Time’s POTY: “The Protester”

posted at 8:44 am on December 14, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

Really?  The most influential and newsworthy person of the year currently occupies space in urban downtown areas, unless you’re on the West Coast, where you can find them hanging out at the docks, blocking traffic and making your cost of goods needlessly increase.  At least that’s how Time Magazine sees it, and they get there by conflating the Arab Spring protests with the labor-driven Occupy “movement,” which is collapsing from its own meaninglessness:

Once upon a time, when major news events were chronicled strictly by professionals and printed on paper or transmitted through the air by the few for the masses, protesters were prime makers of history. Back then, when citizen multitudes took to the streets without weapons to declare themselves opposed, it was the very definition of news — vivid, important, often consequential. In the 1960s in America they marched for civil rights and against the Vietnam War; in the ’70s, they rose up in Iran and Portugal; in the ’80s, they spoke out against nuclear weapons in the U.S. and Europe, against Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, against communist tyranny in Tiananmen Square and Eastern Europe. Protest was the natural continuation of politics by other means.

And then came the End of History, summed up by Francis Fukuyama’s influential 1989 essay declaring that mankind had arrived at the “end point of … ideological evolution” in globally triumphant “Western liberalism.”

Oh, please.  First, the idea that political protest originated in the 1960s is nothing but nostalgic nonsense, and quoting the long-debunked Fukuyama at this point is almost self-parody.  America has seen plenty of grassroots protests throughout its history, nor is the US alone.  From our own history, we had massive anti-war and anti-draft protests in the 60s … the 1860s, in New York.  It had the same effect as anti-war protests in the 1960s, which was that the war continued apace (and the nation elected a Republican as president in the next national election).

In 2009, Time had the same opportunity to pick “the protester” when the protests were the Tea Party and Iran’s Green Revolution, which followed from Ukraine’s Orange Revolution, and so on.  Who did they pick?  Ben Bernanke.  When the Tea Party movement actually delivered results at the ballot box in 2010 in a historic midterm drubbing of Barack Obama’s Democrats — they lost 68 seats, the worst outing since 1938 — they could have hailed The Protester then, too.  Who did they pick?  Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.

So they’re a little late to “the protester” story in terms of real impact.  And what impact has “the protester” actually had in 2011?  Has the Occupy Movement, such as it is, had any kind of ground-breaking impact on politics in the way the Tea Party did in 2010 and still does in this cycle?  Not even close, and even people on the Left have begun washing their hands of the literally pointless display.  The Arab Spring protesters have had somewhat more impact, but the two dictators they overthrew in Tunisia and Egypt look to be replaced by Muslim Brotherhood theocrats.  In Libya, Moammar Qaddafi didn’t get taken down by “protesters,” but by an armed insurrection that combined several militia forces with NATO’s air power dropping bombs on the capital for several months.  In Syria, the Assad regime is mowing down the protesters while the US and Europe stand idly by.  In that sense, it’s exactly like Iran in 2009 — when Time passed on the opportunity to name the martyred Neda as their person of the year.

Who should it have been?  I’ll admit that there aren’t any slam-dunk choices.  Nicolas Sarkozy might be one good choice for championing the mission to unseat Qaddafi.  Angela Merkel and her nearly singlehanded effort to keep the EU from melting down and creating another global financial crisis might be another.  Instead of picking an actual person who had a real impact on the world this year, though, Time instead chose to highlight one of the media’s most overblown stories and dress it up a little with a nonsense connection to protests in the Arab world that were prompted by completely different issues.

So, anyway, here’s Time’s idea of the Person of the Year.  Enjoy.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

How about the Lice in the protester’s hair? Dont’ they count too?

Oil Can on December 14, 2011 at 10:18 AM

Where they really lose credibility is in naming Kate Middleton as a runner up.

Inignort on December 14, 2011 at 10:22 AM

Oh, Good Lord. And here I’d thought that Time magazine had jumped the shark into utter ridiculousness the year they declared everybody (and therefore nobody) “Person of the Year.”

But it seems I was wrong. Time is apparently perfectly capable of hitting rock bottom… and digging.

