contention that they are all thugs, claiming to be so erudite, enlightened, egalitarian, free…compared to us, the rubes :)
Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 12:06 PM
I glory in being a rube.
Cindy Munford on May 15, 2013 at 12:09 PM
When he promised TRANSFORMATION WAS COMING TO AMERICA, he wasn’t kidding, and all the idiots followed.
rjoco1 on May 15, 2013 at 12:21 PM
Because they actually believe that they do have an open mind. To positions they find reasonable, the type of ‘reasonable’ having nothing to do with reason.
Fenris on May 15, 2013 at 12:22 PM
Me too, Cindy.
———-
Expose this waste of dough, for retraining the obvious, fools of Obama. I wouldn’t be surprised if Brennan and Hagel would by now be converted to Islam already.
Schadenfreude on May 15, 2013 at 12:22 PM
Color me unimpressed by the press’s sudden burst of interest in executive branch overreach. They’ve been spiking stories for the last 5 years that document this SOB’s gross abuse of power, corruption, incompetence, and utter contempt of the law and civil society. Obama and his Stalinist followers have demonized and abused entire swaths of American society for years. Only now that he’s been caught abusing the press they finally take notice? They can eat crap and die for all I care.
RobertE on May 15, 2013 at 12:24 PM
lol
Resist We Much on May 15, 2013 at 12:31 PM
Her name is Allison. I call her Allidunce.
Resist We Much on May 15, 2013 at 12:32 PM
Exactly, a few phone calls, a couple of “beer summits”, a nice dinner, some “inside info”, and all will be forgiven…
right2bright on May 15, 2013 at 12:34 PM
This is bad news people. I am really sickened by the idea that BigGov sees fit to encroach upon my freedom. There is a reason the First Amendment leads the BOR.
I am almost sure that I have used one of the phones that was tapped. Breathe, it was years ago at Hartfod’s, Courant.
Without giving up too much info here are a few details:
Scores if not hundreds of people have used the phones all over that newsroom. Imagine your own office or home? Does anybody let a landline ring ceaselessly? No. People answer and use landlines at will. That likely means that people who have NOTHING to do with their investigation are now dockets and potential witnesses. (Would defense attorneys would be entitled to interview every person captured in those recordings?)
Feds trapped phone numbers and IDs for incoming calls to varying AP offices. This means that reporters, staff, custodians even third-party vendors could have incoming calls routed through the newsroom. How could they possibly filter thousands of incoming sources to protect your privacy? They can’t and likely did not.
I don’t know what the exact arrangement is but AP reporters seemin to freely use Courant facilities and vice-versa. Though the latter seemed somewhat limited access. That being said, I know that Courant reporters were able to login to AP photo and article DB from Courant workstations.
Also, AP files are accessable remotely from anywhere in the world I believe. Why not tap every phone in America? The potential for witnesses would be unmatched.
This is not a report. It is recalled off the top and simply meant to add context.
If you’re a fed, consider everything I just wrote a lie. Also **** you for violating our primary tool for freedom.
Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 1:27 PM
Translation: “When there’s no false narrative,
stuff like thisthe truth consumes you.”novaculus on May 15, 2013 at 1:27 PM
Do you know what “spiking” means? If so you realize that making such a statement requires specific instances or you’re simply making stuff up. I’m not saying stories don’t get spiked. I’ve seen it happen. I’ve been told to stop calling or interviewing subjects.
I don’t disagree with you. I just don’t believe you know what you’re talking about.
Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 1:29 PM
At least we know they investigated the Fast & Furious scandal to it’s fullest. So, they dodged that bullet.
BKeyser on May 15, 2013 at 1:30 PM
Reporter: How many reporters records were seized?
Holder: I’m not sure.
Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 1:56 PM
Well, there you go. He’s not good at math either.
Barnestormer on May 15, 2013 at 2:10 PM
Though it’s difficult to plumb the depths of leftist stupidity, especially the fools in the WH, turning on the media has to be one of the greatest blunders in ever. They made Obama, & by extension the low lifes around him. AG Holder quickly comes to mind in that area. So what do the lower order apes do, they contrive to wreck the relationship
arand on May 15, 2013 at 2:44 PM
“They’re just jealous they don’t have relatives of their top execs setting White House policy like we do. Holder, crush them!” – CBSABCCNNPMSDNC cabal
Steve Eggleston on May 15, 2013 at 2:51 PM
This would have been the Comment of the Day™, but you had the wrong owner/owned relationship. Presstitute organs don’t own who they spew for.
Steve Eggleston on May 15, 2013 at 2:53 PM
They thought their endless bum-nuzzling would give them an exemption. All they got for their effort was a brown mustache . . .
tpitman on May 15, 2013 at 2:56 PM
Charles Johnson over at LGF:
Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 3:06 PM
Up-Chuck Oddly Blind
Steve Eggleston on May 15, 2013 at 3:13 PM
The media is so utterly corrupt.