Hayabusa on December 14, 2011 at 10:26 AM

Whatever. What individual on their side could they name? Corzine? Dr. Death Panels Berwick? Soros? Certainly not Obama — not even their ear is so tin as to put him on the cover after three years of unrelieved disaster.

Scriptor on December 14, 2011 at 10:30 AM

OWS…It is not a real “Grass Roots” movement, it never has been. If the media each and every day has to scramble and make desperate attempts at trying to nail down the talking point of the day for them.

Time Magazine POTY worthy to flush.

ActinUpinTexas on December 14, 2011 at 10:30 AM

and we wonder how obama has a 46% approval rate

acyl72 on December 14, 2011 at 10:31 AM

Articles like these are why I read Hot Air. Well done, Ed!

gabby on December 14, 2011 at 10:31 AM

DAMN you Time magazine! There goes the only distraction I had at the dentist’s office, once a year…

lan astaslem!

fewenuff on December 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM

In 2009, Time had the same opportunity to pick “the protester” when the protests were the Tea Party and Iran’s Green Revolution, which followed from Ukraine’s Orange Revolution, and so on. Who did they pick? Ben Bernanke. When the Tea Party movement actually delivered results at the ballot box in 2010 in a historic midterm drubbing of Barack Obama’s Democrats — they lost 68 seats, the worst outing since 1938 — they could have hailed The Protester then, too. Who did they pick? Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.

THIS is why I love HG (nee Hot Air)! Ed, your ability to focus on these absurd liberal outgassings (sorry) and analyze polls to deliver cogent remarks like this is nonpareil. I would only add that Time also selected Hitler as their MOTY..

..in 1938!

The War Planner on December 14, 2011 at 10:36 AM

Isn’t it kind of a foregone conclusion that the POTY will be someone silly like Obama, Bernanke, or the Occupy Poopers?

This year I was really rooting for Amadinerjad. Next year, Mahmoud, next year….

CorporatePiggy on December 14, 2011 at 10:36 AM

Cavuto said it best “your a waste of time”. That goes for all these OWS moonbats.

WiRichey on December 14, 2011 at 10:38 AM

SIR David Attenborough was Time Magazines first choice; however he was busy pilfering archival footage of the holocaust to segue into promoting the West Texas sand dune lizard into to the caring arms of the endangered species act.

RAGIN CAJUN on December 14, 2011 at 10:40 AM

ragin cajun,

have to disagree.

I had heard it was jerry sandusky.

acyl72 on December 14, 2011 at 10:44 AM

The lsm is just eating this up
Gag me with a spoon

cmsinaz on December 14, 2011 at 10:47 AM

Times POTY POTTY
FIFY

MikeA on December 14, 2011 at 10:47 AM

Losers deserve trophies too.

starboard lookout on December 14, 2011 at 10:49 AM

Back then, when citizen multitudes took to the streets without weapons to declare themselves opposed, it was the very definition of news — vivid, important, often consequential. In the 1960s in America they marched …….. against the Vietnam War; in the ’70s,

…..more deceitful,rewriting of History form liberals.

According to Time….anti-war protesters blowing up government buildings….attacking police officers……vandalizing/ destroying small businesses/private property and threatening to overthrow the government is “taking to the streets without weapons (which is a walkback from “peaceful protests”)”……
……………………….absolutely pathetic

………it’s getting harder and harder for the left to spin their violent behavior.

Of course while publications like Time rewrite History to fit their liberal narrative…..the MSM went just the opposite way concerning the Tea Party.
Any single incident or, manufactured incident, that could be blown up to label the Tea Party “racist” and “militant” was publicized to the hilt.

Allegations of spitting and slurs at Capitol protest merit more reporting

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/09/AR2010040903716.html

NY Times,WashPost,LATimes,MSNBC,CNN,NBC,CBS and many other publications that can’t find any space to report on the massive amount of violence coming from OWS…..shouted fabricated and unsubstantiated reports of “racism” and “violence” from every corner of the MSM.Going so far as to accuse them of being accessories to murder in the Gabby Giffords shooting….without one shred of evidence……zero…nothing.

We had so called “independent news sources” like NPR doing the same thing.


Caught On Tape Calling Tea Party ‘Xenophobic’ And ‘Racist’

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-03-08/entertainment/29998510_1_npr-muslim-brotherhood-republican-party#ixzz1gWRCbLYR

……this is the same “news” organization that had a hateful graphic on their “news” site referring to Americans as “Teabaggers”….

……….but all the proven hatred,racism,and violence coming from OWS seems to escape them for some reason.

Pravda West is in full swing.
……..they have carried on a love affair with OWS that would make the average porn star blush.

Truly a pathetic display by the MSM.

Baxter Greene on December 14, 2011 at 10:50 AM

Do you think TIME would have voted differently if the “gentleman” had pooped on their doorstep?

LeftCoastRight on December 14, 2011 at 10:57 AM

Paul Ryan as Runner UP

oops sorry! I hope this Link works

CoffeeLover on December 14, 2011 at 10:57 AM

Glenn Beck was just saying that TIME didn’t even include tea partiers in their Year in Review sections when the tea party was hitting it big politically. If that’s true, and I think it is, it’s just more indictment of the corrupt msm.

juliesa on December 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM

Gee, I guess many people forget the Whiskey Rebellion of 1789.

Torch on December 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM

..nonsense! I drink to its memory every night!

The War Planner on December 14, 2011 at 11:00 AM

Evidently, Time has the requirement that the “Person of the Year” must agree and advance their ideology. Much like the requirement for the CNN Hero of the Year to be founder/president of their own Non-Governmental Organization, religious organizations excluded.

Shakes41 on December 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM

OWS MSM – somebody help me here with the difference. Ironic as it is, they are blind to being the 1% supporting their own overthrow. But of course, they will be protected – right. Get a weapon for protection, not appeasement.

baseballguy on December 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM

Add that to The American Soldier, The Whistleblower, The Peacemaker, Endangered Earth, The Computer, American Women, The Middle American, 25 and Under, U.S. Scientists, Hungarian Freedom Fighter, and American Fighting Man, and the loooooong history of Time making up generic figures as stand-ins for persons of interest becomes plain. But no less fatuous and self-important.

The Schaef on December 14, 2011 at 10:12 AM

It’s because they’re collectivists, not individualists. They really do see people as groups- ‘Women’. ‘blacks’, ‘the Middle American’, and so on- not as people.
And, in the words of a very wise man:

A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky animals.

LunaLovegood on December 14, 2011 at 11:04 AM

I wonder if these protesters will show up the the DNC like they did in Chicago. It would be fitting.

woodiebob on December 14, 2011 at 11:06 AM

I can remember when being Time’s Person of the Year actually meant something.

Jeff A on December 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM

It’s amazing the epic demise of Time magazine. Once an icon, now a sad joke.

I’ve got to believe the subscription count is a tiny fraction of what it once was.

saiga on December 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM

Eco anarcho-primitivists. Rewilding America as a senseless pass time.

newpine on December 14, 2011 at 11:17 AM

OWS MSM – somebody help me here with the difference.

baseballguy on December 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM

..none! They both produce and leave piles of turd in public places.

The War Planner on December 14, 2011 at 11:20 AM

They should put the picture of the guy taking a dump on the sidewalk on their cover if they are serious about this.

BBReggie on December 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM

What I find amusing about that picture is the position chosen for defection. Typical “protester.” Too lazy to even climb on top of the cruiser.

Gravity 1 Protester 0

Hat Trick on December 14, 2011 at 11:25 AM

some peoples kids

The Spear on December 14, 2011 at 11:27 AM

Time would have served well back in the day when thrifty families kept the Sears catalog or other similar slick surfaced paper in the outhouse for use as toilet paper!

rockncoal on December 14, 2011 at 11:27 AM

TIME is run directly by the obama White House, so, is it any surprise that they would proclaim that obama’s rioters/defecaters have all of the characteristics necessary to be declared ‘Person of the Year’ (POTY – or is that POTTY?)?

Barry obama’s idiotic riot movement is just one more nail in the coffin of democrats and the anti-American, failed “presidency” of the worst “president” in U.S. history – democrats are just too stoned to realize it.