The result of this will be a couple people fired and the continued cover up of Fast and Furious and Bengazi. The left will continue to oppress those that fight their power with Big Government. This is just standard opporating procedure in any statist regime.
GardenGnome on May 15, 2013 at 3:31 PM
Aww, it’s never fun when the Brownshirt mob comes a’knockin on YOUR door, is it?
You dolts always said the “Pen is Mightier than the Sword”…prove it now. Otherwise, suck it up and put some ice on it…
Maggots.
BlaxPac on May 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Michelle Malkin’s header image alludes to that same cliché.
I don’t understand how so many conservatives fail to believe in and promote the importance of journalism. FOP comes before gun-owner rights. Dismissing all journalists is perilous.
This scandal has the potential to inspire more conservative journalists. But it won’t. Tea Partiers prefer extremism to being informed. GOP and moderates are too stupid, feckless and wussified to think outside the Tea Party box.
Capitalist Hog on May 15, 2013 at 3:55 PM
And Obama’s answer: No you can’t drive!
“After they drove the car into the ditch, made it as difficult as possible for us to pull it back, now they want to keys back. No! You can’t drive. We don’t want to have to go back into the ditch. We just got the car out.”
socalcon on May 15, 2013 at 4:23 PM
I’m not treated with respect…But I am the Atty. Gen. of the United States – Holder
workingclass artist on May 15, 2013 at 5:04 PM
CSPAN: WH asks Schumer to reintroduce a Press Shield law…
d1carter on May 15, 2013 at 5:19 PM
Since when has the AP behaved like an upstanding news organization? They use the power of the press to attack Tea Party groups and conservatives and Republicans. Note how quick they are to jump on scandals involving these groups and how they provide minimal coverage of Dem scandals. Often they leave out the political affiliation if a Dem is involved in a scandal.
Media elites have such a high opinion of themselves that this is the first time they’re really mad at Obama. How dare the administration attack the holy media! 4 dead Americans and a big lie about a stupid cartoonish video = no big deal. NDAA = no big deal. Fast & Furious = no big deal. AP phone records seized = (as Biden would say) a BFD.
Ibanez Lotus on May 15, 2013 at 8:18 PM
I do believe in the importance of true journalism. However, the MSM has not practiced true journalism in a long time. The majority of MSM reporters are registered democrats and that leaves us with a one-sided Pravda-like press.
Nice way to pretend to care about having more conservative journalists. Inspirational, the sweeping attack on such a large group of Americans. There are decent MSM reporters like Jake Tapper out there, but I think I’ll borrow your broad brush and call MSM reporters the Joseph Goebbels and Leni Riefenstahls of journalism.
Ibanez Lotus on May 15, 2013 at 8:30 PM
Screw the MSM you dolt.
Hmmm, did you know Michelle Malkin was one a mainstream media journalist? There are others here at HotAir too. I have always asserted that the right is well-suited to reproduce the Tea Party enthusiasm and growth in journalism instead of outrage.
You mention Jake Tapper. He’s pretty solid. But I bet you more Republicans conservatives listen to Glenn Beck who is mostly full of shiite. But I’m sure you’ll defend him. Per my presumption, you embody the problem. (Pardon my endogenous sleight of hand if you will.)
The Tea Party disgusts me. Journalism gives me hope. Too bad Republicans have screwed themselves by embracing the wrong avenue to extend the party’s lifeline. GOP is on an IV drip as evidenced by the hysterics which would normally be played out on the left.
Yes, there are people like Kevin Williamson and NR. There’s Howard Portnoy who now blogs/reports at Liberty Unyielding. He used to be in the Green Room here. Counter to that, there are so many angry voices that just rant and rave. Good reporting gets buried. Ha, bury the lede as a lifestyle.
Any so-called conservative who doesn’t long for conservative reporters is an idiot. You sound like an idiot.
Then I’ve been pretending for a long time.
You’re just so tragically partisan that you deign not to think for yourself. The thought of doing so frightens you. Also you must not know me very well because I don’t need an excuse. Read any one of my comments and you’ll figure that out quickly. I’m that a-hole. Got it?
You react to moderation like liberals react to black-conservatives. Since you make an assertion. I’d love to see you back it up. You can accuse me of being an insensitive jerk but you must realize that I back up what I say as often as time permits.
(This reply was a perfect excuse to blow my workout this morning. Thank you for being daft.)
Capitalist Hog on May 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM
MKH’s Green Room post shows the importance of conservative journalism is necessary. Angry voices don’t reach as many people as conservatives like to think. Americans still like their news soft-serve.
Jake Tapper is not enough. We need more unbiased voices in news.
Capitalist Hog on May 16, 2013 at 11:44 AM
I’m not surprised. Normal everyday people do disgust those who think themselves better than the mere rabble. Thank you for illustrating so succinctly what is wrong with “journalism” today.
dominigan on May 19, 2013 at 7:40 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2