Pork-Chop on December 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM

Will the 1960s never end??

PattyJ on December 14, 2011 at 11:31 AM

POTY

Pooper of the Year…a very prestigious award.

BR549 on December 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM

Time magazine….not even worth glancing at.

I would agree with this statement for the current iteration of Time. There was a time when most educated people looked forward to reading Time. That was 50 years ago when we still had real journalism in America. Unfortunatly what passes for journalism today, is nothing more for the most part, than a propaganda machine for the far left.

trickychicken on December 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM

Relax folks, it’s only Time.

scgas on December 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM

Time Magazine lives in a fantasy world, where proven failed ideas are more important than real accomplishments. It’s the world of today’s mass media and academia, the world Barack Obama came from and still lives in. It’s a shrinking magazine for a shrinking fantasy.

Socratease on December 14, 2011 at 11:41 AM

Wow the OccuPOOPer is the most anything except disgusting is a real mis-step in the integrity of….Oops sorry forgot who I was talking about.

landowner on December 14, 2011 at 11:42 AM

Ask this in all seriousness….

Aside from dentist patients sitting in wait rooms, does anyone else actually read Time anymore?

angryed on December 14, 2011 at 11:43 AM

On December 7, 2011 I told my Facebook friends Time’ People of the year would be the occ-u-p’s. I was only half right. I would have suggested the Congressional Medal of Honor awardees.

hamman1956 on December 14, 2011 at 11:49 AM

Unfortunately, its quite fitting that the “Everyone Gets A Trophy” generation wins an award for accomplishing nothing.

Misremembered on December 14, 2011 at 11:50 AM

And what impact has “the protester” actually had in 2011?

How about driving people out of business (Milk Street Cafe) and causing others (port workers and truckers) to lose pay due to their protest shutdown of the west coast ports? Yeah, that’s caring about the 99%–just call them all nincomPoopers of the year.

stukinIL4now on December 14, 2011 at 11:52 AM

This just goes to show how far this country has fallen. That anyone has any respect for these delinquents is completely baffling to me.

Brent E on December 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM

I used to be in the occupy movement, then I took a job application to the knee.

Machismo on December 14, 2011 at 11:57 AM

A prime example of Time Magazine’s downward spiral to insignificance. What a slap in the fact to every American!

phoebe1 on December 14, 2011 at 11:57 AM

Let me just say that I work as a secretary. I can envision a time in the not too distant future when my job will be obsolete due to the computer age. I submit that the profession of journalist is becoming obsolete as we speak. Time magazine is just one blatant and obvious example of how irrelevant the MSM is now. Who in their right minds believes for a minute that “the protestor” of 2011 is more important than the protestor of 2009? Not even the leftists will buy that one. No longer does Uncle Walt control dissemination of news to the masses. The left can no longer control how news is reported and distributed, it is out of their hands. I believe this is why such rags as the NYT and Time have “outed” themselves. They no longer hide their prejudices. I think it’s the last gasp of a dying man. They have nothing to lose so they show their leftist leanings for all to see. To name “The Protestor” (read OWS) as man of the year can be seen for what it is, a slap towards the Tea Party. It can be read no other way. I continue to laugh at the irrelevance that is the so-called MSM. We aren’t buying what they are selling anymore (literally).

neyney on December 14, 2011 at 11:58 AM

Another reason for the shrinking Times.

GarandFan on December 14, 2011 at 11:58 AM

Seriously…this is hilarious! Not a mention of the Tea Party Protester, oh no, can’t have that, its all about the Moslem Brotherhood and the Arab Spring, the Criminals and Deadbeats in Athens that are upset their free lunch was taken away and the dirty scum Hippies (festival season was over) of OWS and their concused mess of a “protest” of drum circles.

Yep, what world.

Dino V on December 14, 2011 at 12:00 PM

I gave up long ago on Time Magazine actually selecting someone or a group of someones that truly deserved the honor of Person of the Year. The year they selected “You” as POTY, I tuned them out…

mlewis7299 on December 14, 2011 at 12:01 PM

Yet the Tea Party didn’t even get mentioned last year in Time’s pictures of the year!

Major_Skidmark on December 14, 2011 at 12:03 PM

Wasn’t Hitler a POTY? I don’t think it is a popularity contest, but one that focuses on the person(s) who had the most news play…whether positive or negative. Still, it does give OWS some POSITIVE press that is grossly UNdeserved.

Oh and hello! From a long time wannabe HotGas Noob!

PorchDawg on December 14, 2011 at 12:08 PM

Nice going Time. Keep digging the hole deeper.

Irrelevant much?

ICanSeeNovFromMyHouse on December 14, 2011 at 12:09 PM

There was any doubt that this is who they would pick?

Once upon a time, when major news events were chronicled strictly by professionals and printed on paper or transmitted through the air by the few for the masses…

I think they are not happy campers.

cozmo on December 14, 2011 at 8:47 AM

Then let’s finish the job and punt them completely into irrelevancy, if they don’t do it to themselves first.

kim roy on December 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM

Time Magazine lives in a fantasy world, where proven failed ideas are more important than real accomplishments. It’s the world of today’s mass media and academia, the world Barack Obama came from and still lives in. It’s a shrinking magazine for a shrinking fantasy.

Socratease on December 14, 2011 at 11:41 AM

That’s because the thing about failed ideas is the future possibility that they may one day work.

That possibility is what fuels the left, while simultaneously having no basis in the tangible here and now.

mintycrys on December 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM

And time wants to be taken seriously. This is pathetic. But this is what happens when little mamas boys are in charge. Hey Time there are real people in the world that have actually accomplished something. And its not the OWS movement.

rbtsckdj on December 14, 2011 at 12:30 PM

Maybe because they were using Time Magazine as toilet paper?

samazf on December 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM

POTY should have been “The 1%.”

I guess they don’t make such a big impact on people’s lives, after all, and Time just admitted it.

Christien on December 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM

We probably shouldn’t laugh too hard. Next thing you know, the Nobel Peace Prize will be given to OWS, if they can figure out who to give it to.

Tennman on December 14, 2011 at 12:50 PM

Nervous people in doctor’s and dentist’s offices everywhere await its arrival with bated breath.

Time magazine is less relevant than the Pennysaver, and it’s free.

SD Tom on December 14, 2011 at 1:00 PM

The Coffee Party wuz so robbed……

apostic on December 14, 2011 at 1:02 PM

We probably shouldn’t laugh too hard. Next thing you know, the Nobel Peace Prize will be given to OWS, if they can figure out who to give it to.

Tennman on December 14, 2011 at 12:50 PM

Good candidate?

She’s gone from Occupy Wall Street to Occupy a job on Wall Street.

Down-on-her-luck protester Tracy Postert spent 15 days washing sidewalks and making sandwiches at Zuccotti Park — then landed a dream job at a Wall St. investment firm thanks to a high-powered Wall St. executive who offered her work.

FlatFoot on December 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM

I fail to see where the Occupiers influenced anything except the sanitary conditions of our major cities. Did they change anyone’s mind? Did they influence any legislation? It can be said the Tea Party did both of these things. Any progressive legislation was already on our president’s agenda and had nothing to do with the protests.

soberguy63 on December 14, 2011 at 1:11 PM

a friend once had a mirror in the bathroom that had writing on it looking like the outline of the Time magazine cover, it read: “Time: Man of the Year” …and back before the PC crowd at Time changed it to person. Slime Magazine is largely irrelevant, dreck for the waiting room.

maineconservative on December 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM

YAY!

Urban Infidel on December 14, 2011 at 1:14 PM

Part of my above post got eaten!

I meant to type:

‘YAY! Time Mag picked the Tea Party… oh.. wait..’

Urban Infidel on December 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM

Here:

During the second half of 2009 the magazine saw a 34.9% decline in news stand sales.[11] During the first half of 2010, there was another decline of at least one third in Time magazine sales. In the second half of 2010, Time magazine newsstand sales declined by about 12% to just over 79 thousand copies per week. (source: Wikipedia)

I would say this sums it up.

manyears on December 14, 2011 at 1:34 PM

Big story all the same

redfate on December 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM

Not that most of us needed any further proof but this just reaffirms Time Magazine is nothing but a left wing mouth piece/cheerleading squad in the tank for the progressives and Obummer!

Liberty or Death on December 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM

Time is still around? Who cares.

StevC on December 14, 2011 at 2:41 PM

I have no time to waste on Time and their timeless ability to suck worse than anything that has ever sucked in the entire history of sucking!

insidiator on December 14, 2011 at 2:45 PM

a squeaky clean example of the POTYhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26GmRUx8MKo

a1776patriot on December 14, 2011 at 3:02 PM

Didn’t Time Mag’s “Person of the Year” gang rape a CBS reporter?

Goodale on December 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM

I’d like to read a Mad Magazine or Onion version of the Time Person of the Year Story. I bet they would manage to get the tone just about right.

JennyHatch on December 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM

Hello, it’s Dec. 2011, a weekly news mag it about as relevant as a pager.

Wallythedog on December 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM

Irrelevant much?

Time: Irrelevant we much!

But it seems I was wrong. Time is apparently perfectly capable of hitting rock bottom… and digging.

They are, remarkably, still capable of surprise. After Constitutional-scholar Stengel’s story on said document got shredded down to the bones and then had the bones crushed, I thought they’d be more careful.

incredible on December 14, 2011 at 3:46 PM

What the real cover should have looked like.

holygoat on December 14, 2011 at 4:03 PM

What the real cover should have looked like.

that’s classic – well done. I hope it sparks more.

a1776patriot on December 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM

Expect to see them again en masse when election season rolls around. Obama’s “citizen army” will wreak havoc with election returns…

Pest on December 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM

Unfortunately, its quite fitting that the “Everyone Gets A Trophy” generation wins an award for accomplishing nothing.

Misremembered on December 14, 2011 at 11:50 AM

Exactly…I second this!

Liberty or Death on December 14, 2011 at 4:47 PM

Sandbagger is right. Seal Team Six.

TheHitman on December 14, 2011 at 4:55 PM

Chosen unemployed moochers was at one time the worse I could think of.

seabuzz on December 14, 2011 at 5:12 PM

Just posted this on FB with the fake Times POY pic!

WOW!! The OWS protesters are the “Person of the Year” according to Time Magazine, really?!?! The fact that Time Magazine pronounces the Occu-tard protesters as the “Person of the Year” just proves Time Magazine is an irrelevant joke! Personally I believe it is the hard working people of this nation that drag themselves to work each and every day so they can earn money to purchase goods and servi…ces that are the engines powering our economy, not the ingrate OWS protesters that are too damn lazy to “occupy a job” and be productive members of society like the TRUE 99%!!! Instead these “Everyone Gets a Trophy” generation OWSers would rather everything be handed to them, something their mommies and daddies have done for them all their lives! To those parents that turned out all these “Everyone Gets a Trophy” thumb sucking panty-waist losers…please go get your spoiled ass kid, grab them by the ear and drag them back to your damn basement where they belong so us adults can continue to be productive without the additional aggravation of having to deal with your spoiled dumbass kids!

Liberty or Death on December 14, 2011 at 5:25 PM

What is Time magazine?

Colony14 on December 14, 2011 at 5:35 PM

No post-mortem Steve Jobs Person of the Year? Huh?!?

The Nerve on December 14, 2011 at 6:25 PM

I didnt even know that Time was still in print. The last Id heard of them was something ridiculous like ignoring the entire tea party and instead putting a shiny cover on the magazine with some half baked idea that it was all about you. After that I thought they went out of business. Ohnwell guess I was wrong.

Anyways, just ignore them and let them finish passing into irrellavence.

speekr on December 14, 2011 at 6:39 PM

Just listened to Shepturd Smith talking about this…..

he could hardly contain his pleasure and excitement with the choice.

Turds of a feather….. ah, never mind.

Green eyed Lady on December 14, 2011 at 7:54 PM

I like this choice. It’ll keep reminding people that 99% of us don’t like that particular “99%.”

ThurmanLady on December 14, 2011 at 9:47 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3